The allegation that Wisconsin state Supreme Court Justice David Prosser grabbed a colleague by the neck has devolved into a he said/she said. Prosser has denied choking Justice Ann Walsh Bradley prior to a ruling on the anti-union law, but Justice Bradley has confirmed the report.
“The facts are that I was demanding that he get out of my office and he put his hands around my neck in anger in a chokehold,” Bradley told the Journal Sentinel.
Sources told the Journal Sentinel two very different stories Saturday about what occurred. Some confirmed Bradley’s version. According to others, Bradley charged Prosser, who raised his hands to defend himself and made contact with her neck.
A joint investigation by Wisconsin Public Radio and the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism first reported on the incident early Saturday, stating that Prosser “allegedly grabbed” Bradley around the neck.
Before Bradley spoke to the Journal Sentinel, Prosser issued a statement that said: “Once there’s a proper review of the matter and the facts surrounding it are made clear, the anonymous claim made to the media will be proven false. Until then I will refrain from further public comment.”
Prior to this incident, in a different context, Prosser was quoted in reference to calling Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson a “total bitch” by saying, “I probably overreacted, but I think it was entirely warranted. They [Abrahamson and Bradley] are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements.” It’s at least possible that’s where this story will end.
For now, we have two stories, one where Bradley, angered by a comment Prosser made about Abrahamson according to one report, charges Prosser and gets her neck caught up in Prosser’s hands; another where Prosser grabs Bradley after refusing to leave her office. Bradley’s latest statement Saturday night is this: “You can try to spin those facts and try to make it sound like I ran up to him and threw my neck into his hands, but that’s only spin. Matters of abusive behavior in the workplace aren’t resolved by competing press releases. I’m confident the appropriate authorities will conduct a thorough investigation of this incident involving abusive behavior in the workplace.”
Some Republican leaders are getting Prosser’s back. Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald said he doesn’t believe Bradley. His brother, Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald, hasn’t made comment other than to say he’s withholding judgment until the facts come in.
Apparently, there are years of enmity between the two Justices. We don’t yet have independent confirmation of how this manifested itself in that office earlier this month. But there’s at least the possibility of a physical assault. And it’s unclear what would happen next as a result. (My point is that if Prosser is digging in this hard now, I don’t see him resigning before a 10-year term, so talk of that is premature).
UPDATE: Good stuff from the Cheddarsphere here and here. I guess Ann Althouse put her sleuth hat on for this now.




85 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thanks DDay, IMHO, this story is great news for the upcoming Recall elections. It has the chance to remind voters about exactly what the five Koch justices on the SC did.
1 They basically said the legislator can pass whatever law they want. Violating the state open records law (and others?) was no impediment.
2 And perhaps more important was the timing. This was all about making sure the Senate didn’t have to revote. The GOP was embarrassed, because Dems kept telling them, all they had to, to get around the problem with open records, was vote again. That scared the bejesus out of the Senate. AFAIK, the SC didn’t read the bill or deliberate the law.
As I understand it, it’s in that context that Justice Choker put hands on Justice Bradley’s neck.
Enjoy following you on Twitter.
Another side benefit of Justice Choker has been the trashing of another endorsement from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Prosser a vote for Independence
The JS Editorial board endorsed Prosser AFTER the JS’ news division had published the accounts of Prosser putting in an email that the Chief Justice was a b…. and that he would “destroy” her.
I think this is also a great chance for the leftyblogs in Wisconsin. They will stay on this and I hope that will force the corporate media to follow.
They need to have continuous video and audio taping in each justice’s chambers. Just consider all of it a bad neighboorhood, and do it.
Weren’t there any actual witnesses to this? Is she actually bruised? If not, there may sadly be no resolution of this.
There seems to be a venerable legal precedent involved here, namely the “Uppity Bitch Made Me Do It” defense.
Prosser’s wife, if he has one, needs to be deprogrammed for Stockholm syndrome and interviewed about potential mental and physical abuse. Do you think he may have abused her during their marriage?
By the time Walker and his ilk in combination with the rightwing hate radio here get done with the event it’ll make us long for the OJ trial.
In Texas, they grab the bull by the horns, but in Wisc. Prosser handles it differntly…
I admit to being gobsmacked by all this. I didn’t think Prosser was as emotionally unstable as he clearly is. He was obviously always a shit, but shits at that level and especially in office generally control themselves. The recall election obviously got under his skin, which turns out to be paper thin. Hard to see how he will be able to function in court after this. This is not something he is going to be able to wriggle out of.
Just your typical Republikan criminals. While Prosser has a stranglehold on the neck of a female colleague, Governor Walker has his boot on the necks of nurses, teachers, and first responders. All for the benefit of their corporate criminal friends.
Prosser: “They [Abrahamson and Bradley] are masters at deliberately goading people into perhaps incautious statements.”
In other words: “She made me do it.”
How many wife-bashers use that defense?
There were three witnesses whose names have not been released. If you witnessed a Conservative attack a Liberal, would you want your name released to the Rabid Right?
But she made him do it. Just ask him!/S
Oh, yeah, she MADE him do it. /standard abuser excuse
Some people think that this “war on women” that is spoken about is just a joke but it isn’t. Women are offensive to these jerks and more and more they are showing it in public. It’s rather alarming.
Fine. Charge Prosser AND Bradley. If that’s what it takes …
FWIW, Prosser is single, never married.
AFAIK, the only guy backing Prosser is a Justice Gabelman who actually might be a little worse. If Joanne Kloppenburg had been able to defeat Justice Choker, pundits were saying they could throw Gabelman off the court, for the way he ran his original Koch-financed campaign to get on the court. The guy is an idiot and brought a lot of baggage.
Given Prosser’s history, it’s tough to see a Dane County court ruling against Justice Bradley. At that point, it might be interesting to see if Gabelman sticks to his story. If he does could he eventually face perjury charges? If he doesn’t are there remedies for lying to the police? I don’t know but the Madison police already have his statement and afaik, it’s inconsistent with the statement from three other Justices, who are not named Bradley.
Prosser has the same vacant lapdog expression as Walker.
Minimize, deny, and blame. He must dig in his heels, he has a lot to lose. And when he blames her, watch how the media rushes to the idea, as if there is ever any good reason to lose it or try to control another human being. If he was in her office and would not leave…that’s abuse enough…much less if he put his hands around her neck.
Charge Anne Bradley for getting choked by David Prosser?
What would you charge her with?
Bullseye.
Ex-Gov. Lucey resigns as Prosser’s honorary campaign co-chair, endorses Kloppenburg
“Lucey also cited Prosser’s “disturbing distemper and lack of civility that does not bode well for the High Court in the face of demands that are sure to be placed on it in these times of great political and legal volatility.”‘
LINK
It is very alarming. Especially for us women. I am very leery of working with men anymore.
Failure to apologize? I think Cheney’s hunting accident established that precedent.
I am only half-serious. I’m just so very tired of he said she said letting people get off. Prosser is saying that Bradley attacked him! And these other witnesses seem to be ducking their responsibility to stand up for her. So take it at face value if that’s all we have. Let the investigations sort it out.
Yes. It’s horrific and incredible that this can happen among colleagues at this level of public service.
Sorry.
I think you have hit on one of the most important points. It is no longer public service. It’s a sense of entitlement for life.
She may have walked toward him to show him the door, but he responded with violence. That’s the most likely explanation, especially given his history of disrespect towards female colleagues. The explanation that he was defending himself is laughable. That others would back his story shows how warped and determined to win at all costs the Republicans are today.
Wisconsin Court Supremely Slippery
A botched legal opinion and a choke hold … the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s anti-union opinion is a phrenic blunder unworthy even of a first-week law student …
Article:
http://beeryblog.wordpress.com/2011/06/15/wisconsin-courts-anti-union-ruling-debases-the-rule-of-law/
No worries! :-)
So this guy was black box elected and they’re going to straighten it all out with a black box recalls ????? WTF
Yes are so violent especially Older women/s. This story stinks its not believable tell a good lie or go home is that to much to ask for from today’s pol’s?
Rpublican; The ends justify the means, any and all, legal or illegal cause it’s GOD’S will.
Are the police bringing up charges a judge claims this happened who were the other witness? Who are the witnesses backing Prosser we need background on all the witnesses if one GOPer has any morals and is backing Bradley then its a slam dunk case and I guess we have a trial then another special election.
Any word on previous Prosser violence does he like choking in a fight?
Oh please. Nowhere is there mention of Prosser charging Bradley, nobody had to pull him off her, apparently there is no physical evidence, and nobody has been arrested for assault. Bradley is lying through her teeth. It’s a Weiner episode, bad behavior and lying when caught.
Thanks for keeping us updated on this sorry story. Of course it’s going to devolve into “he said/she said,” but I hope that the witnesses DO actually step up & speak out to the proper authorities.
I’m so sure that Justice Chokehold is going to dig in and blame Bradely for *making him do it.* It almost goes without saying. That is standard behavior for abusers, no matter which gender.
Great post; continue to update on this important story.
Why does it have to be that the female is lying?
Oh really? Were YOU there? Did YOU SEE what happened?
If not, you might want to re-consider your wholly unattributed assertions.
How can you overreact to something that did not happen? How can you be goaded into something that did not happen? Physical contact was made I don’t think words would cause that kind of response unless he was swearing up a storm this was not one swear word. Or he made threats of violence in either case Bradley would not have any witnesses saying choking happened.
Because it’s still a (white) MAN’s world, isn’t it?? It’s always gotta be the female that lies, not the man. /not snark; seen it too often.
Within the state, David Prosser has extremely high name recognition. He’s been an elected official for decades. And he had the I (Incumbent) after his name on the ballot. JoAnne Kloppenburg was a career state DA, who had zero name recognition, and zero experience in running for elected office. To run as close as a race as she did was amazing.
The Koch brothers had to dump millions into the Milwaukee market to confuse voters. That’s what put Prosser over the top in a very close race. People in Milwaukee County voted against the thug candidate for County Executive. Unfortunately, enough of them voted for Prosser.
Waiting on your link.
Just wondering? Can abusive justices be charged with “Obstruction of Justice?”
Any bets on “Prosser” pleading the fifth Amendment to an A&B charge, if ever charged? As we all know, it is not the crime that gets people, it is usually the cover-up, after the fact? Take “Prosser” and C. Thomas down! While at it nail Scaglia to. The notion of an independent, impartial state or Federal SJCs went out the window when Taney adjudicated slaves inferior, in a motion to dismiss, protecting the “rights” of aristocrats to own people as property! This is all a more sophisticated way, to enslave people to corporations and the monopolies in commerce and trade, perpetuated with campaign contributions, with the money extracted from US! Suited criminals, using the color of law to diminish opportunity and maintain corporate’s profit, at life’s expense?
Yes and the other witnesses all say the same thing? But some witnesses say it did not happen? Any bets those other witnesses had ties to Prosser? Prosser needs at least one Dem witness to say it did not happen. This is a case with 2 judges not regular people either way there is an investigation judges make great witnesses in court.
How the witnesses especially other judges if there were any other judges witness to this and the other witnesses political leanings will decide this case.
That and if Prosser has a history of violence or Bradley has a history of making stuff up. Bradley is a judge making stuff up hurts anybody from ever being a judge in the first place. Its sad but choking Women would not have a similar effect.
Geez, in Domestic A&B cases, an arrest is now mandatory, even if the allegation is not supported with evidence! A different set of rules and standards for those who rule on law? One nice happy family that SJC?
I think a lot of people are asking why Prosser wasn’t arrested.
If he had any African-American ancestors, there would have been no doubt.
Thanks for bringing it up.
5th amendment nice insight but with other witnesses he still loses but it does keep him off record with his own words so they can’t be used against him in later political campaigns or against other GOPers plus it avoids possible perjury charges.
I expect him to take the 5th on talking to witnesses who now support him before they decided to support him or having other people acting for or knowing that people acting on his behalf talked to him.
We are going to need phone records of both judges calls to witnesses.
ignore the troll
This is another thing that bothers me about all of this. Now Prosser is being allowed to spin it away. The longer this takes the more likely that is to be the outcome. I am speechless.
All the SC justices – 1 were in the room.
Any witnesses AGAINST Bradley should be investigated accordingly. Fair is fair … as long as the witnesses AGAINST Prosser are treated with the same rigour. That’s the problem with democrat’s fairness: it never seems to end in a fair result. There is no rule of law. This is another example.
How about judicial perjury? What happens then? Obstruction of Justice charges? It might do the people of Wisconsin some justice to appoint a special prosecutor now, and or convene a grand jury, to investigate the alleged assault. Seems “justice” is compromised in Wisconsin as justice was denied “Dred Scott,” for political expedience?
Police won’t arrest a judge until they are sure the other judge would press charges otherwise any D.A bringing up charges would never win a case against Prosser its politics and yes any African American or Hispanic would be up on charges however would any socially or politically powerful White Person face such charges…maybe depends how connected.
Again: there should be NO question that proper procedures would be followed instead of a coverup that ends up protecting Prosser. Will not ONE SINGLE JUSTICE do their DUTY?????
The Capitol police are supposed to release a statement today, let him spin that.
Sure…. who issues the gag order! This is absurd!
Then its a question of how many judges support each side and the political leanings of the judges.
Even if we lose the case just how many voters will believe an older woman attacked a Man? Every Judge who supports Prosser is going to lose Women votes next election if this goes to trial.
I’m frustrated with this diary, which opens by asserting that the issue has devolved into a he said, she said, and closes by asserting that the matter may be left there. This is lazy journalism, having the predictable effect of depressing readers. But the diarist, in fact, offers zero evidence that the matter stops there in what is, in fact, an ongoing investigation.
Too much idle speculation, not enough facts. If–for ex.–you could show us that the other Dem witnesses were not backing Bradley, that would be depressing; you don’t.
No one will be shocked if Prosser does avoid legal action, but let’s cross that bridge when we come to it. In the meantime, the SOB is presently in hot water.
There surely must be other instances when Prosser has lost control. That should come out as well.
We are watching.
Agreed
At least prosser didn’t text Bradley a shot of his junk.
I read that yesterday Bradley’s father one of the six who raised the flag on Iwo Jima in that famous photo, haven’t been able to confirm or refute.
Cripes if we get one GOPer witness backing Bradley then everything you say becomes very possible if it goes to trial Prossener’s best hope then is a deal the charges go away then he resigns for health reasons 6 months a year later.
But thats the best deal worse or in my mind best case every Judge backing Prosser is forced to resign rather than face a court trial and jail.
Judges fear going to jail with the inmates they sentenced more than anything they will all resign rather than face that.
Is there any legal move to make this case go away? With the Koch brothers interested I assume illegal moves like payoffs to witnesses have already happened.
Favors for friends, campaign contributors and or relatives by Koch Brothers or other GOPers that can’t be tracked back directly should be investigated.
Any bets the sons of certain Wisconsin Judges all just got job offers that will start 6 months a year after the trial ?
Nice Twain and since the Lefty blogs are on it internet searches and local intelligence from Lefties who know Bradley and Prosser will find stuff. The Local Wisconsin blogs are going to get a bunch of traffic.
Except for the statements from Bradley and Choker, the sources are anonymous. There have been no arrests, which should give you great pause.
DDay can’t write whatever he wants. He/FDL could get sued for ONE wrong word.
I’ve been following the story closely and I thought that given its brevity, his summary was exceptional and timely.
If you want more info, go to “leftyblogs,” and click on “Wisconsin.” If you find a better summary than what DDay’s provided, please provide a link. I’d like to read it.
I emailed a Milwaukee blogger about that. Chris Liebenthal of Cognitive Dissidence, a courageous Walker critic for years, was kind enough to respond. He said Justice Bradley was NOT the daughter-in-law of Pharmacist’s Mate, John Bradley, U.S.M.C.
“Judges fear going to jail with the inmates they sentenced more than anything they will all resign rather than face that.”
Self interest and self preservation? Great motivators to lie! Send the SOB to prison like any other law breaker, if convicted? Then get introduce to Bubba! The 6 foot 10 inch, 280 pound con who has a thing for tender sphincters! Payback can be brutal! lol………….
A restraining order would prevent him from going into the court house. So he’d be another republican sucking at the teat of WI tax payers. The same people he just skrewed.
At the risk of being too inside baseball, the scene was this. Six of the seven justices were in Bradley’s chambers discussing the case in which the trial court had voided the legislation eliminating state employees’ collective bargaining rights due to a violation of the state’s open meetings law.
The WI protests were very much about this legislation, stripping unions of their rights, and the recall elections are directly tied to that legislation as well.
The justices were not discussing the outcome as that was foregone, frankly. What they were arguing over was the timing of the decision’s release. This case got to the SCt in record time, it was the longest oral argument heard in the court’s history, over five hours, and the court reached a decision a mere week later. Now there was no emergency requiring such speedy action on this appeal except for this: if the decision wasn’t overturned, Walker and the Fitzgerald Brothers would have to hold another vote on the matter, this time conforming to the notice requirements of the open meetings law. Two things would occur, then. First, organized protests but more important, the six GOP lawmakers who are now the subject of recall elections would have to go on record before the elections. Walker wanted to avoid that vote if at all possible. One of the Fitzgerald Bros declared to the media that they’d have that vote if the court didn’t rule by June 15. In other words, he very publicly stated what the deadline was.
Chief Justice Abrahamson determines when cases are released and published, as is the prerogative of her position. She was not in favor of a speedy release which Prosser was adamant needed to occur. That’s what the fight was over, this is what enraged Prosser, that he wasn’t going to be able to deliver the decision in time to avoid a revote in the state legislature.
Then why were campus police called to the scene? Why do others back her account?
Prosser’s explanation doesn’t pass the smell test, except to a turd.
Thanks
“this guy was black box elected and they’re going to straighten it all out with a black box recalls”
Yep, the votes have already been counted, all they need to do is wait for election day.
“people are asking why Prosser wasn’t arrested”
Because he’s a Republican, installed in a flagrantly fraudulent ‘election’ where one town clerk was allowed to add 7000 votes to the tally from an insecure computer that had been in her possession for days after the election was over.
The Rule of Law does not apply to Republicans, only Democrats.
“Chief Justice Abrahamson determines when cases are released and published, as is the prerogative of her position. She was not in favor of a speedy release which Prosser was adamant needed to occur. That’s what the fight was over, this is what enraged Prosser, that he wasn’t going to be able to deliver the decision in time to avoid a revote in the state legislature.”
So Prosser’s alleged assault was motivated by anger and frustration at his failure to get the court’s timely deliverance of a decision, for political purposes? If true, this is sickening and cause for removal from the bench. So much for checks and balances? Seems Jefferson is again correct concerning the actions of corporate aristocrats gutting checks and balances and law in the lust for endless profit! BTW Jefferson, was no communist or corporate fascist! In fact he warned America of all of this garbage, as a founder! Prosser should resign now, for the well being of the citizens of Wisconsin. He is IMHO, unfit to serve as a trier of fact and rule on law. Is he compromised in every sense of the word? To life, not hacks……..
To be fair, they also may have been fighting over the destruction of the rule of law generally as the majority decision is a joke.
Bullseye, thank you.
This apparently took place in the full view of most of the other Justices on the court.
The Capitol Police are the law officers for the state capitol building which also houses the supreme court chambers where the incident occurred.
What I don’t know is who would do the charging–county district attorney or state dept of justice, as I’m not sure the chain of command for the Capitol Police. Of course the state supreme court is the ultimate legal authority…
Just checked with the Capitol police. The venue for any criminal proceeding would be the county in which the incident occurred in this case, Dane County. Thus, the Dane County district attorney would determine whether and what to charge and a Dane Country trial judge would conduct any proceedings thereon out.
Conservatives hate liberal Dane County, just for the record…
So where is the grand jury? Seems the relationships that exist, requires an impartial investigative tool to see if probable cause exists to charge the Judge with A&B? Any DA who has his career in mind would protect himself from such “discretion,” which might come back to bite him at a future legal proceedings?
A grand jury replaces the discretion exercised by a DA. An indictment establishes, probable cause, to charge a person with a crime. It would be wonderful for a grand jury made up of citizens to determine based on testimony and facts, if a Judge committed a crime. Judges are not ABOVE THE LAW!
Lucky for the creep of a man, because if someone puts their hands like that on my wife and I would beat them to death with my bare fists, then call for a jury of my peers; those men whose wife’s were assaulted.
Nullification for sure. What if it where your mother he grabbed by the neck? Creep is to nice!
If Bradley’s taller and stronger than Prosser, he must almost literally be a dwarf, as the two normally-sized men in this photo are towering over the much smaller and slighter Justice Bradley: http://www.wicourts.gov/news/thirdbranch/current/images/vetschipvalley.jpg