I said in the last post that I think the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell repeal will just never get taken up in the lame duck session. In fact, that looks to be true of a lot of priorities, as Democrats retreat into their shell. Staring into the abyss of a Republican-controlled House, they will return to Washington November 15, with 58 Senators and 255 House members, for as much as 5 weeks of floor time, and it looks like the plan is to schedule pretty much nothing.
In the wake of a midterm election that President Obama called a “shellacking” of his party, Democratic insiders question if anything more than a stop-gap spending measure and temporary extension of Bush-era tax cuts can pass.
“I’m very pessimistic we’ll get much done,” said a labor official familiar with lame-duck negotiations. “We’re focused on extending unemployment benefits and middle-class tax cuts.”
“Republicans will try to put off everything so they can claim credit for anything that passes at the beginning of the new Congress,” said the source. “I expect a short-term continuing resolution into the new year,” in reference to a temporary funding measure to keep the federal government in operation.
It’s worth noting that there are enough “emergency” pieces of legislation to tide over a session that could be as small as three weeks (one week before Thanksgiving, and perhaps only two weeks after). Congress needs to pass a continuing resolution to keep the government running. There are several pieces of legislation that expire on November 30, like extended unemployment benefits and the “doctor’s fix” for Medicare reimbursement rates. And then there are the Bush tax cuts, which expire at the end of the year. Clearly that doesn’t leave much room for energy, child nutrition, DADT, the DREAM Act, labor bills, a Chinese currency measure, the new START treaty or even the deficit commission recommendations, parts or all of which had been promised a vote in the lame duck.
The only three bills the Senate could take up on November 15, for which Harry Reid filed cloture at the end of September, are bills on natural gas and electric vehicles, the Paycheck Fairness Act (a companion to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act), and the food safety bill. It’s unclear which one they’ll start with or whether they’ll finish any of them.
As for the tax cuts, a debate where Democrats held the upper hand with the public but decided to duck the issue before the elections, you see the trajectory completely in two headlines today: “Obama opens door for talks with GOP on tax-cut extension” and GOP: There’ll be no compromise on tax cuts. While the President is talking about a temporary extension for up to two years as a “basis for conversation,” Republicans are roundly rejecting anything where the tax rates don’t move together. They don’t want “decoupling,” where the middle class rates get extended permanently and the rates on the rich get a temporary extension.
While I think that Congress will spend a lot of time on this debate in the lame duck, my money is actually still on gridlock, because Republicans can get what they want after January.
Republicans, meanwhile, have been less accommodating, with some suggesting that they could simply hold off until January, when they will control the House and hold a stronger hand in the Senate. That would set the stage for a more powerful push to permanently extend all the cuts — the preferred GOP alternative.
“They might blame GOP obstructionism. But, you know, people are going to start missing a lot of money in their weekly paychecks in January. And there’s only going to be one person in the White House,” said a Republican House aide, speaking on condition of anonymity to describe party thinking.
I actually don’t think people will start missing the money in their paychecks, or at least they won’t make the connection. They never did about the tax decrease done through their paychecks the past two years. But Republicans will scream and cry and use the mighty Wurlitzer about it so often that they can adequately pressure the White House into a permanent extension.




38 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
While the President is talking about a temporary extension for up to two years as a “basis for conversation,” Republicans are roundly rejecting anything where the tax rates don’t move together.
OK, does the White House realize how atrociously bad a negotiator the President is? I mean seriously, even if he secretly wanted the tax cuts extended permanently he could at least use it as a bargaining chip to get something else (err, debt limit increase?).
If you were a Republican senator under the gun from the Tea Party (with poor Robert Bennett, the undead senator from Utah till January, a constant reminder), you can’t go home and explain you simply accepted the President’s opening offer. Every time the President moves right, it only drives the Republicans further to the right.
Interesting bit of history to go along with the continued rape of America.
USA – Profit Be(for)e People ?!
Her’s another amazing article on what is happening worldwide because our government can’t control it’s banks:
Finance Has Become a New Form of Warfare
And Obama always seem happy to take the wrong message from just about anything he does.
Where does the Cat Food Commission vote fit in here?
As much as I would like to see the “middle-class” tax cuts extended, the fact is that we can’t afford them any more than we can afford the upper-class tax cuts. America can’t afford any more tax cuts, period. Any time you cut taxes it has to be paid for by raising taxes on the wealthy – redistribute the tax burden, but don’t reduce it.
Now that Bennett is a lame duck, maybe he can be persuaded to join a cloture vote. Maybe more than nothing can be accomplished. Or not.
You assume O doesn’t want the tax cuts for the wealthy to continue, a false assumption IMO. O’s wanted them all along (they’re his campaign contributors, after all), and now he can blame the Rs as a way to pacify his base.
Can’t decide which picture is more disturbing, the lame duck above or the silhouette of the Iraqi prisoner on the post below.
‘People’ will never make the connection, because they’ve been trained to make only those connections pointed out by the right-wing-Wurlitzer.
Ron Paul was on CNBC this morning, making the case that Paul Krugman is leading our country’s wrong-headed economic policy, and that our problems are caused by The Fed following Paul Krugman’s instructions while the brave and oh-so common-sensible deficit-hawks stand in the road waving flags to save us from the washed-out road ahead.
According to Ron Paul, Krugman and the Fed are together at one end of the spectrum of economic philosophy and He and the Tea-Party stand at the other.
Socialism on the one hand and Free-Markets on the other.
Who knew?
You beat me to it. I bet they’ll have plenty of time for the catfood commission and their great recommendations!
Revoking the “middle-class” tax cuts would be an anti-stimulus,
cutting consumer demand is the last thing the economy needs.
Most economists feel that we need a second stimulus.
Can we all get jobs that do that and get paid their salary?
And;
Teachers unions are what is wrong with education.
All of our economic problems are the result of FDR taking us off the gold standard.
Obama is a socialist.
The list could go on almost for ever.
Jane has a fresh cross-post up: Melissa Bean For CFPA Head? Please.
They lost because they lacked audacity and failed to deliver real change.
Acting like cowards is not the way for them to get the American people back on their side.
They are going to let Republicans make things worse and promise to fix it, and we’re suppose to hate the Republicans so much that we’ll believe anything their opponents promise.
It won’t work next time. We’ve had enough of the empty promises followed by a series of betrayals.
If we can’t succeed in cleaning out the sellouts and enablers in the Democratic Party, none of us should support them next time around.
IMVHO,
I am on a fixed income now that I am retired. Yes, I substitute teach about three days a week, but in reality, I would favor the tax cuts expiring in total.
Take the Repubs talking point and force it down their throats.
I read today where Indiana is going to begin to pull the rug out on all social programs, Wisconsin Gov-elect is going to cancel the high speed rail between Milwaukee and Madison, the company that was going to build the trains says may/will pull out of Milwaukee costing a lot of jobs and yet the Gov-elect, says the state is “open for business…”
Grab the popcorn, this is going to get interesting when those who are $#it upon and lose their jobs, benefits, finally came to the realization that the Pubs really do not care about them.
And won’t and the “R’s” will rule for a century. But what can you expect when Obama gave the oiligarchs all our $$$ and then, let then, buy our government, which truly IS now small enuff to drown in a tub
They should do a three-month extension until March 2011. Then let the new Congress pick up the issue of cutting taxes.
How come no one is calling this the planned Bush Tax Increase?
Meanwhile Republican govenors have their eyes on balancing THEIR budgets on the backs of the workers as well:
Now in Power, G.O.P. Vows Cuts in State Budgets
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/08/us/politics/08govs.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
This will result in more job losses and more deficits.
The govs cannot get revenue when nobody has a job if the people can’t spend then the corporation can’t spend/buy or create jobs.
What they’re trying here is a self-perpetuating cycle of debt and no jobs.
If they take any more money out of the economy we WILL have a Depression and even more companies will fail.
Cutting programs that provide jobs for the short term improvement of balance books is beyond ridiculous.
Prosecute the crooks who took US down. already the world is moving sharply away from the dollar:
Finance Has Become a New Form of Warfare
http://www.hamsayeh.net/hamsayehnet_iran-international-news1869.htm
Oilbama is over in Asia…lots of talk about India, but the true sellout will be his free trade agreement with South Korea, which isn’t getting any press at all.
President Obama negotiated with himself, as he likes to do. I guess it gets lonely in the White House sometimes when there’s nobody to compromise with, so he just offers the GOP whatever they want for free.
DEM! Lame DUCKS!! Just(ly) Do NOTHING!!!
Oh yeah and expect the banks to try to reinfalte the housing bubble. Get suckers to buy and drive up the prices once again.
this is why Bernanke is printing 600 billion…to once again, help the banks cover the bad paper instead of writing it off.
It’s another bailout by a different name.
Call me naive in matters of sausage making but, couldn’t Harry Reid end the filibuster right now in this session, and say everything that stopped at his doorstep that died will now be passed, and that the R’s can kiss his wrinkled ass? I’m not saying he WOULD, but COULD he?
If they haven’t realized it by now I’m afraid there’s no hope for most of them. If it didn’t amount to a government program, the R’s would give out free swords and demand that working people fall on them. Many would do it.
ROn Paul was talking AS-IF the democrats were busy implimenting Krugman’s suggestions, and that’s why we’re in such deep shit.
Anybody who is paying the least bit of attention knows that nobody is acting on Krugmans advice.
Let the tax cuts for the rich expire in a Republican-controlled House. Yeah, that’ll show ‘em.
Why bother doing any work during the lame duck session? It looks like these folks have taken lessons from Palin about how it’s better to quit than to be a lame duck.
Can anybody tell me the difference between the lame duck Democratic Congress and the huge majority Democratic Congress?
Had to leave for awhile, so very late in responding.
The Bush Tax Cuts as I understand it expire on December 31st unless Congress acts to extend them by that deadline. The present Congress is still Democratic until January 3rd or thereabouts. That is what I was talking about just letting them expire BEFORE the new Republican majority comes in. I would really love for the R’s to own this one, but that 31st date is the deadline to act on some or all of it in extensions.
That is why this Lame Duck session such as it is, becomes important.
O will never get any vote of mine if he caves on this issue.
Let the tax cuts expire.
Then let pay for rules make the GOP either vote to suspend pay for rules, or find offsets for the revenue lost.
Do the Democrats in our leadership even pretend they know how to act in a street fight?
I feel a little like the pouting baby, but can anybody tell me why the Dem leadership don’t take all the things they promised to do like David said “energy, child nutrition, DADT, the DREAM Act, labor bills, a Chinese currency measure, the new START treaty or even the deficit commission recommendations, parts or all of which had been promised a vote” and lump it together with the Bush tax cuts and say to the Reps left,
‘Take it or Leave It’.
You know, the way politics is done. Or used to be done.
And if they don’t get it done, January comes and everybody’s taxes go up and the Rep’s in the House have to fix it. When they complain, say, ‘Take It or Leave It, just like in ’06. You gave us a helluva mess and the job’s not done.’
Why? McConnell and Cantor, Boehner will have to think pretty quick to appease the new freshmen, write a budget, with details to satisfy a majority and meanwhile the WH should have their own to present, if they’re on the ball, like every other January.
I see now others are thinking the same thing
Doggone it, Cassie, you’re supposed to be young and naive and full of audacious optimism. Now that us old fogies have screwed everything up so much, we’re hoping that your generation can get us out of this mess. I’m hoping that you will adopt Obama’s eloquent vision (except for the stupid “looking forward not backward” meme), but not his tactics. Don’t become too cynical yet! Please! You have a lifetime of accomplishment ahead of you.
Cheers,
Bob in AZ
(Uh, I don’t think this Kassandra is the Cassie you are thinking of, i.e., I don’t think it is SnarKassandra)
I think he’s bound by the rules this Congress adopted almost 2 years ago. I think he has to wait until January to change the rules.
But what about the 250 bills that the House passed that the Senate has in its inbox? The Senatorial “holds” are gluing everything up, but that’s largely a matter of courtesy. IMHO Reid is not obligated to honor every single “hold” forever. In fact, I think he has slapped down a number of Democratic holds already (I think he ignored one of Chris Dodd’s holds). Of course, the Republicans might filibuster, but he could make them do it, and not just let that keep the bills off the floor.
Bob in AZ
She uses several handles, and I thought this was one of them. If not, please pardon!
Bob in AZ
But I think only the one of SnarKassandra at FDL since she switched to it back when.
Let the tax cuts expire and blame the GOP. Public pressure will restore them for the middle class.
It would if the Senate only agrees to the millionaire cuts with offsetting spending reductions out of red states.
What the R’s will say to anything they object to, is that it isn’t the will of the people as expressed in the last election. (It’s the people’s will from November 2008!)
It could be the deal is no filibusters and get your Millionaire’s tax cut temporarily extended.