Michelle Rhee, the former DC schools chief, has a perception of being results-oriented. She doesn’t have personal animus toward teacher’s unions, she just feels that the best way to improve learning for students is to engage in policies that allow her to elevate the best teachers and fire the worst. The rights of the student come first. It’s all about results.
So it’s very revealing to see this story in USA Today, hinting that the high performances in the classrooms Rhee oversaw may have been altered:
In just two years, Crosby S. Noyes Education Campus went from a school deemed in need of improvement to a place that the District of Columbia Public Schools called one of its “shining stars.”
Standardized test scores improved dramatically. In 2006, only 10% of Noyes’ students scored “proficient” or “advanced” in math on the standardized tests required by the federal No Child Left Behind law. Two years later, 58% achieved that level. The school showed similar gains in reading [...]
A USA TODAY investigation, based on documents and data secured under D.C.’s Freedom of Information Act, found that for the past three school years most of Noyes’ classrooms had extraordinarily high numbers of erasures on standardized tests. The consistent pattern was that wrong answers were erased and changed to right ones [...]
In 2007-08, six classrooms out of the eight taking tests at Noyes were flagged by McGraw-Hill because of high wrong-to-right erasure rates. The pattern was repeated in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 school years, when 80% of Noyes classrooms were flagged by McGraw-Hill.
On the 2009 reading test, for example, seventh-graders in one Noyes classroom averaged 12.7 wrong-to-right erasures per student on answer sheets; the average for seventh-graders in all D.C. schools on that test was less than 1. The odds are better for winning the Powerball grand prize than having that many erasures by chance, according to statisticians consulted by USA TODAY.
This doesn’t fully prove a case of fraud at the Noyes School: as Kevin Drum noted, perhaps students at Noyes were taught to look over their answers before completing the test. But he adds, “the pattern here sure seems to follow a pattern we’ve seen in other school districts that have reported startling test gains and later had to recant them for one reason or another.”
I think it’s important that this is part of Michelle Rhee’s legacy, while I’m not necessarily holding her responsible. She put a premium on success at DC schools, and that pressure can lead to some dastardly things. Moreover, if the Noyes School is found to have cheated on standardized tests, it invalidates a lot of the results Rhee held up as a model in how to best teach students.
USA Today ran into a lot of resistance from the DC Public Schools in getting to the bottom of their story. Needless to say, Rhee wouldn’t comment. Because of the high-profile nature of the then-chancellor and her advocacy in pushing for policies that have a major impact on teachers, this should be investigated further.
There’s also a point to be made about standardized testing and its inherently insecure nature, and how it’s ridiculous to use it as the only measure of school achievement, but we’ll leave that for another time.



49 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Back in July of 2007, Bob Somerby was warning his readers that the puffery surrounding Rhee was not exactly reality-based.
And there’s been more evidence since then:
http://gfbrandenburg.wordpress.com/2010/10/27/fraud-accompanies-michelle-rhee-part-1/
http://gfbrandenburg.wordpress.com/2010/10/27/fraud-accompanies-michelle-rhee-part-2/
http://gfbrandenburg.wordpress.com/2010/10/27/fraud-accompanies-michelle-rhee-part-3/
The debunking of Rhee has got so intense that Rhee backers like Richard Whitmire (who is funded by the same third-way anti-unionists that back Rhee) have been working overtime defending her.
I love the smell of for-profit public schools in the morning!
12.7 erasures per test is ridiculous.
I wish people could just come out and tell the truth. Kevin Drum, some member or members of the faculty at this school sat in a teachers’ lounge or a classroom and altered the tests after they were submitted. That much is obvious.
This is the woman King Rick I has chosen to finish the job of destroying Florida’s public school system. She’s already under fire here. We need to run this ********** out of town on a rail.
Are ALL the erasures changed to correct answers?
IIRC, most of my teachers tended to counsel us to stick with our first answers and to be wary of changing them. Seems that might also be playing in to the McGraw-Hill analysis. Anyone have any stats on the right-to-wrong-answer erasures as a form of comparison?
Good Morning Class,
Today’s word is: G-r-i-f-t-e-r
That’s how it was in my school days, and that’s what my daughters are told.
“Your first instinct is usually correct. If you can’t confirm your answer or don’t know for sure, go with your gut.”
Interestingly, the Performing Arts Center where I volunteer is screening the movie Waiting for Superman, and the following week there will be a panel discussion that will include Michelle Rhee. I am glad for this post. I need to educate myself, although as a volunteer usher it probably won’t be appropriate for me to ask a question.
This has been going on for decades.
I was in the 5th grade in 1969, my mother explained to me that the two competing testing companies (I think one was Iowa Basic Skills) could guarantee each school district superintendent that buying their test would guarantee above average results. This was accomplished by one testing company selling to half the schools in a market area and the other testing company selling to the other half. Test results could then be compared to the competitors results and through slanted statistics every school district could end up above average.
Recall Bush’s (the younger) sec of education, Rod Paige and his fake “Houston Miracle”.
Cheating was going on… (note use of passive voice)
Well, knock me over with a feather.
You know, that’s the quickest way to become Secy of USD of Ed.
Years ago Texas was ‘outed’ when it was discovered that its reading/math proficiency tests were administered to only a select few of its elementary and high school students. It’s excuse was that the ‘other’ students were not in classes the day the test was administered. It’s an ‘educated’ guess that Rhees is working for the privatize-the-public-schools cabal.
Plant your Q & collateral info with someone in the audience who you know will be aggressive about asking the first Q.
Sorry but it does or maybe you want to argue buying lottery tickets are a good investment? Lets bring the kids in and test them now to prove they are still high scorers.
Either the kids did erase everything and still score high or the tests were faked.
Good one!
I hadn’t heard that one before, and it’s representative my fave form of knowledge. Stuff that you learn that’s sooo obvious (but who can think of everything that’s obvious), that once you hear it, you never forget it.
The Buck stops with her she led if she or her teachers changed test scores then her teachers pension should be taken away until we hold leaders accountable for mistakes nothing will change.
Heck of a job Brownie comes to mind and the medal of Failure Bush used to give when someone would later resign for personal reasons *cough* failure.
A link would be great:)
Gah, need more coffee.
Smaller class sizes, year long school with kids getting days off on the hottest and coldest months to save schools money Obama should know education is cheaper than incarceration.
All this talk of testing students not a mention about their text books Texas certainly has some funny text books I’m sure lower their students grades.
I also immediately thought of Somerby as soon as I read the headline. He is not too happy with Ravitch either. You can check
here, but scroll down. Somerby does point out some interesting things, such as Texas scoring better on the NAEP than Wisconsin, but not so much on the SAT and ACT.
did you know they make all the sick and disabeled kids take the PUBLIC schoool tests ,making their scores lower?
Somehow I doubt that Triad1′s mother was writing a blog in 1969.
The most toxic flaw in NCLB was its legislative command that all students in every school must be proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014, including students with special needs, students whose native language is not English, students who are homeless and lacking in any societal advantage, and students who have every societal advantage but are not interested in their schoolwork. All will be proficient by 2014. And if they are not, then their schools and teachers will suffer the consequences.
The 2014 goal is a timetable for the demolition of public education in the United States. The goal of 100 percent proficiency has placed thousands of public schools at risk of being privatized, turned into charters, or closed. And indeed, scores of schools in New York City, Chicago, Washington, D.C., and other districts were closed because they were unable to meet the unreasonable demands of NCLB. Superintendents in those districts boasted of how many schools they had closed, as if it were a badge of honor rather than an admission of defeat.
http://www.nea.org/home/39774.htm
Ding.
Free Markets are great how about raising teachers pay and benefits to what other professionals with similar degree levels get? Then we could attract a better class of teacher not that I think that was the problem 25 kids in a class kids learn 40 kids in a class and its hard for even good kids not to find chances to goof off.
Look at Bradley Manning just one Problem Prisoner and how many armed Marine Guards with guns have to strip him nakid and keep him awake all day just because they claim they can’t control him.
Yet Obama expects one teacher to handle how many kids? One Teacher without guns! One Teacher who can’t torture Students!
If the Marines can’t handle Bradley a skinny Computer Geek just how can Obama expect a teacher to handle more than 20 students and raise test scores?
This is what you get in an unregulated “free” market: people doing whatever they can get away with to gain the advantage and profit.
we had the opposite experience with our youngest – he falls within the ADHD/Autism spectrum, was always able to talk school in to letting him not test as a means of “protecting” their higher scores
I was hoping it might have been mentioned in the news or in academic circles. A better idea than schools paying for testing would be to look and see how many students are accepted into college from a particular grade and or highschool and how many finish college.
Once you factor in ability to pay for college you have real numbers without the cost of schools paying for tests. You also reduce the chance of schools paying for high scores or otherwise cheating. Except of course for rich schools who’s students can pay to get into the Ivy league no matter what their intelligence.
but they are on a mission now to close public schools
lies, lies, lies. culture of nothing but.
and everybody else just shut up.
ANYWAY TO MAKE A BUCK
thats why Kock Brothers sell asswipes!
Jon Walker has a fresh cross-post ready: A Winning Progressive Strategy for Social Security: Refuse to Do Anything – Ever
Does Obama really want to face the African American voters in 2 years with this record on education?
I take your point :D
Sounds like a good google exercise.
I was using the department’s college remedial English (aka Developmental Studies) text called Programmed Spelling Demons, 3rd edition. An exasperated student asked for help, would I explain to her the difference between ‘whose’ and ‘who’s', because, she said, she was sure she understood but kept getting it wrong on the test. I was somewhat familiar with the text, but not as familiar as a proofreader or editor would be. We used the first two editions also.
After asking her some questions, it was clear that she understood ‘whose’, ‘who’s', and similar homophones, so I looked at the book’s chapter covering those words. The book’s ‘program’ consists of instruction/explanation/example; then you’re asked a question, you write the answer, turn the page to see if you’re right or wrong. At the end of each unit is a pre-test (like the ‘real’ test that counts for your grade). Okay? Ready?
The pre-test has sentences requiring ‘whose’ here, and ‘who’s’ there; also ‘alter’ here, and ‘altar’ there. The answer section had the wrong answers: ‘whose’ for ‘who’s’ and ‘who’s’ for ‘whose’, and also ‘altar’ for ‘alter’ and ‘alter’ for ‘altar’.
The look on the bright student’s face was unmistakable as horror.
That was many years ago. It was also many years after Jonathan Kozol published Death At An Early Age (1967).
That’s exactly the case, as it’s difficult for the private sector to profit off of the public school entity as it exists now.
Who knows the needs of the Ass better than they? :)
Jonathan Kozol what does he say about Obama’s education policy?
My husband spotted the article first. We were not surprised. I hated hearing the words, “I’m not going to study that, because it isn’t on the test.” My junior NCOs and airman didn’t say that more than once to me. The red in my user name is from my hair color.
As to the erasures: While at the NCO Academy, the guy sitting right behind me often changed his answers, but always to the wrong answer. On an important test, I turned around and told him that if I heard him use the eraser, I was going to grab his pencil and break the eraser off. That was his best test score of the six-week period.
I’ve been saying that since the introduction of the FCAT in FL and other “standardized” tests in K-8. Some, repeat some, standardized tests may be suitable for 9-12, but not to the extent they do them today. The goal is students graduating from high school who can read, write, add and subtract and not much else. Low wage workers for a feudal economy.
Precisely. The testing is all about funding and this has resulted in teaching towards the test. It’s so engrained now that the teachers no longer try to hide it, as they did just a dozen years ago when I was in school.
My 9 year old’s teacher explained to us during back to school night this year that the curiculum was designed around producing optimum STAR testing scores, and that this was important because the school needed more money.
Not only are they wrapping the curiculum around the tests, but they’re teaching the kids TO test. My daughters have both had multiple hours of lessons on exactly HOW to take the test in order to produce better scores.
It’s all fucked, and it’s all about money.
In the 1970′s schools instituted an teaching/learning model known as ‘individualized instruction’. I trained for two weeks to learn the methodologies. It’s not what you think by its name. Its process has the learner learning everything on her own. It takes the instructor out of the process. Tests are standardized and machine scored.
Something else: you know how you have to wait when you’re at the doctor’s office for an exam, how the waiting area has drug company reps coming and going more than patients? It’s like that at college during office hours, but with textbook publishers’ reps coming and going.
Test question: “What is the song’s title: Old MacDonald had a _________”.
FIRST STUDENT. (Whispering) Psst. What’s the answer?
SECOND STUDENT. (Whispering) Man you’re dumb!
FIRST STUDENT. (Whispering) No, what is it?
SECOND STUDENT. (Whispering) Farm.
FIRST STUDENT. (Whispering) (long pause) How do you spell it?
SECOND STUDENT. (Whispering) Man are you stupid!
FIRST STUDENT. (Whispering) No, I know, tell me. How do you spell farm?
SECOND STUDENT. (Whispering) E, i,e,i,o.
Under these circumstances, I don’t think you should worry about being appropriate. But, if you are concerned, ask someone who isn’t an usher to get the question out there.
Wow. With the test scores from a single year having such a profound impact — Michelle Rhee, the “Accountability Movement”, Waiting for Superman, all the way to Scott Walker, does anyone want to take a crack at derivative statistics and what a load of crap they must be?
I’m thinking specifically of SAS’s Value Added Assessment System. I mean, if one single round of test scores is this liable to manipulation, and without having analyzed the sensitivity to initial conditions of the whole education of a child, how good is any value projection if you don’t count the lifetime expected erasures in that child’s future as a function of their future corrupt school superintendents and those superintendent’s possible movie appearances and subsequent correlations to APEC driven schemes to create a permanent Republican victory? ;-} Let’s face it, we just don’t know which 5 year-old’s number 2 pencil will be used to propel the next assault on global warming, so it’s kind of useless trying to determine which teacher to fire because of it.
I hope Michelle Rhee enjoyed her 15 minutes. I hope she pays dearly for it.
dcblogger has followed the career of Michelle Rhee, including the deliberate misinformation about Rhee’s results, the effect on students of teaching to the test, and Rhee’s firing American teachers and importing teachers from the Philippines on H1B visas: