Any hopes that South African President Jacob Zuma would be able to mediate a resolution to the Libyan civil war have apparently gone by the boards after his one-day visit. Zuma did meet with Moammar Gadhafi, and said that Gadhafi was ready to implement the African Union “roadmap” accompanying a cease-fire. But while that plan includes reforms, it does not call for Gadhafi to step down, and it’s unclear whether he would agree to that. Anyway, the AU roadmap is already a dead document, having been rejected by the opposition.
Zuma said Gaddafi had insisted that “all Libyans be given a chance to talk among themselves” to determine the country’s future, but made no mention of the Libyan leader’s possible departure. His office denied rebel claims that the South African president had raised the subject.
The BBC’s report is even more dour – they say that Zuma acknowledged that Gadhafi would not step down.
NATO allies have made clear they won’t end hostilities until Gadhafi leaves power, and the rebels are united on that point as well.
The other two major developments concern military operations. First, eight major government military officers showed up in Italy after defecting from Libya, and they plan to now fight on the side of the rebel forces. Second, an Al Jazeera report clearly showed armed Westerners, perhaps British former SAS personnel, on the ground near the front lines west of Misurata. This yet again violates the UN resolution which explicitly stated that it excluded any foreign troops on Libyan soil. The Guardian report has additional details:
There have been numerous reports in the British press that SAS soldiers are acting as spotters in Libya to help Nato warplanes target pro-Gaddafi forces. In March, six special forces soldiers and two MI6 officers were detained by rebel fighters when they landed on an abortive mission to meet rebel leaders in Benghazi, in an embarrassing episode for the SAS. The group was withdrawn soon afterwards and a new “liaison team” sent in its place.
Asked for comment on Monday, a Ministry of Defence spokeswoman said: “We don’t have any forces out there.” [...]
There were unconfirmed reports… that Britain would send former SAS members and other experienced soldiers to Libya under the cover of private security companies, paid for by Arab states, to train the anti-government forces.
In other words, you could have some Blackwater copycat – if not the reformed Xe themselves – operating in conjunction with the rebels.




9 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Short wars = a little teeny-weeny bit of profit.
Long drawn out ‘conflicts’ = lots of money for everybody to spread around.
This was clear from the get-go… Libya is a test-bed for arms dealers, a virtual gravy-train.
Zuma is a distraction. Although the ex-guerilla has more personal credibility than his predecessor, pampered Mbeki the HIV-denier, their party the post-liberation ANC has devolved into bling-bling neoliberalism while continuing to cover for their crazy Zim uncle, Comrade Bob Mugabe. So did you really expect Zuma would speak home truths to Il Duce Geddafi? As for the African Union, it’s still the same dictators’ club which got a Geddafi-sponsored makeover a few years ago. History moves on, potbellied bigmen have been deposed by the scrawny unemployed of Tunisia and Egypt and this is only the beginning. Eventually the tropical part of the continent will get into the act, and then it will be the Maghribi population including free Libyans who will save the African Union rather than viceversa. The U.S. will continue to play its opportunist role, but “even a broken watch tells the correct time twice a day” so our government may occasionally do the right thing for the wrong reason…
The British and French have an agenda – oil in Libya. The international banks have an agenda – getting conrol of the Libya economy and privatizing everything – the so-called Arab Spring. The WH has an agenda – hopey dreamy ideas about a violent part of the world embracing “democracy”, which is just corporate/elite/oligarch state capitalism.
Arabs should start hiding now from their so-called, self-appointed saviors from the West.
Was this war against Libya planned in 2010? Check it out – the first is from Al Jazeera http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgHDUGHwUYk and the second is a talk from Kucinich (google for it). It seems UK and France had joint war games scheduled, matching the attack on Libya.
I have always found it odd that for all the ME uprising, except Libya, you see thousands of peaceful protesters in the streets. Most of the photos of Libya show from 1 to 10 “rebels”, seeming to be posing for a photo opp.
So since NATO and the rebels won’t ceasefire, shouldn’t the UN get out of it. If this is about regime change rather than merely protecting civilians, the UN shouldn’t touch it with a 100 mile pole. Obama is making Bush look like a real amateur as far as calls for regime change go.
Yep
“The Love Police In Wrexham [UK]” (video, May 29, 2011)
Then you weren’t paying attention at the beginning when Gaddafi used tanks and airplanes to kill protestors in Tripoli,
Here’a video on facebook with a date of Aprill 22, Feb 14 was Libya’s day of rage when the protests began.
It’s in arabic, and I don’t know what the captions are, but they clearly want to be free of the tyrant Gadhafi, but they point out not only foreigners- these are westerners among the fighters, but they also point out the Libyan Transitional council leaders as traitors that appear to be collaborating with the French, Israelis, and Americans. See the same persons pics
Stupid.Stupid.Stupid.Hillary.Obama.Sarkozy.Dumbasses.Supreme.