Russ Feingold may be well-positioned to return to the US Senate if he chooses, now that Herb Kohl has retired. A normal politician in that position would not make waves with any party leaders, or take up principled causes where both parties have failed. Feingold is not that normal politician. The Hill reports that he publicly shamed several Democrats in an email to supporters of his new organization, Progressives United. But they don’t make clear what the fuss is about.
I got a copy of the email. Feingold, consistent with the mission of Progressives United, is attacking those who have tried to stop President Obama from issuing an executive order that would force government contractors to disclose their campaign spending. Since news leaked this of this potential order, which has not yet been executed, corporate interests, Republicans and some Democrats have criticized the proposal, saying that it could lead to unintended consequences and the use of the information to deny government contracts. This is largely projection, and it’s coming mostly from politicians who have a lot of contractors in their backyards who simply don’t want to disclose their political donations.
So Feingold called these people out in the email. I’ve put the whole thing below, but here’s the key excerpt:
But not surprisingly, corporate interests in Congress want to keep this process in the dark. Sadly, but predictably, it’s not just Republicans. Some Democrats are joining Republicans in pressing to keep the cycle of political money and federal contracts hidden [...]
This culture of corporate influence and corruption is precisely what we as Progressives United want to change. So we’ve decided to take on those legislators who are unwilling to stand up to corporate power, and we’re naming names.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-CT; Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO; Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY; Sen. Rob Portman, R-OH; Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-MD; and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-CA.
These are some of the legislators claiming that if contractors are forced to disclose their political contributions, contracts will start going to the highest contributor.
Here’s why that’s baloney: Legislators already know who’s greasing their palms.
The contractors know where their contributions are going.
The only party who doesn’t know where the money is going is us, the public.
The logic here is compelling. The people making calls on contracting already have the maximum amount of information; they’re complicit in the corrupt game. The public does not have this tool for accountability. That’s all that’s being sought in this particular executive order: full disclosure and transparency. Under this order, corporations can continue under the law to spend on campaigns (whether that should continue is another matter). But they have to stand behind their decisions.
I don’t know what Feingold is really saying wrong here. Hoyer, McCaskill and the others have gone public with their concerns. Feingold disagrees. And he disagrees strongly enough to pick a fight about it. This particular issue aligns Feingold with the President of the United States, incidentally.
Steny Hoyer and Joe Lieberman should be called corporate suck-ups at virtually every opportunity, regardless of the effect on one’s political career. Maybe this suggests that Feingold is not running. It’s completely in character for him to be an iconoclast on these issues, so maybe he’s just doing what comes naturally. But it doesn’t really matter. The important thing is speaking the truth.
Here’s the full email:
Friend,
In American government, corruption thrives through secrecy.
People and corporations shouldn’t be allowed to make behind-the-scenes contributions to sway elections while at the same time applying for contracts with the federal government. It is a corrupt loophole that too many lawmakers and corporations want to keep open.
That’s why members of Progressives United have made thousands of calls to President Obama supporting an executive order to bring political contributions by companies with federal contracts into the light — and it’s gaining steam.
But not surprisingly, corporate interests in Congress want to keep this process in the dark. Sadly, but predictably, it’s not just Republicans. Some Democrats are joining Republicans in pressing to keep the cycle of political money and federal contracts hidden.
Incredibly, they’re claiming that transparency will somehow lead to more corruption. I spent nearly two decades in the Senate, and I can tell you: that’s just baloney.
Contribute $5 now to help us shame some of the anti-transparency senators and representatives by running online ads targeting their constituents.
This culture of corporate influence and corruption is precisely what we as Progressives United want to change. So we’ve decided to take on those legislators who are unwilling to stand up to corporate power, and we’re naming names.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-CT; Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO; Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY; Sen. Rob Portman, R-OH; Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-MD; and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-CA.
These are some of the legislators claiming that if contractors are forced to disclose their political contributions, contracts will start going to the highest contributor.
Here’s why that’s baloney: Legislators already know who’s greasing their palms.
The contractors know where their contributions are going.
The only party who doesn’t know where the money is going is us, the public.
If we make contributions public, we can hold legislators and contractors accountable. We can shine the bright light of transparency on the whole practice of awarding government contracts, so the American people can truly see what is going on.
Let’s start by holding the defenders of corruption accountable to their constituents right now.
Contribute $5 now to help us shame some of the anti-transparency senators and representatives by running online ads targeting their constituents.
It’s the people’s money — our money — that the federal government uses to pay these contractors. So you and I have a right to know who these contractors and their lobbyists are trying to elect with our money — and if they’re getting more contracts in exchange.
This is a big opportunity to take action, and we need to seize it.
Thank you for uniting as a Progressive,
Russ




29 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Quirky news item about another one who marches to his own drummer:
Kucinich would beat Palin, Trump in hypothetical races: Poll LINK.http
Fuck the party leaders. If the party leaders hadn’t sat around twiddling their thumbs for two years, Russ wouldn’t have lost to a half wit “businessman” that just happened to marry into money.
It’s up to the people of Wisconsin to elect our next Senator, not the party leaders. I hope Russ will hold out and run for Governor, but I’ll vote for him wherever he appears on the ballot.
Well at least he mentioned some names instead of the “some DEM & GOP congress people” cop-out.
I will give him kudos for that.
My thoughts exactly. Russ would be much more effective at the state level as appose to the federal level.
I do believe if a progressive wanted to mount a primary challenge all they would have to is say’
“the justices that declared corporations “people” are corporate tools and do not understand our constitution, our law, the founders who were opposed to corporations and these justices are incompetent and need to be impeached”
bing, instant fame and fortune
Excuse me for being petty, but wouldn’t it be better for Feingold to brand his organization “United Progressives” instead of “Progressives United”?
“UP” just seems preferable to “PU”. I wish he’d move to Florida, we could really use a Russ Feingold here.
classic!
You know, his idea is a really good one. But honestly, we already know who gets the government contracts and why. It is the Bush Family of bizniss and their friends. They are the world’s largest government Welfare queens and kings, they just don’t want it plastered over the MSM. However, the MSM would be too busy talking about Governators and such to cover real news.
You’ve got one. Send money to Alan Grayson.
Yeah but for how long before the people catch on that they(candidates) are in it for “fame & fortune”…the creep in the WH used what you outlined in your comment & most people have now caught on to his scam.
Feingold, Kucinich, Dr. Dean, and Hillary were the only viable primary opponents to Obama – with Hillary the only real threat. But the base has shown how they treat anyone running – refusing to coalesce behind anyone – so they all will not primary Obama. I like Feingold because he really tries – he tried from 2003 on to pass legislation in Congress that would require all voting machines in the country to produce a paper trail and that elections have random sample audits, with legislation failing via the GOP getting Bev Harris (blackboxvoting) to find reasons to kill it – such as the accessibility issue for the disabled initially, then saving State election folk’s jobs, and then paper ballots only campaigns when accessibility and state jobs were addressed. I really like the fact he keeps trying.
Maybe Feingold is better positioned to do more good at Progressives United than he or anyone could do at the US Senate.
Maybe he’s just protecting the brand. McCain-Feingold. I doubt our shadow president will join him this time, but this is one of Russ’s long-time signature issues. It’s been pretty popular. Also essential.
It takes guts to rake your own party members, if you call McCaskill and Hoyer Democrats.
In case ya missed it:
The Obama Deception: Why Cornel West Went Ballistic
By Chris Hedges:
Dr West lays it in the line that BO has betrayed the people, a great read but it may yer blood boil… But of course our blood is already boiling!!!
I think he wanted to make a parallel with “Citizens United.”
By the way, if Feingold can’t nail ‘em, the IRS just might:
http://my.firedoglake.com/rogershuler/2011/05/17/could-koch-brothers-money-express-run-afoul-of-the-irs/
Grayson is no Russ Feingold. Rather than running on his record and using factual arguments to get reelected, he released a campaign ad against his opponent that could have been produced by Faux News. It was edited to portray his opponent saying the opposite of what was actually said. Not exactly the tactics I can endorse, and completely unnecessary.
More kabuki and symbolism from Russ Fhonygold.
Russ Feingold unseated Bob Kasten in Wisconsin U.S. Senate race on Election 1992, while the White House flipped with the unseating of 41st president George Bush in favor of 42nd president Bill Clinton.
Not liking Alan Grayson’s 2010 campaign? Doesn’t matter. He did much more fighting than a lot of quasi-liberals deserve.
Yep, Russ Phonygold who, along with Kucinich back-stabbed us by voting for the Max Baucus / Liz Fowler corporate health care giveaway. I don’t care if Jerry Falwell and Sara Palin are on the ballot, I’m not voting for Feingold (Phonygold), or any other DLC corporate democrats. Grrrr!!!!
Antoine
What’s with the Wisconsin repubs and their screwed up policies/proposals on both the state and federal levels. Must be their bad haircuts affects their thinking, both Walker and Ryan. Feingold at least has a decent haircut and smarts to boot.
Too bad the democratic party in Wisconsin closed the barn door only after Russ was defeated and Walker announced all his wonderful progams.
Off thread, anyone see (a late night CSPAN replay)the AEI sponsored panel yesterday moderated by John Yoo with Mukasey and other righties and only one other on the panel (a woman) to rebuff them. They discussed how enhanced interrogation led to getting UBL and it wasn’t torture.
One of the panelist, A WA Po editorialist, stated how enhanced interrogation “added value” to our intelligence programs and thus was definitely not torture. Is this FU”ed up or what?
Honestly, who cares? When Feingold leaves the Democratic party then I will care. That is when something real might be happening…
Is PU going to let the corporatist stench of Obamacare remain?
These Dems deserve the criticism. And we should all call for Russ to Challenge Obama in 2012.
Obama must be challenged in order to force him into public debates with a reliable liberal/progressive Democrat such as Russ Feingold and/or Dennis Kucinich. This “policy” debate would have the effect of clearing the air and pushing policy to the left.
I would enthusiastically support either or both of them as a team. They both have great reputations and are both capable of debating Democratic principles in a forceful, eloquent manner.
==>> The DNC, Presidential Debate Commission and Media will have no choice but to allow full participation by all candidates. <<==
AND given how badly liberal candidates were treated in the 2008 primary, they will not DARE try it again, as to do so would immediately cause a huge part of the Democratic Party rank and file to sit out of the election.
These two terrific Democratic politicians can help move the Democratic Party in the direction it needs to go…… Left… not Right.
As if that republican has not voted to take away women’s rights and everything else that Grayson implied with that Taliban Dan ad? “progressives” like you are worse than useless.
Do not remember labeling myself as a “progressive” or anything else, for that matter. If the concepts of integrity, facts, and honesty are foreign to you, it’s not my fault. I’m a survivor from the 60′s who doesn’t compromise my principles. Do you have your papers?
The Democratic Party will never move to the left. Well, maybe it will, during the primaries in an attempt to scuttle real liberals, like the Greens. However, once nominated, Obama will mover right back to the DLC right. I find it hard to believe the naivete of people who still believe that non-billionaires, can actually influence the plutocratic parties.
O, by the way, is the new W, and Ds are the new Rs.
Antoine
The Democrats will do nothing for the left until the left demonstrates that they will not vote for Democrats.
Most people posting here would vote for a primary challenger to Obama, but in the general election will vote for Obama out of fear of Republicans.
As long as 6 of 10 Americans don’t vote, there will never be any progressive advancement.
A small percentage of progressives, say 4% could throw all these fake Democrats out by voting Republican in 2012. The country would quickly go to hell-in-a-hand-basket, conservative theory would be shown a failure again (think, 1929, 2008) and those 6 of 10 Americans who don’t vote might just be motivated to participate.
Think about it, Texas could be a blue state by 2014 if 90% voted there.
“Bewildered liberals will soon forget the betrayals by Obama and the 111th Congress and will direct their fear and hatred back toward the Republican beast”.
http://my.firedoglake.com/szielinski/2010/10/30/a-karpian-analysis-of-barak-obama-—-reform-and-the-uses-of-misrule/