I have a piece today in the Washington Independent about the most important races in the country nobody is talking about, at least relative to the foreclosure fraud scandal. Most consumer experts agree that the Attorney Generals investigation, which spans all 50 states, will have the best chance of getting remedies for homeowners. The leads in the investigation have said on the record that they are looking to force the banks into mass loan modifications, and raising the possibility of fraud prosecutions if the banks don’t comply. I believe this is one component of a successful strategy on foreclosure fraud. Criminal prosecutions should be on the table, but from a civil perspective, mass loan modifications with principal reductions would be a way to actually bounce back our economy and provide value to a large group of people.
The only problem is, a lot of these AGs have to survive re-election in order to continue with their work.
Consider this: Of the 12 state attorneys general on the executive committee of the coordinated investigation, only two of them — Roy Cooper in North Carolina and Rob McKenna in Washington — aren’t up for re-election this year. Several of them — Jerry Brown in California, Richard Blumenthal in Connecticut, Terry Goddard in Arizona, Andrew Cuomo in New York and Bill McCollum in Florida — are running for higher office and will not return to their posts. And other races are closely contested.
Currently, 32 of the 50 attorneys general across the nation are Democrats, to 18 Republicans. According to Governing Magazine, the GOP is poised to pick up anywhere from six to 13 of those seats after November, dramatically changing the makeup of the attorneys general across the country — and potentially the nature of their investigation.
In Ohio, the guy who sued GMAC Mortgage, Richard Cordray, is losing to Mike DeWine, the former Senator who voted pretty much down the line with Republicans on consumer issues while in the Senate. In Iowa, Tom Miller is leading the investigation, has been AG off and on since 1978 and has a sterling record on issues like consumer protection, and he’s in a neck-and-neck race against Steve King’s former chief of staff.
In open seats in Florida and New York, the Republicans running contrast themselves with two strong progressive Democrats, Eric Schneiderman and Dan Gelber, by definitively saying they don’t want to be a “sheriff,” directly citing Eliot Spitzer’s AG run against Wall Street. I would say a sheriff and a paddy wagon is what we need at this point.
So this is something to watch. Attorney General may not be at the top of the ticket, but it’s at the top of the list when it comes to the foreclosure fraud scandal. And the offices across the country may end up having a radically different focus by this time next week.



13 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
In other words, “We don’t want to alienate our benefactors.”
Voting is so much more important in mid terms than people think. Most mid term elections are where states add in their ammendments and propositions. I agree we must vote and be conscious of all offices.
Vote. Go VOTE. Your life depends on it.
Excellent points, about the role of those ‘down ticket’ positions that will determine so much of the policies either for or against the public interest. Redistricting will be carried out by those seated in this election, with huge effects on future prospects for everyone. It’s no accident that right wing interests are pouring money into the race against anyone progressive or even some other complexion than wingnutterie.
One of the reasons I out early to vote….I saw this coming, being Kassandra and all
The AG’s offices are usually staffed with career people, and people looking to make their reputations by crushing someone. They will resist any backing off by a new AG. Leaving in protest is actually good for their reputations.
I hope.
As was said to me when I looked into this, the career staffers will carry out the same investigation, but the person at the top, in the room when the final decisions get made, matters. It’s just not a surprise that the emphasis and goals would change depending on the AG.
Do you think that the shrinkage of state budgets because of foreclosure fraud will have any positive impact on this process?
I expect that AGs will be feeling the budgetary pinch and if they are hurting because of bad actors in the mortgage industry, I would think they would have significant motivation to continue to pursue this, even if they were otherwise disinclined to pursue consumer protection issues.
I’ve found the silence and apparent inactivity of Andrew Cuomo a bit unsettling.
Blue Texan has a fresh cross-post up: John Boehner’s Clear and Bold Vision for Solving America’s Problems
Good point on this and things like court cases against HIR (sometimes refered to as HCR).
Biggest fish would seem to be State Houses & re-districting.
Yes All State offices. Especially State Supreme Court judges who pretend to
be unaffilated with a party-which is untrue. Also ballot initiatives (unless
you know who’s behind them,vote NO). Constitutional Conventions-which may
allow any sort of mischief. Secretary of State offices-who can determine
various eligibility of candidates and ballot initiatives.
Generally, I recommend voting No on ballot initiatives and in favor
of Democrats for State offices.
Unfortunately,the Democrat candidate(s) (at least in MI) seem unprepared
to rebut untruths during a debate. Last night,several on the other side were
trying to use the “borrowing” by SS as a reason for why changes are needed-
whereas the truth is that SS revenue is down due to unemployment and retirement
increases. This point is a crucial one for my district which has a lot of
older people who draw SS benefits.
My policy of not voting for Democratic politicians this year only applies to DC Democrats. Everywhere else, it’s business as usual. “Not voting” means not voting in particular races, not generally refusing to vote. That’s an important distinction, as David has demonstrated.
Excellent post, David. Recommended!
And, folks, VOTE!