I agree with Marcy Wheeler that Netroots Nation 2011 consisted in many ways of a “desperate conversation to save the middle class.” I don’t think anybody figured this out. But some members of the coalition kicked off some important test campaigns.
I went to the old Wesley Church in Minneapolis on Saturday, to the premiere of the “Speakout for Good Jobs Now” event put on by ProgressiveCongress.org and the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Essentially this was a field hearing, where members of Congress – in this case, Progressive Caucus co-chairs Raul Grijalva and Keith Ellison, along with Rep. Jared Polis and former members Mary Jo Kilroy and Alan Grayson – could listen to the stories of working people and the poor, and find out directly from them how they have had to navigate the real economy. It was a very productive event. The members of Congress heard from an hourly Wal-Mart worker who got two raises and still only makes $9.80 an hour. They heard from a woman who was told right before a second check on a mammogram that her insurance company wouldn’t pay for the service. “What the hell are they doing with my premiums,” she said, noting that they were just raised 40%. They heard from a woman who will “be homeless by July 1st if nothing changes.” They heard from people who would just be happy to have a job and a little help to get back on their feet.
As former Rep. Kilroy said, “the fight for good jobs is a fight to define our society.” It’s the only way to reverse the terrible, almost feudal stratification of society. The Speakout for Good Jobs event, which will be replicated in almost a dozen cities across the country, is a way to define the problem, and also provide a pledge for a solution. The Progressive Caucus came up with a three-part pledge that people can endorse.
1) In America, every worker deserves a good job.
2) America should work again for people who work for a living.
3) We will use our strength in numbers to counter corporate dollars.
The pledge will be turned into legislation later. Rep. Ellison explained that they need to “getting people to buy into some principles first.” These pledge items will then be passed on to politicians at all levels. “If Grover Norquist can do pledges than we can get people to sign pledges too,” Ellison told me. “We can create a new normal. A movement like the civil rights movement.”
This is basically the perspective of a new group led by MoveOn.org, something that Netroots Nation keynote speaker Van Jones described as the “American Dream movement.” Again, jobs and the middle class were at the forefront of the agenda. It’s about allowing those who work hard and play by the rules to have a living wage, to provide for their children, to get to college, to secure a retirement. There’s a kickoff event for this movement coming later this week in New York, and then house parties to connect people, and future actions.
You’ll notice that there’s not much difference between this and MoveOn’s work circa, say, 2005. The language of coming together and using the new tools at our disposal to progress our values is the same. The activities are largely the same. The difference is that economic justice sits at the center of the agenda, rather than other issue silos. Economic justice can indeed be a solution that fits for all the other problems felt by those individual issue silos. This is in many ways a reaction to the tea party assault on workers and the ravages of a never-ending recession.
It’s also a moment to create a movement based on principle. In a very telling moment in Jones’ PowerPoint presentation, he described how the issue groups filtered up to the Obama meta-brand in 2008, and in one move, he wiped out Obama from the picture in favor of the American Dream Movement. In other words, an icon or a symbol of progress won’t cut it anymore. The movement is sustained not based on an individual but on an idea. It’s a movement that says “I support Democrats when they support me.” It’s the only way for a movement to endure, rather than become subservient to a personality. And we’ve seen proof of this just this year in places like Wisconsin and Ohio.
Again, I don’t think there were any answers at the conference, and certainly there was a good deal of frustration. But I also saw a lot of organizing, built around how to specifically rebuild a middle class and an economy that works. It may or may not be successful, but it’s the only conversation worth having. Otherwise, these jobs, and this middle class, isn’t coming back.





6 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
A few relevant articles:
Justice for the Jobless
Unemployed Americans are fighting for a federal jobs program.
LINK.
He tried to rob a bank of $1–and did it to get medical care. The surprising thing is that we haven’t seen a lot more of this.
Wal-Mart Wins First Round In Sex Discrimination Legal Fight
Banks were “too big to fail”. Class action lawsuits are “too big to be handled.” But the middle class wasn’t too big to be destroyed.
LINK.
I’m a tad old-fashioned.
As such, I prefer the notional for “perpetuating and expanding” LBJ’s Great Society. Of course, in forty years, the Great Society will be the bedrock foundation for all Progressives, if the Native American/Chicano Construct has any say in the politics of the Future.
Jaango
I noted on Marcy’s post how assisting the poor has rarely been discussed in the last 12 years. Now we discuss saving the middle class. Interesting how the national discourse has been directed away from acknowledging our failure of the poor, to saving the middle class from ourselves, non-responsive government and predatory capitalism.
Workers were never middle class. Better paid workers were at the top of the lower class. Calling them “middle class” was just a big con. The middle class owns businesses. The upper class owns virtually everything else.
Workers for salary or wages are lower class. Calling the better paid members of the lower class “middle class” accomplished several things:
A) It stroked the egos of better paid workers and created a false sense of security. Who cares about the lower classes – but nobody wants to throw the middle class under the bus.
B) It created a perceived class difference between members of the lower classes. “It’s a shame that all those poor folks are having it so tough, but HEY! I’m not having is so easy myself – and I’m middle class! What do you lower class folks expect?”
C) It destroyed all notion of solidarity in the lower class. “Divide and conquer” worked for Julius Caesar – and Ronald Reagan.
We – the bottom 80 or 90% have been segmented so that we can be defeated individually. What in the hell does an illegal worker in Texas have in common with an auto worker in Detroit, have in common with an unemployed food stamp recipient in Georgia?
5 points if your answer was: “They are all peons, getting screwed over by the aristocracy.”
“… you are still fucking peasants as far as I can see.” John Lennon.
Please refer to us not as the “lower class” but as “The Working Class”. We, the Working Class, are actually capable of doing something that has positive value.
I was discussing economic classes, which are upper, middle and lower. There is no shame in being in or from the lower class and no honor in being from the upper.
This discussion wouldn’t be necessary or productive if 80% or more of the population in this country didn’t consider themselves – erroneously – to be “middle class.” This has made it easier for the aristocracy to divide the lower economic class against itself.
The John Lennon quote, ironically, was from the song “Working Class Hero”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njG7p6CSbCU
Working class is my preferred term also, fatster. But I think it is important for us all to understand that it isn’t “the middle class” that is getting screwed here; it’s the lower class – and it’s them against us. The lower class includes all us wage slaves, the disposables (unemployed) and the already disposed of (the rest of the poor.) Until the working class (generally more prosperous – for now – members of the lower class) recognizes the need for solidarity with the rest of the lower class, we will continue to be easily divided and manipulated by the upper classes.