Scott Walker has lost the thread in Wisconsin. This documenting of 20 lies he’s told in the past couple weeks is going viral. A new poll from a conservative-leaning think tank in Wisconsin shows that voters want Walker to compromise by a 2-1 margin. Commentators from across the political spectrum have come to the conclusion that Walker is sunk, and not just in the near term.
Should Gov. Walker accomplish his goal, he will have stoked a level of union anger that I very much suspect will become a key driver in an Obama victory in 2012. He will also have prompted the nation’s unions to work together for a common objective– a feat that would have seemed impossible just one month ago.
If Walker loses his fight, he will have reminded the unions of the importance of fighting back against their enemies, reminding them of how life was for their forbearers who fought to establish the modern union movement. This will ignite the passion for battle while reminding those union folks who have been voting republican of the importance of sticking with the party that sticks with them.
There’s no question about this, to the extent that even the traditional media has begun to pick up on it. America’s last living labor reporter for a major newspaper, Steven Greenhouse, gathered a bunch of quotes from labor leaders, eager to turn this moment into a movement. And importantly, they’re working on converting anger and protest into traditional organizing:
At the A.F.L.-C.I.O.’s winter meeting in Washington last week, labor leaders were laying plans to enlist some of the thousands of union members who have protested in Madison; Indianapolis; Columbus, Ohio; and elsewhere to work in the campaign by the Communications Workers of America to unionize 20,000 T-Mobile workers.
Similarly, union leaders want to harness some of this activism as well as the newfound cooperation between private sector and public sector unions to get hundreds of organizers to help unionize 45,000 airport security employees.
And the Service Employees International Union is seeking to channel the spirit and energy of Wisconsin into its immense new campaign in 15 cities, including Chicago, Detroit and Houston, to unionize tens of thousands of low-wage private sector workers as well as to get them to fight foreclosures and budget cuts. Mary Kay Henry, the S.E.I.U.’s president, said she hoped the protests in Wisconsin and Ohio would give a particular lift to her union’s efforts in Milwaukee and Cleveland.
This new movement obviously will have an electoral component – it’s easier for a broader group of people to participate in that – but I’d argue that the organizing component is that much more important. We’ve seen in Wisconsin the power of solidarity, and the near-universal recognition of fundamental collective bargaining rights. Unions have been pushed back to the point of near-irrelevance over the last 50 years, as Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson have demonstrated, and the best way to capitalize on this moment is to increase their ranks, at a time when workers could be more favorable to such organizing. Unions in this fight are expressing a broader desire for a voice for the middle class, a rebalancing of the US economy, an end to the pillage of the worker by elites and rampant income inequality. This needs to translate into tangible gains. As Hacker and Pierson write, “labor continues to be the only large-scale membership organization consistently representing Americans of moderate means on pocketbook matters.”
The best story about the revival of labor after Wisconsin comes from Mike Elk, who also recognizes that organized labor has a more favorable image than it has in decades as a result of this battle, particularly among the young. Labor has become a symbol of a new voice for everyday people. But it has to expand beyond these rearguard actions.
Among many young people, the most popular profile image on Facebook has been a map of Wisconsin overlaid with a solidarity fist; some have gone so far as to tattoo the symbol on their bodies, a symbol of their lifelong commitment to the labor movement. At night, you can spot veteran union organizers in the state Capitol sharing stories about workplace struggles with students who a week before had never considered being involved in a labor struggle.
But the surge of pro-union support and activity pales in comparison to that of previous decades: Around the height of the labor movement in 1952, 33 percent of the workforce was unionized and there were 470 major strikes involving 1,000 workers or more. In 2010, only 12 percent of the workforce unionized, and there were only 11 major strikes involving 1,000 workers or more.
While polls showing that young people — the bellwether for the future of the labor movement — are more supportive of organized labor than they were just a few months ago, the real question will be whether organized labor can use the current momentum to create sustainable alliances among young people who have grown up largely without the presence of a vibrant labor movement. Win or lose, the battle in Wisconsin has started the ignition.
And this has to happen on two tracks – not just deposing anti-union politicians, but organizing workplaces to expand membership. Rates of unionization will be the best place to look to see if this revival is real.




52 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Some great links DD. Thank you.
A lot of people may not realize there are plenty of opportunities for people to get involved, even if they are not in a union or working where a union is trying to build support. Comprehensive campaigns have all sorts of roles for activists, both on line and off, and a surge of activism may make them more likely and effective.
the labor movement biggest problem the last couple of decades has been the lack of friends in the WH.
Is Obama really a friend of labor.
Obama is doing a NAFTA type of Deal with Korea
Obama supported Blanche Lincoln, a Union hater
Unions are going to have to elect some Senators in 2012, that are UNION friendly!
Unions, Progressives, 70% of real dems, want a real Dem to run for president in 2012.
Unions support for OBAMA will be cold at best.
What pisses me off (but shouldn’t) is that Obama will be repaid so handsomely by newly reinvigorated unions. In return for his nearly non-existent support, they’ll wear themselves out for him next year. Talk about your “unearned benefits.”
THis is scheduled for the 12th. Sure hope it materializes.
Thousands of Farmers to Descend on WI Capitol with Their Tractors
LINK.
Gee how many more elections do we need to have with fake promises that are quickly stuffed into the dustbin of history before the people realize it is all a sham. We do not have two parties we have one party that works for the benefit of the MIC against the people.
Even if we could elect a POTUS for the people the current system will make sure s/he will be able to achieve nothing. It is corrupt to the core, it works for the MIC and a few voices will not change that. I think it is time we asked: What is the purpose of the vote? is it achieving its purpose? can it in this system ever achieve its purpose? and if so how long will it take and how many more will be destroyed before we get there? I think the answer if pretty clear the current system which is not a democracy needs to go, the power given to the banking cartel needs to end, and I know if we move toward this we will see our own govt use force against the people to maintain control and power
Unless this translates into unionizing in the services sector–e.g. organizing Walmart and the IT industry–it isn’t going to keep up with changes in the U.S. and world economy.
A smidgen of class consciousness has entered the zeitgeist. It acts like yeast. American workers are learning from Egypt and the Wisconsin Teachers Union. There is no way this is good news for Obama. He needs people to be frightened and alone. Excellent report David.
The bottom line issue is this – there is not enough money to pay everyone feeding from the public trough. It is truly only a “union issue” because a large number of the folks lined up at the same trough are in the union (nebulous term). In time likes these someone has to compromise and that is definitely not a functional character trait of a government union.
Government workers, pouring money into the campaigns of politicans, who in turn give and give to government workers, who in turn give to ploitical campaigns…yada – yada…whose funding ultimately comes from the taxpayer (whom neither side cares about). Once they’ve sucked all the blood out the tax payer, the only option they’ll have left is to print their own money.
Oh wait…they’re already doing that too. Nevermind – we’re all screwed in the end anyway, give ‘em whatever they want.
The pigs at the trough are the Wall Street bankers and the war profiteers. Not to mention the health insurance companies, big pharma, oil companies, big agra and all the other corporate welfare pigs.
If the public workers unions are at the trough they are ants picking at the left overs.
I think you have been listening to bull shit and mistaking it for gospel.
Gov. Walker–Put down the gun. Your little hostage-taking game is over.
The adults are showing up and you are going to be punished. First we will take away your “privilege” of majority rule in the state senate. In the foreseeable future, you will be sent home.
You will have a lot of time to reflect on your attempt to hurt the people you were elected to represent.
I’ve got some bad news, it’s the middle class taxpayer, those very people you disparage as “feeding at the public trough” who are supporting enormous tax breaks and subsidies for banks, oil companies, pharmaceuticals, insurance companies and other corporate interests who nakedly bribe politicians through PACs and lobbyists. Wake up. The vampire on the neck of this country are the corporations, the middle class taxpayer is the life blood being drained away, not vice versa.
Ok, so if the above is true why am I reading the following in the WSJ:
If the Democrats return without a 100% assurance they have peeled off a couple Republicans to vote against this how is it anything other than yet another sellout of labor by the Democratic Party?
Not that this isn’t exactly what I expected all along…
Ya know, if you believe anything that Newscorp puts out, I see no point in trying to disabuse you of the idea.
I was just coming in to cut-n-paste the following quote to make the same point.
It pisses me off no end that this will benefit Obama, who hates unions only slightly less than Walker does.
One of the interesting bits of information from the rally yesterday (thanks for streaming video) was what is going on the the UW system. Not just TAs but faculty are beginning to have elections to vote for a union as their collective bargaining units. (Or at least that was what I got from the TAA’s rep’s report). And not just in Madison, but in Milwaukee, Stevens Point, and Stout–with the beginning of interest in Green Bay.
I have maintained for some time that the future organizing strength for unions is on the information plantation, currently a haven for libertarian types. The message is clear. That white collar and “exempt” status notwithstanding, unless you are in the CEOs chair or the executive suite, you are labor and will be treated so. That is, you are outside the circle of crony patronage.
Keep in mind, Scott Walker is following the credo of his next-door neighbor who left Minnesota’s budget in shambles: T-Paw.
It really depends on the Congress that they wear themselves out electing. Congress, even members of his own party, can push a president around. He does not get a free pass if the Congress that is elected is dramatically more progressive than he is. Of course, there’s the Senate.
Can we start a “Draft Russ Feingold” campaign? He has appeal to liberals, progressives and libertarians.
“a key driver in an Obama victory in 2012″
Is this supposed to be a good thing? If he continues on his present course, it doesn’t make a damn bit of difference.
I’d like to thank FDL for the excellent, in depth coverage of this issue, something sorely lacking in the corporate media.
He’s actually being coached by Mitch Daniels although he aims to repeat T-Paw’s success and I bet run for the presidency. What a success story–a high school education and running for the presidency!–that’s what Scott Walker’s dreams are made of no doubt.
How delicious for Walker, Kasich and the Kochs if exposing their wars on labor, the middle class, the environment and representative government were to enhance reforms and union membership. Revenge may be a dish best served cold, but crow can be eaten hot or cold.
and just think of all the new groups of workers who now know more about unions and may work to gain one at their workplace. Adjunct Instructors at colleges, for example
Good to know you support child-labor.
Apple Reveals Chinese Child Labor at Suppliers
With more people like you, the U.S. can repeal child-labor laws in a few years.
Bullseye.
Yep, and Murdoch just got permission to by BSkyB, a UK television broadcaster likely to generate half the industry’s revenue over the next ten years, enhancing his cash and global reach.
Wisconsin Guardsmen alerted about possible mobilization to Kosovo
Only 160-soldier deployment, but this might diminish Gov. Dropout’s ability to use the WI National Guard as scab labor in the eyes of the state prison guards’ union.
The post you replied to reads like a Murdoch puppet. It confuses the symbiotic relationship the middle class wants with government, whose taxes it pays the largest share of, with the parasitic relationship the non-taxpaying corporate and wealth elite of this country are now enjoying. They are the ones living off the slogan of all for me, none for thee, not the firefighters, teachers, librarians, county clerks, police, road crews, university lecturers, town hall and courthouse administrators, and farm laborers.
I’ll bet that commentator read the joke put up here last week and thought, “Yea, watch out!” Paraphrasing:
- A CEO, a union guy and a Staples clerk sit round a table with a plate of twelve cookies and pitcher of milk.
- The CEO pops eleven cookies into his mouth and downs all the milk. He points to the union guy and says to the clerk:
- “Watch out; that guy wants to steal your cookie.”
Did Murdoch agree to Sky news being not part of the deal – limiting him to his current 39.1% ownership? Did he up the offer from the 700p to the 800p demanded?
With his similar minority interest in the US’s DirectTV, plus the other sat operations, he is becoming the only editor of the news in many places – all this power and only worth $6 billion – curious that mainland China bans him in most areas – curious that “western” regulators see no problem – ever.
By the way, you mentioned on another thread “the most elite institutions are the staunchest defenders of legacy admissions, which further limit access and upward mobility. The odds of equally talented students gaining admission to Harvard, where one is from a single-parent family in white Appalachia and the other is a double legacy whose parents live in Sudbury, MA, are quite different.” I do agree with you – but I live in the area and for 2!!!! legacy parents would have chosen Wellesley or Weston – just curious as to why Sudbury?
No kidding. If this really did happen, the Wisconsin State Journal — which backed Walker last November but now regrets doing so — would have had it splashed all over their website. Instead, nothing.
Yup.
Ironic, isn’t it? Obama hasn’t lifted his pinky for labor and has provided no support for the Wisconsin demonstrators, other than some wishy-washy words. He doesn’t deserve any consideration from unions in 2012. Wisconsin Democrats are another story. They have shown that they have fight in them, and whose side they are on.
Anyone who hasn’t seen or read Michael Moore’s speech in Madison should head over to The Huffington Post and check it out. Spectacular.
Nifty chart which shows how tax breaks for the wealthy/super-wealthy result in cuts for the rest of us since we get to pay for those tax breaks. And these are just tax breaks, not all the other things we get to pay for.
And sure enough, it’s been shot down. And again here.
…”sticking with the Party that sticks
withthem”….. there, fixed for ya.He’s heading towards Marie antionette territory and you know how that went.
Fing scumbags..
I forgot to capitalize the a in antionette oh dear. sw little man, little mind, little dick. Not much there there.
You’re reading that because the WSJ is not a good paper, and the Senate Dems have already said publicly that the report is wrong.
http://www.facebook.com/VoteChrisLarson/posts/204685202875073
From Chris Larson’s response to the Murdoch Journal’s working to cause disruption and dismay:
“…how is it anything other than yet another sellout of labor by the Democratic Party?”
Nailed it. All we have seen from the democrats so far is action based in a local political expediency. I have seen nothing that suggests a return to core values by the national party.
Expect promises galore in the run up to 2012 to try and gain the support of big labor but there will be nothing by way of meaningful action.
Actually, expect a battle between Obama and the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party that is sick and tired of his thinking and acting only of himself, and his hijacking the party apparatus for his own ends. The first shots are about to be fired:
This is why while individual Dems have been supportive — Keith Ellison’s been sending pizzas to the protesters and appearing on MSNBC talking them up, and Mark Dayton’s made appearances in Wisconsin on their behalf — the party as a whole has been unconscionably silent.
Interesting diary, David.
The headline is quite misleading, however. All the organizing initiatives you mentioned were underway before Wisconsin, and some of the campaigns have even been going on for years. If Wisconsin can inject some new energy into these campaigns, that’s great, but they are not new nor do they have any direct relation to Wisconsin.
Exellent column today on the history of the labor movement:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/03/07/whos_to_blame_for_union_woes_109129.html
Ahem. Nice try, Rafe. RCP is a GOP shop that’s nearly as blatant and sleazy as Breitbart himself.
Well, it’s a column, all right, but it is not excellent. Barone is a union-hater from way back, aside from being a generally obnoxious right-wing hack.
from wikipedia:
Sing a song of sixpence,
A pocket full of rye.
Four and twenty blackbirds,
Baked in a pie.
When the pie was opened,
The birds began to sing;
Wasn’t that a dainty dish,
To set before the king?
The king was in his counting house,
Counting out his money;
The queen was in the parlour,
Eating bread and honey.
The maid was in the garden,
Hanging out the clothes;
When down came a blackbird
And pecked off her nose.
The final line of the fourth verse is sometimes slightly varied, with nose pecked or nipped off. One of the following additional verses is often added to moderate the ending:
They send for the king’s doctor,
who sewed it on again;
He sewed it on so neatly,
the seam was never seen.
or:
There was such a commotion,
that little Jenny wren;
Flew down into the garden,
and put it back again.
Hear hear.
This is fucking unconscionable ~ electoral politics gone absolutely mad.
I am *almost* speechless.
All activists need to know about this. Will anyone at HQ quit?
“..you support child labor..”
wtf?
How did you get there from what I wrote?
Yo Marg – take a pill.
Just because I stated that the workers are feeding at the government trough does not mean that I believe they are the ONLY ones feeding at the trough. Personally I think the the trough should be destroyed and people (and corporations) should fend for themselves.
The government was never intended to be our daddy, our nanny, our primary means of employment, our doctor, our lawyer, our god, etc. It has been utterly corrupted and in need of some serious reduction in scope.
You should drop the class warfare crapola – it only works in France…and not so well.
Since you’re a commonman, there is certainly a trough from which you feed. And a bit of your feed comes from the government, whether you like it or not.