The hopes that Laurent Gbagbo would go quietly from Ivory Coast after forces loyal to the Presidential rival Alassane Ouattara marched into the commercial capital of Abidjan have faded. Gbagbo issued a call to arms for his supporters, and Gbagbo’s loyalists retook the state television station and swarmed a bridge leading to the Presidential palace. The state TV station is now being used by Gbagbo to deliver instructions to the people to go into the streets and defend their embattled President. UN peacekeepers have been a particular target for attack; Gbagbo supporters fired a rocket-propelled grenade at a UN armored personnel carrier, injuring four people. The UN responded by evacuating all their staff from Abidjan. The French have taken over the airport in Abidjan and plan to send 300 additional troops to the country; state TV accused French President Nicolas Sarkozy of “preparing a Rwandan genocide” in Ivory Coast. Gunfire is a constant companion to terrified civilians in Abidjan, who cannot leave their homes for basic supplies.
While some Ivorian security forces have switched sides and abandoned Gbagbo, the pro-Ouattara forces have yet to capture the Presidential palace, residence, or military barracks, and they lost the TV station. Gbagbo’s youth militia is in the streets and well-armed, and despite the defections Gbagbo still has the superior firepower. So the thought that Gbagbo will immediately step down, as Secretary of State Clinton called for today, seems remote.
Meanwhile, a massacre has been discovered in the west.
As rebels swept across Ivory Coast in a rapid advance last week to oust the nation’s strongman, Laurent Gbagbo, hundreds of people were killed in a single town, the United Nations and aid groups said Saturday, in the worst episode of violence during the four-month political crisis that has plunged the country back into civil war.
The exact number of dead was unclear. The United Nations said that 330 people had been killed, while aid organizations put the death toll as high as 1,000. It was also uncertain how many were civilians, and how many were combatants, but Caritas, a Catholic charity whose staff members visited the town, Duékoué, in western Ivory Coast, called it a “massacre.”
The “town was full of bodies,” said Patrick Nicholson, a spokesman for the charity. “They saw bodies in the city, in the bush, mass graves.”
Humanitarian workers did not say who was responsible. But the United Nations said that more than 100 had been killed by Mr. Gbagbo’s fighters, while about 200 had been killed by forces loyal to his rival, Alassane Ouattara, the man recognized by the United Nations, the African Union and other international bodies as the winner of the presidential election last year.
Ouattara denied responsibility for the attack, and blamed it on UN peacekeepers abandoning the town. But the UN said that “Dozos,” a sect of traditional hunters in the country, took part in the killings in Duékoué. And they responded to the charge from Ouattara by saying that their peacekeepers were mostly protecting 15,000 refugees at a Catholic mission. And they demanded that Ouattara undertake an investigation into the deaths.
The violence brings the total dead to over 1,300 since the Presidential election. But this would be the first example of large-scale killings in Ivory Coast blamed on forces loyal to Ouattara. There have been rumors of him not exactly being a saint, despite how the West has characterized him. Human rights groups have said that both sides have committed war crimes. And certainly the violence has triggered tensions that have highlighted ethnic rivalries in Ivory Coast.
The country had been called “pre-genocidal” for weeks prior to the massacre at Duékoué. It was well-known that something like this could happen. The vaunted international community, coming to the rescue of civilians in Benghazi, could not be bothered to do the same in Duékoué or Abidjan. As a result, Africans are dying. And the doctrine of humanitarian intervention is revealed to be selective in nature.




25 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The UN peacekeepers have been there since 2006. If not for them, violence on both sides would have been far worse than it is now. Considering how understaffed and underfunded they are (in large part because the US keeps withholding and slashing funding, especially when Republicans get control of either or both houses of Congress; see also here), they’re doing a remarkably good job.
By the way, if you’re wondering why NATO, aka the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, hasn’t got involved in a country near the Equator: Check out this map of NATO members. Notice how far away they are from Ivory Coast? As in thousands of miles away? (French Guiana, which as the name implies is French territory, is probably the closest to Ivory Coast.) Compare this to Libya, which is half an hour’s flight from Sicily. The Mediterranean is in fact ringed with NATO bases.
To implement a no-fly zone in Ivory Coast, it would have to be done using aircraft carriers for floating air bases — which would, moving at a top speed of 35 knots, take at least a week to arrive. (And as it turns out, a “no-fly zone” would be pointless as neither side has an air force to speak of anyway; the government has ninety planes, but only six to eight of those might still be operational.)
Also, the idea that we’re not interested because Ivory Coast doesn’t have oil? Oh yes, it does. In fact, it’s arguing with Ghana over who owns some particularly choice offshore oil fields. (Oh, and the Sudan has oil too, which the Chinese are busily developing even as they turn a blind eye, same as does the West to Darfur; that’s why their digs at the West on Libya are a touch hypocritical.)
IIRC, NATO countries are all signatories to the UN Charter, and have the R2P; if you’re making the argument that distance precludes responsibility, that’s quite novel. The fleet flag designation of a UN Charter member has something to do with R2P? That would also be quite novel.
Evidently, Libya has no airforce worthy of speaking of at the present. Further, the transit could well have been met with participating countries will to do so.
I’m not one that has made an oil argument; nonetheless, as regards the importance of oil to the Ivory Coast-
Where’s the clamor for a NFZ and/or ‘Humanitarian Intervention’ for the Ivory Coast…? *gah*
Samantha Power must be too busy to speak out on this.
It is a mistake to think that any sort of sense that Ouattara is a good guy drove recognition of Ouattara as the legitimate leader of Cote d’Ivoire. It was simply a matter of the decisions of election monitors and the African Union that designated Ouattara the winner of the Presidential election. The Ivoirian Constitutional Court and election commission came to opposite conclusions because of politicization of the courts.
The play-by-play of the Ivorian 2010 elections outlines the controversy.
If France and a designated UN peacekeeping force can’t handle the situation, it likely has spiraled out of control because of two stubborn men. What has been done is warning both Gbagbo and Outtara that they are subject to investigation for the deaths in Duekoue.
The vaunted international community was in the area. Currently deployed in the Ivory Coast are 9,024 total uniformed personnel from the following countries:
Bangladesh, Benin, Bolivia, Brazil, Chad, China, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, France, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, India, Ireland, Jordan, Moldova, Morocco, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Senegal, Serbia, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
The authorization was UN Security Council Resolution 1963 passed on December 20, 2010. There has been a UN peacekeeping mission in the Ivory Coast since 2004.
Notice, by the way, what countries are not in that list of countries that have boots on the ground.
I hate to keep repeating what I have said, but these Cote d’Ivoire threads seem to disappear in just a few hours, so some of this I have said before.
Over 1000 dead are reported in Duekoue. This is in the southern (Gbagbo) part of the country but close to the northern (Ouattara) part. Ouattara forces took the town. Since the the “international community” has gotten behind Ouattara, he has clearly taken the most aggressive posture. And add again that the fact that the media is starting to spin this as ethnic violence (which it partially is) and as perhaps the work of mercenaries (which it perhaps is), and we are inclined to the preliminary conclusion that the largest massacre by far was done by Ouattara forces. I would draw the further conclusion that the violence was in no small part due to the crude and ignorant and self-serving way in which Sarkozy and Obama handled this situation. Furthermore, the scale of the massacre has dramatically increased the chance of future violence next week and over the years to come. The two men had a very long history of rivalry and the election was not nearly as clear cut as the media would have one believe. If West Africa sees a marked increase in violence, then this will be the key moment and the colonial(in the worst sense of the term) desire of Sarkozy and Obama to install their IMF man in Abdijan will have been the driving force.
I would further add, that the news coverage, when it isn’t giving it the pro-Sarkozy spin, is about 90% irresponsible garbage. Reporters who know nothing about the conflict suggest narratives that have nothing to do with the facts. Calling Gbagbo a “strongman” for example. Or comparing what is going on to what has happened elsewhere in Africa. Then there is the skeptical tone of the newscasters who don’t have a fucking clue what they are talking about but figure some kind of blanket skepticism proves how discerning they are like the Al-jazeera knucklehead impatiently asking “this has gone on for four months now; why has this gone on so long?” Belgium can go without a government for 10 months but if Cote d’Ivore goes without one for three months, then Sarkozy and Obama have to stupidly force matters and ride roughshod over the constitutional provisions of Cote d’Ivoire.
Just imagine if the “international community” had declared Gore the winner in 2000. What would Americans do??
The fact is that this did not begin as an all out ethnic conflict. It began as an election with some implicit ethnic dimensions.
The ratcheting up of the conflict into an ethnic one is above all do to the horrifying ignorance and impatience of Sarkozy and Obama.
When no one is flying, you don’t need a no-fly zone. The humanitarian intervention has been there since 2004.
Granted, I was merely being rhetorical…! 8-(
I have not seen the conflict portrayed as anything other than a contested election. What is the purported ethnic conflict?
And what exactly did Obama and Sarkozy do to inflame the situation; I missed that.
“When no one is flying, you don’t need a no-fly zone.”
As we’ve come to learn, it all depends on how you define a no fly zone, like no fly zones can be used to attack ground targets like tanks and artillery and even military headquarters.
This is a long story with many chapters about two men vying for power for more than a decade. Gbagbo is a socialist Catholic who has great respect for his struggles against colonialism. Ouattara is a liberal IMF guy. The country has seen large immigration into the north from neighboring countries and Ouattara’s constituency is there. Gbagbo’s support is in the south. The history is long and complicated but the country has been somewhat defacto divided into northern and southern parts for a while.
What did Obama and Sarkozy do? Well they totally fucked up that is what. They throw their weight around without having a fucking clue what they are doing. All they know is that Ouattara is their IMF guy. Well, it is his forces that have carried out this massacre and now Sarkozy and Obama should take some responsibility for fucking it up. They were impatient and ignorant. And now we have this enormous jump in bloodshed. They could have told Gbagbo and Ouattara that they didn’t want to see any violence and would not look favorably on one side if it was found responsible for violence. And they could have told the two to work out a power sharing agreement as they had in the past. But that little Napoleon shit face in Paris started pushing and this is the result. This has really made things a lot worse in West Africa what happened these last days. Much worse. This could turn into a decades long ethnic struggle. And it would be all because these two idiots started dictating. Ouattara took the support and this is the result. Ouattara has refused overtures from Gbagbo for a powersharing agreement because he had Sarkozy and Obama on his side. Well look at the result.
I’m not saying that Ouattara doesn’t have a serious claim to the Presidency. But so did Gore. And Cote d’Ivoire has its own constitutional arrangements that Sarkozy and Obama couldn’t be bothered with.
Sarkozy and Obama have been impatient obnoxious colonialists in all of this and I blame them above everybody else for the violence. Sarkozy first. Obama second. Ouattara third. Gbagbo fourth.
It is fucking sickening.
I just wonder what in the hell is going on in Africa. all the countries seem to be in revolt. Somehow, I don’t think this is an spontaneous thing nor a move toward “democracy”.
I suspect it is another colonial attempt by western powers
Well, there you go
Doesn’t care the new normal
Thanks for the background about Gbagbo and Ouatarra.
The attacks on Gaddafi’s military heavy equipment (tanks, artillery, etc.) was not implementing the no-fly zone but the language in the UN Security Council Resolution authorizing protection of civilians.
Gaddafi’s military headquarters were attacked for two reasons: (1) the air defense communication and control was centralized there and (2) command and control of troops who were attacking civilians was centralized there.
Teddy Partridge is upstairs!
Sunday Late Night: Transocean CEO Has No Shame
Obama has killed more innocent people in the last month than Jared Lee Loughner.
Could you source some of your stuff, please? Because not all of this began as a disputed election, and preliminary reports didn’t blame the massacre on Ouattara’s faction, but on Gbagbo’s people. There is a long running insurgency that has split the country north-south for longer than 4 months, recently the rebels have decided to put their lot in with Ouattara. At least some of the genocidal aspects are in part due to the chasing down of other tribes that are trying to flee the country towards Liberia. Some parts of Abidjian have been under siege conditions, and there has been a goodly part of the country cut off from water near San Pedro in the past week, due to heavy fighting away from the city of Abidjian. Most of the reporting is just from Abidjian, and most of the reporting is only about what happens there. That’s why when the other stuff suddenly hits the news it comes as a big shock. But there are heavily armed rebels that have been in the north for a long time, predating the elections. And there was a collosal screw up in the handling of the election outcome not at the peacekeeping troops level but at the diplomatic level by the UN, in Jan-Feb. Source material on ReliefWeb going back to January and December and all through February, mostly from UNHCR and related agencies.
I wouldn’t be just assigning a contrary set of values to everything. Ouattara did win the election, by exit polls and international election observer reckoning.
There has been a steadily racheted up response in Ivory Coast in the Security Council since February. It hasn’t been what it has in Libya, because it’s been hard to get the world’s attention. Are you saying that’s because of something like oil? It’s because of the cachet of the “Arab Spring”. And everybody is riveted by an earthquake and tsunami. Sad but true.
I wrote comments and pleaded in a diary about Côte D’Ivoire here at FDL. I didn’t get the attention of people right here at FDL. Including you, Kelly Canfield.
You people showed interest in Ivory Coast precisely when it became something you could use as a tool in your grand game against the US for your arguments. Not before.
Ivory Coast got zero attention because it wasn’t Arab. Neither did Mauritania, Gabon, Cameroon, or Zimbabwe. A hundred people could die in Ivory Coast the same day that 10 would die in Bahrain and FDL would be aflame about Bahrain, not the Ivorians. In fact, there were people, including you, who demanded outrage over 40 Yemenis when you hadn’t even noticed that 43 Zimbabweans had been beaten, disappeared, and charged with treason just for watching a video of the Egyptian protests. I bet you’d die young before you’d give any attention to what’s going on right now in the DRC, too. Unless you can use it to slam the people arguing R2P. Then you’ll be all over it like flies to shit. It’s called opportunism.
If you want sources in French, I’d be happy to source it for you. As far as I can tell, besides David, I am the only person following this story around here. I’ve been following it for months. I wish some other people were following it, but nobody is.
I’m trying to give a bunch of background and context and you want sources? Ouattara took the town. 10000 plus are terrified seeking refuge at a Catholic church. You should check your own sources because the UN is asking Ouattara to investigate the massacre at Duekoue.
http://www.mg.co.za/article/2011-04-03-refugees-report-massacres-by-ouattara-rebels/
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/UN-chief-presses-Ouattara-over-Ivory-Coast-massacre/articleshow/7858236.cms
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/un-head-presses-i-coast-leader-on-massacre-20110403-1csvx.html
Really, what are your sources???? You write “preliminary reports didn’t blame the massacre on Ouattara’s faction, but on Gbagbo’s people”. That is just false. I have read a hundred articles on this in three languages and the closest I have seen to anything like that are some reports that tried to claim that 300 deaths were due to Ouattara’s forces and 150 were due to Gbagbo.
The fact is that Sarkozy and Obama have blood on their hands. They have done EVERYTHING WRONG in this conflict. Everything. Their attitudes frankly have been colonial in the full racist sense of the term. And the 90% of the press and its shitty coverage and stereotypes have been racist as well. People hear Africa and they say the stupidest shit. Cote d’Ivoire isn’t Rwanda and Gbagbo isn’t Mugabe. But now that the full bore fuckheads Sarkozy and Obama spent all of 30 minutes assessing the situation, consulting their stereotypes and issuing dictates, Cote d’Ivoire has become an order of magnitude more violent.
It’s fucking disgusting.
I’d like to see one source that indicates what you have claimed.
Here is Ouattara rejecting the envoy from the African Union a week ago:
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-03-27/world/ivory.coast.standoff_1_ivory-coast-civil-war-laurent-gbagbo?_s=PM:WORLD
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/africa-mideast/ouattara-rejects-african-union-envoy-for-ivory-coasts-crisis/article1958536/
Sarkozy and Obama didn’t object to that.
Of the 330, you are correct. There are claims of a lot more and there are longstanding claims of crimes against humanity, and those claims are against Laurent Gbagbos forces. You know it and I know it. And Sarkozy didn’t just start getting involved, the French have been involved with Ivory Coast for a while now, and there isn’t some, it wasn’t violent until Sarkozy and Obama got involved.
Here is a better source than your Times of India:
http://reliefweb.int/rw/RWFiles2011.nsf/FilesByRWDocUnidFilename/VVOS-8F6MZF-full_report.pdf/$File/full_report.pdf
Your notion that everything was fine until Obama and Sarkozy got involved is just bullshit. The group of African leaders tasked with finding a way out of the impasse by the Security Council dallied and that’s how the whole crisis broke into violence in Abobo in the first place.
Yes, but both the AU and ECOWAS asked for Security Council intervention. So did the Ambassador, he was pleading for it, denouncing the fact that if you were an Arab, the world paid attention to your plight, a West African, the world ignored you, back in February.
Now you come along with a totally revisionist history in which the villians are the Western powers. How convenient. And how interesting that you are the second person on these pages (the first being Robert Naiman) in a couple of days, for whom any dictator in Africa is a good guy if it just gives another means to slam Obama.
I’m not buying. The ICRC says 800 dead in the massacre, not 300.
I’m also not buying that you’ve been desperately trying to contribute to a diary about it. I wrote, and sat there waiting futilely for responses. kspopulist wrote, and got little response. Only now that there’s a reason to hold up Côte D’Ivoire and use it against the Western powers are people contributing.
Thanks for the background information. When these elections happened I remember Ouattara wanted the UN to come in militarily and seat him in power but the African Union declined using violence for him. Does Sarkozy want France’s former colony back or what?