The President entered the debt talks yesterday, meeting with the leaders of both parties in the Senate. And we’re starting to get some numbers out of the negotiations.
The “down payment” of deficit reduction is expected to be anywhere from $2-$2.4 trillion, of which between $500 billion and $1 trillion has been agreed to. So there’s still a way to go. The talks led by Vice President Biden ended when Democrats raised $400 billion in increased revenues as their contribution. So that would be between a 4:1 and a 5:1 ratio between spending cuts and revenue increases. That $400 billion concerns mainly eliminating tax breaks for wealthy individuals and companies.
Among Democrats’ revenue proposals is a change to a common method for valuing businesses’ inventories called last-in-first-out, or LIFO.
Under this method, manufacturers can estimate the cost of the goods they’ve sold at their most recent market prices, even if they purchased the goods at lower prices. An oil company could value the oil it sells at roughly $100 a barrel, for example, rather than $80 a barrel as it may have cost several years earlier. Being able to calculate higher expenses makes a company’s taxable income smaller.
Democrats are proposing to increase the amount of income subject to tax, a move fiercely resisted by many businesses.
Another Democratic proposal would limit the itemized deductions that wealthier Americans can claim on their tax returns to a certain percent of their income. Depending on how strict the limit is, that could generate $300 billion more revenue over 10 years.
Democrats are also pushing to end oil company subsidies and ethanol tax breaks, though the ethanol subsidy is already scheduled to end this year.
The limitation on itemized deductions was floated last week with a higher threshold, on taxpayers making over $500,000 a year, than the previous offer of $250,000, which was in Obama’s first budget and the health care bill, at various points. So I think it would yield less than $300 billion. But anyway, the total revenue here would be $400 billion.
Reportedly, Democrats also want to close the carried interest loophole that allows investment fund managers to have their income taxed as capital gains. That’s roughly a $20 billion loophole.
Mitch McConnell, prior to his meeting with the White House, adamantly rejected any talk of revenue increases, even at this relatively minor 5:1 ratio. In yesterday’s Filibernie, Bernie Sanders called for a 1:1 ratio. “It is time for the president to stand with the millions who have lost their jobs, homes, and life savings, instead of the millionaires, who in many cases, have never had it so good,” he said on the Senate floor.
The $2 trillion “down payment” is only half of the deal. The other half would come in the form of triggers, that would kick in down the road with automatic cuts (or possibly automatic tax increases, it’s not clear) if the budget doesn’t get to primary balance by 2015.
One thing the deal will not include is the Bush tax cuts. That means they will have to be dealt with separately. As I’ve said repeatedly, allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire and doing nothing on a host of other scheduled issues brings the budget into balance all by itself. Gridlock is a more realizable and more sustainable plan than anything either side has come up with.
With Obama in the mix now, the concerns of House Democrats are very acute.
One Democrat who was there said Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) bluntly asked Obama whether he was willing to fight for Democratic priorities amid GOP calls for trillions of dollars in spending cuts.
In asking the question, Waxman said he’d asked several Republicans about their White House meeting the day before and had been concerned by their response.
“To a person, they said the president’s going to cave,” Waxman told Obama, according to his colleague’s account.
“If you’re not going to cave, eliminating that misunderstanding is very, very important to the negotiations,” the lawmaker said, retelling Waxman’s message. “And if you’re going to cave, tell us right now.”
Obama, however, “didn’t answer the question,” the Democrat added. “Obama got in a huff, and he said, ‘I’m the president of the United States, my words carry weight’ — which is not the answer,” the lawmaker said. “That’s not what anyone challenges. It’s whether he is doing this negotiation in the right way.”






130 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Game over. It was over before it began.
It’s all Kabuki Theater!
The destruction of the middle class is their goal. Go Back and read Greg Palast’s “Globalization” And Argentina..it was the practice run for what is happening here now! And all the crooks in Washington are involved.ALL OF THEM.
So will Waxman and his colleague actually tell the Billion Dollar Huffy Baby to go sit in the corner or will they continue to coddle this sorry excuse for a party leader? If the House Dems don’t stand up for themselves, why on earth would they expect Billion Dollar O to do it for them?
Congressional Dems need to revolt until Billion Dollar O stops selling them out.
Forgive me though, if I don’t hold my breath while we wait…
Good on Waxman! It’s a start. But who will follow?
It’s only a “START” if Waxman holds O accountable and goes public with the sell out..see here..O was in a Huff…“Obama got in a huff, and he said, ‘I’m the president of the United States, my words carry weight’
yeah and his words continue to sell out everything I have ever stood for as a Democrat..how about you??
What start is this????????
I see O selling us out to the Bankers, Wall Street, Big Pharma, Huge Hospital conglomerates..wars..pissing on the War Powers Act..calling Liberals and progressives names through his henchmen..
So One congressman gets in his face and he gets in a Huff..wow what a start!!
The big bad O doesn’t even answer..and the widdle Congressman goes back to his office with his tail where??
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
“To a person, they said the president’s going to cave,” Waxman told Obama, according to his colleague’s account.
“If you’re not going to cave, eliminating that misunderstanding is very, very important to the negotiations,” the lawmaker said, retelling Waxman’s message. “And if you’re going to cave, tell us right now.”
Obama, however, “didn’t answer the question,” the Democrat added. “Obama got in a huff, and he said, ‘I’m the president of the United States, my words carry weight’ — which is not the answer,” the lawmaker said. “That’s not what anyone challenges. It’s whether he is doing this negotiation in the right way.”
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
this is who matters to the O man..not we little people..and certainly not Liberals or progressives or those who have carried this party for generations!!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Obama Returns to New York to Raise Money, Dine With Bankers – Businessweek
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-06-23/obama-returns-to-new-york-to-raise-money-dine-with-bankers.html
June 23 (Bloomberg) — The last time President Barack Obama flew to New York for a Broadway show, it was for a long-promised date with his wife.
Today’s New York trip was a less intimate affair: a $1,250- per-person fundraiser with gay and lesbian activists and a $35,800-per-plate dinner with Wall Street bankers. After dinner was a performance of the musical “Sister Act,” where he will be joined by the show’s producer, actress Whoopi Goldberg, and young Democratic donors.
The dinner at Daniel, a restaurant on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, drew some of Obama’s biggest donors to the 2008 campaign, as well as some who initially backed his rival for the party’s nomination, then-Senator Hillary Clinton.
snip;
Wealthy Donors
Among those who were to dine with Obama at Daniel were Robert Wolf, chairman of UBS Americas; Blair W. Effron, partner and co-founder of Centerview Partners LLP; Marc Lasry, managing partner and founder of Avenue Capital Group; Mark Gallogly, a managing principal of Centerbridge Partners; James Rubin, managing director of BC Partners; and Frank Brosens of Taconic Capital Advisors LP, according to a party official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the list hadn’t been made public.
Obama is making his third trip to New York in four months to raise money for the Democratic Party and his presidential campaign before the June 30 deadline to report donations through the second quarter. The president has attended 27 donor events since January, helping the Democratic National Committee outpace its Republican counterpart. Through May 31, the DNC has taken in $45.5 million, compared with $30.5 million collected by the Republican National Committee, according to the Federal Election Commission.
I LOVE that he called it caving right to his face. The bluntness of the term alone was necessary to wake Obama up out of his delusions. That he got in a huff tells me that the criticism is finally starting to sink in that he doesn’t know how to negotiate. Now granted, the way these negotiations are going still reflects the activities of someone who DOES NOT know how to negotiate, but I will say this: I think the only reason even SOME revenue increases are going in is because of this criticism. I mean who goes to the table giving the enemy 80% of what they want? What kind of joker does that? At the same time, I know they’d be getting 100% of what they want if the criticism hadn’t been put to him and then Obama would try coming around with a hang dog face saying TINA (there is no alternative) and his hand out asking for more donations to stop those “darn” Repugs.
He knows how to negotiate he just does not want to.
I know he doesn’t want to, but I think it’s because he doesn’t know how to, is scared of it, but too full of himself to admit it.
Nothing is going to “wake up Obama” he is doing what his rulers want him to do. He does not represent you or me..he represents the Corporate powers. He has proven that over and over and over again.
He may get in a “HUFF” for being called on it, but that will not change his direction.
He has proven that.
Repeatedly!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Obama Returns to New York to Raise Money, Dine With Bankers – Businessweek
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-06-23/obama-returns-to-new-york-to-raise-money-dine-with-bankers.html
June 23 (Bloomberg) — The last time President Barack Obama flew to New York for a Broadway show, it was for a long-promised date with his wife.
Today’s New York trip was a less intimate affair: a $1,250- per-person fundraiser with gay and lesbian activists and a $35,800-per-plate dinner with Wall Street bankers. After dinner was a performance of the musical “Sister Act,” where he will be joined by the show’s producer, actress Whoopi Goldberg, and young Democratic donors.
The dinner at Daniel, a restaurant on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, drew some of Obama’s biggest donors to the 2008 campaign, as well as some who initially backed his rival for the party’s nomination, then-Senator Hillary Clinton.
snip;
Wealthy Donors
Among those who were to dine with Obama at Daniel were Robert Wolf, chairman of UBS Americas; Blair W. Effron, partner and co-founder of Centerview Partners LLP; Marc Lasry, managing partner and founder of Avenue Capital Group; Mark Gallogly, a managing principal of Centerbridge Partners; James Rubin, managing director of BC Partners; and Frank Brosens of Taconic Capital Advisors LP, according to a party official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the list hadn’t been made public.
Obama is making his third trip to New York in four months to raise money for the Democratic Party and his presidential campaign before the June 30 deadline to report donations through the second quarter. The president has attended 27 donor events since January, helping the Democratic National Committee outpace its Republican counterpart. Through May 31, the DNC has taken in $45.5 million, compared with $30.5 million collected by the Republican National Committee, according to the Federal Election Commission.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IRS to Receive Unprecedented Amount of Information in UBS Agreement
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=212124,00.html
IR-2009-75, Aug. 19, 2009
WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice today announced the successful negotiation of an agreement that will result in the IRS receiving an unprecedented amount of information on United States holders of accounts at the Swiss bank UBS.
As a result of this agreement, the IRS will receive substantially all of the accounts that it was interested in when it initiated the John Doe summons against UBS.
Under the agreement, the IRS will submit a treaty request to the Swiss government describing the accounts for which it is requesting information. The Swiss government will then direct UBS to initiate procedures to turn over information on thousands of accounts to the IRS. The IRS will receive information on accounts of various amounts and types, including bank-only accounts, custody accounts in which securities or other investment assets were held and offshore company nominee accounts through which an individual indirectly held beneficial ownership in the accounts.
IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman’s Statement on UBS / Voluntary Disclosure Program
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=231520,00.html
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
what’s a little money to get you out of frauding the US Government of rich people hiding their money out of the country????????
http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/committees/ubs-americas-fund-for-better-government.asp?cycle=08
It’s whether he is doing this negotiation the “right’s” way. That’s the question.
President Lawn-chair in a huff, proceeds post-haste to his secret lair – Unconditional Cave.
I agree.
Yet there is a schism between Obama’s interests and the most progressive House Dems’. Someone like Waxman who comes from a very blue district doesn’t have to worry about support from the large progressive base, he’ll have it, and doesn’t need votes from the center or right to win.
For Obama and blue dog Dems in Congress, it’s an entirely different situation , no?
Job #1 relates to the upcoming election for each of them, rather than ideology.
Oh, and Mr. President? Here’s a nice negotiating point for you: “War Tax”.
Fixed.
ShorterBarack: Fuck you, Democratic base.
Henry Waxman asked a question.
Henry Waxman got an answer (of sorts).
Henry Waxman will do what with that “answer”?
Henry Waxman will stand up publicly and tell “the people” of this nation precisely what?
If Waxman neither does anything regarding the “answer” he has “received” nor shares the actual truth with “the people” of this nation, then Henry Waxman has done precisely … nothing.
And the sooner that we all forget about all of the “nothing” which has been forthcoming from Congress, for more decades than I care to remember, the better it will be … for Waxman AND Obama (and the entire political class, which includes “the media” and the Judicial “branch”, especially SCOTUS …)
As for the rest of us … would it be too bluntly pessimistic to say, that “it” (all things, considered), will simply get worse, regardless, until “the people” have a clear vision of what sort of society which they, “the people”, want to have … and the courage to insist upon “it”?
DW
Even Kucinich folded on the health care bill after his joyride on Air Force One. I have yet to see a single “safe progressive Dem” actually stand up to this President. They occasionally make the right noises, but there is no follow through at all. The House Progressive Caucus is a total joke, so I’m not the slightest bit impressed by Waxman’s pointless display. In the end, he’ll go along with Billion Dollar O, or if he doesn’t, it will only be after Pelosi is certain that there are enough other votes in the caucus to release him from his fealty to the King.
Why is elimination of the Bush Tax Cuts off the table. If everyone paid 4 to 5% more in taxes it would help to eliminate the debt.
By the way, I love your imagery with President Lawn-chair in his Unconditional Cave. That is brilliant : )
I would adopt that framing myself, if I didn’t feel compelled to keep Billion Dollar O’s re-election fundraising goal front and center. As long as fundraising is the only real job our federally elected officials perform (including Congress critters), they will never be bothered about governing, their constitutional obligations, or the public good.
Ah, phred, I find my agreement with you to be total, regarding our political “betters” and their arrogant fetishes, all quite selfish, with amassing great unfettered wealth and completely unrestrained POWER.
Always great to “see” you.
;~DW
Great to see you too, DW : )
I’ve been scarce lately, I do miss railing against the injustices foisted upon us by our political and corporate betters on a more regular basis ; ) I hope you are well these days…
Because everyone who would vote to eliminate it would then have to pay more taxes. What a silly question.
“I am the President of the United States. My words carry weight.” These are the words of a true social dominating authoritarian with a deep seated contempt for democracy. So it has always been. His catch phrase, “Let me be clear,” is not a request, it is not about dialogue or understanding. It is meant to brow beat the listener regarding the Right Answer and exactly who is delivering it.
One out of every two dollars go to the military. This is insane!
Rich Democrats live in the same neighborhoods and buildings as Rich Republicans. We need to change the discourse from D v. R to People v. Greedy Rich
Depends on who is running the voting machines..or stealing primaries!
And who the Super delegates can be made afraid of..or which way their power comes from!
This comedy show lost it’s humor a long time ago. Our Government is not on our side and has to go.
Didn’t the Dems decide to do away with the Super delegates? Seems to me I read that.
I be well (and also scarce of late), how be you and every ole thang wid life? Hope there be joy to accompany your sustained and articulate railings, which are much appreciated … and often too funny for my grumpy words.
I agree with your assessment of 4cdave’s comment @ 11 … busted a gut, I did. (Thank you, 4cdave!!!)
;~DW
Unemployment’s at 9.1%. Glad to see nobody in Washington’s doing anything about jobs. *arrrgh!* You’d think even a politician would realize that people care more about jobs than they do about deficits.
Only until there are hundreds of thousands of people in the streets demanding environmental, social and economic justice the powers that be will continue to take the “people” for chumps and fools. They must be made to realize there are consequences for their corporate subservience. Fear is a powerful weapon and it’s time the plutocrats begin feeling fear.
Come! Come!, otto, the Big O is merely running gummint the way a bidness is run.
Bidness need not bother with even the pretense of democracy.
In bidness, “power” flows but one way.
Ah, well …
DW
If you factor in those who have given up looking the actual number is 16%. They are trying to get the people to accept high unemployment as the norm.
Life is grand (political considerations notwithstanding), just busy. Sigh. I would look forward to retirement and more time to hobnob if it weren’t for the crooked bastards working so hard to deprive me of it ; )
Glad to hear you are well…
If he’s running the country as a business then it’s imperative there be a countervailing balance, a union of the people that hold the plutocrats accountable.
The predatory class sells FEAR!
And undreneath it all, they are a timid, frightened little bunch of nothings who even lack the courage to strangle an enemy (a Prosser-cute-torial judge being, apparently the exception, although he alleges he was either “provoked” or “threatened”), sending lackies, troops, or hirelings to do the dirtiest of what the elites term, “Gawd’s work”.
Basically, Bluetoe2, you’re laying out the truth.
Carry on.
Please … and …
Thank you, Bluetoe2.
DW
I don’t doubt your number but why would you just give up and stop looking? What has sitting on your couch feeling sorry for yourself ever accomplished. This used to be a country of innovators. So sad.
That is the only possible way to actually MOVE forward, Bluetoe2.
As opposed to supposedly “looking” in that “direction”.
DW
Hey, DW. Obama doesn’t want to look back but I wonder what the future looks like to him? How can he not see what’s coming at us?
Plutocrats see nothing but what they can steal from the people whether it be with a six shooter or a fountain pen. And O knows what’s coming to the working and middle class. Sadly he believes in the fantasy the Republicans have been painting for the last 35 years. Only until they fear the people will anything change.
He sees a nation controlled by the monied elites for their benefit. Whether or not he’s reelected he can rest assured that he and his family’s financial well being is taken care of.
Fuck Obama and the rest of the One Percenters.
Fact is Obama doesn’t need any democrat to support him in this “negotiation”. Once he srikes a deal with the repubs, it’s done and congress will pass it. We will see what this genius gets done.
Whenever they meet they need someone like Waxman to say a few choice words to put him in the right frame of mind. You’re behaving like an asshole, man.Sooner or later O will have to move over to the other party as the dems will desert him – - some think he already has.
Obama dreams of the walnut paneled corner office on Wall Street the banksters have waiting for him when he leaves office.
In France the flame of social change was ignited in the hearts of the French people with the storming of the Bastille. In the U.S. that flame could be ignited with a storming of Wall Street.
He would have that any way so why is he destroying the country to get something that is almost automatic unless he chooses to do something else?
To all democrats and republicans–ten years of the bush-obama tax cuts to the most wealthy have produced nothing but higher unemployment and an America where much of it looks like a third world nation. But why not–third world nations do not have an EPA or a middle class.
It’s all an act. After the big show, lawmakers and the politicians currently in office will have a better retirement and better health care AT A MUCH YOUNGER AGE than they legislate and turn the screws for the rest of us. Later, down the road, these lawmakers, politicians and their puppetmasters might deserve no mercy when things change and they are perhaps held accountable for what they have done to the majority of American citizens who trusted to put them in office.
Funny thing, the thugs have Cantor, Boner and McC all with a lot of noise to throw out every day.And the media eats it up. Tax increases are absolutely off the table, we have to cut spending or the fucking world will end, blah, blah. Why are there no dems with a stock speech? Maybe they don’t know what to say b/c O won’t let them. Don’t put words in his mouth.
Frankly, Twain, I suspect that Barack Obama perceives no “us”.
Obama’s personal future looks quite golden …. to him. He will want for nothing, as they say … and will become wealthy beyond his wildest dreams.
As for the rest of “us” … well, in about twenty years “the people”, in their vast majority, will “get it”.
But first, as Mencken used to say, the people are “… going to get it, good and hard …”
Barack has no intention of trudging along on the unfortunate and likely path of the many, for he is special, even “exceptional”.
Twain, I honestly see no eveidence, anywhere, that Barack Obama cares, in any meaningful way, about anyone except himself, his immediate family, and his “astute” connections …
But enough of this falderall, how be you, Twain?
(I appreciate your presence and influence, here, more than I can possibly put into words; your perspective and sensibility make you an especially favorite human being of mine – hoping you won’t mind that presumption?)
DW
I assume it’s merely a rhetorical question. Anyone that has any faith in Obama, that Obama will “come to his senses”, that Obama has a “grand strategy”, that Obama is really “one of us” is either delusional or a fool.
It’s been said around here for a long time one way or another: he is just not that into us.
Thanks, DW. I’m like fine wine – getting better with age, thanks for asking.
Had a good conversation with someone about Obama. We reached no conclusions but the question on the table was “What does Obama get out of the things he has done and not done.” There is no good answer because as I said above he would have gotten the same things if he had done progressive things. Lots of money for speeches, sitting on boards of big companies, etc. So what’s the profit for him?
Obama admired Reagan and loves Billy DLC Clinton. That explains everything that’s happening.
If there is any justice Obama’s future will mirror that of Alexander Kerensky’s, fading into obscurity when the winds of change roll over him. OT, revolution is in the air in Greece. Molotov cocktails thrown outside of the Greek parliament.
The goal of neoliberalism is to concentrate power with the wealthy. That’s what’s behind the dismantling of the social programs. Government exists to protect the assets of the wealthy. The WH, Congress and the Judiciary exist to present the facade of a democratic republic. Just yer basic banana republic.
Obama has a small mind, despite the propaganda to the contrary. No grand vision and no sense of the winds of historic change in the air. Not unlike Louis the XVI.
Hey, don’t u folks understand that in DC ONLY LOSERS pay taxes? The Winners are given our taxes. Its just a matter of how much more WE are going to fork over and how much we are all going to lose benefits wise. The other side not only won’t have to pay up or God forbid sacrifice but they ( the winners /producers) will be getting a much bigger slice of the Federal pie. Why? Because , thats what they’ve paid for! They’re the president’s and both parties clients were just the poor stupid sheeple that can’t afford the “services” of these elite ladies and gentlemen in DC. Why don’t we get it they’re thinking? Politics is a business folks and the people that pay get the choice cuts and the rest of us get the left over crumbs, maybe.
No revolution coming in Greece. At the end of the day the Greeks realize they have been living well beyond their means to impress western Europe. When this tantrum ends they’ll go back to their lives with more responsible fiscal policies.
Exactly! The problem for them is keeping the curtain pulled so nobody see the wizards. To that end they are working furiously to eventually eliminate these pesky blogs and other media that is trying to pull away that curtain.
What is the profit for Cass Sunstein, for Clarence Thomas, for anyone in the political class, which includes the media and the judicial “branch”?
Politics IS Bussine$$
“The people” are of no moment, being expendable little nothings.
The elite are loyal to themselves (and possibly, one or two other “elites”) everyone else is merely in the way.
It is kind of like religious “belief”.
The elites, every single one of them are “chosen”.
(By themselves, and, as they’ve no empathy nor desire any, EVERYTHING is GOLDEN … there is no truth but power …which they reaffirm for themselves every single day.)
For the likes of Obama, the easiest (and safest) course is to not run the risk of upsetting ANY applecarts.
Now THAT would be mayhem. (To see the elites groveling for pennies.)
DW
To address the issue of the LIFO costing, LIFO most accurately assigns cost to a sale because it uses the current cost of the product. Of the other available methods for assigning a cost of goods sold to a sale, FIFO (first in – first out) uses the oldest cost for the most current sale. Other costing mechanisms, such as average cost or standard cost (commonly used for those situations where the product can come from two different sources, such as internally fabricated vs purchased) will result in different calculations. of course, all of this is in a condition where the cost of the product is rising. A condition where that is not true, such as the price of oil which seems to be receding, will have the opposite effect.
All of this goes to show that when a political objective interferes with standard accounting rules, you get some very arcane results.
“For what profits a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul” – I always think of that re Obama. I’m not religious but that sounds like pretty good advice to me.
Can we please find a replacement phrase for ‘kabuki’ theater’ it’s starting to get on my nerves.
A bargain Obama happily made long ago, Twain.
The motto on our coinage reads, “In God We Trust”.
I think it should read “It Is Up To Us”.
The neoliberals see it as “In Us All Money (and POWER) We Trust”.
There are, fundamenatally, but two types of people, those who see themselves as being essentially like everyone else and those who see themselves as “better” than everyone else …
DW
The ancient Greeks gave the world democracy. Perhaps the modern Greeks are trying to reestablish it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13935400
As you know we use many different accounting rules – at the same time. Indeed the IRS corporate return has Sch M is reconcile between the GAAP accounting the firm has used and the accounting results under the rules required by the IRS.
Your comment while interesting and true has nothing to do with IRS accounting and the fact that anything other than FIFO IRS accounting is in effect a tax deferral that is not justified.
Speaking of democracy … what is happening in Egypt these days?
(And how much does America “pay” the Egyptian Military to keep up the “good” work?)
DW
It is fairly amazing how quickly major stories drop out of the news. Monsanto’s pesticide causing birth defects and cancer, for example. That should be headline news for a year until something is done about it. I doubt we’ll hear about it again.
I hear they want the Greeks to take a 21% reduction in the budget to help their banker friends. Wonder what would happen it they told the bankers and the ECB NO, hell no.
The world wouldn’t stop turning – just like Iceland.
Well, Jim, the experts will tell you that it is the attention-span thingie … ‘Murkans don’t have none.
However, when OJ “confesses”, there will be months of in-depth coverage.
Circuses!
We must have circuses.
Toss them some bread!
What?
Well, let ‘em eat cake.
(To hell with politics, let’s eat. Is it true that bankers used to query: “Who shall we have for breakfast?” Or is that merely “Greed is Good” propaganda?)
And, with a straight face, the political class accuses the thoughtful of being “cynical” … and then go off an manipulate the “system” to their own sweet advantage.
And, when this nation was founded … people did understand the risks of concentrated wealth and power, however somewhwere, along the pathway of bloody empire, such concerns were dismissed as cowardly and “negative” …
Ah, well …
Appreciate your comments, Jim, carry on.
DW
What would happen if we told the thugs NO. We want jobs first, then we’ll get around to your “debt problem” that you caused. Maybe we need to get in the streets too.
You mean that birds would still sing … and Brooks would still babble …?
;~DW
Birds still sing but the brooks are filled with toxins. Politicians still babble, if that helps. :)
madness to excuse this as being a bad negotiator
He’s selling the house and us out and he damn well knows it. That’s why he didn’t rebuff the question but dodged it.
He’s a smart evil bastard, akin to bush being a dumb evil bastard.
Indeed.
“In bidness, “power” flows but one way.” And shit rolls downhill. :)
And what’s the answer?
Joe Hill: “Organize.”
Any organizing you see that holds promise, DWB?
The times are desperate for it.
If Waxman truly functioned as a representative of the American people, he would have used all of the weapons in his arsenal…specifically calling Obama’s bluff re: his petulant “I’m the President” response. Seriously. How about we prosecute Mr. “my words carry weight” President for breaking the law re: War Powers Act. Now, THAT would impress me. The petulant brat (haven’t we already dealt w/this pathetic behavior w/Bush?) might need a clearer understanding of just how much “weight” one loses when one is sporting pinstripes behind bars.
Waxman could have put an end to the perpetual Kabuki theatre but he chose not to. He has the power but he’ll never use it because that’s not in his job description. He sickens me almost as much as Obama does.
My favorite synopsis of what you describe: http://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2009/02/07/burroughs-last-words-of-hassan-sabbah/
Obama’s bark may carry weight but his bite won’t leave a mark.
In this President all we got was a smarter decider’er.
Speaking of Mencken, from 1920:
“When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental — men whose whole thinking is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack or be lost… All the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum. The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”
Don’t know about Mencken, but how do insecure voting systems that make it easy to flip votes factor into blaming the faceless mob?
“As democracy is being perfected” – ? I don’t think that is what has been happening. The illusion, otoh, may be being perfected.
I’ve seen NO REAL PROOF of “smarter” from this particular puppet. They just keep telling us he is.
Wayang Kulit?
Please, please, please….let a third party or independent run for president. Otherwise, I won’t be voting–and I don’t even care if that nut Bachman wins. At this point I can’t support the continued destruction of the middle class at the hands of my own party. Nope.
I won’t do it.
The party has long left me behind and we need a new political force to emerge.
It may be too late to save this country but at this stage the only way out is to rebuild after we crash and burn.
I feel for my 21 and 19 year old. No jobs. No real future beyond us all pretty much hanging together and relying on a larger family system to survive.
These bastards have taken the money and run and they’re burning everything in their trail. Life will be different for my kids and for my wife and I as we head toward the retirement years. There is no rosey picture or bright future. It’s dark and forbidding.
And Washington? They can’t even hear us.
But Obama will offer me the chance to win dinner with him for a small donation.
Sorry–I have no appetitie.
Smart???
Obama spoke before “God Save the Queen” and made a fool of himself ..at a British State Dinner with the Queen of England..
Smart?
He just gave a speech about Afgahnistan to the 10th Mountain Division of our military..
quote ” Obama’s unforgivable faux pas yesterday while giving a speech on his troop drawdown in Afghanistan using some of the 10th Mountain Division as backdrop. Obama described deceased Medal of Honor recipient, Jared Monti, as alive and well:” [/b]
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2011/06/24/obama-dumb-as-a-fucking-rock/
He reads a good teleprompter..I will give him that..but smarter..nahhhhhhhhhh
There are no safe progressive democratic seats. Kucinich, even though he cooperated with the President, had his seat redistricted out from under him. Weiner was forced out of his seat because of cyber sex in his personal life.
No, they didn’t do away with them. They made a lot of noise about doing away with them and then quietly kept them.
Ah, fatster, in short, the answer to your question is: No.
Frankly, there has not yet been a compelling and consistent narrative of the society in which human beings would thrive… either being shared or considered.
So long as all “organization” is centered upon “response” to specific “outrage”, there will be no transformative possibilities of UNDERSTANDING and SOLIDARITY, which MUST come before effective ACTION may actually occur … though there are would-be “leaders” who will glady tell you otherwise …
Such “organizing” as will be ultimately (over whatever time as may be “necessary”) successful is still in a nascent state, but its aspects and elements may be seen here, increasingly, as thoughtful and empathic human beings, themselves, put forth ideas and possibilities of mutual interest and build trust upon clear evidence of common plight.
It is a work in process, its constituent “elements” have simply, as yet, not fully recognized each other …
The need to do something has been recognized … “what” to do amd “how” to do “it” remain to be agreed upon … and then, the courage to do “it” will have to be found … within the heart of each and every one.
Otherwise, the demagogues will hold sway … as they always have done, and this time that suasion will be brutal and merciless.
What will “it” take?
About another twenty years … but people need to be clearly certain of what they will do … long before then … or “it” will be … too late and too little.
DW
Heya flyarm, good to “see” ya :)
Smarter, didn’t say smart. I despise him, but it is a lil off to say his intellect doesn’t soar over shrub’s. Does it even matter though? I’d vote for dumb as a nail if it meant using the power of the President to fight on behalf of average people.
We traded up but are still stuck with a puppet.
Hundreds of thousands of people in the streets will make no difference. They’ll just bottle us up in side streets and ignore us. Look at the power of millions of us in the streets before the Iraq War. Look at the good it did in Wisconsin.
We’ve got to do more than just have feel good protest marches. We’ve got to take action that threatens their system. Of course that kind of civil disobedience comes at a greater cost for us than a fine and a night in jail.
Was Kucinich ever explicit about what was said on that plane ride?
Yes, that’s more like it! Storming Wall Street and shutting it down is the kind of action we need. We can’t be peaceful here. We can and should be non-violent, but we need to disrupt the system. I think we should also shut down the media. I’d love to see a coordinated action to shut down the Sunday Morning shows. Believe me, the mainstream media would report about us then.
Forest,
Good point about the technological changes since 1920. Indeed.
Although television has probably increased the thoughtless, emotional component of mob mentality.
Mencken was more critical of democracy than I am. And when it comes to the mob, I prefer Surowiecki’s “The Wisdom of Crowds” thesis. However, the President is a reflection of us, a product of the nation. Or else where did these folks come from? Did they fall from the sky? Are they not products of our system? There are tremendous power imbalances to factor into that simplistic statement, but the point is that an us versus them dichotomy, even in a bogus democracy like that in the US, is not quite accurate. Mencken’s comment is similar to Vonnegut’s about how only “nut jobs want to be president.”
Frankly, I don’t think political “leaders” do a whole lot to begin with. In fact, I don’t think they lead very much at all. I suspect they are closer to surfers who, locating the right wave with a keen eye, jump on their board and ride the thing out, mainly for their own individual gain. Mencken expressed this last bit quite well
How about good cop bad cop? I so wanted to tell Thom Hartmann that this morning when he was defending the Dems against a caller who said they were the same and Thom was saying they weren’t.
Any show of resistance needs to be sustained, not just one day or one week.
So how do we do it? What are the ways?
Shadow land?
Most appropriate, otto.
;~DW
Not that I know of.
Well, wayang kulit doesn’t roll off the tongue like kabuki. But most of the folks in the White House and Congress do seem to only cast a shadow (onto our TV screens?), while someone else works the two-dimensional puppet that casts it.
Thanks, DWB. Always look forward to your comments.
I guess the part of “organize” that we’re missing is “galvanize”. And maybe an event will come soon, or at least we’ll reach the “tipping point” in all the crap we’re being forced to eat, and people will begin to confront (not react) to the situation in a forceful, direct, and (goddammit!) productive way.
Frustrations expressed here over this incident, of course indicate the ever-shortening fuse. Somehow, that frustration, anger and outrage must be put to effective use. Else, we’ll just continue to sit before our computers and pound out our screams, and even attack each other.
It isn’t as simple as riding waves, maybe. If we looked at different issues and how the President rode them, maybe we could see if the idea was true. The idea of wave riding does sound persuasive and I like the imagery, but it may be false.
I’d pick health care because that was one of the worse betrayals. There was an enormous wave of support for offering at the very least a strong public option. Obama could have rode it, but instead held firm to his negotiations he had made with the counter parties, not even being honest that he had traded them away from the start. If that wasn’t leading, I’m unsure what that was. He led but on behalf of multiple industry interests. Maybe the support they offered provided him a smoother ride, but it wasn’t the people’s wave.
How ya doing Forest?? Good to see you too!
We differ as I don’t think we traded up..I saw this puppet in Iowa when the teleprompters fell and broke..like i said ..he does good teleprompter..he was trained well..He also does a good IFB in his ear..the difference from the schrub..is schrub couldn’t learn the IFB or the teleprompter by the powers that be.
Heck O man even needed notes to say his speech at the Queens state dinner..when he so rudely read it before “God Save the Queen”..even the poor in Britian knew he was classless..and ignorant.
We’re not there yet. We’ve reduced the struggle to “Protest.” Protest is only part of the last step of action. Before we can have viable action we have to organize and before we organize we have to educate and agitate. Lenin was wrong on so many things but he was right that revolutions don’t happen by mass movements but by small, dedicated cadres. What that cadre does is educate, agitate and then organize.
The heart of reform has to be the working people. We have got to do what Labor used to do, we’ve got to get back to organizing whether it’s legal or not. When we have the workers educated, agitated and organized then we can do the action that needs to happen: GENERAL STRIKES are the big ones.
But along side we need to take non-violent action that is more than symbolic and threatens the integrity of the oppressive system. Ghandi broke the law by making his own salt, drawing attention to it with a long march to the sea. King broke the law by registering African-Americans to vote in Birmingham and drawing attention to it with a march. (King wasn’t able to actually do the registration before they stopped it with violence.) Parks refused to move to the back of the bus.
That’s why I say protests are worthless in and of themselves. They don’t threaten the system if they ignore us. But if all long distance truckers went on strike that would. If we brought true Leftists to the Sunday Morning Talk shows and shut them down by sit ins unless they included the Left, that would. If we blocked the entrance to the Wall Street exchanges or to the Capitol building that would. If we had our mass movement of thousands in the street instead be thousands in the mall that would.
But we’re not there yet. We’ve got to mobilize the folk who are the real victims of this system and too many of them don’t realize who the real enemy is yet. But we can do it. Our ancestors did it before us at Haymarket and hundreds of other places that no longer get taught about in our schools.
Booyakasha! You nailed it: A “compelling and consistent narrative,” one of the few collective, external things that can trump Fear. And the US ain’t got one that competes with the fairytale bedtime story of Corporatism, bootstrap exceptionalism and the Big Man theory of how things come to be that supports it.
If the big 0 ever gives us the beautiful turns of phrase like
“Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?” —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000
Wait, I found these too
“So I analyzed that and decided I didn’t want to be the president during a depression greater than the Great Depression, or the beginning of a depression greater than the Great Depression.” –George W. Bush, Washington D.C., Dec. 18, 2008
“I’ve abandoned free market principles to save the free market system.” –George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Dec. 16, 2008
You may be right. Looking at those last two quotes make me think Bush may have been smarter in some select instances, just wow.
“Our ancestors did it before us at Haymarket and hundreds of other places that no longer get taught about in our schools.”
You’re quite correct, LibWing, and I’m only trying to underscore your point by noting that I wasn’t taught about Haymarket in school, either, and I went to school a long time ago. We were wonderfully fortunate that into that great gap concerning labor history came Howard Zinn!
Those other movements took generations. It may even take us generations this time.
When we educate people, I think we need to be able to give them things they can do right now that begin to take back some of their personal power and reinvigorate them.
“. . . but it may be false.” I try to stand steadfast on one conviction: I may be wrong. :)
I would say Obama did ride the wave of public support for health care, especially the public option. Before the election, most of his supporters that I know had hopes in this direction and pinned them on Obama (why, I’m not sure). But then there is the issue of public versus private, as you point out. That whole puzzler many of us go through in trying to figure out if these folks believe what the say or are just “bark[ing] with the pack.” And indeed, for exactly whom is the President a leader? Enter the con job of the would-be surfer?
I suspect, fatster, that the outrages will continue, and accelerate in consequence.
The sentiment against both endless (and mindless) warfare and the many depradations of the “elite” will continue to grow, but until there is a set of commonly and clearly agreed upon PRINCIPLES, defining a sustsinable and sane civil society, which “the people” may willlingly and consciously aspire to, there will be little “future” but uneven “confrontations” and increasing “control”.
Until, the people decide that economic systems, legal systems, all of the “systems” of decent and civilized society, either must benefit the many and proclaim that life is the most important oppotunity which the earth affords all of us, or such “systems” will, inevitably, be corrupted to the benefit of the few … then nothing, really, has been understood or learned.
If the people cannot or will not rise to this basic understanding of the meaning of existence, then all will be sound and fury signifying … little and resulting in less.
Which is precisely what the few believe they may count, or “bank”, on.
Of course, that is the essence of your last sentence, is it not, fatster?
DW
Howard Zinn!
Long may his understandings and “suggestions for action” live and be cherished, even by generations as yet unborn … fatster.
DW
If he caves? Then it is time to draft a primary contender – Senator Bernie Sanders!
And there are examples where a Party, especially the Republicans, create the waves for the “leader” to ride? Gutting social security would be one example but sure there are better ones.
So the leader may not be an individual as much as wealthy backers? In which case, we aren’t adequately identifying the leaders, especially the ones no one has elected. Koch’s or PG Peterson would be examples.
As I noted when you first posted this – anything other that FIFO IRS tax accounting is an unneeded tax deferral – and most folks know that tax accounting rules are not the same as earnings presentation priority based GAAP rules.
The people in a lot of cases may be withdrawing politically and redefining the meaning of their existence more locally and more meaningfully for them.
Maybe there are millions yearning for the change and waiting for some movement to coalesce. Maybe the movement has been building for some time, yet we haven’t identified it as such, and there is a newer power base forming in the vacuum that exists? If that is the case, where can we identify the seeds of change now? What can we do to ensure they grow strongly?
The powerful have been wrong before. They are wrong now and will be defeated. I know that is of no satisfaction to the refugees of economic and outright war going on now.
Just thinking aloud, hope it wasn’t a total waste.
Well, yes, DWB, in answer to your question, but you, as is your unique ability, just elevated it to a much more respectable level! Many thanks.
We do need this generation’s version of the Port Huron Statement, but, then, even the ugliness of the wars in Southeast Asia could not sustain the movement that produced that Statement. Once the draft disappeared, so did much of the anti-war activity.
I almost despair, and then I think what a personal, selfish luxury that is, so I don’t. But I do come close.
It wasn’t, and thanks for sharing.
forest, I appreciate your comment @111 and all of your other comments as well; the conversation you and LibWing shared with the rest of us was superb.
Such thinking aloud is precisely what is required.
DW
Nice try – equating Reagan to Bill Clinton
Funny how the Obama crowd now tries to say Obama loves each Clinton – after Obama called them (had his staff and media call them) racist because they noted that he had called for a racist SC vote by Blacks – although he later said he was just asking for “group loyalty” .
Obama does indeed love Reagan – why he ran as a Democrat is obvious – the path was closed in the GOP because of his skin color. Why the left bought his con-job is also obvious – the “first black” and he copied Hillary’s positions more or less – and we got the bonus of giving the finger to the fellow that gave us 22 million new jobs with higher tax rates that balanced the budget.
Well, he is a nice man and has a nice family – he is a nice family man. Not enough for me but perhaps for others.
Fatster, ya know how I feel (and think) about ya …
You’ve no need of “elevation” for your words, for the profundity and depth of your considerations are cherished and appreciated most widely, hereabouts.
Agreed. Each generation must have the wisdom and the humanity to make their own declarations of independence from want, from fear, and from oppression.
And the older, too-often failed and selfish, generations must have the grace and wisdom to acknowledge this truth, and NOT set up immortal fictitious beings as having ANY of the rights of fleash and blood human beings … and certainly NONE of the privileges.
Our species “humanity” and tenure on planet Earth are on the line.
And the generations alive today must confront … themselves and their destructive mythologies … else there will be no future for anyone … at least, none worth the “having”.
DW
Let the reaming commence! No lube, serfs. None whatsoever…
“Our species “humanity” and tenure on planet Earth are on the line.” There it is, and perfectly stated, DWB.
We are there, whether we deserve it or not. Time is not on our side, but out commitment and energies are.
Spot on
indeed the quality of the listener determines how loud and “violent” the protest must be. MLK needed a JFK/LBJ – esp LBJ – to get so much with so little violence.
The moneyed and corporate do not respond to “threats” – a simple march can be dealt with – it is a “macho” thing – even for the females with money. They do respond to fear – at least for a few years. Jefferson thought they needed a blast of fear (revolution) every 20 years and nothing that I’ve seen or heard, nor has any experience in my long life convinced me think he was wrong about that 20 years.
I like the positive
“redefining the meaning of their existence more locally and more meaningfully for them” – yes – we all do that – indeed as we age it is more likely what we are doing.
I just wish I believed in the ultimate good outcome.
In re question 1: The Whigs?
2: I suspect we aren’t adequately identifying the leaders, surely not the political leaders who are supposed to represent the majority of US citizens. And here we are at the issue of political backers and campaign financing, and also another question: Can a President ride a popular wave both in terms of rhetoric and public image as well as in action, especially if following through on the action runs up against the interests of the folks with real power and money who were essential to the candidate gaining their political office to begin with? Can a member of Congress or the President bite the hand that granted them their sinecure and get away with it? Those who accept millions in corporate funds for campaigns incur a debt that must be paid via the office they command or their political careers are most likely finished, for “the borrower is the slave of the lender.”
Good cop bad cop has always described it perfectly and is much less annoying than kabuki theater.
Not long ago, mzchief termed it the “Elaborate Masquerade” which all the little people, those too-small-to-matter, are earnestly to “believe” is “for real”.
And to think, Jim, that “the people” have watched the essentially same “show” (with new, sexy, and different “players”) for nigh on to ten thousand years certainly lends a somber and depressing aspect to the whole contrived deceit.
However, hoi paloi ARE learning …
DW
That’s what wrong with the Democratic People…instead of everyone suggesting what we could and can do. We have everyone over here commenting off of what someone else is saying! and trying to prove to one another how high their intellect is?
No danm wonder we can’t never stay on message
We all know how depressing this is becoming, but we too can be like GREECE…TAKE TO THE STREET PEOPLE AND I DON’T MEAN IN A PEACEFUL WAY!!!
DON’T TREAD ON ME
WE HAVE TOO MANY WUSSIES IN OUR PARTY….ALL YOU PEOPLE DOING OVER HERE IS COMMENTING ON ONE ANOTHER COMMENT
SO MUCH FOR DEMOCRATS BEEN ORIGINAL AND REPUBICANS CAN’T ORIGINATE AN ORIGINAL RESPONSE….DEMS OVER HERE ARE DOING THE SAME DAMN THING!!!
Did you expect otherwise? My lifelong Dem party has always been limp, but now they’ve graduated to Pussies. Game truly over.
Precisely who are you accusing of being “Democratic People”?
And when you’ve finished with that, nogop, you might provide a list of “Democratic leaders” who, in your estimation, have behaved in any but craven, cowardly, and complicitous fashion … regarding the deliberate destruction of the rule of law, the continuing and vicious assault upon civil society, and the ongoing prosecution of spendthrift and mindless Endless Wars?
Oh, BTW, the excessive use of capital letters is considered akin to shouting … and frankly, you’ve little to be complaining about, loudly or otherwise, considering the abject failure of Barack Obama to lead or even to use his bully pulpit to advance the well-being of his fellow citizens who are NOT astute bankers, Military brass, or fellow, intellectual thugs.
Tom Paine you are not, I would venture to suggest, nor even an approximation of a Palinesque Paul Revere …
But then, I do not wish you to take my comment any more personally than you intended your intemperate comment to be taken.
It is possible that you might feel more at “home” were you to visit the Daily Kos, as this site obviously vexes you past reasoned discourse and thoughtful conversation.
DW
The people of Greece are inspiring but they too had to feel much more pain before this moment could occur. Might check out MaxKeiser. He’s been doing some wonderful stuff with regard to Greece and the other dominoes.
Amen.
But I think that drawing people into the work of educating, agitating, organizing and mobilizing will also keep them engaged and empowered. But we don’t just put off action until we have done the above enough to pull of major General Strikes.
So you are right. We will engage in actions. But they will be smaller and have less impact on the general public. We will need to spread the word about them ourselves to those we are recruiting into the movement.
A powerful action like that which got little press was the occupation by laid off workers of the Republic Windows and Doors factory in Chicago for nine days in December 2008 when the business closed it until they got their back pay and health insurance. I never heard about that until I saw Michael Moore’s “Capitalism: A Love Story.” These kind of actions are totally possible now. But we’ve got to create an infrastructure to keep our target population informed.