The President’s remarks on immigration reform, happening live from El Paso, Texas right now, reflect a return to promises made during the 2008 campaign, with the experience of a Presidency that has focused on border and workplace enforcement and deportations more than building the coalition for reform. I’m going to put the entire, 3,300-plus word speech below, because I do think it’s important to have a marker for this set of promises around our immigration system. And to be clear, there weren’t 60 or maybe even 50 votes in the Senate for immigration reform last year, and there probably weren’t 218 votes in the House either. This was not a battle with a lot of potential.
That’s why I take the position of Rep. Luis Gutierrez on this issue, saying that we should not get the hopes up of a generation of Latinos about a comprehensive solution. That’s not happening soon. The DREAM Act had an outside chance last year thanks to some incredible activism. But that’s a minor piece of the puzzle.
So let’s look at what’s in this speech with regards to the here and now. One thing is building the rhetorical space for future changes. And so we see President Obama, finally, making the economic argument for expanding immigration:
Think about it. Over the past decade, even before the recession, middle class families were struggling to get by as costs went up but incomes didn’t. We’re seeing this again with gas prices. Well, one way to strengthen the middle class is to reform our immigration system, so that there is no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everyone else. I want incomes for middle class families to rise again. I want prosperity in this country to be widely shared. That’s why immigration reform is an economic imperative.
Allowing more immigrants to become productive members of society would solve a great deal of our economic problems. As it is we educate and train many immigrants, only to watch them return to their home countries because of the difficulties with keeping them here on visas. This is a monumentally dumb policy for this country to maintain. And it’s true at the bottom of the wage scale too. An underground economy benefits nobody.
The other thing Obama says here is that he’s answered the questions from the naysayers who demanded that America secure the border before even talking about immigration reform. He says there are more agents on the border than at any time in history. He says that the border fence has been built (the virtual fence has been abandoned). He says that unmanned drones are on patrol, that intelligence analysts are working the border, that all southbound rail shipments are being screened for contraband, and on and on. It’s enough to make you uncomfortable. But he touts the results. More drugs and weapons are being seized. Apprehensions are down. Violent crime is way down (El Paso is way safer than Ohio, Speaker Boehner).
At least rhetorically, Obama seems to realize this is a fool’s errand even as he does it:
So, we have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement. But even though we’ve answered these concerns, I suspect there will be those who will try to move the goal posts one more time. They’ll say we need to triple the border patrol. Or quadruple the border patrol. They’ll say we need a higher fence to support reform.
Maybe they’ll say we need a moat. Or alligators in the moat.
At a Univision town hall, Obama did say that he would focus enforcement efforts on criminals, and touted that deportations of criminals went up 70% while deportation of others went down. And there’s indications that undocumented students are being de-emphasized for deportation. But there’s something unsettling about all the money and effort put into border security and worksite enforcement to please a faction that everyone knows will never be satisfied – including the President. You can argue that those were ends themselves, to follow the laws of our system before we seek to fix them. But it was definitely pitched as proving to the naysayers that the government can take care of this. But the naysayers will never believe that.
And then, we have the program. There are four steps outlined here: 1) secure the borders and enforce the law (as I said, end in itself); 2) businesses held accountable for exploiting the undocumented; 3) responsibility for those here illegally, including an admission of guilt, paying back taxes and fines, learning English and getting in the back of the line for a path to citizenship; 4) reforming the legal immigration system, including high-tech and farmworkers. There’s a fifth principle of respecting families through reunification that’s here as well, and that ties in to a renewed call to pass the DREAM Act.
I already touched on this yesterday, but only now has the President decided that “this change has to be driven by you,” that outside pressure is what’s needed to bring about immigration reform. If this is the new plan, I’m all for it, but the President is a bit late to the game.
Here’s the full speech:
Hello, El Paso! It’s great to be back here with all of you, and to be back in the Lone Star State. I love coming to Texas. Even the welcomes are bigger down here. So, to show my appreciation, I wanted to give a big policy speech… outdoors… right in the middle of a hot, sunny day.
I hope everyone is wearing sunscreen.
Now, about a week ago, I delivered the commencement address at Miami Dade Community College, one of the most diverse schools in the nation. The graduates were proud that their class could claim heritage from 181 countries around the world. Many of the students were immigrants themselves, coming to America with little more than the dreams of their parents and the clothes on their backs. A handful had discovered only in adolescence or adulthood that they were undocumented. But they worked hard and gave it their all, and they earned those diplomas.
At the ceremony, 181 flags – one for every nation represented – was marched across the stage. Each was applauded by the graduates and relatives with ties to those countries. But then, the last flag – the American flag – came into view. And the room erupted. Every person in the auditorium cheered. Yes, their parents or grandparents – or the graduates themselves – had come from every corner of the globe. But it was here that they had found opportunity, and had a chance to contribute to the nation that is their home.
It was a reminder of a simple idea, as old as America itself. E pluribus, unum. Out of many, one. We define ourselves as a nation of immigrants – a nation that welcomes those willing to embrace America’s precepts. That’s why millions of people, ancestors to most of us, braved hardship and great risk to come here – so they could be free to work and worship and live their lives in peace. The Asian immigrants who made their way to California’s Angel Island. The Germans and Scandinavians who settled across the Midwest. The waves of the Irish, Italian, Polish, Russian, and Jewish immigrants who leaned against the railing to catch that first glimpse of the Statue of Liberty.
This flow of immigrants has helped make this country stronger and more prosperous. We can point to the genius of Einstein and the designs of I. M. Pei, the stories of Isaac Asimov and whole industries forged by Andrew Carnegie.
And I think of the naturalization ceremonies we’ve held at the White House for members of the military, which have been so inspiring. Even though they were not yet citizens, these men and women had signed up to serve. One was a young man named Granger Michael from Papua New Guinea, a Marine who deployed to Iraq three times. Here’s what he said about becoming an American citizen. “I might as well. I love this country already.” Marines aren’t big on speeches. Another was a woman named Perla Ramos. She was born and raised in Mexico, came to the United States shortly after 9/11, and joined the Navy. She said, “I take pride in our flag … and the history we write day by day.”
That’s the promise of this country – that anyone can write the next chapter of our story. It doesn’t matter where you come from; what matters is that you believe in the ideals on which we were founded; that you believe all of us are equal and deserve the freedom to pursue happiness. In embracing America, you can become American. And that enriches all of us.
Yet at the same time, we are standing at the border today because we also recognize that being a nation of laws goes hand in hand with being a nation of immigrants. This, too, is our heritage. This, too, is important. And the truth is, we’ve often wrestled with the politics of who is and who isn’t allowed to enter this country. At times, there has been fear and resentment directed toward newcomers, particularly in periods of economic hardship. And because these issues touch on deeply held convictions – about who we are as a people, about what it means to be an American – these debates often elicit strong emotions.
That’s one reason it’s been so difficult to reform our broken immigration system. When an issue is this complex and raises such strong feelings, it’s easier for politicians to defer the problem until after the next election. And there’s always a next election. So we’ve seen a lot blame and politics and ugly rhetoric. We’ve seen good faith efforts – from leaders of both parties – fall prey to the usual Washington games. And all the while, we’ve seen the mounting consequences of decades of inaction.
Today, there are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States. Some crossed the border illegally. Others avoid immigration laws by overstaying their visas. Regardless of how they came, the overwhelming majority of these folks are just trying to earn a living and provide for their families. But they’ve broken the rules, and have cut in front of the line. And the truth is, the presence of so many illegal immigrants makes a mockery of all those who are trying to immigrate legally.
Also, because undocumented immigrants live in the shadows, they’re vulnerable to unscrupulous businesses that skirt taxes, pay workers less than the minimum wage, or cut corners with health and safety. This puts companies who follow those rules, and Americans who rightly demand the minimum wage or overtime or just a safe place to work, at an unfair disadvantage.
Think about it. Over the past decade, even before the recession, middle class families were struggling to get by as costs went up but incomes didn’t. We’re seeing this again with gas prices. Well, one way to strengthen the middle class is to reform our immigration system, so that there is no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everyone else. I want incomes for middle class families to rise again. I want prosperity in this country to be widely shared. That’s why immigration reform is an economic imperative.
And reform will also help make America more competitive in the global economy. Today, we provide students from around the world with visas to get engineering and computer science degrees at our top universities. But our laws discourage them from using those skills to start a business or power a new industry right here in the United States. So instead of training entrepreneurs to create jobs in America, we train them to create jobs for our competition. That makes no sense. In a global marketplace, we need all the talent we can get – not just to benefit those individuals, but because their contributions will benefit all Americans.
Look at Intel and Google and Yahoo and eBay – these are great American companies that have created countless jobs and helped us lead the world in high-tech industries. Every one was founded by an immigrant. We don’t want the next Intel or Google to be created in China or India. We want those companies and jobs to take root in America. Bill Gates gets this. “The United States will find it far more difficult to maintain its competitive edge,” he’s said, “if it excludes those who are able and willing to help us compete.”
It’s for this reason that businesses all across America are demanding that Washington finally meet its responsibility to solve the immigration problem. Everyone recognizes the system is broken. The question is, will we summon the political will to do something about it? And that’s why we’re here at the border today.
In recent years, among the greatest impediments to reform were questions about border security. These were legitimate concerns; it’s true that a lack of manpower and resources at the border, combined with the pull of jobs and ill-considered enforcement once folks were in the country, contributed to a growing number of undocumented people living in the United States. And these concerns helped unravel a bipartisan coalition we forged back when I was a United States Senator. In the years since, “borders first” has been a common refrain, even among those who previously supported comprehensive immigration reform.
Well, over the past two years we have answered those concerns. Under Secretary Napolitano’s leadership, we have strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible. They wanted more agents on the border. Well, we now have more boots on the ground on the southwest border than at any time in our history. The Border Patrol has 20,000 agents – more than twice as many as there were in 2004, a build up that began under President Bush and that we have continued.
They wanted a fence. Well, that fence is now basically complete.
And we’ve gone further. We tripled the number of intelligence analysts working the border. I’ve deployed unmanned aerial vehicles to patrol the skies from Texas to California. We’ve forged a partnership with Mexico to fight the transnational criminal organizations that have affected both of our countries. And for the first time we are screening 100 percent of southbound rail shipments – to seize guns and money going south even as we go after drugs coming north.
So, we have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement. But even though we’ve answered these concerns, I suspect there will be those who will try to move the goal posts one more time. They’ll say we need to triple the border patrol. Or quadruple the border patrol. They’ll say we need a higher fence to support reform.
Maybe they’ll say we need a moat. Or alligators in the moat.
They’ll never be satisfied. And I understand that. That’s politics.
But the truth is, the measures we’ve put in place are getting results. Over the past two and a half years, we’ve seized 31 percent more drugs, 75 percent more currency, and 64 percent more weapons than before. Even as we’ve stepped up patrols, apprehensions along the border have been cut by nearly 40 percent from two years ago – that means far fewer people are attempting to cross the border illegally.
Also, despite a lot of breathless reports that have tagged places like El Paso as dangerous, violent crime in southwest border counties has dropped by a third. El Paso and other cities and towns along the border are consistently rated among the safest in the nation. Of course, we shouldn’t accept any violence or crime, and we have more work to do. But this progress is important.
Beyond the border, we’re also going after employers who knowingly exploit people and break the law. And we are deporting those who are here illegally. Now, I know that the increase in deportations has been a source of controversy. But I want to emphasize: we are not doing this haphazardly; we are focusing our limited resources on violent offenders and people convicted of crimes; not families, not folks who are just looking to scrape together an income. As a result, we increased the removal of criminals by 70 percent.
That is not to ignore the real human toll. Even as we recognize that enforcing the law is necessary, we don’t relish the pain it causes in the lives of people just trying to get by. And as long as the current laws are on the books, it’s not just hardened felons who are subject to removal; but also families just trying to earn a living, bright and eager students; decent people with the best of intentions. I know some here wish that I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how a democracy works. What we really need to do is keep up the fight to pass reform. That’s the ultimate solution to this problem.
And I’d point out, the most significant step we can take now to secure the borders is to fix the system as a whole – so that fewer people have incentive to enter illegally in search of work in the first place. This would allow agents to focus on the worst threats on both of our borders – from drug traffickers to those who would come here to commit acts of violence or terror.
So, the question is whether those in Congress who previously walked away in the name of enforcement are now ready to come back to the table and finish the work we’ve started. We have to put the politics aside. And if we do, I’m confident we can find common ground. Washington is behind the country on this. Already, there is a growing coalition of leaders across America who don’t always see eye-to-eye, but who are coming together on this issue. They see the harmful consequences of this broken system for their businesses and communities. They understand why we need to act.
There are Democrats and Republicans, including former-Republican Senator Mel Martinez and former-Bush administration Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff; leaders like Mayor Michael Bloomberg; evangelical ministers like Leith Anderson and Bill Hybels; police chiefs from across the nation; educators and advocates; labor unions and chambers of commerce; small business owners and Fortune 500 CEOs. One CEO had this to say about reform. “American ingenuity is a product of the openness and diversity of this society… Immigrants have made America great as the world leader in business, science, higher education and innovation.” That’s Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, and an immigrant himself. I don’t know if you’re familiar with his views, but let’s just say he doesn’t have an Obama bumper sticker on his car.
So there is a consensus around fixing what’s broken. Now we need Congress to catch up to a train that’s leaving the station. Now we need to come together around reform that reflects our values as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants; that demands everyone take responsibility.
So what would comprehensive reform look like?
First, we know that government has a threshold responsibility to secure the borders and enforce the law. Second, businesses have to be held accountable if they exploit undocumented workers. Third, those who are here illegally have a responsibility as well. They have to admit that they broke the law, pay their taxes, pay a fine, and learn English. And they have to undergo background checks and a lengthy process before they can get in line for legalization.
And fourth, stopping illegal immigration also depends on reforming our outdated system of legal immigration. We should make it easier for the best and the brightest to not only study here, but also to start businesses and create jobs here. In recent years, a full 25 percent of high-tech startups in the U.S. were founded by immigrants, leading to more than 200,000 jobs in America. I’m glad those jobs are here. And I want to see more of them created in this country.
We need to provide farms a legal way to hire the workers they rely on, and a path for those workers to earn legal status.
Our laws should respect families following the rules – reuniting them more quickly instead of splitting them apart. Today, the immigration system not only tolerates those who break the rules, it punishes the folks who follow the rules. While applicants wait for approval, for example, they’re often forbidden from visiting the United States. Even husbands and wives may have to spend years apart. Parents can’t see their children. I don’t believe the United States of America should be in the business of separating families. That’s not right. That’s not who we are.
And we should stop punishing innocent young people for the actions of their parents – by denying them the chance to earn an education or serve in the military. That’s why we need to pass the Dream Act. Now, we passed the Dream Act through the House last year. But even though it received a majority of votes in the Senate, it was blocked when several Republicans who had previously supported the Dream Act voted no.
It was a tremendous disappointment to get so close and then see politics get in the way. And as I gave the commencement at Miami Dade, it broke my heart knowing that a number of those promising, bright students – young people who worked so hard and who speak to what’s best about America – are at risk of facing the agony of deportation. These are kids who grew up in this country, love this country, and know no other place as home. The idea that we would punish them is cruel and it makes no sense. We are a better nation than that.
So we’re going to keep up the fight for the Dream Act. We’re going to keep up the fight for reform. And that’s where you come in. I will do my part to lead a constructive and civil debate on these issues. We’ve already held a series of meetings about this at the White House in recent weeks. And we’ve got leaders here and around the country helping to move the debate forward. But this change has to be driven by you – to help us push for comprehensive reform, and to identify what steps we can take right now – like the Dream Act and visa reform – areas where we can find common ground among Democrats and Republicans to begin fixing what’s broken.
I am asking you to add your voices to this debate – and you can sign up to help at whitehouse.gov. We need Washington to know that there is a movement for reform gathering strength from coast to coast. That’s how we’ll get this done. That’s how we can ensure that in the years ahead we are welcoming the talents of all who can contribute to this country; and that we are living up to that basic American idea: you can make it if you try.
That idea is what gave hope to José Hernández, who is here today. José’s parents were migrant farm workers. And so, growing up, he was too. He was born in California, though he could have just as easily been born on the other side of the border, had it been a different time of year, because his family moved with the seasons. Two of his siblings were actually born in Mexico.
They traveled a lot and José joined his parents picking cucumbers and strawberries. He missed part of the school year when they returned to Mexico each winter. He didn’t learn English until he was 12. But José was good at math, and he liked it. The great thing about math was that it’s the same in every school, and it’s the same in Spanish.
So he studied hard. And one day, standing in the fields, collecting sugar beets, he heard on a transistor radio that a man named Franklin Chang-Diaz – a man with a name like his – was going to be an astronaut for NASA.
José decided that he could be an astronaut, too.
So he kept studying, and graduated high school. He kept studying, earning an engineering degree and a graduate degree. He kept working hard, ending up at a national laboratory, helping to develop a new kind of digital medical imaging system.
And a few years later, he found himself more than 100 miles above the surface of the earth, staring out the window of the Shuttle Discovery, remembering the boy in the California fields with a crazy dream and an unshakable belief that everything was possible in America.
That is what we are fighting for. We are fighting for every boy and girl like José with a dream and potential just waiting to be tapped. We are fighting to unlock that promise, and all that it holds not just for their futures, but for the future of this great country.
Thank you. God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America.





22 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I don’t know about other FDLers, but I am very uncomfortable with this line of reasoning. I know you’re merely trying to state the facts, but I don’t think this approach will lead to significant progress anytime soon.
The facts certainly did not preclude establishing a more aggressive and earlier narrative — a calling for a determined push in spite of the opposition and low probability of legislative victory. Clearly calling folks out who opposed reform and making it clear who the enemy was.
But, I admit, YMMV.
Jobs should be the priority, not immigration. Doesn’t anyone care about the people, citizens who are suffering.
Healthcare after that.
What a concept.
Why should we trust Obama to return to promises he’s spent two and a half years not keeping?
Assume your question is rhetorical, but A = No.
Must admit that I don’t see much point in going down the Immigration Reform road at this point, other than more Kabuki Show to avoid doing anything about jobs, the economy, etc. A time-sink, in other words, and more ways to rile up the base in order to distract from other issues. Not that immigration reform isn’t worth considering, but under the present economic/jobs conditions right now, seems rather specious to even be raising this right now.
Nothing to see here folks. It’s a campaign speech designed to make Hispanics forget how bad the last two and a half years of his immigration policy has been. We are going to see dozens of these exercises in horse puckey between now and Nov 2012.
Immigration reform is far from being on my top most list of issues.
However, the Future of America is at the top of my list. Thusly, the “self-restraint” demonstrated by America’s “racial and ethnics” in the years ahead, will come to recognized as a stellar character trait, given the angst and anger for Obama failing to keep his promises and despite his much ballyhoowey for self-absorption.
During the Nixon Era, he was legislating two dozen issues simultaneously, and during the Carter Era, he was simultaneously addressing a dozen issues on a daily basis. As such, Obama is far from being even comparable to Jimmy Carter in this regard.
To wit, Gutierrez received the “portfolio” on immigration, and had it taken away by both Obama and Pelosi, and turned over to Schumer. Consequently, Schumer “trolled” the deep pockets of the anti-immigrationists on Wall Street, and thereby lost “control” of Pelosi’s House. Thus, Obama is today, asking us to follow the “blind” and in addition, he is asking us to disregard their political bling.
Consequently, it’s an oxymoron to suggest that the usual suspects, the “majority” of white America, is being a tad “kind” to Obama and Biden and their certitude for a Legacy of Squandered Opportunities.
Jaango
Obama’s move seems to make sense. The lastest Pew Research polls give the issues of immigration enforcement and path to citizenship roughly 75% public support. Even “moderate” Republicans are in favor of said reforms. So… in terms of agreement on issues, this one should be as close as we can get to a no-brainer.
I think having everyone working in the US doing so with legit legal status would help put a floor underneath our sinking economy. Prolly nowhere near enough on it’s own but it represents one of many things that need to be done.
Tougher border issues will be ending the drug war and helping to revive the Mexican economy.
“Violent crime is way down (El Paso is way safer than Ohio, Speaker Boehner).”
I agree with Reyes. I have usually felt safer, freer, and generally more comfortable in Mexico than in the US (with 20 years in Ohio), including “notorious” towns like Nuevo Laredo and Juarez. The test of perceived violence and apprehension, however, will be the amount of US tourists, shoppers, and especially senior citizens buying pharmaceuticals that they can’t afford domestically crossing the border. This traffic has almost come to a standstill in the last five years or so since the US has increased its control and violence of the border.
Obama has guts to shows up in North Ciudad Juárez with a speech scapegoating peon Mexicans on a border the US has turned into a war zone for profit with its banksta operations and in collusion with the Calderón Administration.
Bidness wants complete price control and to “own the customer” (the telcos would actually say this out loud on the business site) so no more of the US citizens wandering between Detroit and Windsor or Laredo and Nuevo Laredo for cheaper goods and better services. However, the corporate transport will continue as usual. Bidness doesn’t want legal immigrants.
Oooooh! Pretty speech! Pretty!
Now let’s see action.
Too right, MZ. it does take guts, or maybe hubris. Something tells me Obama won’t be getting the same kind of turnout in 2012 from all the groups he fucked over after he won in 2008.
what a fake! Did I read one damn word about the poverty rate in El Paso Texas which happens to be at 26%, second in the nation only to Detroit Michigan? H no. Did he present a plan for dealing with the poverty in El Paso?
Juarez has a lower unemployment rate than El Paso–did he happen to mention that?
All I read was crap about law and order and the D.R.E.A.M. act. The DREAM act is important and I support it but at the moment there are many issues such as hunger and job creation which are more immediate and pressing for at least 26% of the people of the city.
You want a job? Move to El Paso and cross the border every day to work in a Maquiladora. Ironic that El Paso also has a current poverty ranking of 7th in the United States at roughly 26% of its residents living below the official federal poverty level, of $19,157 in household income for a family of four. However that poverty rating is a lot easier to understand when you consider what the American citizens working in the Maquiladoras get paid–on average $65 a week. The Maquiladora program was established in 1965, to help alleviate unemployment on the U.S.–Mexico border by allowing non-Mexican companies to establish manufacturing operations in Mexico to produce goods for exportation. [Note: we all know why the program was created and it was not to "alleviate unemployment". It was to provide cheap labor for U.S. companies.]
El Paso’s sister city Ciudad Juárez has more than 300 such plants employing approximately 195,000 workers, many of them El Paso residents. Yes American citizens cross the border to work in Mexico. More than 70 of the maquiladora plants established in Ciudad Juárez are owned by Fortune 500 companies operating in telecommunications, manufacturing of medical supplies, consumer appliances, electronics, and automotive parts.
Despite a weak U.S. economy and a drug war that has turned this city into Mexico’s deadliest, the maquiladoras are on the rebound. Yep! In a city where drug violence has killed 7,000 people in three years. The maquiladoras are hiring. “Of course you’re scared, but you’ve still got to go to work,” said Luis Garcia, 36, who makes 800 pesos, about $65, a week cutting car-seat leather for the Eagle Ottawa company of Michigan, and who rides the same bus route where shootings occurred. The maquiladora industry ran into the drug violence in Juarez on Oct. 28, 2010 when gunmen opened fire on a trio of buses carrying night shift maquiladora workers to communities outside the city. Four people were killed all four worked for the same company as Luis–Eagle Ottawa. [Source]
DID OBAMA MENTION ANYTHING ABOUT THIS SHAME?
This is just Obama speechifying as his speechiest. There is no chance of anything on immigration, except increased punishment and humiliation for “looking Hispanic”, for the foreseeable future with the T Baggers still resurgent.
For those who can get their heads out of “rhetoric fantasyland”, see the other side of reality:
http://www.borderlandbeat.com/
The maquiladoras were a test case. Then later came the Free Trade Agreements as KORUS FTA (see info here from Jane Hamsher on Jan. 25, 2011). Here’s a bit more on Ciudad Juárez here and here.
Besides being a liar, Oilbomber looks pretty heartless to me.
Obama could propose the GOP’s ideal immigration plan, and the GOP would still vote against it. They won’t let Dems get credit for passing reform. The Hispanic vote is too important.
IF Obama didn’t have the votes last year, it’s because he didn’t want them. Do not forget he got the votes to pass a Republican HCR Bill when Dems controlled both the House & the Senate. It’s all to easy now for Obama feign a fight for his campaign promises because he no longer controls the House. Obama’s a disgrace, what he tried to do to Jane was enough for any Progressive to fight against him at every opportunity – for as long as he remains in puiblic life. What he’s allowed to have done to Manning is worse. Yet here we are, reading posts on FDL that are actually making excuses for him. Politics, ain’t it grand?
The President Obama is a member of the Naked Liars And Deception Club who wares clothes by choice. Enough with the dog eat my home work excuses.The worn out phrase of “Our Administration sucks less” will not exculpate this liar from his responsibilities do what he promise. I guess this is what happen when you become president of the Iron Triangle of Politics and not the people.It getting to the point you know what coming out his mouth before he say it. Now that scary.
When Oblahblah starts throwing around the word “reform,” I’ve learned I’m about to be screwed and to hold tight to my wallet, that the word “reform” means some big benefit for the 1 percenters and some major loss for the rest of us. The con artist’s eloquent speeches bear no resemblance to the reality of his deeds or true commitments or loyalties. I don’t care what he says or does anymore, he lost my vote back when he handed health care “reform” to Max Baucus and walked away, said and did nothing when doctors and nurses were arrested in The People’s House simply for demanding the “place at the table” promised by the Liar in Chief. He can take his “reform” and shove it. He will deliver NOTHING in this regard, just as he has delivered NOTHING of any real value to We The Little People from Day 1.