The John Ensign report from the Senate Ethics Committee is really a sad piece of pulp fiction. You have a US Senator in a strong position of power essentially bullying a female subordinate into an affair, refusing to give up on it after being caught several times, finally trying to cover up the evidence of the affair and pay off the participants, and lying and covering his tracks as the plot slowly unravels. That’s about it in a nutshell.
But the details are even seamier. Ensign started the affair with Cindy Hampton, who worked for his campaign committee and PAC, and was the wife of his best friend and chief of staff, after the Hamptons had a burglary at their house. Like some kind of bad porno, Ensign suggested that the couple move into his house instead. “Well, you guys are going to have to come and stay with me,” Ensign said. And then the predatory behavior began.
It becomes pretty clear from the report that Ensign forced himself on Cindy Hampton. And the deceit here is voluminous. He spent $1,000 calling her while he was on a Congressional delegation to Iraq. He put her number into his phone under the name “Aunt Judy.” After he was caught, he bought special new phones to contact Hampton. He used fake email addresses to contact her, like “fredschwartz72@yahoo.com.” And it didn’t stop until Ensign’s religious right C Street buddies, including Sen. Tom Coburn, put a stop to it. Even that didn’t fully take:
On February 16, 2008, two days after the intervention, Tim Coe received a call from Doug Hampton. Mr. Hampton was looking for the Senator to have him sign some documents for the NRSC, and saw his car and Ms. Hampton’s car parked in a parking lot of a hotel close to their Summerlin neighborhood. Mr. Coe “pleaded with him [Hampton] to go home.” Mr. Coe called Senator Ensign and stated “I know exactly where you are. I know exactly what you are doing. Put your pants on and go home.” Senator Ensign initially said he would not leave the hotel room, telling Mr. Coe “I cant, I love her [Ms. Hampton].” Senator Ensign ultimately agreed to leave the hotel. After he left the hotel, Senator Ensign told Mr. Coe that he wanted to marry Ms. Hampton.
And he asked her to marry him at the sexy venue of the National Prayer Breakfast.
But aside from this folly, the legal issues here are deep and clear, and not just for Ensign. It was Marty Sherman and Tim Coe of The Fellowship (the C Street people) who developed the plan for “transition finances” for the Hamptons, i.e. a payout. Tom Coburn knew about the plan and supported it, becoming a negotiator between Ensign and Hampton on a cash settlement over damage claims.
Ensign called initial payments to the Hamptons “severance payments” until he was told by lawyers that was a real no-no. The initial public statement mentioned the payments until a lawyer told him to delete them. Here’s what the lawyer said:
[t]he statement, as currently written, raises a host of potential criminal issues for the Senator. The language draws a direct connection between the affair, the termination of the staffers, and the severance payment. Although the statement attempts to legitimize the reason for the payment, it’s awfully odd that he made the payments from personal funds. If this statement doesn’t get the attention of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, then nothing will.
The severance payments refer to the $96,000 in payments from Ensign’s parents to the Hamptons, which they lied about to the FEC. The FEC, which ignored its own general counsel in dropping the Ensign probe, looks totally useless here.
But obviously, Ensign is in serious legal trouble. Providing for a lobbying job and clients for Doug Hampton represents a violation of the one-year lobbying ban. He did favors for clients connected to Hampton specifically. He lied and obstructed investigations through shredding documents and deleting email accounts. But Coburn has a lot to answer for as well. So do the leaders of the Fellowship. So does Rick Santorum, who apparently got involved in this by tipping off Ensign that Doug Hampton was about to go public on Fox News with details of the escapade. This was after Hampton wrote a personal letter to Santorum asking for help.
And now, we learn that Ensign’s most recent chief of staff, John Lopez, cooperated with the case after being granted immunity from DoJ.
John Lopez, the former chief of staff to Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) who was a key witness in the case against Ensign compiled by the Senate Ethics Committee and its special counsel, agreed to cooperate with the investigation only after the Justice Department granted him immunity from prosecution.
The special counsel working with the Senate Ethics Committee applied for immunity for both Lopez and Doug Hampton, the former Ensign staffer with whose wife Ensign had the affair that ended his Senate career. The Justice Department didn’t agree initially to either request but eventually dropped its opposition to granting immunity to Lopez. Federal prosecutors ultimately indicted Hampton for violating conflict of interest laws.
With Lopez’ evidence, which appears throughout the Ethics Committee report, I don’t know how Ensign will be able to avoid prosecution in this matter. And he was done in by his own arrogance, his belief of being above the law, and pure bullying.




43 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
It’s pretty simple. The Obama DoJ makes the decision about prosecution. And they’ve ignored much worse.
Boxturtle (We must look forward, after all)
so, does Sen. Coburn get roped into this as a co-conspirator in the buy off of Doug Hampton?
and why the hell not!
Men of character and courage seek justice! Ensign is neither. To bad the DOJ looks myopically forward>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/justice-after-66-years-nazi-guard-john-demjanjuk-is-convicted-for-slaughter-of-jews-2283436.html
Ensign Report Shows Sexual Harassment, Cluelessness About the Law and that IOKIYAR
I remember Clinton being impeached for getting a blow job. Ensign on the other hand was allowed to stay in the Senate without any consequences until he resigned and he committed actual crimes. And Coburn is still there despite lying about being an accessory to a crime. The difference? They are Republicans. And not just Republicans but bible thumpin’ sanctimonious, holier than thou Republicans.
Haven’t they, tho.
Round ‘em up, and throw ‘em in the pokey. I was reading about this sorry mess today (it’s a slow day, complete with hail), and you’ve done a great rendition of it, David. Many thanks.
And talk about having dysfunctional, misogynist problems, check out this IMF head-dude (not his first time, either).
Ensign should plead insanity because it sounds as if he is/was. Can lust make you insane?
It’s most important to preserve the illusion of the rule of law. It’s the only thing between the wealthy and powerful and the pitchforks.
Every now and then, some MOTU must screw up. Literally. Periodically, some financier must be caught egregiously trading on insider information. We will be vigilant. We will prosecute to the full extent of the law. (Results may vary on sentencing.)
Case closed. Nothing to see here. Proof positive that no one in America is above the law. Tearful TV confessions and Christian repentance follow, as do the book deals and speaking tours.
The system works. Clearly.
Indeed…think Gov Sanford and the woman astronaut, among others.
$1,000 in calls from Iraq to Aunt Judy?!
hahahahaha
Especially if the person prosecuted is a Brown person from Sir Lanka, and prosecuted for insider trading.
A white boy for crashing the economy? Or torturing civilians? Nothing to see here, look forward, etc.
Sounds like the Senate is in dire need of some adult supervision.
I have downloaded the PDF of the report to the Senate Ethics Committee, and have my popcorn all popped. Ought to make an interesting evening’s reading, followed by the Lies of Sarah Palin book on my iPad.
I think maybe Coburn will go down in flames if the DoJ puts its big boy pants on and digs into this. (One can hope…)
The devil made him do it. How does Satan go unindicted while Ensign serves as the scapegoat?
We are well into the era of unaccountability by the powerful. If Ensign is prosecuted, then I will be surprised.
In D.C.?? There are no adults there…
IMHO, Coburn and Frothy Santorum will remain untainted. The kidd gloves deal has already been made. Ensign was allowed to keep his seat until it could be handed off to another Righteous, On-fire-For-Christ Rethug. Prayer, Counselling, Praise and Worship, and a Fat Lobbyist Gig will cure everything.
Holder drops the ball.
Laws are for the little people.
Harry Reid, also of Nevada dirty deals, probably made the deal.
“The Senate is a Collegial Body.” – Harry Reid
I don’t know, but it can certainly make people stop thinking straight.
Look at Sanford and his mistress. Or at Edwards.
People, people, people! Cut the man some slack. Those phone calls from Iraq alone are enough to prove Ensign broke under the pressure of his zealous patriotism in the established tradition of Newt Gingrich.
Does anyone know what patriotic women in congress do?
That Prayer Breakfast is coming up soon. The C Street Fellowship has lots of forgiveness for Republicans because Republicans say they don’t like other people to abort their fetuses. Republicans prefer killing babies after they’re born. Like Jesus said.
Theatrics and headlines.
Holder’s DOJ is subservient to Obama’s wishes.
Prosecuting whistleblowers is pretty much it.
War crimes? everybody’s innocent.
Financial crimes? couple little fish, some are savvy.
Corporate crimes? nah. boring.
Environmental crimes, huh?
Obama will never prosecute a Republican so Ensign’s got nothing to
worry about.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Nothing will happen to any of these people.
If I could, I would give you a gold star. :)
Lust can certainly make you insane. But last year the Supreme Court struck down “deprivation of honest services” which was the basis for charging public officials for minor league corruption (like recommending your GF to be US attorney).
This however is major league corruption. Sexual harrassment. Bribery. Obstruction of Justice. Conspiracy. This is a rock solid case. Otherwise the pathetically weak Ethics Committee would never have referred it to DOJ.
Now FEC and DOJ have to explain why they dropped the ball the first time.
I’m a man in my 40s and find it amazing that many men are STILL horny after 50. WTF??? Guess I need a testosterone check.
The PTB made sure those two went down.
We or the law had nothing to do with it.
Hey, thanks.
Well, these religious boys do know how to repent and have been saved. So, it’s only natural that the government would refuse to prosecute their lawless behavior.
/sarcasm
Tell me again why Obama’s DoJ concluded it was Hampton who was the bad guy, indicting him for several “conflict of interest” crimes – shades of Don Siegleman and Leura Canary in Alabama – but initially gave Ensign a free pass.
You need to get out more. Ensign’s behavior, like Mark Sanford’s in South Carolina, is unusual for political Washington only in that it has come to light.
Corrupt as he is, he still helped to pass laws that have taken rights and property away from ordinary hard working USA citizens. And those laws cannot be rescinded because of these revelations. We’ve been screwed by another “lawmaker”. Does anyone know when Rip Van Holder’s alarm clock will go off?
C Streeters are Randians at heart. They believe in the elect, who are inherently worth more and should be better cared for, including their sexual gratification. They are not into ascetism, restraint or delayed gratification for those at the top. Their Savior is a CEO and paymaster, who will bring them riches, not social justice. To call that a perversion is an understatement.
Gov. Sanford got a false rap. He told an aide that he was going for some Argentinian tail and due to a bad cell phone connection it came out ‘Appalachian Trail.’
Now Sen. Ensign just said he was going to the Hamptons . . .Did Doug watch?
Or Sen. Vitter and his New Orleans’ diaper fetish. That behavior is echoed in the screen name of our one time commentator, General Pudding. The name is taken from a surreal novel by Thomas Pynchon, whose Brigadier Pudding died from e. coli poisoning after an orgy in which he gleefully ingested his dominatrix’s, well, read the novel.
It’s about power and, in Ensign’s case, a midlife crisis. As with Sanford, the public is better off with him in retirement, though the evidence that would justify an investigation should get the attention of even Mr. Holder’s DoJ. Except they already knew or didn’t want to know whatever this senate report contains.
Someone should tell Mr. Holder that protecting the elite from their own illegal conduct is not actually in his job description. Or they could just observe that in keeping his head so deeply buried in the sand, something else sticks up in the air.
Obama will make sure of that.
The more I hear about politicians and their worlds, the more nausea I feel. What truly wretched men and women.
As obvious a target as Ensign has made of himself with his midlife crisis, his sexual needs are irrelevant. His alleged abuses of power are what would be criminal, as well as violations of trust as a friend, employer and senior public official. They are several.
The Ensigns and Hamptons had been friends for 20 years, individually and as couples. They lived in the same gated community and in social circles in Mormon Utah that are even more closed and constrained than elsewhere. As an Ensign and Senator, the reach of Ensign’s influence in Utah and DC would have been considerable, far greater than any of his employees.
Ensign, or at least his parents, was independently wealthy. He had tremendous formal and informal power: he was a sitting senator and the sole source of income for both Hamptons. A subtle word from Ensign could bar one or both of them from working in their chosen professions.
Ensign started the affair while Ms. Hampton was in extremis and her husband was away. He fired his friend and chief of staff so that he could continue his affair with his wife, then tried to compensate Doug through arguably illegally structured gifts and work, which most of us, in similar circumstances, would have accepted, though one wonders whether Doug sought legal advice and what kind he received.
There’s nothing prurient about investigating that behavior. Doing so would be a step toward revivifying the rule of law. Mr. Obama, who has indicated that that is not a priority personally or for his political agenda, could dispel those perceptions, in part, by backing Mr. Holder’s decision to investigate this case properly and by letting the prosecutorial chips fall where they may. It would be a productive break from past practice.
It’s better that Mr. Holder investigate Sen. Ensign than the killing of “suspected insurgents” in Pakistan, some of them children. The law is the law, and the law is keeping those in power, in power.
Did Doug watch?
nothing will happen. surprise to no one.
let’s all accept our places. and their place.
thank you sir, may I have another.
and my new favorite,
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_21/b4229060222515.htm?&
Wall Street: Not Guilty
Why have no executives gone to jail for their roles in the financial crisis? Perhaps because risk-taking and stupidity aren’t criminal
Right, dumb like a fox.
Wow. Truly breathtaking pretzel logic.
Horniness is one thing. The things these egoistical creeps will do/have done in order to achieve gratification are something else again.
doj can always do what they did for ted stevens…take a dive.