Walter Pincus was the guy at the Washington Post known for writing skeptical stories about the Iraq debacle that wound up on page A17. He still gets that level of respect today, even when he’s got better information than anyone else. In this case, Pincus advances the story of permanent bases in Afghanistan (I’m calling them permanent bases, even if they end up being “joint bases” in the end), by taking a look at the construction contracts:
The United States may be planning to reduce its troop levels in Afghanistan over the next three years, but new construction contracts at Bagram Air Field serve as a reminder that current plans call for a significant continuing American military presence there.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers awarded a $14.2 million contract to a Turkish company to construct an eight-building barracks complex for troops. The facility is expected to house more than 1,200 personnel, and it’s not scheduled to be completed until the fall of 2013, one year before the Afghan army is scheduled to take over security across the country.
Other Bagram construction projects have either just been completed, or are still being lined up.
In March, construction was completed on an $18 million two-bay hangar for C-130 transport planes at Bagram, almost two years after it was begun. The hangar is approximately 60,000 square feet.
This is simply not the kind of building you do when you’re preparing to leave.
It’s possible to believe, as I do, that the announcement on troop withdrawals heralds a change in mission toward more of a counter-terrorism approach than a nation-building approach. It’s possible to believe that the US wants a peace deal between the Karzai government and the Taliban in place, as a precursor to an exit.
But none of that is incompatible with setting up a permanent base structure, a place from which to launch counter-terrorism attacks in places like Pakistan. Indeed, the idea that the US had to leave Afghanistan completely, as a precursor to any talks with the Taliban, has been dropped:
“Negotiations have begun, and the Taliban have shown interest,” said Waheed Mujda, who was a government official during the Taliban regime and maintains contact with Taliban leaders. “In the past, the Taliban has insisted that unless the United States leaves Afghanistan, it will never come to the negotiating table. But now it seems that problem has been solved, and that important condition has been set aside.”
It’s possible that the bases are being built up to increase capacity on quick strikes against the Taliban inside Afghanistan, as a means to bomb them to the bargaining table, which has been the clear strategy of late. But the plans do appear to be made for a post-reconciliation world, with the US in a prime position for regional covert ops.



17 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The Congress has provided more than $69 billion to rebuild Afghanistan since 2002. The President has asked the Congress for an additional $17.3 billion for FY 2012 [Oct '11 - Sep '12].
The Afghanistan Engineer District is divided into two districts, north (AEN) and south (AES).
News releases on projects are here:
AEN
http://www.aed.usace.army.mil/news2010.asp
AES
http://www.aed.usace.army.mil/AES/news.asp
Geebuz, think what all that could have done domestically as we sink deeper and deeper.
LeSigh.
And, a great read Mr. Dayen, thanks.
kinda funny. i ‘member after 9/11 Pakistan was the place we used to launch counter terrorism attacks in afghanistan. (shhhh.secret).
Fucking Absurd! War is a racket!
I wonder if Kabul’s ‘Embassy’ will be even bigger than Baghdad’s ginormous complex…! 8-(
Brilliant. We are going to be in a state of permanent war with a nuclear-armed nation.
Obama makes GWB look like a genius,
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
AES Four Major Program Areas:
1. USACE contributes to the Afghanistan National Security Force Program by designing and constructing facilities for the Afghan National Army, Afghan National Police and other defense sectors.
2. USACE provides engineering and technical support to the Department of Defense and its Military Construction requirements in Afghanistan.
3. Counter-Narcotics/Border Management Initiative (CN/BMI Program) oversees the construction of forward operating bases and border crossings, as well as other projects such as the National Investigative Unit, Judicial Center and Joint Aviation Facilities in Afghanistan.
4. Strategic Reconstruction Program – Through this program, the AES staff works with USAID, and other donor nations and agencies to identify areas where projects have an immediate effect building alternative livelihoods, creating ownership and eroding enemy support.
On any given day in AES, thousands of Afghans are at work on Corps projects scattered around the country. AES Afghan First Initiative focuses on placing more work with Afghan nationals and firms. The number of Afghan construction firms submitting proposals on AES projects has significantly increased. About 55 percent of AES contracts are being awarded to Afghan or Afghan-American firms.
“This is simply not the kind of building you do when you’re preparing to leave.”
The military objective following 9/11 in Afghanistan was to clear out Al-Qaeda, not the Taliban. The so-called coalition of the willing that George W. Bush brayed about constantly was an attempt at convincing the American public and the politicians that once that was accomplished the remaining allied forces would help rebuild basic infrastructure and train the Afghan army to fend for itself. Our foreign country partners did not intend to stay nor plan for a 10-year slog and most of them pulled out before Barack Obama was elected.
That didn’t happen for the simple reason that Bush abandoned that war to go after what he considered the bigger fish in Iraq, Saddam Hussein. But, that didn’t work out either since Saddam was in jail 9 months after Bush bombed, invaded and occupied that country, having disposed of the Iraqi Shia conscripts who made up most of the Iraqi army. That war lasted an additional 7 years.
We still have 46,000 troops in that country who are reduced to being observers in a tripartite government of Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds that could once again explode over the control of oil revenues.
What we have now is an Obama policy that made no sense from the get-go. Most expert analysts have admitted that General David Petraeus’s takeover of Afghanistan from retired General Stanley McChrystal has been a failure. Ergo, Obama, as commander-in-chief, must take full blame for not understanding the nature of a corrupt Hamid Karzai government, the Taliban tribal jealousies and their power grab to control the opium profits which fund their weapons and fighters.
Now, the attempts to construct air bases and army facilities to leave behind for the Afghan military who are expected to stand up while we stand down are lessons in futility that prove once again, Afghanistan cannot be controlled by foreign invaders no matter what their noble intentions.
Now, instead of two countries that hate us, Iraq and Afghanistan, we have several, including Pakistan that many believe is the most dangerous country in the Middle East. We won what?
I am rooting, praying, chanting, for the absolute collapse of this system that is destroying us all and the planet and every living thing.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE.
This would all be quite nice, if we were not FUCKING MURDERERS.
Gotta read the fine print.
March 27, 2009
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON A NEW STRATEGY FOR AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN
“Prevent their return”
means kill allnegotiate with the Taliban, whatever. Subject to revision.There’s no substitute for
victorycompromise.I am quite late with this comment, which means that I am simply writing for the archives.
I read the part about the hangar for the C-130s. The cost works out to $300.00 per foot. We just built a strip center in Houston of 30,000 square feet a year ago. Total cost was under $100.00 per square foot.
And we did fancy brick work and stucco and a membrane roof and a parking lot with landscaping and permitting and architects.
And construction took 2 years? It should take maybe six months tops. Are these guys grossly incompetent?
I know. Short answers to stupid questions. Yes.
Anyone remember Sibel Edmonds and what she testified to? Dennis Hastert and his money grubbing from the Turks??
Let Sibel Edmonds Speak
Mar 29, 2010 … Chicago was the center of it all, Chicago was the center of the foreign espionage activity, and the center for money laundering, and also a major heroin distribution center. Celebi was a key player, but Dennis Hastert, Mayor Daley, …. Some of the names, said to have been illegally tied to Turkish …
letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.com/ – Similar
Daily Kos: Hastert took Heroin bribes – Sibel Edmonds, Daniel …
Oct 23, 2006 … 1) ‘suitcases of cash’ – delivered to his home – from Turkish heroin dealers … believe the Speaker Hastert is indeed taking money from foreign nationals, …. Dennis Hastert, at his home, near Chicago, from Turkish sources, … Representative Waxman, to whose staff she’s spoken has said the same. …
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/23/260662/-Hastert-took-Heroin-b... – Similar
guess it is the Dems getting the $$$$$$ now??
ever since that disappearing $6.6 b in iraq, we shifted to using smaller denominations. takes a long time to haul off all that loot, don’cha know?
no one – including the afghans – has ever been able to control afghanistan, the centerpiece in the Great Game. i think Mr. O has decided that once we have secure bases from which to keep an eye on china, pakistan and iran, we don’t care who’s running / ruining afghanistan for the foreseeable future.
Ummn, isn’t that also true of having an “embassy” as big as Vatican City such as the one we have in Baghdad?
A friend of ours has a son in Afghanistan–he is disarming roadside bombs. I saw her the other day and said–optimistically–that maybe, given the approaching draw-down, he would soon be coming home? She told me that her son had told her not to ever take such reports seriously. We are there more or less permanently, according to him.
Half of our economy is predicated on military industrialism and military activity; it is what we do. It is a long-term outcome of hyper-industrialization, of an emphasis on profit over basic needs. It is the central contradiction, and reinforces many other contradictions–including the way we continue to police the brown world for the white one with a Black man at the helm. Leave Afghanistan and we have to start a war somewhere else. Getting out, given all of the people (mostly Republicans) whom we have made rich through outsourcing and base-building, just gets to be too complicated. Elites in Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea, etc. have built their economies around these facts.
Attacking and hollowing out areas of the world that are “unproductive” for global corporatism–the use of troops, creation of bases, recreation of governments with shallow representative governments to offer the veneer of democracy–this is a growth industry, where economic growth will come from. This is now what we do. Obama crafts the apologia. This has long been the role of liberalism which–after all–was the founding ideology OF capitalism. (The conservatives/Tories held out for the brute privilege of the landed elite.)
Liberal (personal) freedom as useful ideology has run its course. Collective rights–to food, housing, the integrity of our communities, to organize–are where we need to focus the fight.