I don’t necessarily think ethanol subsidies is at the heart of Jim DeMint’s opposition to the tax cut deal – he just doesn’t believe in compromise. It probably doesn’t hurt, however, that a form of the ethanol subsidies are included in the deal:
The tax legislation that congressional Republicans and the White House have agreed to will include extensions of the biodiesel and ethanol subsidies through 2011, says Iowa. Charles Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee. The $1-a-gallon biodiesel subsidy, which lapsed at the end of 2009, would be retroactive to this year, he said.
Some leading Senate Democrats, including the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus of Montana, indicated that the energy tax provisions were still to be worked out. “We’re going to have to wait the detail,” said North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad, a member of the finance committee [...]
Grassley wasn’t sure if the tax agreement would extend the ethanol tax credit at its current level – 45 cents per gallon – or reduce it. Grassley said the subsidy should stay at 45 cents, but there have been proposals in the House and Senate this year to reduce it to 36 cents. Industry officials also were trying to confirm details today.
I’ve heard that the subsidy would go down to 36 cents. But the revival of the $1 biodiesel credit would be included as well, along with an 8 cent credit for small ethanol producers and a 54-cent ethanol tariff for imports.
I think this could lead to the belief that the bill has become a Christmas tree. Harry Reid’s push to legalize online poker in the bill adds to that as well. And nothing will take down this bill faster than cries of “pork” and “the cornhusker kickback” (in this case, actually having to do with corn).




49 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Yet no job creation, nor help for the long term employed that are no longer on UI benefits. Just keep funneling money to those that have and take from the rest of us.
Sickening!
Government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich….
JHFC on a crutch. They don’t have a problem throwing $0.36 a gallon at the ethanol scam but UI for the 99ers isn’t even talked about. Assholes.
Tax cuts for the rich.
Pay freeze for Fed workers.
Ethanol subsidies for agribiz
Obama surrenders to Israel (AIPAC) on settlements
Afghan war pullout “deadline” (haha) now 2014 (subject to change of course)
FISA
Torture, lies
Sellout to Tauzin/pharma, AHIP
Had McCain been elected he’d be bragging about this stuff. Face it, the “2 party” system is joke – you get to choose which set of whores will sell you out to the plutocrats until the next “election”.
Not only that but DeMint thinks UI benefits should be in the form of loans.
I got a loan for him! Maybe he thinks we all need a TARP plan. That would be nice. /s
Ah, DDay, will there be bright and shiny things all over this Christmas tree, with tinsel, and lights, and a bright star on top?
Will Obama dress as Santa?
Will the nation reaffirm its “Christian” sensibilities and give the poor and downtrodden what they deserve?
Oh? They already are?
‘Tis the season …
Looks like rough weather, ahead …
So, back to our trees …
The “Christmas Tree”, just like the nation, is covered with “compromises” … look how they glitter, see how they shine … the fine print mutters … “Screw you, I got mine!”
DW
We just need to change our names.
Depends on who he’s visiting. At the Chamber of Commerce, he’ll be Santa. At the DFW, he’ll be the Grinch.
You is now a bank, Margaret?
Should be some bigga bucks comin’ your way, verra soon.
But you should call yoursef, “The Bigga bank of Margaret”, just to be sure.
;~DW
Yes, yes, that Obama be satorially “correct”, for sure, Margaret.
He got a closet full of the nicest “threads” you ever did see.
Even so.
;~DW
Going for my TARP
loangiveaway. Good suggestion btw.Now you is properly addressed.
Verra nice.
DW
LOL! Oh my gosh! I went over to read Ruth’s post and come back to see that now you are no longer purist, or infinity, but now a TBTF!
You are sumptin else, girlfriend. Yeah, I guess everyone knows that peasants are peasants, I might as well change my handle to Golden Sacs or America Banksters Pool.
And the House just voted down a one time “payment” to Seniors of $250. Man these dems are dong us proud.
What was the excuse du jour? I’m almost afraid to ask.
How’s this for the twoofh?
Don’t want no “run” on catfood, dammit, nomolos.
Thinkin’ ahead, the House … “looking forward” it is.
DW
Or as I like to say –
Government of the millionaires, by the lobbyists, for the billionaires
Man, we are really representing today! Get on the program and show solidarity. Change your handle to get your TARP today.
Ooooooooh my!
You is a sight to behold, but all that glittery gold shore is hard on a body’s eyes, Mr. Bankster.
;~DW
Well ya see, that’s the plan. I have to shine brighter than the rest of youze!
is Sanctimonious Purist already taken ?
I guess there’s always the dreaded Single Issue Voter™
Uh, brighter than all but TBTF Margaret that is. She has the corner of the Margaret, er Market!
I changed my screen name back because I sent my auto surgery diary link to a couple of people and I want it to be taken seriously, though I don’t suppose they’ll want to discomfort themselves by actually reading it. Staying “Too Big to Fail Bank of Margaret” would just give them an excuse to dismiss it.
It needs to be a bank name, dear. We are all now freestanding, freeloaders—uh grab bags.
Not that I’m aware of. :)
Okay. Here goes …
First National Security and Trustmylawyer Military Contractor and Rapture Bank of the Fourth Branch and the New World Order.
Hmmm, a bit long.
But it does have gravitas.
I’ll simply hire some peons to carry the “train”.
Bet Dick Cheney will be jealous.
;~DW
OT. Unpossible:
Uh-Oh! Local nooze says the two Carolinas are broke! Especially the South one and is appealing to the government to run deficit accounts for education, transportation, etc.
Whowouldaknown?
Jane has a fresh cross-post up: Keith Olbermann’s Special Comment on McConnell-Obama Tax Deal: Must-See TV
Great! Dick Cheney won’t be too jealous just now. He has all his faculties projected towards his Nigera problems. ;-)
Ode to hostage takers and extortion. Obama wants to be reelected in 2012. The oligarchy wants its bonuses as represented by low income and estate tax rates made permanent. The oligarchy withheld $2 trillion dollars in profits from reinvestment into businesses driving up the unemployment rate for months until Obama came to his senses by being soundly beaten in the 2010 elections. Now that Obama has caved in to the oligarchy with his “tax comprimise” they will release that $2 trillion into the economy increasing employment and assuring Obama’s relection in 2012 (maybe, but at least he’ll have a fighting chance). The oligarchy gets another shot at making its low income and estate tax rates permanent after the 2012 election whether Obama wins or loses. “We the people” get a snowjob by one and all. Peace
The highly negative consequences of this “tax cut compromise” are so great that no matter what earmarks are added, it needs to be filibustered and stopped.
I got DeMint’s loan swingin’.
Naw, Barack’s coverin’ for ‘im.
Dick’s got no worries, ‘cuz, internationally, everybody’s still afraid of the American Eagle, especially when it’s drunk with power and willin’ ta shoot anything that moves.
Obama’s only inept in certain areas, he’s got the Constitution (which died in 2000) and the rule of law (which Judge Bates just put out of its misery) on his scalp-belt already.
Wonder what he’ll be gunnin’ for next?
(Shudder)
DW
I am now a Bank of America branch. Gimme my fuckin money, you spineless pols.
Note that the right wing Club for Growth and DeMint have both come out against Obama’s “tax compromise” today. If the Left and the Right put the squeeze on the moderate middle Obama and his Republican political pals are in for a very rough ride. Peace
You gotta add Pharma or insurance somewhere in there to make sure you get the full extent of the governmental gravy train.
I’m not sure the oligarchs are that smart or competent. That’s why they’ve been butterin’ both sides of the proverbial bread.
Well, I didn’t want to be too greedy good.
I failed Sociopathy Class, and have been ashamed ever since.
But Grifters Anonymous has saved me and set me upon a new path to the freedom of enterprise and the democracy of the rich.
And I do so want to do Gawd’s work, like that Gold Saxman do.
I wanna be astute and admired by Presidents, I want MINE … I want it ALL.
I want it NOW …
My money … heh, heh, heh.
;~DW
We ain’t got no money. The gubmint took it and gave it away.
Yeah for the boat anchors that will drag the tax cuts for the rich down to never be seen again.
How big is your bank account? Is your last name Rockefeller or Bush? The oligarchy may not be smart or competent, but they are in charge. What they want they get. How many of your wishes come true on a regular basis? Peace
Yves Smith takes note of a little something in this abomination that’s just tailor-made for states who need to borrow.
I have a feeling we collectively had better read this darn thing thoroughly.
So, we could have had cannibis decriminalization as a rider as well?
This is what one would expect from a bill that had geithner and baucus as part of the bargaining team. I’m sure that’s also why the inheritance tax was included as well. Always looking out for the common citizen unless you are a 99er.
Cat food? I was in a PetCo getting litter and, wow, cat food has become mighty expensive.
When someone can’t afford cat food, what do they go to? Ramen noodles? The high sodium diet?
Business as usual. Yet another example of why we need to get big business out of politics.
I put together a comparison of corn ethanol and wind power – It is called “Farming Wind versus Farming Corn for Energy” and is at:
http://8020vision.com/2010/09/02/farming-wind-versus-farming-corn-for-energy/
Bottom line:
- Corn ethanol consumes almost as much energy to make it, as it produces.
- Farmers can produce 10,000 times more energy per acre using wind than growing corn for ethanol.
- The income to a farmer is less than a tenth what the farmer could make by erecting wind towers.
- Corn taken out of the food market for energy causes food prices to rise.
Corn ethanol is a boondogle.
Jay Kimball
8020 VIsion