Indiana Democrats fled the state for five weeks to protest, among other things, a bill that would revamp education in the state, a top priority of Mitch Daniels. Having won some concessions, they returned. And as part of the deal, yesterday Indiana passed the education bill, which still includes a very wide-reaching school voucher program.
The Republican-controlled state legislature handed Daniels a huge victory Wednesday when the House voted 55-43 to give final approval to a bill creating the voucher program that would allow even middle-class families to use taxpayer money to send their children to private schools.
Unlike other systems that are limited to lower-income households, children with special needs or those in failing schools, Indiana’s voucher program will be open to a much larger pool of students, including those already in excellent schools. Families would have to meet certain income limits to qualify, with families of four making up to about $60,000 a year getting some type of scholarship.
Daniels’ agenda mirrors ideas being pushed nationwide by Republicans empowered by 2010 election victories. But Daniels has successfully led Indiana — a conservative state not known for going out on a limb — into uncharted education territory.
It seems that the Democrats got some limits on the amount of the voucher for middle-class families, which will make it somewhat less attractive. But you’re still likely to see a mass exodus from public schools, starving them of revenue. Sixty percent of the school population would be eligible to receive some kind of voucher under this legislation.
Indiana is also on the way to defunding Planned Parenthood:
The Indiana state legislature is on the verge of becoming the first state to block Medicaid reimbursements for low-income patients seeking basic health services at Planned Parenthood clinics.
House Bill 1210, introduced by state Rep. Eric Turner (R-Cicero) in January, takes a number of swipes at abortion rights and includes a provision that would prohibit the state of Indiana from contracting with “any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions are performed.” While the provision does not name a specific health provider, it effectively singles out Planned Parenthood, which receives $3 million dollars a year from the state.
“We have patients booking appointments for pap smears as we speak, but if the bill passes and the intent is met, we would literally have to get in touch with these patients and say, ‘You come prepared to pay for your services, or you will need to find another medical home,’” said Betty Cockrum, president of Planned Parenthood Indiana, which currently serves about 22,000 low-income patients under Titles X, V, and XX and through Medicaid.
This will end up as a court battle because of the discrimination against a single provider, and it could also put at risk $4 million in federal family planning funds for the state. But I’m not sure that will deter Indiana’s Republican legislature, which has clearly veered hard right and plans to use that power.
I guess women’s health wasn’t part of the deal that brought Indiana Democrats back to the Capitol.




42 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Shit.
Womens’ health or public education.
Thanks for the article DDay.
Imagine!
Planned parenthood activities –
“These health centers provide a wide range of safe, reliable health care — and more than 90 percent is preventive, primary care, which helps prevent unintended pregnancies through contraception, reduce the spread of sexually transmitted infections through testing and treatment, and screen for cervical and other cancers.”
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are-4648.htm
conflict with Christian Bible principles –
Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
Eph.5:22-24 “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.”
so let’s pray together and then everything will be all right.
oh, wtf…………I keep trying to decide if I should stay and fight or retire and leave the country. This whole State Policy Network is really, really screwing the citizenry. Yet I bet the Republicans will still get elected to office, again and again, even after showing their true colors. Too many Americans are fools.
Yep. Imagine poor people not having access to basic services. God forbid we let homeless and lower-income women have healthy vaginas.
If I pray hard enough a condom will appear on my jimmy?
Either that or the heat from your laptop will decimate your sperm count. It works out either way. :-)
Resegregation is on the march. Reaganomics proceeds apace.
(its a pretty familiar view here in Little Rock…)
The continuing privatization of education and academics in general will ultimately lead to a society where only the wealthy can be educated. The serfs will only be taught to be system managers. Vouchers for private schools is the intermediate step to this process.
No! That is why the Pope and his Cardinals are teh gay.
There is no war but class war.
Just like early America or late English empire, only the very wealthy were educated in universities.
You can already the see the systems managers model being implemented in universities across America with the elimination of majors that don’t directly involve a corporate position.
School vouchers seems like a state money saver to me, but Superintendent of Public Instruction Dr. Tony Bennett thinks it’s all about the kids:
They’re not gay. They just practice safe sex by only having it with people who can’t get pregnant.
I’m going to go vomit now. The institution of the Catholic church makes me fucking sick.
Ummm, problem?
Can’t force a business to build a school in a black neighborhood.
I’m sure the vouchers will be about $4,000.00 per year for a $12,000.00 per year elementary school.
And who will issue these vouchers? I see room for lots of fraud and deception. And bureaucracy as far as the eye can see.
I have been correlating the decline of the American Empire to the decline of the British Empire for some time now. The uprisings in the middle-east are American colonies in disarray. The British Raj period in India was the same thing. As you point out as well that in this period, education was something for the wealthy.
The vouchers will be between 50% and 90% of the per-student funding received by their public district.
Just scroll. This person used to be somewhat reasonable but recently has dived off into the deep end of conservative wingnuttia. Probably wen to see Atlas Crapped.
Which amount does not refute the primary point Peasant Party was making.
Or have private schools suddenly gotten cheaper these days?
Say the private school tuition is $12K and the public school system has been funding per student costs of $8k and your 50% figure is correct, then guess what, $4k is the amount of the voucher.
Whatever ways you slice it, those vouchers are not going to allow students from low income families to suddenly be able to afford a private school which leaves the tax payer subsidizing rich kids to go to private schools at the expense of the public school system
That’s right, just scroll, don’t think.
So for a single mom who is raising 4 kids and making $14,000 a year, where does the other 10% payment come from? Let’s just throw around some numbers…
If a private elementary school charges $5,000 per year per child the 10% burden to her is $500 x 4 kids. That’s $2,000.
Where’s she supposed to get that money, alan? You going to write her a fucking check?
Why would you want Margaret to function as you do?
It said without irony….
Which, of course, is the point. But the Ds have no one to blame but themselves — starting at the very top. Vilification of public schools, teachers, and unions has become the standard claptrap of the educated elite.
When the Secretary of Education can spot a whole school full of teachers who “deserve to be fired” from a hundred miles away, it is pretty obvious why clowns like Daniels can get away with substituting anemic vouchers for public education.
Really sad.
You missed the part about “Families would have to meet certain income limits to qualify”.
Republicans are determined to turn our country into Somalia. I wonder if they expect to be able to live in peace and prosperity inside gated communities under private guard or if they are planning to move to Abu Dhabi?
All I did was post a quote from the Superintendent of Public Instruction. I thought he may be able to provide some perspective. I guess he doesn’t know as much about Ind. education as FDL posters.
And those families would still need to make up the difference between the voucher amount and the actual tuition so I ask again, who is going to benefit from this the most?
The next step will be to mandate education
insurancevouchers.By the way, I wasn’t trying to refute the primary point Peasant Party was making. I was only adding factual material to what was posted.
Not the rich kids, they don’t qualify.
Let’s say that the funding per-student is comparable to what we have in TX (which has been somewhere between $4,975 and $9,000 per student in public schools – depending on which district and numbers that were wrong when they were used originally back in ’89 and still haven’t been updated), then the worst-case scenario means that the person in the district that gets $4,975 per student per year would be worth somewhere between $2,487 and $4,478.
For a $12,000 per year tuition at a private school (John Cooper School here in The Woodlands is getting about $15K per student for grades 1-8, by the way, so $12K is pretty reasonable as a working figure), that doesn’t QUITE cover the cost of a year’s worth of tuition. In fact, it comes up about $7,500 short. Remember, now, that the low per-student funding happens most frequently in low-income areas, so it is unlikely that the parent(s) of a student in such a district will be able to come up with an extra $833/month (only paying in months where there is actually a class being held).
So please explain to me how a family that is already in a relatively low-income neighborhood can afford the equivalent of an extra car payment and a half per month so they don’t have to send their child to a private school?
Please bear in mind that the price of a private school’s tuition is likely to increase as demand for the fixed number of seats in the private schools increases (standard supply & demand economics, y’know), so in fact the costs to the family will probably be well in excess of the $7500/year demonstrated above…
The partisan Republican suckling at the teat of his Republican governor Superintendent? Gotcha. He’s as reliable as Rush Limbaugh.
I can hardly bear to listen to more republican governor bullshit. So now we have school vouchers and fuck the poor on medicaid. What else is new? I think we are fast becoming Afghanistan. Sad thing is some people think it’s all good. Too many think it.
yup.
the whole point.
but shhhhhhhhhhhhhh, don’t let the peons know.
oh wait, they don’t care. don’t understand. nor want to understand.
yo geniuses, dakine already nailed it.
“Whatever ways you slice it, those vouchers are not going to allow students from low income families to suddenly be able to afford a private school which leaves the tax payer subsidizing rich kids to go to private schools at the expense of the public school system.”
so now everyone pays taxes so that private schools can get rich. and that means once again the few get rich from the many. LMAO. american imperial decline. not a pretty picture. and of course americans are signing up for it. they are literally getting in line for the meat grinder. LMAO (after you just don’t have any more Fing tears, all you can do is laugh).
and of course the private schools are not required to educate. they can just kick out anyone not meeting their standards. F those kids right? yup.
so they will always have better scores than public schools, because all of the “difficult” kids will be kicked out of private schools and have no choice. and then they will use their test scores to further bolster their “rep”.
oh my, race to the bottom. of course this will further destroy the middle class now and decimate future generations (unless a job at McDees is not considered decimation).
and the band plays on.
they don’t care.
many middle class households are already struggling TO SURVIVE!!!
and now in a few years, the private schools will kick out all the “difficult” students and relegate them to “their own kind” in public schools. so percentage of “difficult” kids will increase dramatically in public schools. so the middle class family that can’t pay, must send them to public school.
luckily peers have no effect on kids, right?
LMAO. going, going, gone ………………
Start here.
http://sss.nais.org/Parents/FinAidResources/content.cfm?ItemNumber=152506&navItemNumber=152525