She broke the news on Twitter:
Driven by the urgency of creating jobs & protecting #hcr, #wsr, Social Security & Medicare, I am running for Dem Leader.
Not everyone in the caucus will support her, obviously. We already have Heath Shuler thinking he can win a Minority Leader race, Jim Matheson has called on her to step down from leadership, and Oklahoma’s Dan Boren followed suit today. But this represents an extreme minority of the 187 member-plus Democratic caucus. I’d be shocked if she didn’t have the numbers well in hand to lead the caucus again.
Given the alternatives, in my view it’s good news. We’ll see what Steny Hoyer has to say about this.
UPDATE: Keep in mind that for the most part, Pelosi never brought anything up for a vote in the House unless she knew she would succeed. I assume we have the same dynamic here.
UPDATE II: Pelosi has released a letter to colleagues outlining her decision. On the flip.
Over the past several days, I have spoken with many Democratic colleagues about how to continue our fight for to make our country more secure and strengthen the middle class, create jobs, protect Social Security and Medicare, and promote the innovation, technology and education to make America Number One in the world. As always, I am inspired by the fighting spirit of our Democratic Members.
As you know, Democrats have produced historic legislation in the area of health care, veterans’ benefits, women’s rights, Wall Street reform, and cutting taxes for 95 percent of the American people and millions of small businesses. And we have restored fiscal discipline to the Congress by making the deficit-cutting Pay As You Go rules the law of the land.
These accomplishments have begun the difficult work of recovering from the worst economic collapse since the 1930s and, according to independent reviews, prevented our country from plunging into another Great Depression. As a result, numerous congressional experts call this the most productive Congress in a half century. This was only possible because our Members had the courage of their convictions and put the interests of the Country first.
Our work is far from finished. As a result of Tuesday’s election, the role of Democrats in the 112th Congress will change, but our commitment to serving the American people will not. We have no intention of allowing our great achievements to be rolled back. It is my hope that we can work in a bipartisan way to create jobs and strengthen the middle class
Many of our colleagues have called with their recommendations on how to continue our fight for the middle class, and have encouraged me to run for House Democratic Leader. Based on those discussions, and driven by the urgency of protecting health care reform, Wall Street reform, and Social Security and Medicare, I have decided to run.
I am writing to respectfully request your support and I look forward to hearing your views. Please let me know what you are thinking.
Thank you for your leadership and friendship.
best wishes,
Nancy Pelosi



42 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Pelosi= The arrogance of power.
True—just less than the rest of her ilk. Her taking impeaching Bushco “off the table” still gets my knickers in a knot, though Obama is worse in that, and many other regards.
Ah yes, there’s some clear-headed thinking. Shuler would be much better.
We need more women in congress, not fewer. It would be a huge mistake for Nancy Pelosi to leave. Besides, she was pretty effective. It was the Senate that turned all of the House’s bill into crap.
I’m afraid none of the alternatives offered so far (Hoyer, Shuler) are any better. It would be lovely if there were a real progressive with the courage of his convictions in the race, but there isn’t.
The Senate didn’t make Pelosi take impeachment off the table, nor did it make her do any of the other things we now have to live with. She and the House did it. That’s where the blame lies for what they did; discussing the motivation doesn’t change that.
Shut up! Pot calling the kettle black.
Have you no conscience? No shame? talk about a need for power. You do have mirrors in your house, don’t you?
Please, please, please don’t continue to do this on this site. I’ll even offer you a rice krispie treat.
I’m sorry for going off so early in a thread. We’ve already had a Pelosi trashing thread this morning. And, some people just piss me off.
I’ll leave now, and leave you to continue.
Go ahead, be the brave one to get it back going. It’s really not that challenging. Just speak from your heart. Or head.
Again, apologies.
Boehner’s going to be speaker and would run roughshod over Shuler. Nancy’s about the only hope
Progressivessane people have against the House Rs for the next couple years.You can sit by me.
What’s with all the vitriol against tinman? He may have an opposing view, but it is his opinion to share. Pelosi is trash. Perhaps some like her merely because she wears a skirt, I would have thought the vast majority would prefer to judge her on her failures and accomplishments, not whether she sits to pee.
Oh, thanks, hon. Got outside gardening to do. But, in my Heart, I will.
Nancy was a great soldier for the White House and they stab her in the back a lot of times
Numerous times the white house pull the rug out from under Nancy
“Driven by the urgency of creating jobs & protecting #hcr, #wsr, Social Security & Medicare, I am running for Dem Leader.”
Is Nancy saying today base on the statement above, she plans on killing the catfood commission? that what everyone is waiting to see? “PROTECTING SOCIAL SECURITY will make all AMERICANS LOVE HER”
Nancy in a matter of hours will go from villian to NATIONAL HERO
the white house probably wanted heath shuler a blue dog to take over, how did the blue dogs do on tuesday? that right they got wipe out!
this may also be a signal to the white house, that progressives are about to abandon the Obama right wing agenda
Obama is leaving today,to make sure more USA jobs go off shore. WOW!!!
How many people still think Obama is a political genius?
Dig it deeper. This is not about gender. It’s about heart and mind.
You are insulting. Vitriol vs. calling it like it IS. Like you and people like you claim it is.
It WAS the Senate that thrashed a lot of progressive legislation that came out of the House. However, that would mean Pelosi was ineffective. Her bills didn’t get passed as they were authored. A lot of the progressive legislation went away. Now, as the minority leader, I don’t see how she can have an effect.
Although, I’d rather have her in the minority speaker position than anyone else.
Good, she’ll have another chance to save Social Security, again from a predatory president but this time of her own party.
It’s not like we have any input into this at all; it’s up to her caucus, and it’s more progressive than before. That’s the caucus she comes from, and they love her. Plus: money. It’s how she got her start, it fueled her rise, it’ll rescue her now. The woman is a machine.
Get your ass elected and show you can do the job.
Pelosi did fairly well considering that she was dealing with the Blue Dogs, a Senate that destroyed every bill the House sent over or just ignored it and a president who would not support her.
Oh, Teddy, thank goodnes you showed up. I was just about to use the B word.
And, SD. you rock, as always.
I really gotta go. Still grateful for sane and nice voices here.
Enjoy the gardening. Always good for the soul.
Remember that the tinman in the Wizard of Oz had one primary characteristic…tinman1967 has to run out of 1967 chances to obtain one.
What will need to be done is for the Catfood Comm. to produce its recommendations. Publicly. Only then can she successfully get credit for killing the Commission. In fact, we should let the GOP voice their support for the same bulldada that they were doing in 2005….ending the payroll tax contributions by employers and shifting everything to Wall Street managed funds. Half as much “investment” (a huge loss in deferred salary of hundreds of thousands of dollars over a 40 year working lifetime) and the wealthy, once again, pockets it. Then the Wall Street financial houses steal the rest.
i think dennis kocinach should be supported for the minority leader not nancy.
“Succeed”? OR just SUCKED? “DEM ‘leader’ “, indeed.
Pelosi is the only liberal politician in Washington D.C. with spine.
She couldn’t have the effect she desired, when Obama was undercutting her efforts every step along the way. After all, HE’s the so-called leader of the Democratic Party.
And, last I heard, Pelosi has no influence over the Senate or its procedures.
“Pelosi never brought anything up for a vote in the House unless she knew she would succeed”
And therein lies part of the problem. There should have been a vote on the public option and a vote on the “tax cuts for the rich” before the election. It is better to stand for something and lose than stand for nothing.
One of the top raisers in the House. Number one, I believe. I have a hard time getting an accurate fix on Pelosi, there are so many factors in play that we don’t see or only see the shadows of. There are hundreds of bills from the House waiting in the Senate To Be Considered queue. Haven’t even been taken in for consideration! I was shocked when I saw that 420 House passed bills are just sitting, going nowhere. We bitch that the Senate doesn’t do its job, but we have to consider the possibility that it can’t do its job: it’s set up for a different place and time. Pelosi can’t do anything about that, tho she has complained publicly about the pile up of House passed bills.
Given the egregious lack of support from the WH, I think she may have done as well as could be done. Obama and his mob are treacherous, the kind of allies you sleep with a knife to protect yourself against. Damn, I knew he wasn’t all that, but I never imagined he’d be this bad. Not in my worst scenarios.
When Pelosi first ascended to the Speakership, there were sharp complaints from Democrats that she was too iron fisted, dictatorial. The complaints subsided and it would be interesting to know why. Did Nancy take it down a notch or two or did she impose discipline on fractious members? Or both? She’s an old fashioned pol with a decidedly liberal bent and she can count. Tip O’Neill with sand. If she’s running for minority leader, she’s got the votes. And in any case, I’m predisposed to like her because I’ve seen her website and she’s pretty well aligned with my sentiments.
“Pelosi did fairly well considering that she was dealing with the Blue Dogs, a Senate that destroyed every bill the House sent over or just ignored it and a president who would not support her.”
Exactly!
How does Heath Schuler think he’s going to get this, when half of the Blue Dog coalition got booted out of Congress last week? His wing-nut world is growing smaller and smaller within the Party each and every day.
More women in Congress doesn’t mean anything if those women are like Feinstein or Harman or Clinton. We don’t need a woman Speaker if she was briefed on torture and not only kept silent, but didn’t have the courage to bring up impeachment when she had the chance. That gives women a bad name. I’d trade a hundred Nancy Pelosis for one Shirley Chisholm.
Heath Shuler is just flapping around for attention. Tough being at the far end of the bench for someone who was a star in college. Second in the Heisman vote in 1993, I’ll have you scoffers know.
I understood what Pelosi was doing when she took impeachment off the table at the time and I agreed with her. I do not agree now. But I believe Pelosi still thinks she did the right thing and now it’s water over the dam. The more proper response, which I still completely support, is criminal prosecution. Think about the consequences of impeachment becoming ordinary and regular, like the filibusterer has become in the senate. The filibuster has a place in legislative process but it needs to be shaped so that it can’t be so easily abused. Impeachment was abused during the Clinton administration and I don’t want to see it become the congressional club of choice. Criminal prosecution competently and persistently pursued is very effective.
I have no intention of rewarding the people like Obama and Pelosi, who engineered the debacle of three days ago, by supporting them so they can do more of the same.
They sold us out with big congressional majorities; I would ask why anyone thinks that they will now discover their inner progressive selves.
There’s not a lot we can do about Obama at the moment, but helping Pelosi stay on as House minority leader is just plain crazy. She was part and parcel of the voters’ rejection of so much of what has happened, and not happened, in Obama’s first 22 months.
I want no more of that, and I don’t know why anyone else would.
Re; The filibuster:
I think that making no move to get rid of it was smart. We’re damn sure going to need it.
Pelosi IS a bluedog. She refused to allow those dem congers to bring up a bill that would have stripped Humana, Wellpoint, Blue-cross/Blue-Shield of their immunity from anti-trust laws. There is no way that the repubs could have opposed that without taking a hell of hit with the voters.
Of course, the refusal was just part of the sellout when Obama laid down like a cur dog for those robber barons.
Whether or not you think she is a Blue Dog, it’s pretty hard to make the argument that she was not an effective leader. Ms. Pelosi delivered on everything she was asked to deliver on — unfortunately, the President, on several occasions, left her twisting in the wind after she had managed to get some more conservative Democrats to take politically risky votes. I say keep her as minority leader.
I think it’s fantastic that Mrs. Pelosi is continuing, and I hope the caucus supports her.
She provided a tremendous amount of support to Democratic candidates throughout the country, and the last thing that should be happening during this bad week for the Democrats is certain people trying to kick her down.
The House acted on numerous pieces of useful legislation that were blocked by Mitch McConnell and the Ben Nelsons of the Senate.
Incumbency At All Cost!
I am Nancy Pelooser, and I approve this message.