Last night, the House Republican caucus held emergency meetings in the basement, only emerging late to say they reached an agreement on a spending cut plan for Fiscal Year 2011, one that would cut spending $100 billion below the Obama Administration’s 2011 request. Because Obama’s 2011 request never came to pass, however, the proper comparison is to the 2010 levels, and this cut would be $58 billion from those.
Earlier in the day, Republican leaders recognized they needed to make deeper cuts to please their rank and file. Their original spending plan would have pro-rated the cuts, acknowledging that five months of the fiscal year would have passed by the time their continuing resolution kicked in, and would have been a net cut of only $32 billion. But Tea Party Republicans who ran on a pledge of a $100 billion cut wouldn’t go for it.
Even this $58 billion cut isn’t likely to mollify the entire GOP caucus. They will still allow an open debate on amendments to the CR, and conservatives in their caucus plan to offer more cuts. Rep. Steve King (R-IA) will offer the amendment to block implementation of the health care law. “If we don’t fight on this ground, there will not be ground this good to fight on again,” he told the New York Times. There are probably a handful of conservatives who will vote against the final CR if their amendments fail, though given the agreement last night, not enough to take down the bill entirely.
An open amendment process would mean that Democrats could also force tough votes on restoring popular cuts, but it remains to be seen whether they will be allowed to do that under the rule.
The process in the House says nothing of what will happen once the Senate gets the bill. Senate Democrats do seem poised for cuts, but they are planning on fighting it out in their own chamber, and probably submitting it to the House right before the March 4 deadline and cutting out of town. If cuts are restored, or it doesn’t look precisely like the House version, we go back to the same revolt of the Tea Party that we’ve seen in the past week. I don’t think they have much of a head for compromise, so the end result would be a government shutdown. There are three weeks until the expiration of the current continuing resolution.
Meanwhile, the White House is focused on the FY 2012 budget, which they plan to release next week. But they’re going to have to focus on wrapping up this fiscal year at some point, because it’s looking less and less likely that Congress will be able to get this done.





18 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
OT Mubarak has stepped down and the Military will be in charge.. JOY in the Streets of Egypt!! Victory for the people!!
Rayne has a fresh brief post up: Mubarak Has Stepped Down, Tahrir Square Rejoicing
Where are the cuts to the military portion of the budget?
This is going to be the big story of 2012. This might mollify a few ‘baggers but it’s going to infuriate just about everybody else.
In his usual propagandistic way, David Brooks chimes in on this today, essentially repeating in a nasaly, Mel Gibsony delivery that cuts will give us freeedom!:
He means cuts only in “discretionary” spending, like social services and VA benefits, and programs designed to improve our grasp of a very different future, to alleviate risks associated with old age, destitution (at any age), and widespread economic depression and transition. Cuts in intel and military budgets, not so much. Putz.
This fiscal year will end up like FY 2007, only worse. That year, only DOD and DHS had their appropriations bills passed in the regular fashion. Everything else got lumped into a big continuing resolution in Feb 2007, and kicked the can into the next fiscal year. This year, no appropriations bills has been passed so far, and I’m betting no appropriations bills will be passed at all. It will all go into a big continuing resolution, so that everyone can look ahead to not passing next year’s budget.
The only real question I’ve got is how much the GOP will try to strip from the big continuing resolution that funds the government for the rest of this fiscal year. As close as I can come to an answer is “lots.” How much will they end up getting? Again, as close as I can figure, it’s “more than they should.”
Gregg Levine has his weekly “column” ready: The Party Line – February 11, 2011
We can rake back some serious bucks by just cutting foreign aid which is often a pass through mechanism to the US defense industry and other corporate welfare queens (“Rand Paul: End Welfare to Israel,” time point 10:07). Also check this out from yesterday BusinessInsider.Com post before today’s decision to go beyond that to $58 billion: ‘The difference between the budget that the “big spending Democrats” are proposing and the budget that the “big spending Republicans” are proposing is only about 32 billion dollars.’ Total bunch of fiscal responsibility poseurs!
Not at all surprising. I just read elsewhere that the administration wants to ‘wind down’ Freddie and Fannie.
Joyous. What a doctor we have in Obama… (Anyone remember that ‘scalpel instead of a hacksaw’ thing he used in speeches?)
Basically, in response to our economic malady, President Obama plans to cut out all our lymph nodes and remove a heart valve or two.
At what point does everyone who cheerleads for this man ‘as a proud Democrat’ (not accusing anyone here of such party blindness, of course) wake up and see that the things he’s proposing are way outside what they claim to believe in?
I had a similar thought: when the Prez decides to cut programs to supply heat (which program provides heat to poor and elderly people), they are operating the same way that our governor in AZ, Jan Brewer, does. She decided to cut a program that will cause the death of some of her constituents, and so does Obama.
Sickening, isn’t it?
I always have a wry, bitter smile when I think back to the State of the Union. When the President urged us to ‘outcompete’ and ‘outinnovate’. People went wild, but little did many of them realize he meant ‘outcompete’ with your fellow citizens and ‘outinnovate’ to get things like jobs, income, health care, housing, education, etc.
Every man for himself, and those who cannot do for themselves be damned, all coming from a supposedly left/liberal/progressive party and its elected executive. Greatest Country in the world, indeed.
Both are quacks guilty of malpractice as they perform hack jobs on the citizenry.
Yeah NPR had a segment on this in today’s Morning Edition.
Obama’s biggest deficit cutting comes from raising taxes on the rich in 2013. Props to the NPR reporter who managed to state that without laughing.
I’m pretty sure the general public just wants to see housing and employment fixed. Budget cutting is a Tea Party establishment issue.
Is Obama dedicated to fulfilling St. Ronnie’s unfought war against all good things from FDR and the New Deal???
Sometimes I think Obama is a throwback to pre-Progressive Era days. He seems sunk in worship of wealth and the Uberwealthy. Sheesh.
Yep — who needs death panels when we can just have Obama initiate death cuts?
Dying either from heat stroke or freezing to death (or from stress to a weakened body from being cold all the time) is no respecter of party or ideology or geography (OK, might not happen in Hawaii), so in this Obama is genuinely bipartisan….
Not a Democrat of the real Democratic Party, of course, but a good neo-lib corporatist president. That’s our Obama.
Seems like it.
Tax cuts for the rich? Check.
Massive sacred military budget spending that continues to grow, filled with things the military themselves admit are unnecessary or inefficient? Check.
Rollback of social assistance/anti-poverty/social mobility programs? Check.
Endless asskicking to a corporate status quo that makes record profits, has their taxes cut, their regulations ‘reviewed’, yet still refuses to spend in this country or create domestic jobs? Check.
A cult of personality that regardless of his policy thinks he’s the most wonderful thing that happened since anything? Check.
I’ve lived through only a handful of presidents, being 24, but I don’t think I’ve ever been so incredibly disappointed by my president or my country as now. Even during the Bush era. Bush was an idiot, a problem, a warmonger, and a heartless conservative, but he never claimed to pretend he cared about my lot in life. Obama did in his campaigns, and as president has decided the lives of me and the millions like me who aren’t rich don’t matter.
I think Obama is counting ont the Tea Party vote in ’12.
I wish that was snark.
There are none, nor will there be.