Talks aimed at a resolution between Iran and the West over their nuclear program collapsed today, with no progress and no timetable for future talks. Overall the negotiations sounded like a huge waste of time.
Western officials expressed disappointment, but not surprise. They reiterated that their proposals, including a modified deal under which Iran would ship out most of its enriched uranium in return for nuclear fuel, were still in effect should Iran choose to open talks without preconditions.
The head of the delegation of the six world powers, Catherine Ashton, the European Union foreign policy chief, said: “Our proposals remain on the table. Our door remains open. Our telephone lines remain open.” But she said the Iranian chief negotiator, Saeed Jalili, made no promise even to raise the proposals in Tehran and report back.
The dynamic around Iran’s nuclear program has changed for both sides of late. On the Western side, they recognize that Iran’s progress has slowed to a crawl, perhaps due to the effectiveness of the Stuxnet worm computer virus and other rumored methods of sabotage. There’s less of a sense of urgency now. On Iran’s side, their leaders have used economic sanctions as a means to reform their economic system, strengthening their hold on the country in the process. So more sanctions would have little effect, and Iran has little to fear from them. Therefore, both sides have a lot of incentive to simply stick to their positions.
So the West will still lay out their idea for a fuel swap of highly enriched uranium to keep that process out of Iranian hands, and Iran will still insist on their right to develop civilian nuclear energy, and maybe the most reactionary on both sides will rattle the sabers a little bit. But the reactionaries may not want to face that their argument about an imminent Iranian threat has gotten weaker over time.




10 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Yes, I think you’re right. Even Israel has backed off its claims-as I recall the former head of Mossad recently made the comment that Iran was years away if ever from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Do you sleep?
When one examines what the Iranians said and what the UN, Quartet, P+6, ad nauseum… The Iranians have been the most forthright and honest of all those dishonest Characters…! Why was the Poodle Blair(Quartet Chief) testifying at the Chilcot Iraq Inquiry, that Iran was about to develop the ‘bomb’, when even the ex-head of the Mossad, unexpectedly, testified to the knesset that their ‘successes’ have set back the Iranians 3-5 years on having the bomb…! *gah*
Mr. Dayen: So by my count, you’re up to about One Billion posts this week. What a slacker. heh.
Apologies for the O/T, but the more I think about the Olbermann firing, the angrier I get. However, it is being reported that “the deal carries limitations for Mr. Olbermann in terms of when he can next work on television, though he will be able to take a job in radio or on any forum on the Internet.”
Sat radio with a related website or a regularly-scheduled column with (oh, I dunno) Firedoglake, maybe? He is contractually barred from talking about the exit deal, but he can speak freely about all kinds of other things. Yes, the pay will be lower (at least initially), but being able to say what he wants, when he wants would be a nice trade-off, especially in this day and hour.
Oh…I almost forgot: Fuck the Brass over at MSNBC and (especially) Comcast. Or maybe I’m mistaken about Comcast:
You bet. And by the way, does anybody want to buy a bridge? I’ve got a few for sale. Golden Gate? Verrazano? Chesapeake Bay? George Washington? Hey…I can hook you up with any one or all of them. Cash, cashier’s check or wire transfer. None of this post-dated check crap…
We should invade them anyway. Just for the hell of it.
Russia backs Iran’s use of nuclear fuel. Do you know what their interests are? Maybe a trade for oil and gas?
I would add that the Iranians have gone through the most intrusive IAEA inspections, that even Saddam would’ve blushed…!
If you go to the Arms Control Association you’ll see that Iran has repeatedly made compromise proposals. See – History of Official Proposals on the Iranian Nuclear Issue.
But America and Israel and it’s various western poodles aren’t interested. The American tactic is now the same one that it’s always been, to deliberately make offers it knows are unacceptable as a cynical ploy.
America isn’t even remotely interested in anything other regime change in Tehran. That’s why successive American administrations and it’s apartheid state buddy – (the one that’s lost every war it’s launched against Lebanon) have used the nuclear program as an pretext.
mfi
Palestine: Betrayed again. Major leak.
Interesting article. It’s well-known that all Israel is interested in is talking about talks, but if the story is true, what the PA was prepared to give away–and rejected by Israel–is absolutely astounding.
Perhaps in the current crop of negotiations, looking on the bright side, the PA recognizes that nothing at all will ever please Israel, and they might as well stay firm in a demand for 67 borders.