Virtually every time that Republicans or the Obama Administration talk about working together, they specifically cite the South Korea free trade agreement as a point of covergence. The agreement, modified by Obama’s negotiators last year but substantially similar to the corporate-written agreement originally negotiated under George W. Bush, looks like it’s on a glide path to passage, given that unanimity. In fact, the only person standing in the way is noted grassroots labor organizer Max Baucus. As you can see, this is not about the labor or environmental standards in the agreement, but a parochial issue where Baucus is standing up for the interests of his state.
Baucus, whose committee oversees trade issues, is siding with cattle ranchers from his home state who were shut out of the deal. He has pledged opposition until South Korea reconsiders restrictions on the many U.S. beef exports it has barred. Baucus’s stand is a major obstacle to the White House and Republicans who are eager to bring the long-delayed pact to the Senate floor.
“I don’t support Korea until Korea opens up its market,” Baucus said in an interview Wednesday. By failing to resolve the beef dispute, he said, “they didn’t help at all, the administration or the Koreans.”
Baucus has not said whether he will merely vote against the agreement or will use the full force of his authority as finance chairman to block it indefinitely. The senator said he is working behind the scenes with U.S. trade officials to tweak the agreement to ensure Montana ranchers get a better deal.
“When I see that, I’ll support Korea,” Baucus said.
So it’s fair to say that labor has almost no key allies in this fight. Baucus will get bought off with some goodies for cattle ranchers in Montana, something he can sell to the folks back home. Heck, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association actually supports the deal, so Baucus is just looking for a fig leaf.
Labor itself has fractured, with the UAW in support of the crumbs they get from the deal, while most of the rest of the labor movement in opposition. But this agreement represents bipartisanship for the White House, and the opportunity to work across the aisle and with the business community to “get things done for the American people.” And if all you have standing in the way is Max Baucus, you don’t have much.





22 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The Democratic Party – on trade – is officially dead.
The only “choice” is do you want your fries supersized, as our jobs disappear.
They do not even take note of the US jobs lost estimate on this treaty.
As the war criminal Kissinger says “Obama is there to assure the New World Order”.
Which is pretty much what we’ve figured out already
Shorter Baucus: “Where’s the Beef“…
Ha! Poppy Bush left NAFTA undone so that Clinton, a Dem would slip it in.
Now, Bush Jr. leaves the S. Korea deal to be done by Obama, a Dem in Pretense.
Not having much is correct! Not so much as a fig leaf to cover our workers naughty bits.
I liked the old trading system much better. Average tariffs were twice as high but still reasonably low at 10%. And there were capital controls and a fixed exchange rate to keep international finanance from causing too much chaos.
Me too, but we don’t count. :-P
I simply don’t see how they can think this is something that will benefit America and the working class.
How quaint… Just like all those Geneva conventions we’ve steam-rollered over globally…! Ain’t it grand to have a Peace Laureate in charge…?
When Leo Gerard blogs here, he gets a few tough questions. So sad to see Labor bowed beneath the weight of Corporatocracy. Especially Obama’s.
That the UAW got schmoozed so readily due to abject gratitiude was sad. We wonder what the Unions got for their $31 million (I believe) in campaign contributions.
The Unions are too busy keeping silent on trade issues to remember their progenitors’ history of Leftie force that led to better treatment of, and wages for, American workers.
Thanks, David. Max Baucus, indeed. Kinda like having Ben Nelson in your corner.
The UAW got the Ford, GM, and Chrysler folks the right to land without the “special Korean requirements for US car” rules applying, and then sell, if possible, 25000 cars – each – for a total of 75,000 cars – or about 500 jobs for the US, in return for absolutely no restrictions (other than those on all cars sold in the US) on the about 500,000 Korean cars sold in the US.
We of course had to pay for this gift by giving up on various exports we wanted to do – and Max’s beef was one of those things we gave up to get the generous car deal that bought the UAW on board.
which is exactly like having a rabid wolf (in sheep’s clothing) in your corner.
If I have to choose, I’ll take the wolf – thanks.
“According to the Economic Planning Board, in April 1988, the average monthly income in Seoul and other major cities was 612,400 won (US$868)”
http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-12327.html
Wanna have free trade with a nation where the average wage is less than $900 a month?? Wonder who will win in that one.
Hey, wasn’t he also Mr. Jack-in-the-Box (no hamburger chain reference)
as to the public option? Was that white-haired man dictating into his ear at the hearings a health insurance cartel lobbyist?
By the way, at Drudgereport.com tonight, it’s reported:
” Virginia to seek expedited Supreme Court review of suit over health-care law ”
orig. link for Drudge:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/03/AR2011020305532.html
So, EverNewEcoN would also like things expedited?
1:
Class action firms to EXPLORE (I’m not rendering legal advice) whether selling now-you-see-it-now-you-don’t coverage (plan by design premium death spirals or “going naked” upon individually or one’s group’s failing to meet target MLR) is fraud.
2:
The Justice Dept. to explore whether the inability to avoid exclusions
when moving from state to state consitutes interference with interstate
commerce.
3:
REPEAL OF IMMUNITY OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE CARTEL FROM THE ANTI-TRUST LAWS.
I’d actually welcome that in exchange for repeal of ObamaCare, plus then
leaving everyone, including the health insurers themselves, no choice but an economically sensible and legitimate system that encourages ambition and
scientific growth but does not have built in screwing a population.
http://sites.google.com/site/evernewecon
Screwing a population?
(That’s privatizing the profits, socializing the costs–that’s being a sucker. And the profits are guaranteed. The more cost, the more cost-plus till 20% reached, though the current 39%, 59%, whatever else the insurers are dreaming, are happening despite the 20% “limit.”)
http://sites.google.com/site/evernewecon
Frankly, if at this stage the Govt can’t afford
high risk pools, let alone a public option, that prospect
resulting from the lavish tax breaks extended again for the
ultra-wealthiest Americans, that financed by you and me by
our paying back Beijing for same, then the above (Firedoglake
assembles my comments–there, then the below)
(explore whether fraud / repeal immunity fr anti-trust / exclusions
when moving between states interferes w interstate commerce? )
would in itself be a worthwhile result.
***Mod Note: Only one blog whore reference allowed per day.***
I think the Korea FTA is going to run into a wall of working class opposition, regardless of what the PTB think about it.
I wonder how all this is playing with the Tea Partiers who seemed to be against shipping jobs overseas? I don’t mean this as sarcasm, but would truly be interested in knowing if there is any organized opposition in that quarter.
They don’t think so.
And this was the lesser of two evils…. gah.
Well, this is the same crowd that tells us “What’s good for Wall Street is good for Main Street”.
Depressing. Neither Democrats nor Republicans help the economic life of the U.S. working and middle classes at all.