John Ensign’s resignation was two-fold: a favor to Rep. Dean Heller, who will probably get his seat and also a leg up in the 2012 Senate race from being the incumbent; and a way to avoid a budding Senate Ethics Committee investigation. The Justice Department and the FEC closed their investigations against Ensign, but the Ethics Committee had an ongoing probe. And, the New York Times has learned that Ensign was scheduled for testimony:
Senator John Ensign’s resignation letter allows him to leave office just one day before he was to have to answer questions under oath about whether a $96,000 payment to the family of his former lover was illegal, designed to keep the affair from becoming public, according to people familiar with an investigation of Mr. Ensign’s activities.
That formal testimony scheduled for May 4 was the final step as Senate investigators prepared for what were almost certain to be Senate ethics charges against Mr. Ensign, Republican of Nevada. Mr. Ensign’s resignation is effective May 3.
Incidentally, while Ensign gets to avoid that testimony, he will not be able to avoid the final ruling from the Ethics Committee. They plan to issue a statement – on a bipartisan basis, with the support of both Democratic Chair Barbara Boxer and Republican Vice Chair Johnny Isakson – detailing the findings of the nearly 2-year investigation. They say that they have uncovered evidence of wrongdoing and that Ensign “made the appropriate decision.”
The $96,000 payoff was a particular concern of the investigation. Delivered in installments to fall under disclosure limits, it was clearly an off-the-books severance payment and a potential violation of campaign finance laws, since Hampton was an employee of Ensign’s political campaign and the payment needed to be disclosed.
The FEC is hopelessly broken at this stage, but the Senate Ethics Committee appears to have taken its role seriously, and they aren’t going to bury the report just because Ensign would rather run and hide than face up to his actions. They cannot fully disclose the materials gathered over the course of the investigation, but the public statement has the potential to be damning. And they could choose to make a referral to the Justice Department for criminal charges as well. I’d be surprised if it came to that, but Ensign didn’t resign just to be nice to Dean Heller.




39 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m sure Ensign will be quaking in his Ferragamo’s in anticipation of a sternly worded letter from the Ethics committee. Heaven forfend they look at reducing/terminating his nice retirement stipends for such fine service to the USofA.
Yes a fat government pension as a prize for fucking you best friends wife and paying hush money. Where in the hell is Eric Holder and the justice dept. on this. Obama the fix was in
When has the Senate Ethics Committee *ever* sanctioned anybody? Abramoff–nope. Feinstein steering hundreds of millions in contracts to her husband–absolutely not.
Boehner to his credit protected the Office of Congressional ethics. The Dems in the senate could establish their own OCE but refuse.
I thought that the laughably named Senate “Ethics” Commitee (one can just hear those greedy sh*ts saying: “Ethics” Committee whilst doing the little finger wiggle thing to indicate the quote marks), like their current “leader” Obama, only looked forward, never backward.
Oh hey now, Ensign’s just cashing in on his “just deserts” as any good Galtian libertarian is supposed to, just as Ayn Rand, herself, cashed in on her *husband’s* Social Security & Medicare (Ayn Rand never paid into either system, herself, but like any good little libertarian, she made sure that she got hers).
I duly note that not ONE of our usual libertarian bloggers has swung by to tsk-tsk that the likes of Ensign will get a huge tax-supported pension & very high cost medical benefits for him & his wife for life. But then again, as we all know: IOKIYAR.
A bipartisan statement from the Ethics Committee. The horror!
Was Boner sobbing?
Ah, yes.
Another member of the club breaking the rules and getting off easy.
So good of them to spare him a public humiliation.
Off you go now, Johnny Boy.
Say hi to everyone on “K” Street.
We’ll do lunch.
Do we REALLY care why he’s quiting? There is a chance he could have gone to jail but what would that have done?
Why is this even a topic on FDL? What is the Left doing besides REPORTING THE NEWS? I can get that from RT or Press TV, I don’t need you guys for that. I need you for getting Progressives to protest for improving the health care law, preserving Medicare, Medicaid, Head Start, etc, etc, etc.
It seem to me the Tech Sector has much money how come they aren’t supporting the cause? You sure as hell buy their technology…
Give us a break.
This is a little comedy relief, ok?
Been a shitty week.
You got a problem with that?
Then take a powder.
Ensign has more impt “affairs” to conduct than being in the U.S. senate.
Ya know, it sounds like your time is really precious and you have much higher priorities. So now that you’ve told us that, I’m sure you’ll have no trouble finding a different website that is more suitable to your priorities & constraints.
You go, eCAHN!
Ensign’s letter of resignation was profound and heartfelt. He serviced his constituents the same way he serviced Mrs. Hampton. He fucked them sideways and they liked it.
Now he’ll gladly accept all the perks he railed against (for you and me) – his Ayn Rand Cadillac family health insurance bennies, big gubmint pension and big gubmint socialist ponzi scheme Social Security Entitlement Checks. Just like every other Republican Motherfocker. Ethics, Diapers, Wide Stance or not.
I got me three beers and a fistfull of downs and I’m gonna get ripped – so fuck you clowns! – John Ensignia
I feel like we’ve been “yelled at” all week for never doing something or other the correct way… go read another blog if ya don’t like the looks a this one… there’s plenty more out there.
Yeah, Doug Coe, who founded the “Fellowship,” will welcome adulterer & crook Ensign right back into the bosom (cough cough) of his “Family” of fundie
crooksfine men. It’s ok to screw around and break laws if you’re a Republican, doncha know?Feel free to waste my time on my diary. I’m quite accommodating over there.
Heh.
BTW, I read a lot of your Bee Story: good going, eCAHN! More please (so I can waste more of my time)!
I think I’m going to get my drunk on with you. Where’s the corkscrew?
The response has been heartwarming.
Makes me think I ought to write up one of my other ideas: The Bernank Research on Great Depression Is Dross.
I’ve read just enough of it to know that for a fact. However, I’d prolly have to do 4-5 days of additional reading, writing, editing, getting it into html (gah) to complete it.
I just happen to have some time available and would be giddy to do the HTML for you…. :)
Oh, yeah.
Pretty frightening cult over there.
When you think about what’s happening to us,
and how they’re treating us, seems
The Family has been unleashed.
Other Family members that come to mind
are Hillary, Leiberman, and Salazar.
They’re everywhere.
The Bees, yes.
I’ll make my way over there if it makes you happy.
According to Jon Ralston, interviewed on Rachel’s show last night, the Senate Ethics Committee had voted for public hearings. That motivated Ensign’s resignation. I think he thought, having finessed both the FEC and DoJ, his colleagues would role over.
Others have misunderestimated Barbara Boxer before. And I suppose there’s some intra-GOP-Caucus reason Isakson wouldn’t protect Ensign. He probably gets his parking spot, or something.
Perhaps Mr. Ensign will become a consultant to Erik Prince and they can both enjoy residing in a jurisdiction that lacks an extradition treaty with the United States. Mr. Prince, however, might not appreciate Mr. Ensign’s “I’m a lover, not a fighter, mentality” and the small dollar amounts he thinks are adequate to get VIP’s off the hook.
Boxer is a lot more credible than Feinstein on such matters.
Yes, let’s all get high on royal jelly. Good article, that. Thank you.
Courtesy of incompetence of my computer consultant (long & boring story) I got a 2010 version of MS professional suite, in which Word has a save as webpage.
Seemed to work just fine when I put it into html yesterday morning. However, when I was working in Word, I didn’t put the links in the way they would be in the final doc, so most of the time bet word & editing the diary was making sure the links worked & fixing the ones that didn’t.
There won’t be a lot of links in the Brenanke doc, and I’ve already been thru the baptism of fire (heh), so that part of the process should be more easier (ungrammatical by choice) next time.
The emotional barrier is that Bernanke’s economics is sooo bad, I just don’t want to waste my time on it, as much as pointing it out to others would be a service.
I don’t have many commitments over the next week and the weather is supposed to be shitty, so maybe I can force myself.
More important than me, I think it might make YOU happy (or at least I hope so).
She’s been some kind of a disappointment on many things, including her negotiations in Harry Reid’s office to trade away women’s rights to Bart Stupak, but I will always remember fondly her march over to the Senate Judiciary Committee, leading women in the House to protest the treatment of Anita Hill.
Well, in two senses, excellent!
1) I have the same version of the Office Suite including MS Access, so we are quite compatible.
2) Sounds like you’re going to do it anyway
Just let me know if you ever want any tech help. I’ll be at loose ends for a bit.
Well, that’s good news, no matter what else is wrong in the rest of our lives…
Those were the days …
Is there an extradition agreement between the Senate and the private sector? if not, there should be. All he has to do is resign for his illegal acts to go away? An ethics slap would be welcome, but a guilty verdict, a fine, and jail time would be a lot more satisfying. How could the Obama Justice Dept actually absolve Ensign when he committed an actual crime? Oh, right, that looking forward stuff. Has any one actually added up the number of crimes committed looking forward? How far does one normally go forward in such accounting? Is this a new category of law?
eCAHN ~ actually it sounds like important work, and a service, and you are the ONE to do it. Your title ” … Is Dross” made me laugh out loud so there is that too!!
Sounds like a barn burner to me. Which feels like such an *odd* thing to say, huh.
But, but, but, but, but … *just* today I saw where Obama said we are a country of rule of law and guilty is guilty … why, we don’t even need to bother with ethics committees and trails! So, I say, march Ensign away to solitary. How about it, Holder? Reid? Ethics Committee mavens?
More like an economy burner.
I actually have technical reasons to criticize Bernanke’s work, which I can explain to everyone who unnerstans no statistics whatsoever.
But bc my criticism would be technical (fave weapon of neolibruls who outmath you) would be turning the oppos fave weapon against them.
I can also ‘splain why, in addition to technical garbage, the results make no economic sense in a broader, people oriented context.
Here is a man who can not be trusted around other staffers wives, Seeing that he use to be a veterinarian, I would not trust him around my animals ether. He might not know the difference.Who knows what in this scoundrel heart.AS for Eric Holder (Mister Chiquita ),and The Naked Emperor(Obama), they are so busy looking forward they can not recognized truncated lies or alibis. What worst a senator without principles, or a government with blinders on ? When one hand wash the other both are dirty if you using water from the sewage plant.
Oh dear, bananas and sexually misbehaving veterinarians in the same comment. Think I gotta find the brain bleach dispenser, stat.
eCahn,
I am showing my daughter in Michigan how FDL works for me. I may be asking you for your future comments on MS Professional Suite.