I don’t usually make a blog post out of “did you see what was on Jon Stewart last night,” but his show last night was so rare and important, I’ll make an exception.
The subject was Wisconsin, but Stewart boiled it down to an attack against teachers. Really this was a commentary on his favorite targets in the media, Fox News and Fox Business. But this perspective is so ingrained, the show almost looked like it came from a foreign country. Stewart showed multiple takes of news anchors appalled at the $50,000 a year base salary for teachers, plus benefits, as irresponsibly generous, and then the same anchors downplaying $250,000 a year as not actually rich, when in the context of the Bush tax cuts. He showed reporters decrying any effort to strip bonuses of bailed-out Wall Street executives as a violation of the sanctity of contracts, then the same reporters hopeful that union contracts will be torched and set ablaze.
But it was the interview segment with Diane Ravitch that was even more impressive. The typical Bill Gates/Arne Duncan perspective of privatization and union-busting is so prevalent on American television, critics like Ravitch never get an opportunity. She rightly points out that Finland, held up as a model in movies like Waiting for Superman as having the best schools in the world, have no charter schools, offer no standardized testing, and have 100% teacher’s unions. She points out that it’s poverty more than anything which is the greatest indicator of a successful classroom.
At this point, Stewart talked about how teachers have become such an inviting target, and how it angers him. Then it came out – his mother was a teacher. Mine too. The same is true for millions of people across the country. “God forbid you do the job of a teacher for a year,” Stewart said, growing a little angry. “It will blow your mind. My mother was a teacher for years, she worked in the education field, she’s still in the education field. I couldn’t be more impressed by what she did in her life. Those people have no idea. And yet that’s the conversation.” There are a lot of people with this perspective, I would argue, who see these attacks on teachers as baseless attacks on their own family. But we almost never hear from them.
I don’t think this will have the same impact as, say, the 9-11 health care show that Stewart did. But it ought to. There’s no balance in the media to the debate over education. It’s all pushed by wealthy interests who either have no clue what teachers do and therefore try to run schools like a business, or just want the profits that could be gained by for-profit charter schools. And as Diane Ravitch says, it’s a bipartisan problem. But there’s another side to the debate, and Jon Stewart presented it last night. Let’s hope the high-profile media moguls who hang on his every word were watching.




29 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Stewart is all too often infected with the “you go I go” virus, but when he actually digs into an issue — as he has with this one — he can be the best journalist on TV.
Does the USA really have an Education Problem?
Fact
“Our young people are supposed to be the hope of the future, but most of them are up to their eyeballs in student loan debt. Americans now owe more than $875 billion on student loans, which is more than the total amount that Americans owe on their credit cards.”
the USA has the most college educated un-employed people on the planet Earth.
the USA has a JOB problem, that people like Bill Gates help create. China and India are not part of the USA Bill Gates.
Fact
Some of the people that have been hit the hardest by all this have been children. According to one recent study, approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 – the highest rate in 20 years.
Guess who is on the front line of this problem? Yes Teachers.
Ask a teacher how the future looks, we know Wall Street can’t tell us how the next hour is going to go, we know this because USA taxpayers bail them out to the tune of 13 trillion dollars
thank you Jon Stewart
Thank you for posting David.
Trolling happens…especially when the point is acute.
you called this one David – I no more finished watching this – and there was MSNBC’s banner: Why Blame Teachers ?? clicking over to CNN – yep, Blame The Teachers ??
I did watch. Had a good laugh with his comparison of TBTF and Teachers and how long they both work each year.
The one thing I wish he had done was show what each does during the day. A romper room full of kids versus a dude sitting in front of a PC all day would hit home.
Per others DDay, bullseye.
The Koch’s and the other MOTU want to export U.S. jobs. It’s easier to do that if our educational system lags. I wish they’d consider the other side of the equation, how we’re gonna afford to import all that crap, but that’s clearly asking them to do something approximating consciousness.
You saved Jane an email about the abolitionist, David Walker.
UVa acquires rare anti-slavery booklet
The slave-owners had laws against educating slaves. I’m searching for some efficient way to link the Koch’s with 19th century slave-owners denying their slaves access to education.
The EU = nearly free education
The US = more student debt than credit card debt (and a lot of that credit card debt is student debt).
Meanwhile the folks with the best schools in the world, have no charter schools, offer no standardized testing, and have 100% teacher’s unions.
Finland speaks a variation of Hungarian – I wonder if that is key – or perhaps the cold stimulates the brain – or not being multi-cultural – or being one “one race” (ignoring fact that the concept of race is not scientific – you can not define a race in scientific terms – indeed DNA does kill the concept – albeit there is inbreeding effects, seen in DNA of course, that might be called geographical or location of grandparents that medical folks check for). The right wing will find other answers for the good educational achievement results because they can’t say unions help in getting a good education.
Recall efforts have now been launched against 14 state senators – all eight Republicans and six Democrats.
Thanks to Gov. Walker, Dems have a good shot to take back the state senate.
Hope you don’t mind my changes. I believe that this is a more accurate assessment. In my conversations with Republican voters, one & all, they simply don’t give a sh*t about how kids are educated (or not) in this nation anymore. “Let them eat cake” is their very very narrow & short-sighted attitude.
Conservatives often believe that education should be privatized so that ONLY those with kids should *have* to pay for education. And those without kids can go *scott free.* They have been carefully brainwashed to believe that education is merely something for the kid being educated and *in no way* enures to the benefit of the good of society and the nation as a whole.
Selfish narcissism on steroids the the conservative way…
Please DO SO! I think you are getting to the heart of the issue here. Thanks for that.
Excellent news!
Power to the People!!
School funding should be based on cost of living not local districts ability to pay. Charter Schools don’t improve squat Bill Gates should be ashamed after all aren’t charter schools just a tax dodge?
http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/05/10/wall-street-hearts-charter-schools-gets-rich-off-them/
Double your money in 7 years just how rich is Bill Gates really if he feels he needs to, is desperate enough for cash to con kids into sub standard Charter Schools?
I take it the next version of Windows is going to suck? I take it that China, Russia etc won’t do a thing to stop pirate copies of Windows from going out on the market?
I take it free trade hurts software patent and idea guys the most and Thomas Friedman is wrong about Globalization producing jobs. America can’t move to more brain type jobs and away from making stuff if people steal and copy our ideas.
Destruction of the public school system has been a core plank in the religious right agenda since the early days of Paul Weyrich and the push to control school boards and curricula in the seventies onward. They have actually been quite successful in dismantling what was once the envy of the world. Public schools have been called “government schools”: here in the red state south for years. . The MOTU with their Randian Libertarian insanity are certainly on board. There is no doubt this is the prime target for the governor in Wisconsin. And just now I saw a clip of Rand Paul blathering about there being no need for the Department of Education., an agenda item of a number of Republican candidates for office.
Teachers and government workers in general certainly need defending But we mus focus on the conscious aim of the conservatives; the destruction of the public schools. The whole conservative coalition is the enemy in this caes. That is where the focus needs to be.
The latest from Wisconsin.
If you enjoyed Diane Ravitch last night, you’ll enjoy her letter published in a WaPo blog this week:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/diane-ravitch/ravitch-a-moment-of-national-i.html
It truly is a moment of national insanity. Sadly, that moment has endured for 30 years. Perhaps the protests in Madison and elsewhere will be the beginning of the end.
Appreciated.
The whole tendency to focus student achievement entirely on teachers is somewhat misplaced. Of course a teacher’s performance is important, but other factors have been found to predominate.
The Coleman Report, authorized as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is widely considered the most important education study of the 20th century. Hopkins sociologist James S. Coleman published the 1966 report Equality of Educational Opportunity–a conclusion that would help set in motion the mass busing of students to achieve racial balance in public schools.
Using data from over 600,000 students and teachers across the country, the researchers found that academic achievement was less related to the quality of a student’s school, and more related to the social composition of the school, the student’s sense of control of his environment and future, the verbal skills of teachers, and the student’s family background.
http://www.jhu.edu/jhumag/0400web/18.html
The Coleman report led to school busing as a means to improve the school social composition and increased teacher training, but of course nothing could be done about family disintegration and poverty as educational issues.
Recent papers by others have found that levels of segregation are nearly as high today as they were in 1966, and although Black-White achievement gaps are smaller today than they were in 1966, they remain substantial. Inequalities in student achievement within schools are explained in part by teachers’ biases favoring middle-class students and by schools’ greater reliance on academic and nonacademic tracking.
http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/news/coverstories/coleman_report_40_years.php
I respect and have no challenges to those studies. Any mother can tell you that a child learns best in an environment of respect and trust. And having watched this play out in the south I have no disagreement of the racial components as well as the state today.
I also see the pervasive promotion and celebration of competition over collaboration has wreaked more damage to our educational system than any other segment of the culture.
Note-worthy to remember that infamous remark by the average Republican father, “I sent my Republican/conservative son to college and four years later he came home a confirmed Democrat/flaming liberal.” Forget the miserable pay of the average teacher. The average teacher is a dangerous Socialist and therefore is a member of a lower form of humanity and paying him/her a wage commensurate with his/her education and grueling job would be unforgivable.
A local school district can only afford to do so much, said Thomas Murphy, spokesman for the state Department of Education. While he does find a relationship between resources and performance, those resources are not always financial, Murphy said. “What people do not include in the equation are the resources in the home, for example parents with a high school or college education, parents who speak and read English, books in the home, the Internet, time and money to travel, to go to museums and theater, and to pay for preschool, music, sports or other private lessons.”
Those factors might explain why nearby school districts with comparable demographics show wide variations in things like graduation rate, average SAT scores and the percentage of students meeting the state goal in several subject areas.
http://www.greenwichtime.com/default/article/Little-correlation-found-between-per-pupil-823954.php
Terrific stuff, thanks for the links.
Yes. That’s why the conservatives have taken on the destruction of really any public institution that has a (small s) socializing influence. These people have an anti-social agenda. They strive to fulfill Rand’s agenda of normalizing sociopathy. . Our culture has been amazingly compliant.
re: competition over collaboration
Yes, I’ve encountered that argument before. Once, when my kids were young, I was involved in school district happenings. In that district the superintendent was dead-against tracking. Now my kids (of course) were bright and I kind of favored academic tracking, and there was some in the district. But the super was against because he felt that stigmatizing slow, or different, learners was on balance much worse than the boost it gave to the ones who could “fit in” to the system, you might say.
Later on, because I have an interest in military imperialism, I ran into (on the web) an organization in San Diego which believed that competition was the basis for imperialism, and actually they believed that competition IS imperialism. Leads to bullying, for one example, which is currently a problem. I can’t locate the name of the organization.
You’re welcome. In American education, the Coleman Report rules!
I can even remember my own experience. I was bright and often frustrated at what little reward it brought socially. But the teachers were effective in how they handled it and I grew up feeling being quick was as much responsibility as an asset that certainly had its personal rewards.
I agree completely with your observations regarding its relation to imperialism. It is also deadly to the capacity for close relationships.
The better teachers are always competing with the TV cartels for young hearts and minds, and TV always prevails. If formal and compulsory education were banned, we’d lose a convenient and important babysitting service, but not much else. If commercial TV were banned, we’d gain immeasurably in everything but GNP.
the AB comparison of assholes anchors railing against 50,000 per year workers against whining about the poverty of 250,000 per year jobs should be shown all day a couple days per week. They arent hypocrites, they just dont believe working class people need more than a shed to sleep in and a blanket on the ground to lay on. The more people really internalize this reality the better.
I have heard her a couple of times on progressive radio shows and she says that Obamas’ education plan is like Bushs’ no child left behind on steroids. I was disappointed she was not more forceful on that issue on John’s show.
Finland had a set-to, at one time, with native people within its borders, to wit, Laplanders. As I heard the story told, by a second generation Finish American, the Finish governmment once required that all Lap children go to Finish schools, that they refrain from speaking Laplander or wearing their hair in the traditional style (long for men) or wearing their usual clothing. The drop out rate for Lap children was quite higih and they were thought to be disruptive in the classroom.
In short, not all the children was learning. So the government changed its policy: Attendance became optional. Lap children were allowed to speak Lap. They could wear traditional clothing and hair styles, if they chose. In short order, 100% of Lap children were enrolled in Finish schools. They did well in their school work, graduated along with Finish children and then elected whether to a) Live a traditional Laplander life or b) assimilate into Finnish society.
If this version of events in Finland is true, it is evidence for the proposition that, if you really want to provide education for people, you can do it. (Superman, my ass.)