Sen. Bernie Sanders is about a half-hour into another “filibernie” stemwinder on the floor of the Senate today; the prepared text, which Bernie is likely to embellish, clocked in at over 10,000 words. Sanders has combined this speech, which concerns shared sacrifice, with an action item, a petition to the President that lays out the situation facing America today, and what must be done to rectify it. Here’s the entire letter:
This is a pivotal moment in the history of our country. Decisions are being made about the national budget that will impact the lives of virtually every American for decades to come. As we address the issue of deficit reduction we must not ignore the painful economic reality of today – which is that the wealthiest people in our country and the largest corporations are doing phenomenally well while the middle class is collapsing and poverty is increasing. In fact, the United States today has, by far, the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major country on earth.
Everyone understands that over the long-term we have got to reduce the deficit – a deficit that was caused mainly by Wall Street greed, tax breaks for the rich, two wars, and a prescription drug program written by the drug and insurance companies. It is absolutely imperative, however, that as we go forward with deficit reduction we completely reject the Republican approach that demands savage cuts in desperately-needed programs for working families, the elderly, the sick, our children and the poor, while not asking the wealthiest among us to contribute one penny.
Mr. President, please listen to the overwhelming majority of the American people who believe that deficit reduction must be about shared sacrifice. The wealthiest Americans and the most profitable corporations in this country must pay their fair share. At least 50 percent of any deficit reduction package must come from revenue raised by ending tax breaks for the wealthy and eliminating tax loopholes that benefit large, profitable corporations and Wall Street financial institutions. A sensible deficit reduction package must also include significant cuts to unnecessary and wasteful Pentagon spending.
Please do not yield to outrageous Republican demands that would greatly increase suffering for the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society. Now is the time to stand with the tens of millions of Americans who are struggling to survive economically, not with the millionaires and billionaires who have never had it so good.
I’m sure our Modern Monetary Theorists will dispute Senator Sanders on the efficacy of reducing the deficit over the long-term, but I doubt even they would argue with the rest of the letter. Sanders is staking out the position on the left pole of the debate about as far as he believes he can in Washington. He wants at least half of any solution to come from ending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and ending corporate welfare. He also wants significant cuts to the Pentagon on top of that. And essentially, he wants the poor and vulnerable, who did not cause the crisis, to be held harmless.
There’s a case to be made that Sanders could have opted to do nothing – to return to Clinton-era tax rates and be done with deficit reduction for the next decade. That’s not exactly where Sanders came down, but his solution would theoretically capture the same amount of revenue and allow for tax cuts for the lower income scale (because of marginal tax rates, a lot of these help the rich, too) to stand. So Sanders’ option is arguably more progressive, albeit a bit less realizable a goal than simply doing nothing.
Sanders’ gambit, at least, is getting a lot of play on social media: check the #sharedsacrifice hashtag. The live comment feed at his page is streaming an array of positive comments in rapid fire. He’s trying to use new tools, as well as the bully pulpit of the Senate floor, to push his message. And he’s built off the prior filibernie from back in December. It’s important to have messengers, and that’s what Sanders clearly sees himself as at this point.




66 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I signed and commented and hope others will as well. While I concur with the MMT economic perspective, I do realize that changing the ‘game’ is like turning an ocean liner. so I’m all for Senator Sanders.
Oh and completely OT but I suspect of interest to you:
BANKING: Escondido’s Sunrise Bank could become the flag in California for new owner
Read more: http://www.nctimes.com/business/article_bdd1f573-771c-52c8-aef5-54aac6a8cfa9.html#ixzz1QVoWghSO
Signed, and had my mother sign the letter. May send him a contribution if finances permit this month.
From the Hill:
“President Obama, seeking a Republican agreement to raise the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt ceiling by Aug 2, will not insist that any deal include an end of President Bush’s controversial tax rates on the wealthy.”
what do you, dday, think about the policy goal of reducing the deficit over any term?
rather than attempting to speak for someone else, please share your own pov.
i hate regressive tax cuts AND i think the policy goal of reducing the fed govt deficit is a insanity. imo, the two are not mutually exclusive.
my objections are to claims that tax increases make for a good progressive policy because they will reduce the deficit. that kind of thing is BOTH stupid politics and stupid economics.
i’m not for tax increases to reduce the deficit but to level the playing field. And until MMT is part of the economics mindset in this land, we’re stuck with the idiocy that is.
And who cares if they do? What is relevant is the politics. The big thing as far as actual humans are concerned is “Making a Statement of Priorities” right?:
If MMT theory must trump actual good, when,most Americans believe the Rich have received a great deal without much sacrifice, and should pay more, MMT can go to hell politically, and let the Rich be taxed to achieve anywhere near the income equality we need.
Sorry to MMT theory purists, but no way in hell I want to offer mega-rich people ANY incentive to not pay taxes in our current state of income inequality. Hell no. I see inequality play out daily as regards LGBT rights, and to offer these monetary scoundrels MORE? No.
no one has said that!
please retract.
i agree.
I’m reading a copy of his December 10, 2010, filibuster, which he had published in book form. Most Americans have no clue as to how much the rich have gotten richer in the past decade.
So what? It’s no skin off your nose, as they say. And they already carry the majority of income taxes. This is just class warfare.
I hope a member of Bernie’s staff slips him additional material based on these stats.
I think I found a teeny little flaw in his plan:
Class warfare in which the rich use our money with which to buy the guns and other weapons to kill us.
And since when did “class warfare” become a dirty word? The rich have been engaging in class warfare for decades. It only becomes a dirty word when anyone fights back.
Pretty much done with one or two sane progressives/ liberals who are almost always completely ignored speaking up on important issues. Totally useless.
Yep but at lest there is one person in the congress that likes the little people.
Yes. Certain individuals like to show up here and make personal attacks; never addressing the positive, substantive arguments made by the subject of the post (progressive taxation policies and avoiding cutting programs to benefit low income families); and repeating (lies) Republican talking points verbatim.
Anyone here ever Read Greg Palast’s “GLOBALIZATION”? That is what Jeb and Enron and the World Bank did to Argentina..Greg said many years ago , that was the “practice run” for what was coming our way for the Middle class.
Obama is not going to stop it..”he is one of them” owned by the powers who planned this. Obama was “Planned”, Just as this distruction of the Middle Class was.
I live in Fla..and have seen the collapse going on, The North East has seemed untouched by what has gone on in Fla and Calif and parts of the Mid West and around the country. But it is coming..it’s just a matter of when.
And the When is coming..
After ruling halted N.J. foreclosures, experts fear deluge of filings Source: NJ Star-Ledger
In the past six months, an eerie feeling has settled in the offices of housing counselors and attorneys who confront the foreclosure crisis head-on and help distressed homeowners in New Jersey. The phone hasn’t been ringing any less than it did at the height of the storm, but what is about to hit may be greater than anything the group has seen so far.
Foreclosure filings are down 86 percent so far this year from last, owing in part to a December crackdown by the state’s chief justice that effectively halted proceedings by the country’s biggest mortgage lenders and service companies, according to court data. But lenders are waiting to file an estimated 28,500 foreclosures, and another 55,000 mortgage loans are currently more than 90 days delinquent, according to LPS Applied Analytics, a real estate data firm that tracks mortgage performance. At the current rate, it would take 49 years for banks to clear the logjam of mortgage loans that are currently in the foreclosure process or are more than 90 days delinquent, LPS found.
…snip…
The foreclosure process came to a halt on Dec. 20, when Chief Justice Stuart Rabner announced an initiative to address fears homeowners were unnecessarily put into foreclosure and judges had inadvertently “rubber-stamped” files that had inaccurate or inadequate paperwork.
…snip…
When the foreclosure filings start winding their way through courts again, the influx will affect everyone in the industry.
“There are going to be very substantial numbers of foreclosures that are going to hit the market, all of which is problematic and obviously has a negative impact on housing values,” said Robert Levy, executive director of the Mortgage Bankers Association of New Jersey.
Read more: http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/after_ruling_h…
——————————————————————————–
The homeowners that used to retire and sell their homes for retirement are going to see the bottom drop out..their medicare cut , and their Social Security cut..all homeowners are getting no relief from this President or Congress. The bankers who robbed them got all the relief…but you?? the homeowner..you got the middle finger. And it doesn’t matter how much you were robbed or how crooked the banks are and were…the middle class will pay the price for the crooks! It was planned that way. And Obama and the Dems are just as responsible. To think other wise is to fool only oneself.
There are no two parties..there is but one party with one money pot in the middle..and you aren’t invited to the party.
Who did Obama dine with last week in NYC??????? oh yeah..the Bankers and Wall Street crooks!
What has Obama and the dems done for relief for middle class homeowners?? Oh Yeah..nothing!
And yet the Fraud is right in front of their eyes…it is glaring at them and us!
Anyone remember the problems UBS faced when Obama took office?? Well one of my “Former Neighbors” is the number 4 guy at UBS..now..a Rabid ..I need to say that again.. “A RABID REPUBLICAN Corporate first guy” I was always mocked by him for being a democrat..funny thing..he gave to Obama in 2008..yes indeed, he gave the max to Obama..as did all the UBS people..and gee they got a mere slap on the hand for all their hiding of the rich folks money..to not pay taxes..
Now who did Obama dine with last week..take a look..
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Obama Returns to New York to Raise Money, Dine With Bankers – Businessweek
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-06-23/obama-returns-to-new-york-to-raise-money-dine-with-bankers.html
June 23 (Bloomberg) — The last time President Barack Obama flew to New York for a Broadway show, it was for a long-promised date with his wife.
Today’s New York trip was a less intimate affair: a $1,250- per-person fundraiser with gay and lesbian activists and a $35,800-per-plate dinner with Wall Street bankers. After dinner was a performance of the musical “Sister Act,” where he will be joined by the show’s producer, actress Whoopi Goldberg, and young Democratic donors.
The dinner at Daniel, a restaurant on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, drew some of Obama’s biggest donors to the 2008 campaign, as well as some who initially backed his rival for the party’s nomination, then-Senator Hillary Clinton.
snip;
Wealthy Donors
Among those who were to dine with Obama at Daniel were Robert Wolf, chairman of UBS Americas; Blair W. Effron, partner and co-founder of Centerview Partners LLP; Marc Lasry, managing partner and founder of Avenue Capital Group; Mark Gallogly, a managing principal of Centerbridge Partners; James Rubin, managing director of BC Partners; and Frank Brosens of Taconic Capital Advisors LP, according to a party official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the list hadn’t been made public.
Until Congress cleans up its deceit, we won’t be able to clean up the deficit.
Senator Conrad told Chuck Todd today that the Republicans control the House and the Dems have a narrow margin in the Senate.
No. The Republicans control the Senate, too, with their shameful abuse of filibuster and holds.
There is no shame in Washington. Shame on us for putting up with it.
They are Silent American unwilling to do what is right because…..?
That’s a pretty nice filibuster of your own there.
Sanders is meaningless unless he is willing to filibuster for real.
That being stated, this whole thing just marks the lines of the new border blurred by Obama the wolf in the hen house.
I signed the petition. However, I have no faith that will do any good. Our President has shown that the only constituency that has any influence over him are the Republicans. Even if Bernie reached a million it would do no good. It probably would even be ignored by most of the media. Narratives, not playing into.
One more thing. Stop feeding the trolls!
I doubt that MMTists dispute the fundamental law of reality that “what can’t go on forever won’t.” To get out of this recession, we must increase spending, especially spending that puts money into the hands of people who need and will spend it.
We could pay the bills by simply issuing (“printing”) money for a while, i.e., until the slack comes out of the economy. But in an nation as tax averse as ours, I’d like to see taxes raised sooner rather than waiting until inflation is at the door.
Thanks FDL for bring this to our attention.
And thanks Sen Sanders for your continued efforts to do what’s right (what FDL has incorrectly called “the Left pole in the deficit debate”).
Petition: signed.
One change in the letter to Obama near the end:
Please do not join your fellow Democrats in doing a dance with Republicans that amounts to yielding to outrageous demands that would greatly increase suffering for the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society.
Obama,
Try leading Democrats in delivering on your promise of hope and change rather than joining the sellouts among the Democratic Party and the Republican Party as you have done repeatedly since taking office.
If you don’t give the ridiculously rich everything they want, they’ll be fine.
signed and forward onto others…thank you Bernie and keep it up…shame on the rest of them!
At this point there are less than 40,000 that have signed his petition. Boots in the streets by the hundreds of thousands is the only thing that the plutocracy fears. Petitions? They have petitions for breakfast.
Thanks to Bernie Sanders. At least he’s trying, which is more than I can say for nearly any other corporatist whore in Congress, the White House, SCOTUS and Agencies.
We are certainly in a Class War, and it’s the uber-rich v. the rest of us schlubs. Frankly, I’m sick and tired too of the redistribution of OUR taxes to the upper 1%. It’s a frickin’ joke to believe the LIE put out there by the mega-rich that only they pay taxes, and over 60% of US citizens don’t. That’s bogus; a bald-faced lie; but I see it here at FDL by paid sock puppet trolls (paid by the super wealthy to post here, I might add) all the time.
NOT TRUE. We, of the middle & working classes (no matter how we vote), are being *played* and ripped off by the mega rich. It’s no joke.
Wake up! We need to raise the progressive tax rates, no matter what the economic or monetary theory du jour is.
True. It may come to that, but we’ll see…
They pay little tax if any due to loopholes. Corparations like BP do not pay taxes but also get refunds.
True! How many petitions have I signed in the last decade?? Thousands upon thousands?? When I was still naive and I wasn’t cynical enough yet to believe it mattered to anyone in congress, let alone the White House?? I was just thinking about that..but my biggest question to myself was..when were any of them acted on to the benefit of the middle class? or to end wars? or to allow Single Payer Health Care..and then watered down to a Public Opiton to only learn the O man had sold us out before there ever was petitions for a Public Option or when I blieved the Gulf Of Mexico and our government leaders weren’t owned by Foreign Oil Corporations.and that our Coast Guard and police couldn’t be run over by a Foreign Oil corp or run by them….or when a Lady who lost her son to a bogus war stood in a ditch in Texas..or when my neighbors were losing their homes and businesses to crooks in the banks and Wall Street..and when I wanted our votes to count and not be manipulated by Corporate “OWNED” Voting machines only to see my primary vote stolen when My state Became the only state to ban DRE Voting machines in 2008.
Petitions? Hmmmm.. …I have signed thousands of them…lol..when has anything changed with a petition?
LOL..I am still signing them..but now …with zero expectations!
Next to a person’s home the most costly expense is transportation. SO let’s reason if Americans where not leveraged into spending four dollars a gallon for gasoline and wasting $3.20 of the four dollars spent on gasoline right out the tailpipe of the car, the American people might have more money to spend? However as energy cost rise all costs rise and the extraction of wealth from the governed is further exacerbated Over a billion dollars of value is squandered in America on any given day, on just gasoline for our cars. Never mind diesel fuel and the USA trucking fleets? The proximate cause of America’s economic collapse goes right back the cost and inefficient use of energy.
147.50 per barrel! Goldman Sachs????????????????????????????????????????????
There will be no liberation for the American people from this quandary until the US Congress places the needs of the governed before the corporate interests which use the undue influence of money to manipulate the political process, to protect their interests at our expense. So Exxon Mobile pays no taxes yet the cost of energy inflicts economic hardship on Americans, and EM post record profits? I’m sure Exxon Mobile et als, like the aristocrats of the Antebellum Senate and House divided, will obstruct any change shamelessly,
to emancipate the slaveswhich, would provide the American people with lowered energy costs and the more efficient use of the potential energy purchased by Americans.Your absolutly right about that. For the most part, though, we don’t seem able or willng to put boots on the ground. The so called leaders of the progressive movement do nothing to make it happen.
Funny how all the tax exempt trade organization pop up concerning Energy. The Tobacco Institute once existed for the sole purpose of misinformation, for the Tobacco industry! Where corporations marry a perception of liberty with addiction. Sounds like the same old BS we heard before?
Petitions are the secular, political equivalent of prayers. Participating in them costs almost nothing, so there are an easy thing to do and provide immediate emotional satisfaction (I’ve signed some myself–what the hell). But precisely because they exact almost no real cost from participants, they yield very poor results.
Who needs leaders? Perhaps they are overrated?
Where are the democrats? Why are they not joining Bernie? Oh yes I remember now. Jellyfish have no spines.
Democrats aren’t spineless.
They’re sellouts.
yes indeed!
Petitions provide information and context.
Petitions show leaders that people have been informed and that they cared enough to sign.
Voting isn’t much more than a “yes” or “no” to an incumbent or voting for Candidate A or Candidate B (though I and many others will be choosing one of the other candidates from now on). If I were Obama, I’d care about the number of petitions people will have on their minds when they spend a moment to decide whether to bother going to vote for him or, having gone, to decide whether to pull the lever or whatever by his name.
Delivering petitions in person can sometimes make for a good photo-op for the petitioners.
I just don’t see the down-side.
They’ve created enough buffers between us and them that I don’t think they fear our boots in the streets at all. Breaking windows at banks and McD’s probably doesn’t make even the slightest dent in the profits of insurance companies that have to pay to fix them.
I don’t understand why there isn’t more effort to have consumer strikes. A well organized consumer strike once or twice a month would get their attention.
Images from 1968 “Demorat” Convention
http://www.google.com/search?q=1968+democratic+convention+riots&hl=en&prmd=ivns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=GP0JTqvUD-T30gHeztGCAQ&ved=0CDQQsAQ&biw=799&bih=501
Because JerryB when people protest in America, Americans get there heads caved in by law enforcement acting as Gestapo thugs! Because students who protested an immoral war, like Iraq, predicated on lies, where shot and killed because they where sick and tired of lies deceit and there friends and family members coming home in body bags. Because there are consequences when one exercise constitutional rights, that the power elite see as a threat!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWdu_vaeI7c&playnext=1&list=PL23EC1A40A3FB31E0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWdu_vaeI7c&playnext=1&list=PL23EC1A40A3FB31E0
DEJA VU! Looks like a Gestapo to me!
I don’t think I could produce a major national protest. Do you? Without the leadership of those with major standing it definately can’t happen.
If we are not willing to risk our safety or even our lives then we are not worthy of our heritage. Do you think those who fought for us in the past would have done so if they had known that we would bury our heads and whimper when all they fought for was in jeopardy. “I can’t do anything, I’m afraid” is not the cry of a worthy people.
Funny thing, if tax cuts for the wealthy did nothing or very little to help the economy, then surely putting them back to where they were will not hurt the economy. And it will make me feel one hell of a lot better because that is the right thing to do.
I’ll sign the petition, but I don’t believe do any good, Obama don’t listen to nobody but Wall Street.
True enough, but the current plutocracy has shielded itself from all types of assaults except one: economic.
Why not organize consumer strikes?
““I can’t do anything, I’m afraid” is not the cry of a worthy people.”
You are so correct! You have just described the Silent
GermanAmerican. Not even worthy of being American. Call it freedom to be a smuck!I’d be in favor of that.
“at least half of any solution to come from ending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy ”
the bush tax cuts ended. we are now living with the OBAMA “tax cuts for the wealthy”
Sure. I don’t know that there is a downside either. They can’t hurt. I just meant that because petitions require so little investment it shouldn’t be surprising that they don’t yield the results one might expect.
I suspect you are right regarding breaking windows, etc. Not participating, like a consumer strike, might get better results. A larger, more comprehensive Buy Nothing Day? Plus, anyone, anywhere can decline to participate, either alone or collectively. Stop over-consuming, stop watching the TV, stop joining the military, . . . ?
I don’t believe they result in anything, other than to make the person signing one fullfill their illusions!
You are probably right about a major national protest. But something can be accomplished by anyone without defering to or waiting for a leader. They are not the only agents of change and, for my money, the least desireable.
You don’t know of any qualitative data on the subject do you? I’d be interested to read about how petitions impact politics (outside of my experience), if indeed they do. I suspect that if any results accrue from petitions it correlates with something tangible behind the names on the list. If there are no actions or threat of action behind the petition, what reason is there to do much other than ignore them?
When you originally commented on your experiences with petitions, I thought of George Carlin’s bit on the efficacy of prayer in relation to The Divine Plan and also the ironic gibe by David Cross about how merely the wearing of AIDS ribbons wasn’t making a dent in the disease.
I’m not aware of anyone with power, authority, or significant influence who agrees with you publicly. You, like everyone, know the outcome (“goal”) will be so-called deficit reduction by the trillions. It’s unmasked code for the elimination of our society’s ethical and responsible regard for its citizens and residents. A nation state that can mint its own money and therefore control its monetary policies should have no (or very little) concern for macroeconomics and its scarcity formularies. Life is or can be a fountain indeed, it’s not a barren desert, but we seem to be conditioned to hoard the water and require that everyone be thirsty or afraid of dying of thirst.
Ah ha! Fear. There’s the rub. The success of the exploitative few demands that the many be willing to play the game. And fear is the shackle that keeps our hand in that game.
“Off goes the head of the king, and tyranny gives way to freedom. The change seems abysmal. Then, bit by bit, the face of freedom hardens, and by and by it is the old face of tyranny. Then another cycle, and another. But under the play of all these opposites there is something fundamental and permanent — the basic delusion that men may be governed and yet be free.” –H. L. Mencken
I don’t need any qualitative data..I just watched hearings in the basement of the capitol and all the bullshit that has gone on ..no data needed …I could easily watch the dems ignore the Union protestors in Wisconsin and Ohio and the teachers losing their jobs ..where have the dems been? And the Health Care give away program to big Pharma and the health insurance boys and hospital conglomerates..who needs data when you see a president break the laws of the War Powers act and get away with it..and the funding even comes from democrats.
How many petitions have you signed..I know darned well I have signed more in the past 12 years than my entire lifetime..and have seen ZERO Results.
But I do know as a youth my protests in the streets brought the end to a war ..in Vietnam…but only after thouands upon thousands of my peers died , and were exposed to chemical warfare..and at least 1 million Vietnamese were killed. It took millions of us taking to the streets..over and over again.
I think far more targeted consumer strikes during an election year would work better.
If we focus on Walmart, including having protestors stand outside the entrances to Walmart parking lots, so that there’s an impact to their profits for a day, a point is made.
A bigger point is made if that’s done a few weeks later to another retailer, then a few weeks later to another…
The point isn’t to cripple the economy, but to show that consumers can organize and make a difference to profits.
Also, a day when no one buys gas. It makes a clear statement.
Ah look. Our little deluded, randian, fuckwit troll is back. As I said in a previous thread, please go and spout your mindless bollocks in an appropriate forum with a congregation of fuckwits similar to yourself. Try itulip.com for instance. Glibertarian “morans” to the last. But there are many more places besides.
Just wondering if you’d come across any. My thoughts and experience with petitions is similar to yours, but it doesn’t hurt an argument to have some supporting data or external confirmation.
LET’S PROVE DICK DURBIN WRONG…
HE SAID WE WON’T DO WHAT GREECE IS DOING
LET OBAMA GO AFTER OUR SAFETY NET…AND THAT MAN WILL HAVE NO PEACE ON EARTH FOR THE REMAINING OF HIS LIFE
LET’S NOT VOTE IN 2012…IF OBAMA GUTS THE BIG THREE…WHAT DO WE HAVE TO FEAR OF HAVING A GOP IN THE WHITEHOUSE?
HELL I’M BLACK…AND I SEEN BETTER DAYS UNDER GWB…..ROMNEY COULDN’T BE NO WORSE…AT LEAST HE GOVERN A LIBERAL STATE, SO HE CAN’T BE A RIGHTWING CREEP LIKE BAUHMANN, CAIN, PALEWTY OR PERRY
OBAMA TOUCH THE BIG THREE
UNITED STATES WOULD LIKE LIKE “GREECE-2″
I HOPE SOMEONE CHALLENGE DICK DURBIN!!
Let O lose in 2012. Hell with him. He has proven he has no spine and he can’t lead. Christ, I wish Nader would run again. Gave me someone to vote for since ’96. Get ready for the big schlong of the religious right to come in swingin’. How damn depressing.
well, i’m not so sure who might agree with me… but i can say that i have been very strongly influenced by economists such as galbraith, mosler, wray, mitchell, kelton, fullwiler and more. so they must have some influence. i just wish it was more and i don’t understand why progressives don’t pay more attention to galbraith et al. than to brad delong (a self described neoliberal!!!), krugman (who still doesn’t seem to understand why he and other orthodox economists missed the coming global financial crisis) and similar who, while reliably D party loyalists are hardly what i think of as independent thinking progressive economists.
yes. apparently progressives too (which i confess has surprised the hell out of me).