A couple weeks ago, we saw the enormous lobby culture massing around swipe fees, the relatively obscure issue that determines where billions of dollars go between banks and retailers. The important thing to start with is that this was already determined through a public process. Last year, Congress held a vote, Dick Durbin got over 60 of his colleagues to support him, the measure survived reconciliation, passed into law, and the Federal Reserve began to implement the rule. The system, therefore, worked. What banks are doing is trying to roll back the clock on the reform. They were paying attention to other matters in FinReg and now they have circled back to this. Because they have money and influence, they think they can just nullify a year’s worth of policymaking.
And it appears that Fed Chair Ben Bernanke has been partially captured in this quest:
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said lawmakers should have “reason to be concerned” that an exemption for smaller lenders from U.S. caps on debit- card “swipe” fees won’t work and may cause banks to fail.
“I can’t say with certainty, but I think there is good reason to be concerned about it,” Bernanke said in response to a question at a Senate Banking Committee hearing today in Washington. If the exemption doesn’t work, “it’s going to affect the revenues of the small issuers, and it could result in some smaller banks being less profitable or even failing,” he said.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Fed to cap debit-card swipe fees charged to merchants, while exempting card issuers with assets of less than $10 billion. The central bank has proposed capping the fees at 12 cents a transaction, replacing a formula that averages 1.14 percent of the purchase price.
Community banks and credit unions have said the exemption won’t work and may make their cards less competitive, as they will be more expensive for merchants to accept than cards issued by larger banks. The exempt banks oppose the Fed’s plan along with the biggest lenders, including Bank of America Corp. (BAC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), which could lose more than $12 billion in annual revenue if the caps take effect.
Outgoing FDIC Chair Sheila Bair basically agreed with Bernanke on this one, though Bair just said it would hurt small bank profits, not cause them to collapse. They are both parroting an argument of these community banks in service to the bigger banks who want the entire reform shelved. There’s no evidence that the exemption for smaller banks would work negatively for them. No retailer has come out and said they would charge more for items or not accept purchases from debit cards from smaller banks. It’s a made-up objection from the industry to facilitate a delay of the whole rule.
By the way, the industry is already dealing with this. Visa has initiated a “two-tier” pricing system that will allow smaller banks to charge higher swipe fees.
Despite this, Bair and Bernanke also said that the new swipe fees would take effect on schedule regardless, on July 21. They didn’t feel that any more information was required for the Fed to finalize the rule.
One other thing on this. If the survival of hundreds of banks depends on rent-seeking fees from debit card purchases, isn’t there a much more fundamental problem with the overall system?




23 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Corporate Sodomy! Scumbags of wealth extraction…….
“isn’t there a much more fundamental problem with the overall system?”; and the answer is….Duh !
This is similar to the “argument” used to justify cutting Estate/Death taxes… that’s always framed in terms of how “mom & pop” businesses and small family farms will be so heavily overburdened by *unfair* Estate taxes that the heirs will have to sell the businesses/farms just to pay the damnable taxes, yadda yadda yadda… and of course, some small bus or farm owner will be trotted out to do the usual crybaby dog & pony show.
Fact is, most true mom & pop businesses and/or true small family farms (those that haven’t been run out of businesses by nefarious practices of big agribusiness like Monsanto) are not all that negatively impacted by estate taxes.
It’s the ruse that the upper 1% always use: boo hoo, if doooooo this dreadful thing, all the “small people” will be negatively affected.
LIARS! CHEATS! CROOKS! RIP-OFFS!
Isn’t Bair supposed to be one of the good guys?
“regardless”
We bow down to you oh powerful beings…sit on it and spin.
You mean there’s for-real “good guys” anymore??
I thought that concept was passe. (not snark)
Mr. No-You-Can’t-Audit-The-Fed Bernanke should not be commenting on this issue. The guy actually panicked when it was suggested the Fed be audited. Bernanke has no authority–especially moral authority–especially since he will not allow himself aka the Fed to be audited. Bernanke has never come clean about all those banks failing at the same time in the same way. How could all the banks be in the same shape and on the same page with different boards? How could all of their bottoms fall out at the exact same time? Bernanke is a private institution hack telling public citizens how it is going to be. Use cash. Use cash–for many different reasons.
IIRC, this assertion was debunked – someone (forget who) challenged it and asked for just one actual case where a small farmer had to sell the farm to pay the estate taxes. Result: *crickets*
Same with Reagan’s famous welfare queen – when asked to produce the real person, Reagan’s spokesman had to admit that there was no actual person, it was a “concept.”
Years ago I stopped writing checks for many smaller, local purchases or just to obtain cash for personal spending. I began using my debit card, probably like millions of Americans, because it was an easier method of dealing with these types of transactions. If these people think they will be able to get their hands into my pockets and my bank account, first with relatively small fee transactions, then over time ever increasing fee rates, they can think again. I will stop using the debit card and go back to withdrawing cash directly from the bank for personal spending, and writing checks or using cash for smaller purchases again (e.g., groceries, Costco runs, etc.). I will continue to write checks for payments for car notes, mortgage, bills, etc. One needs to be careful what they wish for, because you may get more than you bargained for…..
Yes all of these rightwing lies have been debunked, many more than once. But as Dick Cheney would say: SO???!!!??
Facts don’t matter to the conservatives in our country – not anymore. As long as Rush Limbaugh or his ilk spew out the usual “talking points,” who gives a sh*t about factual reality? That’s how it works. The rightwing talking points are framed, and then barfed out by Rush & Fox, and a significant enough segment of society is easily satisfied that *their* needs/beliefs/values/interests are being met.
I think it can be labeled as insanity, but factual reality doesn’t matter to those who willingly wish to live in fictional fairytale land.
Banks want big swipe fees. See, they don’t like to lend money to customers anymore. They like to lend it back to the Fed (which loaned it to them for nothing) for four percent interest.
They also like the fat kickbacks of 80 percent (of the original loan value for old notes) involved in the sale of foreclosures and short sales. Even as they are loathe to issue the new mortgages. (Perfect credit scores are required.)
Further, No individual property owner can compete with their fire-sale pricing. That 80 percent kickback gives banks a lock on the RE market.
Banking is hard work.
I guess I am old fashion, but I find the whole “we need to let banks rip you off or they will not make enough profit” argument unpersuasive.
Most of the swipe fees are assessed to the merchant. The merchant raises prices or eats it on the fees.
As long as the consumer does’t see the fees on his side, he will continue to use his cards. Though in the end, the charge gets put on him with higher costs.
Tricky guys, these Bernankes.
Whatever alternative platform or medium we switch (back) to they’ll just shift their extortionate thievery to that. We have allowed a mindless malignancy (corporatist greed uber alles) to take over our lives and it won’t end well.
Interestingly, Chase bank recently added fees to their formerly-free-checking. For the last couple months they have been having their managers tell customers that the new $12 per month fee is because they can’t make any money anymore … and my account that costs them “$100 a month to maintain” can’t be free because the bad government regulators won’t let them make money “doing what banks do” anymore charging for debit transactions.
They’ve got a script. From the second you ask, the teller refuses to say another word to you (literally) – and points to the manager who then goes into their pat spiel. Heard the exact same thing from an assistant manager and the branch manager at completely different times; same verbiage and everything.
Never mind that the $19 million raise they just gave Jamie Dimon equals 131,944 Chase customers paying a $12 fee every month for an entire year just to break even. Fuckers.
Sadly true, something like 30% or so of the public will just believe that which they want to believe, “don’t confuse me with the facts.”
“Despite this, Bair and Bernanke also said that the new swipe fees would take effect on schedule regardless, on July 21. They didn’t feel that any more information was required for the Fed to finalize the rule.”
Ha ha ha, FAILURE, Dimon. FAILURE Pandit. FAILURE Bwawney Fwank and Chris Dodd! You too, Maxine Waters and ‘Debbie’ Wasserman Shultz!
How’s it feel, scumbags?
: )
Fed Reserve/Elite/Wall Street owns this country. When will you green goobers evolve.
FAILURE tetynn!
: )
and tell me. why in the hell you would put up with that?
Chase is also now charging a $6 fee — per check!– for you to cash a Chase made out to you.
Per fucking check!
When I accept checks from new customers out-of-state I routinely take them to a local bank branch, so I don’t end up paying fees if they bounce at my branch.
I was so incensed I said out loud: “You’re going to charge me $6 a piece to cash these two checks? That’s outrageous!”
A customer at the next window said, “Oh yeah, Chase needs the money — although they now own all those houses they foreclosed on.”
The clerk, shamefaced, said she’d charge me “only” $6 for cashing the two checks.
Last time I step into a Chase branch.
I never updated my ATM card to include a visa symbol on it. I didn’t want someone to be able to empty my account if they stole my card and didn’t need to know my PIN number. The result is that Visa NEVER. EVER. gets a cut of my transaction. And apparently that transactional profit requires an additional number. Increasingly, my old school debit card (that denies Visa a prfoit taking)is denied at point of sale, and the code that comes up is that my card is short one number (the profit-taking, Visa number no doubt). I can either pay cash money or forego the purchase. If the purchase requires allowing Visa to profit from the transaction without providing value to ME the consumer, I’m happy to forego the purchase.
Fuck Visa – they don’t own me!
Didn’t … not a Chase customer anymore. Technically, I opened my account with WaMu …. we all saw how that went.