The AFL-CIO has endorsed Nancy Pelosi’s bid to remain as leader of the House Democratic caucus, citing her work on getting key legislation passed for working families. Between the labor endorsement and the attention being focused elsewhere on the Minority Whip battle, I’d say Pelosi’s position is secure.
As to how to resolve that other matter, I think Jesse Jackson Jr. has a pretty sharp idea, though I think he’s only making it to make a point. The common approach is to look to House “leaders” as how they will play broadly in the country, whether they have the ability to excite the mass middle of the public. Yet we know that the identity of the number 2 Democrat in the leadership will have no bearing whatsoever on the fate of the House in 2012 and beyond. The leadership position is a legislative one, particularly the position of the Minority Whip, whose job mainly entails keeping the caucus unified on important votes. So, given that Clyburn and Hoyer are arguing that their skills in getting Democrats elected are the reason they should get a leadership slot, why don’t they put those skills to actual use by running the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee?
“Maybe Mr. Hoyer and his moderate-to-conservative coalition and Mr. Clyburn with his progressive coalition should be co-chairs of the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] and let someone else handle the task of convincing members of the caucus to ‘vote no’ on the Republican agenda that most of us are already against,” Jackson said in a statement. “Mr. Hoyer and Mr. Clyburn both tout their experience in fundraising and supporting Democratic candidates — we need their joint experience at the DCCC.”
Jackson’s really calling for new leadership – perhaps for himself – to do the hard work of legislating inside the caucus. He’s saying that these fights about electoral positioning have a role in the committee that elects Democrats, not the Minority Whip’s office. He happens to be right, but I don’t expect that to really change anything.
In addition, if the future of the Democratic caucus really does depend on what kind of Democrat the DCCC will support in the future, it seems to me a progressive voice is best suited in that capacity. But it seems like Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Joe Crowley already have that seat locked up.




17 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Glad you pointed out that Wasserman-Schultz is not a progressive
I’m all in favor of this since I don’t want either Clyburn or Hoyer anywhere near the Speaker’s gavel.
I was surprised and disappointed however when the Times editors came out against Pelosi remaining as minority leader. I wonder who’s behind that.
While this will probably be viewed as “you old bulls move over for us young people” I think it’s remarkably clever and politically astute: You two say you’re about electing Democrats to the House in 2012, so go do that.
I’m not sure I think JJJ has this level of political expertise, which makes me wonder whence cometh this idea.
My guess,
Eric Cantor and all the Repubs because they fear her. They know that she can outsmart them any time of the day and any day of the week.
What is he doing? He’s got the gavel backwards. The flat end is what you use for smacking the table not the handle end.
He’s fixing to beat himself with it for not having this idea before the Republicans took over the House.
Twirling it like a baton would be my guess.
Folks,The Democratic party is floundering….the core of it’s leadership are mostly all people who are Blue Dogs….The Prez,Clyburn,Hoyer,Harry Reid & Kane…
These people are all corporatist,Americans are asking for bold leadership,you won’t get it from the current Democratic leadership.There is nothing in it’s current make up to excite voters…
Well, golly, an idea that makes so much sense it has no possibility of being executed.
Sigh.
Nancy went too far and did not listen to the American people. The results was the biggest “shellacking” in the house since 1948. 80% of the country is not Progressive. Obama. Harry (please stay as leader Nancy) must move to the center (or right) or take another one on the chin in 2012.
The left appears…sigh…tired!
Actually, she DID listen to the voters in 2008 who overwhelmingly dumped Republicans.
yeah the House passed some decent legislation only to have it go to the Senate and … die.
You actually think Republican-Lite is a good idea?
That’s why people aren’t voting for them now.
If Pelosi gets this post I will be done with Dems . Between the Impeachment is off he table and the We have listened to the American people and given them a HC bill that sucks a$$ and enslaves Americans to the medical health care monopoly, I wouldn’t let her dog sit for me
Go ahead Dems, put this duplicitous elite serving sycophant in charge. Pelosi is every bit as guilty as the Bush WH for the deaths of millions by protecting the lie to war that secured a never ending for profit war franchise for the war profiteering death cult. She backed the phony war and torture and sold out the American people with this Wellpoint written HC bill.
You like losing Dems, put the Medusa’s face up front and seal the deal.
Because Pelosi represents everything that is wrong with Dem Party. Nancy plays office politics for number one, Miss Nancy. She tries to please all the major players, elites, Repubs, and Dems that serve the same masters as the Repubs.. the elite.
If they put in NP they will prove they have made the decisions to continue throwing the fight for the ONEPERCENT. I’m guessing they will because that’s the “in” crowd and most of these guys are there for the perks.
yep