Lisa Murkowski will support repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy and specifically, the standalone bill that executes the legislative repeal, according to her spokesman. Murkowski’s spokesman specifically references the passage of the tax cut bill and the “glide path” to funding the government as clearing the way for support.
“Sen. Murkowski will support a stand-alone repeal of the DADT law,” said Murkowski spokesman Michael Brumas. “With the tax package out of the way, and legislation to fund the government on a glide path to passage, Sen. Murkowski will vote to move to DADT when it is brought to the floor.”
I’m not so sure about that glide path, with Jim DeMint forcing a showdown and trying to “run out the clock” on the bill. If he does force a reading of the 1,900-page bill, then the government funding stream will surely run out, and the bulk of the rest of the time in the lame duck will be spent attending to that. You can actually see the reading of that bill as more about derailing the REST of the Senate agenda in the lame duck, not necessarily the spending bill.
Nevertheless, it’s clear that 60 votes exist for repeal at this moment. Scott Brown also supports the standalone repeal bill, so with him, Murkowski, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, that’s 61 confirmed votes in support, with Dick Lugar likely to be #62.
Again, the votes for cloture exist. It’s just a matter of finding the time on the Senate calendar, where DADT repeal competes with the START treaty and a host of other bills. The wrangling over the omnibus or some other government funding measure will loom large as well.



19 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Super! Now lets have all the gays line up so they can have at those bastards!
The Senators from Maine are probably pulling your chain. First they say they will, and then they don’t.
It’s amazing how much these nimrods can get done — and how quickly — if they really, REALLY want to.
Except Ron Wyden might miss the vote while being treated for prostate cancer. Look, there are very few people who will be happier than me if this vote takes place or if it actually passes but there are also very few people who would be more astonished.
Give it a rest ghost. Do you hang out all day just so you can post the same comment over and over? You think LGBT people want to be butchers. Thanks. We get it.
NahGahHapPen.
Preznit doesn’t want it – ain’t working for it – it ain’t gonna happen.
After Karefull Konsideration, I Koncur with the Kelly.
Need one more if the vote is tomorrow or later, since Wyden’s out of commission for prostate cancer surgery. Also, sequencing is suddenly very important, the order in which the Senate undertakes its tasks. So, I imagine that repeal (and this isn’t actually repeal, which everyone seems to forget) won’t happen.
It just won’t.
But you can bet that lots of lives will be ruined even if it passes, as young servicemembers and their workmates celebrate prematurely; we still need the SecDef, the JCS, and the President to certify military readiness before repeal takes actual effect. Oh, plus a 60-day waiting period after that. Plenty of time for folks to get caught up in the meat grinder by militant fundamentalists, pissed-off exes, and superiors who don’t like the new policy coming down the pike.
Yep. Nothing like giving bigotry and intolerance one more chance.
Here I am, back after two hours and Agony Hill still hasn’t voted on anything yet keep counting possible votes.
What happened to the tax bill? Did they not vote on the procedure change in order to vote for the tax bill yet?
Some questions may be answered in the morning on Washington Journal. Here’s the line up:
Andrew Exum, Adviser to Gen. McChrystal, on Afghanistan-Pakistan Strategy Review Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA) on Legislative Issues Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM) on Legislative Issues Gerald Hanweck, GMU, Professor on the Federal Reserve’s Role in Economic Stability
Jim DeMint wanted to read the entire START Treaty on the floor, or rather, he wanted to have it read. This morning it was announced that McConnell and Reid made a deal to shut DeMint up. What did McConnell get in return? I’m guessing that Reid agreed there won’t be a DADT vote in the Senate in this Congress.
Y’know, following and caring about this Clowncar of Lords and the bullshit they do is like being addicted to a really crappy soap opera, with horrible writing, numbingly predictable and stupid plotlines, and unlikable, talentless actors who all think they’re Olivier.
Or maybe it’s like “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman” without the irony. Or humanity.
Anyway, sick of it.
And isn’t this DADT “repeal” sorta not-quite, and subject to further obstructions and bullshit if “passed”?
Listening to Barney Frank shill for Obama on Olbermann makes me either want to vomit or weep.
It is going to happen.
Ahh – Knew I had researched and written up the Obama Administration before as regards LGBT policies – and women’s reproductive rights. From June, 2009
Since Stupak, I am convinced not only does DADT not happen, but DOMA won’t and Womens Reproductive Rights will be further threatened under this administration – not Sarah Palin’s.
Reid is filing cloture tonight on DADT and Dream Act.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/12/breaking_on_dadt_1.php?ref=fpblg
Yep, that’s what I’m hearing too.
And the reasoning is more evidence of the con that both the D’s and R’s are engaged in.
All Obama cares about is out-Bushing Bush, to fresh vistas unimagined, thus proving himself once and for all to the bankster and military daddies and Uncle Fester Cheney.
It’s hard work.
Srsly, I think even Bush/Satan could and would have ditched DADT by now. Sort of a reverse Nixon China. Also Satan’s got ghey in the family. Honestly, I think Obama’s more spooked by teh ghey than Bush or Cheney. Good god we should have read the fine print more closely on this weird fucking bastard.
Yes, he only had eight years to do so! “Srsly” – not really.