Tax subsidies for Big Oil are giveaways to companies that make huge profits. The amount of subsidies that Democrats want to claw back over ten years represent 60% of what Big Oil made last quarter. Oil is traded on a global market, and the Congressional Research Service confirmed that eliminating the subsidies would have virtually no effect on gas prices. The hit to Big Oil revenues and the consumer, then, is nonexistent; and the idea of helping out billionaires with corporate welfare is totally offensive. I would rather see the money channeled into greentech rather than deficit reduction, but there’s absolutely no rationale for keeping tax subsidies for the richest corporations in the world.
Unless, that is, you’re a Senator from Louisiana or Alaska, regardless of party, and you’re protecting your big-money contributors.
Democratic Sens. Mark Begich and Mary Landrieu, who represent Alaska and Louisiana, respectively, each took to the Senate floor Wednesday to decry their party’s attempt to strip tax breaks from the top oil companies.
Landrieu bemoaned the “inherent unfairness” of closing the tax loophole, insisting that doing so “will not reduce gasoline prices by one penny.”
Begich chided the party for putting message over substance. “It is a gimmick, a gimmick to get the next week of activity, and get some press out there,” he said. “Picking on one industry because it sounds good, rates good in the polls, gets you a couple of headlines is not what the American people want us to do here. If anything, they’re getting fed up with that. … Let’s stop the headline-grabbing and get serious about the energy security.”
It’s not so much headline-grabbing as it is the grabbing of $21 billion in corporate welfare from companies making record profits. That money doesn’t go into natural resource exploration or extraction, it goes right into the corporate dividend and the pockets of the CEOs.
It was inevitable that oil-producing states would get representation like this. And yet every state is a gas-consumer state. Every state is a taxpayer state. Every state has constituents who give their money to the government so a sliver of it can be handed over to the same billionaires who charge $4 a gallon for gasoline. And these billionaires are the same people who think being denied that corporate welfare is actually un-American.
That CEO, ConocoPhillips’ James Mulva, and the heads of the other top oil companies will testify today at a Senate Finance Committee hearing on the subsidies. You can actually watch that hearing at the Finance Committee website. Fortunately, Mark Begich and Mary Landrieu don’t sit on the panel. But their presence in the Senate, and their fealty to the oil industry, will make it impossible to have a reasonable tax policy on this subject.




23 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
We need another Sam Rayburn. He was from Texas yet he wasn’t afraid to tell the oil men where to get off. Then again elections cost lots less than they do now.
Then again, Henry Waxman gets gobs of money from dirty energy, yet he knows how to say “no” to them.
I heard her say something like, poor Exxon is taxed at 45%…I nearly spewed coffee everywhere. What about her boyfriend, BP? What a low-life tool she is.
The oil companies grease the palms of the politicians so they always make slick decisions on their behalf.
We saw what BP did in the Gulf of Mexico. We see what Shell is willing to do now that affects Alaska, Canada, Greenland and Ireland. No blood for oil
diamondsuranium!Perfect example of our government in action.
Yeah, and? What’s your point?
How does a position taken by two percent of the Senate “make it impossible to have a reasonable tax policy on this subject.” I don’t get that.
I used to live in Iowa. The corn state. Iowa Senators defend the ridiculous and counterproductive ethanol subsidies. Now I live in Louisiana. The oil and gas state…………….
Corporate whores willing to spread their legs for any amount of money. Never ends…
How can we cast out these venal corrupt graft-ridden “politicians” from our govt? How can we get our govt back “for the people”??
Therein lies the question. I’m not sure what the answer is. But this is not “news,” just another look at the greedy villainy of a bunch of low-life scum-sucking lying crooks (and now… let me tell ya how I *really* feel…).
Democrats and Republicans are quite adept at the good cop – bad cop game. R’s make the headlines with insane policy proposals, while D’s quietly aid and abet at the proper moment in a low key-ish way to make sure the policy wins out.
No no, Republicans are BAD! Democrats good! We’re on the blue team, we need to support the blue team! The democratic senators had to compromise with the republican senators. Sure, 21 billion dollars in corporate welfare is not perfect, but don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good. At least it’s not 42 billion dollars in corporate welfare. Half a loaf of bread is better than none. Unless we keep voting for democrats, it will be worse. We have to support democrats no matter how much they compromise.
That’s my rank-and-file democrat impersonation.
There really is no reason for Landrieu to continue to give Big Oil subsidies when politicians are cutting domestic programs due to the pretend deficit. Politician not wanting to cut subsidies to ag., oil or gas at this time appear illogical or underhanded.
The US raised taxes at all other times of war–not lowered them. What were the tax rates during WWII and viet Nam? We are going on ten years of war with Bush tax cuts. This is why the nation is in the tank–literally. It is not working. Time to try it with more taxes for those above 1 million or 250,000. Tax cuts for the wealthy do not produce more jobs. Look how the past ten years of Bush tax cuts have raised unemployment terribly. Only morons would have a war or two and LOWER taxes. You would think they wanted to ruin the nation on purpose.
You’ll be eating cake or catfood soon, if you keep voting for Repubs. The Dems aren’t a whole lot better, but if you want to “thrive”, move to Wisconsin.
“The hit to Big Oil revenues and the consumer, then, is nonexistent”. If you are going to use the CRS report as the basis for your assertion, at least get the facts straight. The CRS said that the impact on gasoline prices would be negligible, not nonexistent, and bases this claim on oil prices remaining aboue $100 per barrel.
Let’s leave aside the Business 101 and the fact that oil company profits are driven from a mostly variable revenue stream and a mostly fixed cost model. Let’s set aside that if oil prices decline, taxing away these tax code provisions (yeah, you call them subsidies) may pose a disastrous threat to these oil companies.
Just answer me one question – if you propose to eliminate these tax code provisions for the oil companies, at what levels of profiabaility do you propose to eliminate the same provisions for other successful companies, which ones, and when?
I never voted for the republicans. I never said I did. Don’t assume everyone who doesn’t support the democrats vote republican. You know this isn’t Huffington Post, right?
Pretty much.
simple….it’s one of the symptoms of Corporatocracy.
Now we know what trash looks like in its Sunday’s best. This what happen when you elected a cabbage patch doll to the senate.”Shake me and wake me , don’t let sleep to long”, how the mighty US Senate have fallen. Even in the state of Louisiana a Lemonade Stand Monitor can be a US Senator.
Well said.
I discovered yesterday that if I go to Sen. Begich’s facebook page, I can’t comment there, even if I “like” his page. My wife, OTOH, posted a picture there and commented. I’ve never commented at Mark’s facebook page, so why has his staff made it so I cannot comment there?
Maybe this, eh?
don’t feed the troll.
OK, I won’t.
I’m going to throw this into the mix (my bold):
{ snip }
(excerpt from “Dirty Money for Dirty Laws,” NRDC Action Fund, by Heather Taylor-Miesle, May 4, 2011)
I took a look. The numbers are very interesting.