The Wisconsin State Assembly passed a voter suppression bill last night by a count of 60-35. The bill will force all residents to show ID at the polls, starting with next spring’s primary elections. Two Democrats and one independent joined 57 Republicans in voting for the bill.
Democrats introduced more than 50 amendments, all of which failed. The body debated the bill for more than six hours.
As the bill was passed, a few onlookers in the gallery began shouting their displeasure. The gallery was less than half full, with some familiar faces in the crowd from protests inside the building over the last week.
“Welcome to Wisconsin, Jim Crow,” yelled one man who was escorted out.
Others began to holler their disapproval as the session was adjourned, shouting their now-familiar “shame” chant.
Rep. Tamara Grigsby harshly criticized the bill, saying that her predecessors (she is African-American) “fought and died” for the right to vote, and that the bill, which will make it harder for the poor and minorities to vote, disrespects their memory.
As I have clarified, the voter ID requirements in the bill would not take effect until next year. However, other provisions, like the rule that voters have to live in their districts for at least 28 days to be eligible (right now it’s 10 days), will take effect right away, before the recall elections this summer. So voting laws will be changed in the two months before the recall elections, which will undoubtedly lead to confusion. In addition, election officials will ask for voter ID at the polls for the recalls, telling voters that they will need them for next time. This is a situation ripe for abuse by uninformed or just malign pollworkers, and will need to be watched closely.
The state Senate expects to take up the bill next Tuesday. There was some rumbling about a possible walkout. The bill is fiscal in nature, as it will cost $5.7 million to implement. So the “Fab 14″ Senators could conceivably walk out to block it. But it’s fairly unlikely that will happen, although anything is possible and the pressure could increase between now and Tuesday.
There’s also the probability of court challenge. Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca raised that possibility last night. A court case would possibly stop implementation and push that past the recalls. The Supreme Court has upheld voter ID laws, and they operate in four states – Florida, Georgia, Indiana and Kansas. Twenty-four states mandate some form of identification for voter registration or at the polling place. Critics say that Wisconsin’s law is more restrictive than all of these, and other elements of the bill could be out of Constitutional order.
Ultimately, this bill is a solution to a nonexistent problem. Voter fraud is a myth; forcing photo ID at the polls merely adds a burden to governments and voters, particularly the 19 million Americans who have no eligible ID. There may be ways to deliver free photo IDs to everyone and encourage confidence in the process, but Wisconsin and the other states pushing these laws aren’t really trying to do that. They’re just adding a burden to the disenfranchised. The point is to suppress the vote.




37 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The GOP has yet again done something, that will also hurt them!
Been to a tea party lately?
The Tea Party is made up of some of the dumbest and poor people in the USA! This bill will hurt a lot of tea party followers.
the stuff happening in Wisconsin shows us all how irrational USA politics have become. The GOP needs to be finding ways to grow their base, instead they are creating ways to kill their base.
the elites have created a big problem! GOP followers are not that smart, keeping them under control during this super depression is going to be a huge problem for the elites.
Reagan and Bush Sr. both knew the TEA PARTY crowd or religious right will do a lot more harm to their life styles than Russia or China!
The Tea Party crowd will eventually started doing crazy crap to take their country back, the problem is people like Koch Brothers stole their country, and they will become their targets.
the bond that keeps the USA together is not that strong. Once everyone wakes up realizes their is no American Dream, and this is just a Con Game develop by rich people to keep most people dumb and poor.
the SOCIAL UNREST in the USA will take off like never before.
the Forefathers were a lot smarter than we thought they were.
the USA never was going to be destroyed from out side, nations like the USA always die from within.
Go view you tube! and look at all the crazy and violent things USA citizens are starting to do.
the GOP in Wisconsin is going to be in for very a rude awakening!
I hope the ID BILL creates some great USA jobs!
“There are now about 7.25 million less jobs in America than when the recession began back in 2007.”
The GOP would have to pick some ID regime that will pass muster, mindful of where and why courts have struck down ID requirements in the past, or haven’t.
On the other hand suppression or the ID, itself, may be secondary GOP goals.
Nowadays incendiary things are used to agitate a base. In this case it may be some expectation Holder will get involved and so drive some of the center to the right. Of course that can cut both ways, but maybe GOPers see a net gain.
I don’t think WI senators packing their bags again is a good strategy for them — or maybe that’s another reason the GOP is at it.
Dems are afraid that dead people and illegals won’t be able to cast their votes (plural in many cases) if these people have to show ID. There’s nothing discriminatory about this law unless the government makes getting an approved ID an onerous and costly process, and they’re giving adequate notice to get one.
I don’t see anything wrong with the law.
scroll……………..
Imagine our surprise.
Tangential– From “America Is Rapidly Bleeding Wealth And Jobs: 28 Statistics About The Gutting Of The U.S. Economy That Will Blow Your Mind” (May 12, 2011):
{ snip }
There are some statistics that require knowing how to read the bias but the other ones I’ve selected out seems to indicate that the 3 Trade Agreements are a disaster to what’s left of the US economy.
Meanwhile, the workers that are getting the US jobs want human rights, worker rights and civil liberties.
Just makes me feel dirty seeing that crap, time for a shower.
This just in. The minute you, I and everyone else stops buying things made in China, their market will dry up and the trade deficit will become a surplus. Before you whine anymore on this subject, count how many articles of clothing in your closet bear the “made in the USA” label.
Heh
Yep, it’s quite the shocker.
The GOP has a massive case of projection. How often have they been caught gaming elections now?
suthrnluvr:
All better.
Do you support the The Universal Declaration of Human Rights? I am all for it and for everyone including Chinese workers.
~~~link repaired~~~
Lol. That link goes to an error page that says this subject dies not exist! Is that what you believe! Human rights don’t exist?
Do you not know Teh Google? Do you not know of the United Nations?
{ Thank you for compensating for my fat-finger typing, mo_devatas }
You mean voter fraud like this.
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8492
Ooooppps my bad it was a GOP bust…..in one of the states that has voter ID laws.
Maybe it’s phone jamming I’m thinking of.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_New_Hampshire_Senate_election_phone_jamming_scandal
Nope that was the GOP too.
As I said, the GOP has got a huge case of projection. They want to corner the market on election manipulation/
Hmmmmmmmmmm as I said, members of the GOP have a huge case of projection
Pal, why don’t you just tell me how that’s relevant here instead of making me do your research? Are you saying that voting is a human right? Sure it is. Then it is also a human right not to disenfranchise someone else’s vote by allowing fraud to occur in the voting booth.
When people vote without IDs, what is to stop them from voting multiple times, or from allowing illegal aliens (sorry, undocumented immigrants) to vote? Every fraudulent vote makes a valid vote useless.
Yet you never push for these same rules for absentee ballots, where it is much easier to commit fraud. Just take some ballots from Alzheimer’s patients at a nursing home and forge the signature- this does NOTHING to stop that fraud, and republicans always leave them out, because they are allowed to commit all the fraud they want while intimidating others and bringing back the poll tax.
I know we shouldn’t feed the trolls but I see Sensible Liberals trying to be Reasonable and repeat the same right wing talking points.
Actually, I am I favor of someone having to show ID before being given an absentee ballot. And we can solve the nursing home issue, too, by requiring IDs and / notarized ballots for those people. Great points!
Where can I buy USA products like shoes, washing machines, shirts, etc. Oh that’s right there aren’t any.
Do you even known what disenfranchise means?
If a person gets to vote their vote isn’t “disenfranchised” since disenfranchised means deprived of a right.
Disenfranchisement occurs when you put onerous requirements on people. For example, in order to get an ID you must have a birth certificate which is not “free.” Additionally, most states require you to pay a fee for your photo ID and they require you to be a resident with some sort of permanent address(and dorms do not count). Basically you disenfranchise the homeless, poor and students by these types of laws. Which coincidentally is EXACTLY what the GOP wants since many of those are not their constituency.
Yes, I do think voting should be a human right. It turns out that US citizen don’t have a Federal right to vote (MoveToAmend.Org).
Next, if ‘Voter fraud is the “intentional corruption of the electoral process by the voter”,’ the key findings are:
* Voter fraud is extremely rare.
* The lack of evidence of voter fraud is not because of a failure to codify it.
* Most voter fraud allegations turn out to be something other than fraud.
* The more complex are the rules regulating voter registration and voting, the more likely voter mistakes, clerical errors, and the like will be wrongly identified as “fraud.”
* There is a long history in America of elites using voter fraud allegations to restrict and shape the electorate.
(extracted from “The Politics Of Voter Fraud“)
Staber is an American made washing machine. We do have products made here. The market is concentrated though in cheap products made overseas so you have to look.
Frankly, I’ve gotten to the point where I’ll buy thrift before I’ll buy some of the cheap stuff made overseas marked up thousandfold to fill some CEOs pockets.
You must not vote much. Try training and volunteering as a poll worker adn you’ll see how things really work.
Wash, rinse, repeat…
Buying thrift is an excellent idea, oftentimes you can get brand new or barely used items for very low prices. The same goes for eBay, and although I am loathe to put money into their coffers, I believe there are a great many people who sell things on eBay who desperately need what is left after eBay and their mandated payment method, PayPal, take their disproportionate cut.
As for the voter issue, I have voted in the city of Chicago for the last 32 years and I’ve always been asked to show ID. It seems logical to me, otherwise someone could show up at the polling place claiming to be me and cast my ballot before I arrive. I know the likelihood of that happening is infinitessimally small, but having to prove you are who you say you are seems logical to me.
As with many things, the devil is in the details. The 24th Amendment is actually very clear, in that there are no ways to get around a poll tax by calling it something else.
Given how Snott Walker and his minions has been behaving, it is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that there will be substantial fees to “recover the costs” and help with the “fiscal emergency”. That means you must pay $$$ to vote, which violates the 24th. They’ll also come up with excuses about how hard it is to get the IDs to voters who can’t get around (might violate the Americans for Disability Act or HAVA)
Unless the D’s can get an injunction (depends upon the judge), they’d better be dealing with the excuses and registering voters now.
The problem is that identification isn’t always easily obtained. Not everyone has access to the funds to procure the documentation or has a permanent address to supply to the DMV. Additionally states charge a fee for photo identification. While $10 is not seem like alot when you add it to $30 for a birth certificate and you require a lease as proof of residency then you start to see how difficult it might be for someone on limited funds due to unemployment or a minimum wage job.
According to CFL 22 out of every 10,000 people is homeless.
http://cflhomeless.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/how-many-are-homeless-in-america/
The economic crisis has likely made these numbers worse. Then when you look at the economic well being of my fellow countrymen, you see that 1 out of every 6 people is eligible for food stamps. If someone is having problems procuring food the last thing they are going to worry about is spending funds to get documentation?
This is about disenfranchising the most vulnerable among us and ensuring that they have no chance to weigh in on policy that affects them. This is about ensuring that when they rend apart the safety net that there will be no consequences. It’s just plain wrong.
I continue to be amazed at the holy jihad republicans are waging upon the American people. Absolutely stunning!!
Nothing wrong with showing I.D to vote. Nothing.
I have been voting since 1962 (had to be 21 in those days) and have voted in NJ, MD, VA, NH, TX, OK & FL and have been a poll worker (in Florida) since 2007. Have yet to see a voter trying to vote with bogus documentation. In Florida, one must have a photo ID along with something with your signature. Registration cards were discontinued a couple of years ago in lieu of the photo ID requirement.
As long as getting a photo ID is not made such a chore as to discourage anyone, it works fine as voter turnouts in Florida recently will attest.
Can one get into a nursing home without identification including insurance info?
When my legitimate vote for candidate A is cancelled out by an illegitimate vote for candidate B, cast by a fraudulent voter, MY voting rights have been disenfranchised. I have essentially been deprived of my right to help choose my representative.
Is that a rhetorical question?
Please move forward to a proven serious problem ELECTION FRAUD.
American free enterprise gave us republican electronic voting and tabulation machines.
Today’s Americans won’t protest. They will riot.
Our very partisan AG Van Hollen spent two years trying to find voter fraud. Out of 3 million votes he found 19 questionable ones. 10 of those were cast by felons who were not eligible to vote but who used their real names and real addresses. So HALF of the meager fraud the AG was able to find would NOT be dealt with by this bill. And yet at a time when Republicans in our state say that we are in the midst of a budget CRISIS, they think we should spend millions of dollars on this.
Per the Fiscal Bureau, 20 percent of WI residents do not currently have the proper ID to vote. Three counties in the state do not have a DMV office. Many others are only open part time. Requiring residents to travel and pay a fee to obtain a photo ID to exercise their constitutionally protected right to vote is nothing more than a poll tax, which is unconstitutional.
Students IDs can ostensibly be used, however currently there is no university or college in WI that has a student ID that will work under the parameters of this bill. Students who retain a driver’s license from their home state and not here will not be able to vote unless they obtain a new student ID with their current mailing address and an expiration date. These IDs will have to be reissued often as the fact remains that students do not live at the same address all four years of college.
There is a mountain of evidence that this is a voter suppression tactic that has absolutely nothing to do with voter fraud.
Your line of argument is zero-sum loss similar to that anti-human rights proponents give for disenfranchising others from marriage, you have provided not a shred of evidence nor have made response to your assertion to which I have responded here.
The last of the “Key Findings” from “The Politics Of Voter Fraud“:
* The historically disenfranchised are often the target of voter fraud allegations.
* Better data collection and election administration will improve the public discussion of voter fraud and lead to more appropriate policies.
My problem is that “Voter Suppression” bills are probably only the beginning in the Right Wing’s attempt to make America a permanent one party system with two classes of people, (1) The Served and (2) The Servers. (The rich and decimated Middle Class who will join the absolute poverty stricken to make one class together.) I suppose that somewhere along the line, these “Extremeist” geniuses will come up with a way to pass a “Vote Elimination” Bill. This, suppression is, of course, only a thinly veiled version of the old discrimination practiced before The Civil Rights Act was passed. It is just levelled at a different targeted group. I remember the move that never got off the ground by a few extremeists in Government following 911 when they wanted to keep their incumbent President in power until “The End Of The Iraq Conflict.” Think of what a nightmare that would have created!
http://thelimingview.blogspot.com/