Hillary Clinton’s appearance on all five Sunday shows overshadowed the significant event of the debut performance of Chief of Staff Bill Daley as a public advocate for the Admnistration. Those who had problems with his appointment worried about his more conservative outlook, but were assured that he was a “good soldier” and would not deviate from the party line. Here’s what he had to say on Face the Nation:
The White House acknowledges that more cuts are needed beyond the spending freeze President Obama proposed, chief of staff William Daley said Sunday.
Daley, in his first Sunday show appearance since taking office, said that the Obama administration understands that, if it wants to balance the budget, more cutbacks will be necessary beyond the five-year freeze in domestic discretionary spending the president laid out in his State of the Union address.
“It will take a tremendous amount more than that,” Daley said on “Face the Nation” when asked if more cuts would be needed beyond the freeze.
Let’s stipulate that Daley happens to be telling the truth. If you want to actually balance the budget, if that’s your main thrust, then it will take more than the discretionary non-security spending freeze. But you see his points of emphasis here. He also said “we all agree there must be cuts in spending.” At a time when the Republicans clearly want to make trillions in cuts, right when the economy is in a fragile state, Daley on multiple occasions in this appearance agreed with their premises. At the same time, he said that the tax cut deal will provide stimulus to the economy and create jobs, and you absolutely cannot reconcile those two stances. You cannot presume to be concerned about jobs in the near term while accepting that “everyone agrees” spending must be cut.
There were a lot of ways Daley could have gone here which would have been in step with the Administration perspective. He could have said that the Republicans walled off 84% of the budget, so you can ask them how they’ll squeeze a 40% reduction in spending necessary to balance the budget out of that other 16%. He could have said that if the American people want to see jobs, they cannot see threats to areas of spending that will lead to mass firings. He could have said all sorts of things. Instead he sat there and tried to bargain with crazy.
Needless to say, I wasn’t impressed with Daley’s debut.



45 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I don’t think that the “good soldier” would deviate from the party line. his role will be to say all the things that obama would say if he would be a leader, even if going in the wrong direction. Instead, obama has others to get out front to give the bad news so he can be the “good guy” and mitigate the hurt that you know is coming. The repugs want cuts, mainly to SS and Medicare and they want obama to lead the way on that road. he will, but behind whatever spokesman he can throw out there; he tried it with the bumble twins of erskine toilet bowl and alan simpleton, but they didn’t catch on, so he will now go with a more official spokesman.
I’m not impressed either! Take a look at his comments here and you may find yourself being more than just a little taken aback.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/us-taxpayers-should-not-pay-for-fixing-us-infrastructure-new-white-house-chief-declares/
Until somebody says that we should cut the defense budget by 50%, they’re all full of crap and not worth listening to.
Austerity seems to be all the rage these days. Well, austerity for the little guy, these same people preaching the Austerity sermon are all living high on the hog. Looks like we’ve got a lot more in common than we think with Ireland.
Did we expect any less? FWIW, I think he did spout the WH line, which differs from the Rs not at all.
Nobody expects Daley to talk good look at his brother they do expect results though GOP friendly results on that point he did good WallStreet will be pleased. Never mind Wallstreet and Daley are both as wrong ad Herbert Hoover’s economic advisers.
I expect them to argue that mil spending is stimulative.
Yes, and I am deeming myself a Sanctimonious Peasant! If they can walk around with their heads in the clouds, so can I. Maybe if we say it enough, repeat, repeat, and repeat, we will become the new society presevers of the American citizens.
Yeah, just tell yourself you are Purist and Sanctimonious and will not accept the bull marlarky coming from the elites! ;-P
Yes we should ask him if thats on the table otherwise just how can he balance the budget with spending cuts and no tax increase? Cut ore funding to the states and force them to raise taxes or cut even more jobs like police, firemen and even worse Snowplow drivers?
Remind him thats how his Dad’s political machine lost the Mayor’s seat to Jane Byrne. Ask him if Daley wants to lose Dems in snowplow northern states, Western Fire states and crime ridden urban areas.
Obama and his administration turned out to be a gang of thieves. They are as determined as Eric Cantor, the Koch Brothers and the Supreme Court to wipe out the remains of America’s Middle Class.
Remake us the mold of Mexico or any other third world country.
Thanks for the info, which is always useful to know. Frankly, I wouldn’t have expected Daley to say anything else. Daley, like Obama, works for the Overlords, not the sanctimonious peasants. Hence: austerity measures & cuts for the serfs, whilst the 2% parties on…
Stop spending tax money supporting wars, bankers, and dictators.
It is but it’s the wrong sort of stimulus. It provides huge piles of money to all the wrong people.
My Dad said that Bill’s Dad said for every person on Chicago’s payroll he got the votes of their wife, parents, kids brothers and sisters plus inlaws. I assume that Bill knows cutbacks mean less people on the federal payroll?
The son is not the father.
Keep in mind that the oligarchy never wants to spend a dime on anything except defense. Hence the high walls that surround their mansions.
Al Capone taught him well.
The Austerity Act is surely playing on all the Conservative outlets. A customer, a Teabagger lady, said this to me the other day:
I’d say the MOTU are making good headway.
Cuts can be made, but not anywhere close to 50%.
It’s okay though to ask the American people to foot the bill to bail-out his billionaire Wall Street cronies, and to re-build the infrastructure of Iraq and Afghanistan. Needless to say this guy is completely full of sh*t. He’s a perfect fit for Obama.
Daley is guilty by association – his father and his brother are two of the biggest crooks to ever hold political office. Obama once again showed his true colors (and that is not a race joke) when he appointed this scumbag.
Arthur Anderson accountants still cooking the books from prison? The US spends more on Military and Private Defense Contracts than all the rest of the world’s countries combined.
I wonder if Obama ever thinks about all those promises he’s broken, and how he’s betrayed the country and the people in exchange for power and money. I wonder if he isn’t a little bit scared as he monitors what’s happening in the Middle East. After all, people do reach a breaking point; it’s just a matter of what that breaking point is and when it will happen.
Emptywheel has a fresh cross-post available: Our Industrial Policy Needs to Do More than Arm Dictators
The US spends more on its military industrial complex then the next 10 largest militaries combined. Cutting it by 50% is not only appropriate it’s essential.
Won’t surprise me non if in 6-8 yrs the same atmospherics that has engulfed Egypt does the same here.
Take out dedicated taxes and their programs – highway, Social Security, Medicare – and their is only one program to cut – defense. And Gates Defense cuts are not cuts – just a freeing up of money to be used elsewhere in defense.
Sure wish Obama would find the guts to always and only state that fact – and have his spokesperson say that. But then I still wish the Obama of 2008 existed.
My standard response to all things Obama:
No, we couldn’t.
I think it could be sooner. As the Middle East is rearranged, Obama’s going to lose more and more political capital as he continues his wars, and I think there will be some Democratic politicians who will realize the Pro-War Democratic Party isn’t the place they want to be. You can only keep up the facade of being for the people even as you go against their interests for just so long. I think it’s just a matter of time, and that time is within the next year to year and a half. Just my humble prognostication!
Is the investment in our infrastructure by foreign and domestic entities to be something that is even Constitutional? I know that some things have been done, but have they been challenged in the courts and declared OK? I really don’t want to be driving on a highway where the object of the ownership is to maximize profit since we in the position of minimizing investment.
Maybe Daley is a minder, and the O-team needs to be reined in tighter to whatever TPTB have in mind for us.
Just a question. I have seen links to Raw Story from various people and in reading the article above they refer to SS and Medicare as entitlements. Don’t we need to correct this narrative when we come across it? I know we are “entitled” to it because we pay into it, but it is misleading.
But the freeze will not apply to massive U.S. entitlement programs such as social security and Medicare, which represent the core of the country’s fiscal problems.
(Edited by Mod: Please use bold for emphasis within a comment; using it for the whole comment makes it hard to read)
MASSIVE “entitlement programs” have “massive dedicated taxes” that make them not contributors to the deficit-
only defense is both MASSIVE and a contributor to the deficit -
when we do start to cut defense?
you don’t have to cut if you just raise taxes on the rich
30 years ago.
I realize that SS and Medicare are not entitlements but for someone who doesn’t know that it is misleading.
Here we go – back to the future… He even LOOKS like Ari Fleischer!
This will be a bummer for a few more years for people trying to make some sense out of this president… may as well be chimpy and darth still in there for all the fundamental sameness there is around – and planned.
I think you’re correct.
Sorry, will do.
“W” was a mean spirited fool on almost every level, but even “W” was savy enough to play to his base and deliver on his promises. Obama’s constant attempt to show the Right just how concilatory he can be has been a disaster. They will NEVER side with him over even the most disloyal Republican, and meanwhile he has alienated his base at the same time. He is a smart man, but is politically more a fool than Bush ever was. No matter what happens this next year, he is beatable in 2012 because he has betrayed his base over and over and over, and in doing so has also let the entire country down.
Sounds about right, and if that doesn’t have the desired effect, the TPTB will make Dr. Kervorkian the president’s physician.
Yep, entitlement has become a dirty word. Rather, we paid into those accounts and they are insurance, earned rather than entitled. To take it away is stealing whether a Dem or Regressive does it, doesn’t matter.
Entitlement applies better to the lord and manor, estate tax. The children of the fabulously wealthy are “entitled” to something they have not earned.
Repeal the Reagan tax burden restructuring.
Maybe we should use “restore” concept rather than repeal? Just thinking out loud. We could talk about it as restoring a more equitable responsibility on those who have been so positively good at avoiding their fair responsibility altogether?
I agree.
IMHO He who controls the narrative controls the battle.
I’m not sure the Obama of 2008 ever really existed. I’m beginning to think that that Obama was an illusion.