We know that Wisconsin Republicans are scrambling to pass every right-wing bill they can think of before the recall elections in July, when they could lose control of the state Senate. Among the first of those efforts is a voter supression bill that would disenfranchise many Wisconsin voters.
Wisconsin’s bill requires voters to use a driver’s license, state ID, military ID, passport, naturalization papers or tribal ID at the polls. Though student IDs are technically permitted, none of the colleges or universities in the state currently use IDs that meet the requirements listed in the bill. And as state Sen. Bob Jauch (D) notes, 175,000 seniors (70 percent of whom are women) do not have driver’s licenses and may have to “get a ride at least 50 miles round trip to obtain an identification card to enable them to continue their constitutional right to vote.” What’s more, the bill will cost the state more than $5.7 million to implement — at a time when Gov. Scott Walker (R) is claiming the state is broke and needs to restrict public employees’ collective bargaining rights to survive.
And there’s another twist to this saga. If the bill passes and becomes law in time, it would take effect for the recall elections. In fact, that was one of the two amendments to the bill that passed out of the Joint Finance Committee yesterday – that it would take effect immediately upon passage. So this is a straight-up suppression tactic designed to save GOP Senators by increasing burdens on voter groups – particularly students, minorities and the poor – who traditionally vote for Democrats. State Rep. Jennifer Shilling, who plans to run in the recall election against Sen. Dan Kapanke, put it best: “We were all wondering why there’s such a rush on this bill — now we know… it’s about the recall elections. You feel the rules need to be changed right in the middle of the game.”
There’s the possibility of suing over the bill under a variety of laws, but the Supreme Court allowed Indiana’s voter ID law to go forward, and this is mainly similar, so I don’t think an injunction will work in this case. If this passes, it will be in place for the recalls in all likelihood.
The only positive is that the Joint Finance Committee amended the bill to eliminate the requirement that eligible student IDs would have to carry correct addresses. I don’t know if this makes the student IDs currently used by colleges available for use, but under the former requirement no college ID in the state met the criteria. Perhaps the removal of the address will make some student IDs eligible. It’s not like you’ll see a mass distribution of new student IDs in time for July.
The argument here is that it’s relatively painless to get an eligible ID like a driver’s license, but of course this isn’t true for many people who don’t drive and have no need for such an ID in their daily lives. Even if the state issues free IDs to those who need them, it’s still a matter of getting to the distribution office and verifying the information. This is a voter suppression bill, and that’s been true everywhere it’s been tried.
With the Joint Finance Committee having passed the bill, it moves to the state Assembly, which will probably pass it this week. The Senate Majority Leader promised to “shepherd it through” after that.
People might want to get back to the rotunda with their drums and loudspeakers.



31 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thanks DDay.
Any chance the U.S. Attorneys in Wisconsin could block this? Does Obama wanna try to win Wisconsin in 2012 with these voter suppression laws in place?
Is there someway for the people to strike this down on the issue of the money it will cost to implement after the death drums of the state being broke?
If nothing else, just file injunctions and other legal pleas to hold it up for as long as it takes!
LOL!
You know, it would seem to me that if the Dems really wanted to be re-elected they would go full out on the voting issues and fight to remove all black boxes.
You know, if the United States had single-payer health insurance, none of this would matter, because every citizen would have a health card with his or her photo on it. That’s why the identification requirement in Canada has never raised any problems. It is not a binding constraint on voter participation.
Right now would be an excellent time for the the President to stand up for the people, however, it is times like these that he is usually hard to find.
Yep. I smell a presidential trip to New Zealand, Micronesia and The Falkland islands coming up.
America’s True Patriots in Wisconsin seek to make democracy safe for the Koch brothers!
Who would criticize that? Besides nearly everyone else.
You know, you are right!
With the daily erosion of our rights, especially attacks on voting from every direction the only social contract we have left with our government is Social Security and Medicare.
I’m being serious now. If we the people have very little in rights left and our ability to vote keeps getting narrower, there is nothing left to where OUR government is to be beholden to the people.
I do believe the good people of WI will find a way to get people to the DMV place or whatever to get them IDs.
This should go before the courts, along with election rigging and theft by anyone who hates democracy. Their voting mechanisms need more attention than voter ID.
My hope is Wisconsin blows up the corrupt voting system including the black box “voting” system.
Those Kochsuckers don’t fuck around, do they. Playin for keeps (as in keeping the boot of wealth on the throat of working people).
The Feds need to look at this law or Obama can go home now. The Feds need to look at oting machines in Wisconsin and how votes are counted or foundafter the election.
So, what this really means is that the D’s must make the effort to get the IDs for the people who need them. They have seven weeks. Just like 2008, if enough attention is shined on this, and enough people show up, then the GOP has no chance to steal the election.
Funny the media is not saying anything but how the Popular Tea Baggers need to steal elections. Imagine if we started demanding a test of knowledge of the issues before being allowed to vote Daily Show viewers know more about the issues than Fox News Viewers.
Diebold.
While there is minuscule evidence of voter fraud; there is extensive evidence of election fraud. Political operatives designed and manufacture electronic voting machines whose failings are so elemental that it is obvious they were designed for manipulation. Political operatives within government (like Ohio Sec. of State Ken Blackwell in 2004) and local Boards of Election play fast and loose with legal procedures for the tabulation and storage of ballots in every election. Back in 1972 Ed Muskie said “There are only two kinds of politics, the politics of fear, and the politics of trust.” But he was wrong politics it is both: We fear we cannot trust. So why vote?
And there you have the Republican hidden agenda: reduce the number of voters.
So requiring voters to show voter ID is now called “vote suppression”? Really? If this is “vote suppression”, then what type of voter identification verification system would you consider NOT “vote suppression”? Anything?
Is there some reason a voter ID can’t be issued when someone registers to vote? Couldn’t IDs be sent to registered voters? It seems so simple, or maybe I am.
A deliberate non-sequitur.
Voters have always been identified at the polls.
Voters have been (and in non-winger jurisdictions still are) registered by election officials… who would know best who is and is not eligible to vote and who can handle the chore cheaply and easily with minimal government resources.
And it works. Voter fraud has been and is a vanishingly small non-issue.
Winger “Voter ID” laws do the opposite. They are expensive , expansive, intrusive and fail at their supposed reason for existence.
All that the “Voter ID” laws are is an additional and unneeded layer of government intervention specifically designed to suppress voter turnout in certain demographics.
And in that task they work all too well.
There is not a Voter fraud problem. But there are many documented ballot tabulation and storage problems that make recounts useless or indecisive. These claims by Republican hacks are just camouflage to mask the real subversion.
It is when only particular IDs are accepted. Read the article.
That’s the way it’s been done. You registered to vote and got a card.
Then you showed up at the polls, showed your card, signed in and voted.
The wingers have a problem with this because too many of the wrong kind of people show up and vote.
But they’re working on that problem…
I hate living in the US. Criminals do whatever they want and get away with it.
Wisconsin,being a northern state,where blacks were never deliberately disenfranchised,is not subject to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 where significant changes in voting laws in the southern states have to be approved by the Justice Department.
However,people who don’t drive must be given a free Photo ID by the state for the law to be upheld,if it were not given out free,it would constitute a poll tax.
But they will not offer a free voter ID.
An actual free voter ID program would include free transport to the office where the photo will be taken and vouchers for the costs of acquiring any and all supporting documentation the voter may be required to supply.
Here in Indiana they rigged it so that, in addition to the other costs imposed on voters to get the “free” photo ID, some perfectly eligible elderly voters would have had to pay hundreds of dollars for supporting documents they had never needed before in their life.
Under winger rule there are never any free voter IDs.
True enough, but “absentee” is still supposed to be counted. The idea, as it was in 2008, is to make it that much harder to steal elections because of the turnout. The fact that Diebold and its ilk were decertified by California for lack of accountability and poor performance ought to be broadcast throughout the land, especially WI.
litvak36′s note on the poll tax is accurate, but I am not sure how the SCOTUS got around the clear language of the 24th Amendment unless they split hairs for Indiana’s voter ID law as a “state” office rather than the federal ones noted. I’m pretty sure some of these characters elected to state office would be expected to double as the members of the Electoral College. Maybe the lawyers have an idea.
24th Amendment, US Constitution, ratified 1964:
1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
That was my next observation, that these would never be freebies. If so, then it is a poll tax, since you must pay to vote, and needs to be challenged on those grounds. It might take a while, and a change in the court, but even Plessy v Ferguson was overturned when separate was proved to be unequal when implemented in the country.
The phrase “any other tax” seems pretty clear to me. Does anyone have the rationale used by the SCOTUS for Indiana?
The short version of the Stevens opinion:
All a state has to do in order to pass a blatant voter disenfranchisement law is to declare a fear of “voter fraud.”
That’s it. That’s all.
Simply say that your state is worried about a non-existent problem and you too can toss prohibitively expensive roadblocks in the path of those undesirable voters.
How expensive is too expensive to still comply with the 24th? I guess that is what has to be tested, and it will take a while. Plessy was chipped away that way, and FWIW, it’s how Roe is being watered down.
Why can’t we insist that whatever id is required to vote also be used to buy beer? There are many people who don’t have a drivers license but but beer. Wisconsin has a huge beer industry.
Also credit cards any credit credit holders in must get the new ideas to counter credit card fraud.
Can we add these ideas as amendments to kill the bill?
Heck, just make it a universal ID. Failure to carry it means that you’re automatically guilty of practicing sharia.
And no fair starting on the beer without the rest of us…