John Boehner’s pathetic performance abdicating the Constitutional responsibility over war powers to the executive continues. The House leadership, prior to a closed caucus meeting, will devise a bill to continue US involvement in Libya, as a counterpoint to Dennis Kucinich’s War Powers resolution to end involvement.
This comes just as over 60 House Republicans issued their own resolution of disapproval of the war in Libya.
Setting up a balance-of-power showdown over Libya, more than 60 House Republicans on Thursday embraced a measure calling on Congress to disapprove of U.S. military involvement in the NATO-led campaign against Moammar Gadhafi.
Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio introduced the resolution with the support of 62 House members, mostly Republicans and anti-war Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio. The measure simply states that based on the War Powers Resolution, “Congress does not approve of United States intervention in Libya.”
The Senate has their own resolution of approval on Libya, authored by John Kerry and John McCain, which President Obama has thrown his backing behind. But we are 74 days into this conflict, with no authority from Congress over the mission, despite Constitutional authority. Even the broadest reading of the War Powers Act, assuming that the executive legally had the power to engage in a military mission in Libya, runs out after 60 days.
So after blocking a measure that would apparently have received the necessary support, the House leadership will introduce their own bill approving the mission, and will surely strong-arm their members to support it. The Senate would almost certainly sign on to that – they planned to vote on the resolution of approval next week anyway – and then problem solved, crisis averted. For the war machine, anyway.
Since the House leadership clearly felt that the Kucinich resolution would pass, however, there’s certainly the possibility that the numbers won’t add up and they won’t be able to get the requisite support for their resolution. Stay tuned.




20 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
This is crap anyway. IMO the War Powers Act is unconstitutional too. No way possible that the constitutional requirement of CONGRESS declaring war is met when a President declares war (by entering into hostilities) and then gets Congress’ approval 60 days later. No “act” can amend the constitution.
Oh never mind. There I go again thinking the Constitution really means something. “Oh look at the old fat guy thinking there’s a constitution, isn’t that cute?”
Gawd what happened to my country.
If there was ever any proof needed that we are being ruined by a Money/War Party, this is it.
When a partisan tool like Boehner makes it easy for a Democratic president to flaunt the authority of congress, what else can be said?
The GOP hopes that the executive accrues enough power to itself so that by the time the next GOP candidate gets elected, congress will be nothing more than a rubber stamp.
It’s a bitch, ain’t it, ofg?
Boner and Obama. Pelosi and Bush. What’s the difference?
It’s worse. Suppose Congress were to pass a resolution against the Libyan war and the president ignores it. Would Congress impeach? Doubt it. Could they make impeachment stick? Depends on what the Generals decide. It’s like the Supreme Court deciding Guantanamo prisoners are entitled to the full panoply of American civil rights. Nothing changed except the Supreme Court no longer accepts cases challenging what happens there. Congress should have impeached Obama when he ignored a Supreme Court decision. All Boehner wants is retain the illusion he has power.
The Starwars Defense Initiative never stopped but the legacy products got milked as long as possible before any sun-setting.
(excerpt from “US Debt Can’t Bear More Outmoded Defense Spending,” May 27, 2011)
Meanwhile, drones have been selling like hot cakes in the international market (DefenceNews.Com).
I guess the UK wants to do things from the comfort of their own homes now. “British drone controllers leaving U.S.” (Omaha World Herald, May 13, 2011)
Wonder where the ChineseG has been flying these? “Beijing Police may use drones during emergencies” (May 13, 2011)
Or to accomplish whatever else he, Boehner, is up to. Yikes…
I think SDI was and is a cover for HAARP technology – weather modification, ELF weapons, microwave weapons for use against demonstrators, sound cannons.
We’ll never know, but most of Tesla’s patents belong to Raytheon now and Raytheon, along with the USN, USAF, and the Universities of Pennsylvania and Alaska are deeply involved in HAARP.
If so, humans can only mess with weather manipulation for only so long before it comes around to bite them in the behind as this would be an input to agnotologic global climate change (Apr. 14, 2011)
Our leaders are breaking the laws laid out in the founding documents of our nation. With impunity.
Oh how I wish there were a judiciary that wasn’t bought and paid for and had enough satchel to do something about this.
Things are very bad.
These leaders only follow our nation’s laws by accident.
And there is no rule of law. Not anymore.
This is only the beginning. The worst is yet to come. IMO
It’s going to be an interesting show down. But what Boehner has done is nothing in comparison to what Harry Reid has been doing in the Senate since the Democrats took power and they stuffed FISA down our throats.
I followed a link and found that powwow has been documenting it at salon in Greenwalds comments. It’s a treasure trove of understanding.
Kucinch took a shot across Obama’s bow. If OFG is right and the War Powers Act is not in accordance with the constitution in the first place, then it’s actually not behooven upon the congress to tell him to desist in warmaking or supplying France and Britain with bunker-busters. If this goes any further it will throw us into an open Constitutional crisis, one that they wont be able to ignore – like they have since the Iraq war started.
anyone have the roll call votes on Brad Sherman’s amendment that was rejected today?
I was taught in collage, many moons ago, the constitution is a limiting contract with the government, meaning go this far and no farther. The people who wrote it understood that power corrupts when unchecked or left in the hand of a king or sole decider.
Everything was thought out to foment conflict among the three branches so the forward movement of the country wasn’t hijacked by one branch but by give and take and jealous guarding of their section of the constitution and a two out of three agreement meant it was valid constitutionally.
Impeachment was mentioned Six times so the founders expected many impeachments to right the ship of state. My how far we have fallen away from that document.
No way can the WPA be “broadly” read to mean something that it doesn’t say.
The first part of the Act states the policy behind the law, namely to “insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities,” and that the President’s powers as Commander in Chief are exercised only pursuant to a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization from Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States (50 USC Sec. 1541).
A declaration of war was historically a recognition that the country had been attacked and therefore a state of war existed. It was not intended for elective wars.
On Libya there has been no attack on the U.S. and no statutory authorization from Congress. The president is acting illegally and should have been impeached for acting unconstitutionally. Why make excuses for him?
When I was a naval officer, I would have refused orders to disobey Congress. After all, the oath I and my fellow officers had sworn was to the Constitution — not to the President.
I disagree. At least Bush pretended to ask Congress. And Pelosi pretended to be pro-peace.
Obomba and Boehner don’t even pretend.
Btw, has FDL ever sent funded and organized a gift for the POTUS? I’m thinking we could all donate to buy him a toga and laurel wreath hat? I think that would be just peachy for (Greenwald’s) Imperial President!
we offer cheap ed hardy up to 35%-65% off, ed hardy ed hardy is a kind of street style clothing online store, they are all the newest and cheap ed hardy.
http://www.edhardychothing.com/
cheap ed hardy
ed hardy clothes
ed hardy sale
ed hardy sales
ed hardy on sale
ed hardy on sales
ed hardy discount
ed hardy discounts
we offer cheap nike jordan shoes up to 30%-60% off, nike jordan shoes is a kind of street style shoes online store, they are all the newest and cheap nike jordan shoes.
air jordan 2010 cheap air jordan 2010
jordan retro shoes air jordan shoes 2010
Pls visit us http://www.nikejordanlink.com/