Here’s a fascinating admission by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. And that ABC News is reporting on it is all the more fascinating.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made it clear today that she is worried the United States is losing what she calls the “information war” abroad.
China and Russia, she says, have started English-language networks that push their message overseas and even the Taliban controls the airwaves in Afghanistan.
And in the Arab world? Al Jazeera is king, and Clinton says she can see why.
“Al Jazeera has been the leader in that are literally changing people’s minds and attitudes. And like it or hate it, it is really effective,” she said.
“In fact viewership of al Jazeera is going up in the United States because it’s real news. You may not agree with it, but you feel like you’re getting real news around the clock instead of a million commercials and, you know, arguments between talking heads and the kind of stuff that we do on our news which, you know, is not particularly informative to us, let alone foreigners,” she added.
I’d rather not get into the idea of an “information war,” and this implication that we need better propaganda outlets stationed around the world. But on the core point here, how can you argue with Clinton? Al Jazeera has run circles around every competitor since the beginning of the Arab uprising. They probably did so well before that, too, it’s just that they were so invisible in the US. But they provide “real news,” as Clinton said.
I happened to be on Al Jazeera one time. The lineup went like this: protests in Yemen, protests in Iran, protests in Bahrain, me talking about the Obama budget. I wanted to say “can you just skip me?” The segment was fine and the interviewer was knowledgeable on the subject, but I felt like the broadcast was doing pretty well without me. They have the kind of foreign news bureaus and deep coverage that used to characterize US media, and they don’t resort to some dude talking about some subject from a comfortable studio, like, you know, me.
Al Jazeera is changing the way Muslims view the world, and it ought to change the way news is produced. But in this corporate media environment, it probably won’t. In fact, there’s a concerted effort to keep Al Jazeera English off of American television, perhaps so that nobody gets any ideas about how news can be delivered.
AJE gets a half-hour on KCET (the former public television channel) in Los Angeles every night. They used to have BBC News in that spot. I think that’s telling.



8 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
wow, i think the most fascinating part is she almost admitted that our cable news channels are NOT news.
She can be quite candid, which was a pleasant surprise to me. For example, she said there’s too much money involved in the drug trade to make it legal. And she also objected to TSA’s euphemistically called “pat-downs“, saying she wouldn’t want to go through one if she could avoid it.
In fact viewership of al Jazeera is going up in the United States because it’s real news
There’s the money quote. That’s why so many of us have been streaming Jazeera on computer the last few weeks – especially when we turn on the alleged “news networks” and find discussion about, oh, Charlie Sheen, or Lindsay Lohan, or some local crime that involves a blond young white woman.
Sigh.
Meanwhile, back in WIsconsin:
“The Wisconsin State Senate has approved a resolution that would set a deadline of 4:00 p.m. Thursday for Wisconsin’s 14 Democratic state senators to return to Senate chambers.
“If they do not, they would be held guilty in contempt of the Senate.”
LINK.
Note that A Jazeera (Arabic) and Al Jazeera English do not broadcast the same content. While AJE has been getting high marks for its coverage of the middle east/north african uprisings, some have faulted AJ Arabic for playing favorites, reporting on some revolutions from the point of view of the streets, siding with the reigning powers in others.
She also said about six months ago that the rich aren’t paying their fair share in this country and should be paying more in taxes — a risky statement at the time since by law the Sec. of State is supposed to stay out of domestic issues.
She also told Republican troglodyte congressmen during her confirmation hearings that women’s rights and the right to family planning and abortion would always be a necesary and integral part of American foreign policy under her watch.
Yes, she can be very plain-spoken.
But no surprise she doesnt see our media as real news, since they mostly only comment on her voice sounding like a woman telling a man to take out the garbage, or how she looks like everyone’s first wife, or her cleavage, or her cankles or her hairstyles or even sell in their airport shops her image as a nutcracker doll, while they argue that she makes men cross their legs in fear of castration or call her a bunny boiler and suggest she be drowned in a bathtub or that a superdelegate take her into a darkened room and only he come out or create magazine covers about the voices in her head suggesting she’s the madwoman in the attic, or photoshop her into dominatrix gear.
Gee, why would someone who’d been subjected to that for 20 years think our news outlets actually write the news?
It’s a surprise to you that she can be so plain spoken because her actual words are so seldom reported — instead, what we get is all that other garbage.
Thnx, dandelion.
And the Senate deserves contempt.