For all the talk of how liberals picked up the “progressive” brand to evade the long history of demonization that conservatives associated with that word, the centrist wing of the party has pulled off a pretty impressive bit of brand management over the past several years.
In the beginning (OK, the 1990s) there was the DLC. And they represented the right flank of Democrats. They funneled their kind of candidates into office and pushed corporate-friendly “third way” ideas on the party. Throughout the Bush years, they became reviled by a new and more aggressive left that bubbled up from the blogs. In 2007 every Presidential candidate but Joe Biden came to Yearly Kos and not one came to the DLC’s forum. In a sign of their desperation they hired Harold Ford. They were seen as barely hanging on to whatever was left of their power by 2008.
In the space of two short years, Rahm Emanuel became White House chief of staff, and then a board member of Third Way, Bill Daley, replaced him. Emanuel’s co-author on a policy book and the last President of the DLC, Bruce Reed, became Biden’s Vice Presidential chief of staff. All of a sudden Third Way, before this time a fairly weak sister to the DLC, became significantly more prominent, with op-eds and position papers pretty much blanketing DC. With the hated DLC essentially replaced by Third Way, and with DLC acolytes installed throughout the government, there was no longer any need for the organization. And so, today, they dissolved.
The Democratic Leadership Council, the iconic centrist organization of the Clinton years, is out of money and could close its doors as soon as next week, a person familiar with the plans said Monday.
The DLC, a network of Democratic elected officials and policy intellectuals had long been fading from its mid-’90s political relevance, tarred by the left as a symbol of “triangulation” at a moment when there’s little appetite for intra-party warfare on the center-right. The group tried — but has failed — to remake itself in the summer of 2009, when its founder, Al From, stepped down as president. Its new leader, former Clinton aide Bruce Reed, sought to remake the group as a think tank, and the DLC split from its associated think tank, the Progressive Policy Institute.
The board apparently couldn’t find a replacement for Reed, and some anonymous source said it was hard finding donors for “a Democratic group that isn’t seen as an ally of the White House.”
That’s nonsense. That wing of the party has simply reinvented itself. I’ve been going to conventions for years where “DLC!” was used as a pejorative. Now it doesn’t exist. Its ideas are featured, however, in like-minded think tanks and organizations, and throughout the Congress and the White House at the highest levels. The conservative wing of the Democratic Party managed to shed its skin without altering its policy a whit.
Well done.
UPDATE: As Ezra Klein notes, the DLC’s preferred policy strategy – namely, “free market” solutions – now predominates in Democratic circles. And the Administration on down seeks to promote their business friendliness. As Klein concludes: “For better or for worse, the DLC won. That’s why potential donors and others are now comfortable letting it die.”





48 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I always thought that the DLC/Third Way(or Turd Way as I call it) were one and the same. And no, they’ve never gone away. They were just able to funnel corporate cash to their favorites to run for office. And ruin the Democratic Party in the process.
Rest In Piss, DLC.
OT– Mother-in-law of a Goldman guy sounds like she’s spinning (my bold): Reported Feb. 7, 2011 by RawStory.Com: ‘Asked by Denise Maerker of Televisa what she thought of drug legalization, [Hillary] Clinton said it was unlikely to work.
“There is just too much money in it,” Clinton said. “You can legalize small amounts for possession, but those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped.”‘
{ LOL }
What a great day! They have done so much damage to the Dem Party. Good riddance.
All part of the plan to moving that Overton window ever further right.
The John Birch Society renamed themselves mainstream Republicans and the old mainstream Republicans renamed themselves DLC Democrats and now that they’ve completely taken over the party, just Democrats.
It’s a downright shame so many folks are still so hung up on that old R vs D game that they can’t see the truth right in front of their faces. Folks, the new “D”s are the old “R”s. Why support them now simply because of a letter?
Pot meet kettle.
Yeah, I sure hope ‘something’ trickles down on them.
A crop whore by any other name is still a corp whore.
You’re right. And it might as well be the same thing that’s been trickling down on us from that economics
theorybullshit.So good on you. Rest in piss indeed.
They are not dead at all, just rebranded.
Yes, the DLC with help from the Great Liar Mubarak Obama have transformed the D’s into the R’s. And just as the Republicans kept winning the Wars, the Democrats are now winning. Mubarak told this to Billo the Clown on the Clown Network.
We are winning once again. Mubarak has promised to defeat, that awesome Caliphate army with hundreds of members, Al Qaeda. Actually there is no Al Qaeda. It is fiction invented by Richard Haass, Richard Armitage, Wolfowitz, and Rumsfeld. If there ever was an Al Qaeda, it was a secret CIA gang of thugs. And it still is.
The Taliban will not retake Afghanistan, unless Pakistan decides differently.
What difference does it make if the DLC is “dead” or not – other than feeling some sense of vindication or whatever. I appreciate the post, but it seems to me that we’re home & hosed no matter what. as a prior comment says, the so-called “Democrats” these days are just the somewhat more sane trad Republicans (what were once called “your father’s Republican party”). I agree that the Birchers have taken over what currently passes for the “Republican Party,” and I really don’t know what the Tea Party is bc it seems to me it’s just shouty people who end up voting in dumbfacks who are told by elites what to do and how to vote.
DLC? No DLC?? What’s the difference?
There is no reason for the DLC. The whole of the democratic party is the DLC. Someone told me last week my senator Al Franken was the most progressive democrat and he was/is DLC. Our pres was/is DLC and so now we need a new name for them.
They are still around, they just call themselves the Democratic Party now.
Could be. Haven’t we all thought that?
Just when the Special Ops were “this close” to grabbing Osama bin BushFamilyBestFriendsSon, suddenly Boooosh the dumber calls off the Special Ops just as they get to the Tora Bora Hills. And ooopsie-daisy: geez we gotta *send in righteous troops* bc that thar Osama’s still “at large.”
My @ss. Do any of the Tea Partiers even know who Osama bin Laffinatyou is anymore?? Do they care? Do Democratic voters even know we’re still in two wars that are essentially meaningless except, of course, to those being killed and maimed??
How about RepublicanLite???
I was just talking to a friend about how often the cable service now known as Xfinity has changed its name. In my service area, this is the fifth different name in 20 years. I think that there must be a very high correlation between how often an organization changes its name, and how bad it is at doing what it does. I just don’t know how to measure that.
Anyway, welcome to how we do things in early 21st Century America – if something has a bad reputation, just change the name and keep on going.
Yep. My point exactly. A rose is rose, except the DLC stinks like yesterdays’ fishy garbage.
PR and “branding” uber alles…
The world is awash in privatized wealth, elite products for the upper-middle classes and up.
The world currently is becoming daily more short on public goods: clean air, clean waters, fisheries resources, public transportation networks, public telecomm networks… et cetera.
So at the very moment in human history when public goods — which require collective, government-based action to protect — are more precious than ever, these DNC morons shoot themselves in both left feet.
Amazing.
It’s a Gucci world. Go shopping. :)
Don’t know if “DNC” was a fraudian slip or not, but it sure fits now that the DLC has taken over the whole party.
OT– The Party of Money is have a good ol’ time … “Increasingly, Israel seems to be nothing more than a humongous money laundering haven” (Feb. 7, 2011) not that we aren’t either. All in service of triple buffered London (audio ; “[1188] The Truth About Markets“). “Speculative froth” being skimmed by oil markets discussed here (“World oil markets & their structure-02-04-2011-(Part1)”). Food speculative bubble discussed here (“Ratigan And Fleckenstein Explain The Fed’s Role In Recent Food Price Ignited Revolutions”).
The Democratic party under Obama is the DLC.
My impression, reposted from http://my.firedoglake.com/szielinski/2011/02/07/the-dlc-will-soon-go-tits-up/
“Unless you start calling yourself a radical leftist, or socialist – the progressive designation having just been usurped – you will henceforth be part of the problem.
Did I say “just been usurped”? – my bad. It’s been that for a very long time now. So this news may well be very good news, as it rips the mask off of the ‘Progressive Movement’.
I know what socialist stands for, what it means to be a radical leftist – corporate progressivism a la Arianna and Rayne is Orwellian doublespeak. No wonder the American left is so out of touch with what they stand for, because when push comes to shove they stand for next to nothing.”
“Free market,” except when they’re not – MANDATE!- which they’re only selectively for the free market when it benefits their corporate buddies.
I was commenting on the same thing to another gentleman while waiting in line at Comcast the other day. They’re now under the 4th flag of my lifetime, at least that I can remember. And I’m 26.
My customer service experience, actual product value, and rates have been great with them, though. I’ve never had a service problem, customer service problem, and whenver my rates go up (every nine months or so) I call and tell them I want to cancel my service and they respond by dropping their pants. I did this Friday night and got $100 a month kicked off of my bill.
That said, they are a horrible monster of a company that’s trying to take over the country.
A gaffe czar might be useful now. In short order I can think of three contradictions which stifle progressives’ desired come-hither stance. These have to do with letting the message and terms get worn out — they mutate.
(1) “Investment” has never been a good term for gov’t spending, and has always been a bit skewed and out of kilter. Nowadays it unavoidably takes on negative connations of risk simply due to the times we are in. I can’t think of a good replacement yet, but am convinced enough to avoid even anything else with three syllables.
(2) “Crisis as a tool.” This would be per Rahm and is apt philosophically. It’s something to think about but never utter publicly, as it implies distraction by an ulterior agenda. A crisis is, after all, a crisis rather than something else. It can scare the pediddle out of the public at large. Better fix it now and ruminate publicly later.
(3) “Health care as a tool to redistribute wealth.” This would be per Berwick, who also should have kept it under his hat for the same reasons as in (2) above. He’s correct, of course, but I think it’s wise to never think out loud off the cuff. There’s a danger in opening a controversial healthcare regime to unintended interpretations, motives and goals, cause and effect, etc. The opposition will quickly turn the tables on that.
Sorry, typo. . . should read “connotations” in item (1) line two.
I find it somewhat sad that when I’m asked what party I belong to (as in, “Are you a Democrat?”), I always say, no, I’m independent, and to the left of the Democratic Party.
But when will I have a political party to claim? I’m anti-corporation rights, pro-civil and individual rights, pro-democracy, anti-oligarchy, pro-labor, pro-living wage, pro-health care for all, anti-pollution (isn’t everyone?), pro-science, pro-separation of church and state, pro-progressive taxes (don’t tax the poor!), anti-fundamentalist, anti-lobbyist. Where is my Party?
I dunno, but when you find it let me know. That sounds EXACTLY like the party I want to be a part of.
Here’s the subhead for Alex Pareene’s story about the DLC over at Salon.com:
About sums it up.
They had no members.. Remember how embarrassing that was. The more stridently anti-liberal the DLC spokespeople became, the fewer members they had.
I suppose they were left with a few rich corporate business people, now calling themselves the Third Way, who have now assumed (taken) control of the Democratic Party. I didn’t elect them — or rather, I didn’t know I was electing them. During the election campaign, the only thing I had against Hillary was the obnoxious DLC people on her team. So that’s why I chose to vote for Obama. Now it seems that either Obama was dissembling during the campaign, or since he was elected, he has given in to the power of the corporate elite. I no longer care which it is.
They still have no members. The DLC had no members, and the Third Way has no members. Their positions are extremely unpopular.
They are in fact not Democrats at all, but Republicans calling themselves Democrats they have taken power in a kind of “putsch” and they are running the country.
Sorry for the off-topic, but this struck me as so bizarre I couldn’t help it (and from MY state no less *sigh*)
Virginia Senate OK’s Betting on Old Horse Races.
http://wtopnews.com/?sid=2262325&nid=600
What could possibly go wrong with that?
Someone’s gotta really have the betting itch to want to bet on something that’s already happened. LOL
What bullshit.
Yep, Hillary was connected to the DLC of the ’90′s, and during her campaign, she was trying hard to get military bona fides by being pro-war. I supported some of the fine distinctions that John Edwards drew, but boy, I’m glad he wasn’t the candidate.
Obama is so happy for small, middle-of-the-road victories. And his WTF speech (oh, really, it meant Win The Future, right…), was completely without a vision to restore the health of the middle and lower economic classes in this country. Jobs for techies, yeah! Then build whatever we invent in Korea!
Let’s not forget Newt Gingrich has been a major cheerleader for “The Third Way.”
http://www.themoralliberal.com/2010/01/30/gingrich-toffler-and-gore-a-peculiar-trio-steve-farrell/
This is just another tax-the-poor scheme (as most lotteries are). Who is stupid enough to bet when no information about horses or jockeys will be provided? That, my friends, is a lottery.
Not only tax-the-poor, but outright thievery it seems to me.
Gee, if I were the one in charge of that, I’d wait to see which numbered horse had the least bet on it, and viola, pick a race that had that numbered horse win to put up after all betting is complete.
Yeah, no room for mischief here.
Although part of me wants to say “Hey, if folks are that stupid to bet on something that’s already happened then they deserve it
ifwhen it turns out to be rigged.”But then again, the same could be said about horse races that haven’t occured yet I suppose. Yeah, no rigging there either.
Meh, maybe that’s the logic in approving this?
first time i’ve agreed with Ezra Klein in a very long while… the snake shedding its skin analogy is spot on. And anyone who thinks Obamco isn’t 100% behind this re-branding effort, have I got some choice swampland to sell to you!
They are a monopoly, like the health-care insurers, the big agricultural product firms, banking, big box stores, chains, you name it in the consumer area that most people come into contact with. The DLC ‘market solution’ essentially hands the United States over to monopolies. The consumer industries that are not monopolized are automobiles (where you have a huge range of international choice), consumer electronics, and to some degree household appliances. This isn’t much in a modern economy.
Forty years ago when I was doing my grad work in economics, I was bored stiff by industrial organization, which at that time was about monopoly and barriers to entry and regulation. There was a little economics and a lot of description and law; so unfashionable. And so we gave it over to the guys from Chicago, who proceeded to dismantle anti-trust. And here we are. Fully owned and exploited.
Politicians who are not economists (and economists who are not well-trained)suppose that competition will sort things out. It’s what Uncle Milty said would happen. Well it wouldn’t and it didn’t. And don’t tell me that corporations can make more money by reducing cost. They can make even more money as monopolists by price discrimination. I actually think the DLC probably believed the crap they were sold by conventional economists. As I said, most are no longer well trained.
The dlc wins and then declares itself dead.
Z
doesn’t matter, what members there are have checkbooks much, much larger than ours. The only constituency represented by these (Third Way nee DLC) sons of bitches are other rich sons of bitches. FDR, Truman, and LBJ would not recognize these corporate whores as Democrats, period.
My apologies to Churchill, but when thinking of the University of Chicago as the birthplace of neo-liberal economic philosophy under Friedman, and neo-conservative geo-political philosophy under Strauss I can only come up with,
“Never in the field of human endeavor was so much fucked up for so many by so few…”
nope. as a matter of fact, this is a rewriting of history — one that leaves out the actual left.
it was during the clinton years that the dlc became reviled by a new and more aggressive left that had NOTHING to do with the blogs that were to come. remember the “battle for seattle” (when the wto ministerial meeting was shut down) and all the global justice protests before and after? the world social forum (and local versions)?
the major impact the political blogs have had is to direct one segment (center left) of citizen frustration safely into electoral politics(*) while, with some small exceptions, de-legitimizing real, especially left, social movement politics.
what has bubbled up from the political blogs is rarely even left. aggressive? yes. left? no. style (aggressiveness) is not substance (left). see yves at naked capitalism for a good summary on this: On the Lack of Left Wing Discourse in the Blogosphere
………….
(*) NOTE: electoral politics is safe only when there are no social movements to supply the power needed to use electoral politics effectively.
You’re lucky, then, because MY experience, and that of EACH of my two children has been HORRIBLE with them. They don’t come to service calls when scheduled; the person who comes can’t solve the problem and frequently can’t communicate in English; service itself is crappy.
I congratulate you for your luck, but want you to know it’s not representative.
word!
This place needs more lucid and informed comments like this.
thanks, selise!
Wasn’t Koch Industries (and the John Bircher Koch brothers) among the initial corporate sponsors of the Democratic Leadership Council back in the mid-1980s? And didn’t Koch Industries place some of their executives on the DLC board and in upper DLC management?
Citizens United. Koch brothers. Mission Accomplished!!! Bye-bye, DLC.