I’m not sure that the new Fed bond purchase program will help the economy a whole lot, but the rest of the world is certainly teed off about it.
Germany and China have expressed concerns over US plans to pump $600bn (£373bn) into the US economy.
German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said the US would not solve its problems, but create “extra problems for the world” instead.
Some countries fear that the US Federal Reserve’s move could hurt their exports by making their currencies stronger.
China’s Central Bank head Zhou Xiaochuan urged a reform of the international currency system.
He did not elaborate how the system should be changed.
Why yes, it could hurt world exports, it could make other currencies stronger, and given that both those things could increase US employment, that’s, um, the goal.
Emerging markets like Indonesia in particular are concerned because too much money is streaming into their markets.
As the United States and other developed countries cope with what might be years of slow growth and frugality, the concern in Indonesia is – quite literally – over too much money and how to prevent it from sowing a future crisis.
Governments from Bangkok to Buenos Aires are imposing new taxes and other conditions to try curbing the flow, which can make local currencies more expensive, impede local exporters and create asset bubbles that ultimately crash.
Brazil is talking about retaliation.
I wish we had the ability to just hand over money to the US public that they could spend, instead of going through this Rube Goldberg process that leads to a lot of capital flight to other markets. But let’s be clear about this. The global economy depends on growth in the United States, as surely as it depends on growth in China or Europe. A stagnant US economy is not good for emerging markets, and it’s not good for their exports. A rising tide does lift all boats in this scenario. But the US needs to have a piece of that export pie, or else our role as the consumer to the world is simply unsustainable.
The overseas anger makes me just a little bit more confident that this can actually work, although the fear is that it gets captured by banks instead of getting to people.




3 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Krugman has not been sympathetic to Europe’s stance on this either. A few months ago when Europe shot themselves in the foot by passing austerity measures (i.e., deficit reduction), he summarized their arguments as saying the US trade deficit will make up for our bad policies. Now that they are complaining about the Fed actually taking (tiny) steps to help US jobs, here’s how he summarizes their current arguments:
David, you wrote:
Mais oui! Here’s further substantiation of your point:
(from “At the IMF, Japan, Korea, Brazil, Thailand, Rebel Against Globalized Hot Money Speculation Stoked by Bernanke’s QE2; Capital Controls for Self-Defense Gain Ground,” by geopol, Oct. 14, 2010)
So what if they gripe; they can share. The US needs a job-ful
lessrecovery now and not later. Let this motivate the Asian (and other) economies to create greater equity in wealth distribution within their countries.If QE2 is funneled into speculation and raises the price of food and energy then it’ll only hurt the economy. Especially the people at the bottom.
On the other hand, it could be a fantastic opportunity for speculators.