Those pining for an end to our growing military/security state may be cheered to learn about the end of the F-35 alternate engine program. But they should know that it took an arduous two-plus years, dozens of Congressional votes, threats, counter-threats and the energies of most of the Pentagon leadership to finally cancel a second engine that nobody wanted. This is what counts for progress in Washington.
But if we’re going to get any progress against the MIC and the forces that undergird, we’d have to raise awareness of a recent paper out of the office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (h/t) called “A National Strategic Narrative”:
The piece was written by two senior members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CAPT Wayne Porter, USN and Col Mark “Puck” Mykleby) in a “personal” capacity, but it is clear that it would not have seen the light of day without a measure of official approval. Its findings are revelatory, and they deserve to be read and appreciated not only by every lawmaker in Congress, but by every American citizen.
The narrative argues that the United States is fundamentally getting it wrong when it comes to setting its priorities, particularly with regard to the budget and how Americans as a nation use their resources more broadly. The report says Americans are overreacting to Islamic extremism, underinvesting in their youth, and failing to embrace the sense of competition and opportunity that made America a world power. The United States has been increasingly consumed by seeing the world through the lens of threat, while failing to understand that influence, competitiveness, and innovation are the key to advancing American interests in the modern world.
Courageously, the authors make the case that America continues to rely far too heavily on its military as the primary tool for how it engages the world. Instead of simply pumping more and more dollars into defense, the narrative argues:
“By investing energy, talent, and dollars now in the education and training of young Americans — the scientists, statesmen, industrialists, farmers, inventors, educators, clergy, artists, service members, and parents, of tomorrow — we are truly investing in our ability to successfully compete in, and influence, the strategic environment of the future. Our first investment priority, then, is intellectual capital and a sustainable infrastructure of education, health and social services to provide for the continuing development and growth of America’s youth.”
There was a time when this would be an unsaid proposition. The US attained much of its wealth on the basis of a focus on educating its citizens and spurring innovation. Our social services typically left something to be desired relative to the rest of the world, but our investment in human capital was never threatened. And now that’s all changing, as defense and finance receive the bulk of our dollars.
Keep in mind that this comes from the office of the Joint Chiefs. They are pleading with the country’s leaders to reset their priorities away from the military and national security, to stop being ruled by fear, and to focus on what matters. It takes the group which most benefits from the current imbalanced structure to actually say that.
This is also a foreign policy imperative. Investing at home and building the next generation’s intellectual and social capacity will have tremendous knock-on effects with how we associate with the world. It can only help to have innovation and resources bleed out from the US into other countries. Foreigners could gush about advancements in medicine or technology coming from the US rather than bombs and mortars.
It’s a sad commentary that the best vision for the future that has been put forward in years came out of the Pentagon from some unelected staffers.




41 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Not to be overly contrarian, but this National Prosperity and Security document needs to be taken quite seriously.
Why?
America’s “moment of synchronicity” has arrived, especially from my perspective for the Native American/Chicano Construct. Thus, from my historical perspective, the “moment” will last for an approximate 40 years or until the “racial and ethnics” become the majority here in our USA.
And needless to say but I will, I am writing an article for publication and in which I lay out a differing perspective for Prosperity and Security.
Jaango
Yay! But it occurs to me that this thing has been canceled before. I’ll bet it’s re-instated as a condition for support in raising the debt limit.
WTF? Pentagon officials saying stop giving us money and give it to the people? Cool.
But wait, didn’t Warren Buffett and Bill Gates offer the government more money, and they refused to take it?
The private sector of our MIC will not okay this. I appreciate the effort from these two gentlemen, but they will need to rally more support before anything has a chance of changing.
“This is also a foreign policy imperative. Investing at home and building the next generation’s intellectual and social capacity will have tremendous knock-on effects with how we associate with the world.”
Looking for a PEACEFUL woman candidate for president now.
No, definitely NOT hillary.
How about Cindy? How about Medea Benjamin? How about Grace Boggs? How about Cynthia McKinney?
[should be a paragraph space righ here!]
You men have made such a mess of things. /s
The U.S. has a long history of influencing foreign policy through strategic bribery. War, in most cases, has been comparatively ineffective except as a means to funnel tax dollars to influential defense contractors.
Personally, I’d like Frida Berrigan but she would never consider it.
Thanks for this wonderful post, David. I’m gonna print out the document when I get back to work and give it my Regressive boss and hope he doesn’t have a stroke.
OT – Ed Rendell is on MSNBC, hunched over uncomfortably because Obama’s hand is up his ass. The ventriloquism is amazing though. I can’t even tell that the WH is talking for him.
Amazing to learn that anyone enmeshed in the MIC “machine” actually sees some sort of reality, but perhaps some at the Pentagon are not as cravenly greedy as the private-sector MIC is. Plus perhaps some at the Pentagon have some feelings for military personnel & their families, many of whom at the lower ranks are having a hard time making it these days.
Ohmeohmy, methinks this won’t fly. Paying attention to the serfs and doing something useful for the nation as a whole?? Eh – the unquenchable greed of the upper 1% will never let that happen at this point.
Kudos to those who had the nerve to speak truth to power, however. I won’t hold my breath that it’ll actually happen and/or that someone money will be deflected from the MIC in order to create jobs for serfs on Main St.
Wow. About time somebody in Washington said it. Every single word true.
Thanks, David.
Thatcher did too….
heh… too bad about Rendell – eh? At one time, Rendell appeared to have more going for him… until he totally sold out. C’est la vie & caveat emptor (if I may mix my modern & ancient languages).
I’m a bit stunned but pleased they included artists. Wow.
The strategic environment of the future must be won.
It would seem that there are still a couple people in the Pentagon that actually have a clue.
Perseverance, sweat and tears. It can be done. Folks need the willpower to get off the couch and do it.
Here we go, btw. MSNBC is letting some slack-jawed yokel talk about how Syria’s government is really Iran in disguise and there are confirmed reports of Iranian soldiers on the ground.
Can we just help people because it’s the right thing to do? Do we have to fight Iran by proxy in Syria?
I would make a few changes in that declaration though:
I just don’t think the cowardice is as widespread as it’s implied. Plus I get the idea that the authors are trying to convey a sense of misunderstanding while it’s my belief that they understand exactly what it is they’re doing.
or a very, ver-y dark sense of humor
without even changing the channel to MSNBC, I’m bettin’ the “yokel” was none other than Evan Kohlman – Terra Expert Extraordinare™
Wait till we find out that the ultimate source of this is The Onion.
Negative Ghost Rider – it was a woman. Didn’t catch her name. Had the air of a professional talking head so I stopped paying attention after a moment.
That would make me a sad panda.
LOL..anyone checked?
I’m not surprised that the officers in the Pentagon would know their history and value an educated and engaged populace. The service academies provide excellent education and draw intelligent, analytical minds. They are committed to the Constitution and the preservation of our democratic institutions and actually understand the way they are intended to operate and what is required to maintain them. As liberals and progressives we oppose aggressive militarism, in all likelihood so do career soldiers. If we look beyond stereotypes we may find allies in unexpected places.
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Link
I agree. Academy officers are a different breed of officers. Those who eventually go to the post-grad schools even more so.
“Keep in mind that this comes from the office of the Joint Chiefs. They are pleading with the country’s leaders to reset their priorities away from the military and national security, to stop being ruled by fear, and to focus on what matters. It takes the group which most benefits from the current imbalanced structure to actually say that.”
Maybe they have seen and understood that the PTB are making out like every person in the world is now the enemy, even US citizens. I am astounded at how much spy technology the military has amassed and yet the CIA and FBI continue to play hit men for these crazed people. Soon, those agencies will realize that the coming cuts will move them out of budget for our increasing militarized police state.
That would be hilarious, Margaret!
Hmm. Nonetheless, in his pretty-boy ‘deficit’/'debt’ speech the other week, Obama quoted JCOS Chairman Mullen as saying the greatest threat to our national security is the rising debt (my paraphrase).
Well, my cynicism makes me wonder if ‘artists’ isn’t a reference to piracy of intellectual property, or at the other extreme, the continuing proliferation of pop culture now via optical microwaves in high definition.
Well, I guess I should thank David for posting this as he got a lot more comments than I did when I posted it on April 20.
I think that can be explained by the difference in presentation. Print each post out, sans comments, pretend you’d never seen either before and see which one would most likely get your attention.
Not being critical, just trying to help with the writing.
Maybe the Joint Chiefs don’t want to fight wars to protect Cayman Island depositors. Maybe they’ve issued a coded threat. Seven Days In May but the characters’ roles are reversed?
Thanks for the input; I’m restricted to 3 paragraph quotes and David isn’t. As towards which would get my attention, they BOTH would given that both mention the Pentagon asking for it’s budget to be cut.
BUT the important thing is that others become aware of the report -and ,hopefully. do what I suggested in my diary : “let me suggest you send the Pentagon report to your Senators and Representatives and ask them why they don’t listen to what the Pentagon itself is saying.”
The first two paragraphs in any essay are important. If you haven’t gotten people’s attention by then you ain’t gonna get it. Where and how you find a document is nowhere near as important as what’s in it. A strong first paragraph or two stating what the doc is followed by a zinger quote will do the trick every time. Another paragraph and another quote or two and voila, you’ve got a post. Focus on the document, or whatever, and let it do the talking.
yes, thanks vey much.
It’s worth remembering that it appeared that the person that kept the USA from attacking Iran was
http://ipsnews.net/print.asp?idnews=37738
also worth remembering:
Pentagon report on climate change, 2007:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9580815
there’s no shortage of intelligent people in the military.
The problem is that the White House and Congress are now fully in thrall to Wall Street and the financial industry. Their interests and agenda do not mesh with the JCoS or the middle-class. They are addicted to a lethal and destructive narcotic called Money Grubbing. Nothing will ever interfere with that pursuit. They will burn the country to the ground in their insane lust for ever more.
Isn’t it discouraging to look around and see no one — NO ONE — in the Democratic party with good sense and the right values?