Wisconsin State Senator Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee) is one of 14 Democrats hiding out in Illinois, participating in a “filibuster with our feet” to slow down the budget repair bill, which would strip collective bargaining rights from public employees, among other things. By walking out of the state, Senate Democrats have denied Republicans the 3/5 quorum needed for passing legislation with a fiscal intent. Larson and his 13 colleagues and their whereabouts have become a major part of this unfolding story, but he’d rather the focus go to the legislation on offer and the constituents out in the streets in Madison and elsewhere.
“Ever since we stepped away, there’s been a lot of attention on us,” said Larson in an interview last night from his undisclosed location in Illinois. “We’re trying to focus it back on this ridiculous legislation.”
Despite the disadvantage of being outside the state, Larson believes that he and his colleagues have been able to get their message out. “There have been huge rallies in Wisconsin. Not just in the capital, but in our districts in support of us and against this legislation,” Larson said. He believes that the stalemate has forced a spotlight on what Governor Scott Walker and his fellow Republicans have been doing since taking office. Trying to ram this budget repair bill through the legislature in a matter of days, with radio and TV ads on the air from the Club for Growth before Democrats ever got a chance to see it, is a symptom of how Walker and the Republicans, who control both houses of the legislature, have been operating.
“This has been happening since they got in there,” Larson said, referring to several bills rubber-stamped by the legislature in January, including a series of corporate tax cuts totaling over $140 million at a time when Gov. Walker and his party keep talking about a budget crisis. “Frankly, there hadn’t been much public outcry because of the Packers. People weren’t paying attention. It’s not a coincidence that it’s a week after the Super Bowl when people wake up and say, ‘what the hell is going on?’”
Contrary to the opinions of A.G. Sulzberger in an article in the New York Times today, Larson said that his constituents fully understand the difference between labor concessions on pension and health care contributions, given the tough economic and budget environment, and the stripping of virtually all collective bargaining rights. Most labor groups have agreed to the givebacks but not the loss of their bargaining rights. Larson attributes this awareness from the public to the long tradition of organized labor in the state. He cited one event in particular that sticks in the minds of Wisconsinites.
“My district is in Bay View, south of Milwaukee. A hundred and twenty-five years ago, workers there decided to strike for 8-hour workdays and weekends. They had enough of 16-hour days and poor work conditions. The governor said at the time that if they strike and march on the factory they’ll get shot. Seven people died at Bay View. We started this back then. We were the first state in the nation to provide public employee bargaining rights. The first AFSCME local is here. People get worker rights in Wisconsin.”
The Bay View massacre of 1886, coming up on its 125th anniversary on May 5, is an important corollary to what’s happening in Madison today. The striking workers spent two years building their movement for an 8-hour workday, warning noncompliant businesses that they would call a nationwide strike if they didn’t meet the demand by May 1886. When that date rolled around, labor leaders spent several days marching through Milwaukee, picking up new recruits at each factory and workplace along the way. The strikers shut down every factory in Milwaukee except for one, the North Chicago Railroad Rolling Mills Steel Foundry in Bay View. They could not get entry into Rolling Mills, and after a one-day standoff, Governor Jeremiah Rusk gave the order:
Rusk called the Mills and told Captain Treaumer of the Lincoln Guard “if the strikers try to enter the mill, shoot to kill.” Captain Treaumer then ordered his men to pick out a man, concentrate and kill him when the order is given. The strikers spent the night in open fields nearby while the Militia camps stayed at the Mills with sentries posted. During the night the sentries were shooting at anything that moved. A Navy tug brought provisions for the guard.
May 5: Around nine in the morning the strikers gathered again chanting “eight hours,” a reporter who slept with them reported that it was odd that this was a group with no real leadership, but everyone was united in one single purpose.
The crowd approached the mill and faced the militia who were ready to fire. Before Treaumer knew the crowd’s real intentions he ordered halt, but the strikers, who were about two hundred yards away, did not hear him.
He ordered the militia to fire. The crowd was in chaos as people fled the scene. The Milwaukee Journal reported that six were dead and at least eight more were expected to die within twenty four hours.
Meanwhile, some strikers called for revenge on the militia but to no avail. For several days afterwards a few strikers were still marching throughout the city but no one would join them. The dead included a thirteen year old boy who tagged along with the crowd wondering what was going on and a retired worker who lived in Bay View. He was struck down by a stray bullet, as he was getting water and was not part of the strike.
Public sympathy after the massacre (and others like it, such as the Haymarket riot in Chicago) eventually led to widespread change in Milwaukee county and city governments. Socialists were voted in during the next election in 1888. Eventually, workers won the right to an 8-hour day. They did it through collective action. These are the hard-fought rights that Gov. Walker’s measure would basically take away from public employees – the ability to bargain in their interest for appropriate pay, benefits and working conditions. These rights were won with blood.
There’s a kind of eternal recurrence here. Mike Elk reports that the Southern Central Federation of Labor, a 45,000-member AFL-CIO local in the Madison area, just endorsed a general strike if Gov. Walker signs the budget repair bill and strips worker rights. Only individual unions and not the labor federation can call a strike, so the SCFL announcement takes care to say it “begin educating affiliates and members on the organization and function of a general strike.” Many public sector unions and some construction unions could go out on strike as part of this effort.
Larson did feel a certain burden as part of the group of Senators leading what has become a nationwide effort to fight back against an assault on worker rights. The State Senate committee in Wisconsin has raised $330,000 in a matter of days in online contributions from ActBlue, thanks largely to efforts by the netroots and progressive groups. But Larson said he was trying not to let that go to his head, believing instead that he was part of a continuum with the Bay View marchers.
“People have always stood up for labor,” Larson said. “This has happened for 50 years. People have been spit on, beat up, punched, shot at for protecting their rights. We’re just one piece of that.”
He said he understood the plight of those workers who had decent wages and health insurance and a good pension, and lost it during the Great Recession. “Those people look at the public sector and their union protections. They can either say I hope everyone rises up to that level, or I hope no one does. I don’t fault people who get frustrated, but I hope they say, I don’t have that but I’d like to. The right wing’s counting on the middle class fighting amongst themselves and the rich getting richer.”
Larson continued. “Scott Walker is trying to pit the middle class against itself. If anything it’s brought the middle class together. I’m getting emails and phone calls, people stopping by my office, people who never would stop by my office, people who aren’t in unions are coming out. Walker doesn’t get it. He’s not understanding why we’re upset.”
I’ll have more from Chris Larson on some of the specifics of the bill and the negotiations in a follow-up post.




20 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
the cheese heads voted the union busting assholes in so,be careful who you vote for.recall the sonofabitchs ans start the petetion for a recall vote by the people.what a fucking prick .a fucking american dictator who would of thought in wis of all the places.
Thanks David. From the Bay View Massacre link.
If there is repression in Madison, follow the money.
They did not feel it would make a difference. they had a democrat there that they voted out who now works for Walker. They were really pissed at Obama. Actually, this is a good thing. It could not have happened in a better place. They are progressive there and they are standing up and learning the truth about republicans now, but there are places in the rural areas that has nothing but corporate media. They have to wait another 10 months to recall him, but they can recall the congress immediately.
This is crazy:
Yeah well no shit and the reason you have to go through process is because the Unions have protected worker’s rights.
When they mentioned the busses bringing in the teaparty group, and an estimate needed clarification, a thought came to mind.
After working on tour busses during the summer to supplement my teaching salary and support my family we could get a rough estimate.
The busses carry 47 to 53 passengers, count the busses. Of course some teaparty members would drive so that would foul up the numbers to some degree.
Next, check out the bus and where it originated from. This will be the ICC identification number on the side luggage compartment in most cases.
Start a conversation with the bus driver, he may be ready to talk considering the message the teaparty leader is giving the members upon arrival at their destination. That person would have a microphone up front near the driver so he would hear the entire conversation/directions given out.
Just a thought on how we could really estimate and get an idea of sponsors, where from, and directions given.
Are the bus drivers union? If not, why not.
Why the surprise about Walker? He has always been like this politically according to the net. Voters didn’t know what they were electing? Welcome to democracy. Majority of Canadians despise Harper, but won’t get off their asses to vote him out.
That NYTimes piece gives the last word to a moron: “I know there was a point for unions back in the day because people were being abused,” she said. “But now there’s workers’ rights; there’s laws that protect us.”
Naturally there’s not a single mention of tax cuts being at all responsible for shortfalls.
What’s happening in Wisconsion is the long time dream of the John Birchers of the Bradley family of Milwaukee. Lee Fang provides valuable background.
The bus company I worked for was non-union. It was a family owned operation going back 50 years. The drivers were not happy a lot of the time and from time to time had to give mileage “give backs” so the family could buy new Lincolns, Mercedes, etc.
It is truly amazing that the “man in the street”, gleaned from the comments in the Milwaukee Journal is repeating the mantra of Public employees getting too much recompense for their labours but what they should be bitching about is the fact that they are not getting a living wage, they should have unions representing them so that they may attain the same pay and benefit scales as the public employees.
Why the hell aren’t people saying “Hell where is our health care?”.
Damn that is really surprising!
In the A.G. Sulzberger piece you cited, dressed as a “news” item rather than an opinion piece, the lede is that Wisconsites are emotional and resentful of business closures and the state’s politics are “polarized”, as if that description said anything about why that might be. So it’s emotional, vulnerable workers acting out like children in the face of rational public officials trying their best to manage a strained economy.
He interviews non-union workers who talk about shared sacrifice, ignoring that unions have already offered concessions, but simply aren’t willing to cut off their right to bargain collectively, which is one of the few things keeping labor afloat and is why Walker and his patrons have specifically targeted it.
He also quotes non-union workers as resentful that they can’t collectively bargain for better conditions. Somehow, I think the answer to that lies in extending that right rather than in curtailing it.
Lastly, he suggests that the economy and working conditions are not as bad in Wisconsin as they are elsewhere. The implication is that strident opposition to Walker’s “reforms” is a storm in a teacup. A.G. never seems to wonder why those conditions might be better in Wisconsin than elsewhere, or how adopting Walker’s reforms might change that for the worse.
Sulzberger’s analysis is about as deep as looking at a dead body and saying it’s dead because its heart has stopped. That would be true in all cases, but says nothing about why this person died. So it is with his failure adequately or accurately to analyze why Wisconsites are in such a furor against their governor, and why they should be. His argument, supported by co-writer Monica Davey, really sounds like a warm-up for the NYT’s description of Mr. Obama’s budget choices, soon to be released.
Bravo, dday for reciting this history. And you’re right about the NYT Sulzberger article. It was a vicious effort to pit victims against victims.
Agreed. Sulzberger is either clueless or vicious, or both.
Bravo Larson! Keep repeating it “They want to pit the middle class against each other.” Simple, succinct, and to the point.
Your language shows your intelligence level and limitations of having a serious conversation about anything.
Everyone knows the Unions need to regroup and become more open to what the economy and the public can and will tolerate. Unions put money (raised by their members) and what they consider their political muscle behind certain political view and persons, not even asking their members is this is what they want, so to make them have to be voted on yearly would be a plus for members who are unhappy with the way things are ran now.
With all the laws and ACLU much of the reasons unions were good back in the day is obselete now, so to loose collective bargaining on benefits and work hours should be on the table.
I understand that other issues the Unions handle, such as scheduled raises for employees who may or may not deserve a raise, are not even on the table.
Agree this whole issue pits working class people against each other.
Are we all overlooking the fact that 14 elected officials took off out of state, instead of staying and debating the issues? Yes I know they are outnumbered, but wasn’t it the other way around before the People of Wisconsin voted.
Those elected officials choose to do the work of the people and if you or I took off from our jobs the least we would get is a reprimand if not fired, and we definately would not be getting paid for setting in a motel room out of state so that we would not have to do our jobs.
Problem now days is the politicians get us the taxpayers to blame each other for the state of things, when the real blame is on our elected officials. They want to make us dependant on their handouts, like an infant is on their mother for food, clothing and comfort, then they make back room deals to benefit their paychecks and to secure their jobs, but when it comes to actually protecting our paycheck and securing our jobs or homes they put on a good show, but we are not really their priority.
This is why we need all new blood and no political affiliations, and we all need to be informed voters, not just go with the flow.
Nice try on the framing there, but those Dems are filibustering with their feet; which is representing their constituents, not just blithely doing the will of the Governor, who btw didn’t campaign on busting unions. And filibustering is somehow ok when Republicans do it.
You are aware that the Unions have agreed to the budget piece of the bill, right?
The right for people to make free associations is in the US Constitution, and while you may not like it, lots of us would rather bargain collectively than beg alone.
Taking off so you don’t have to do your job is not right whether you are Republican, Democrat or any person or affiliation.
Collective bargaining is basically your way of not facing your boss and asking for the pay you deserve based on your performance and increased value you have given to the company, is this what you are telling me?
Your right the right for people to make FREE associations is in the US Constitution, Unions are not FREE as you probably know by the dues that are held out of your check or you pay directly. And you also have the right to let other people tell you what political issues you stand for instead of standing on your own.
Sounds like you someone else to make your life easier by making these decisions for you and you pay them.
I could be all wrong, and if I am I do appologize.