I got a pretty incredible email solicitation by the DCCC, the campaign arm for House Democrats, today.
I need your urgent help. Republicans are gearing up to enact their radical plan to balance the budget on the backs of seniors, women and people with disabilities.
At this moment, Speaker Boehner is crafting a deficit deal that would gut Medicare and Social Security, while slashing benefits for seniors and the middle class in order to make sure he protects tax breaks for millionaires. This is unacceptable and House Democrats will not stand for this.
We need to show our strength on this issue with one, unified voice — and time is critical.
Sign our petition right now and join me in telling Republicans that Social Security and Medicare cuts are off the table. We refuse to let Republicans balance the budget on the backs of seniors, women and people with disabilities while supporting tax breaks for millionaires.
President Obama is written out of this story, of course, even though he put the Medicare and Social Security cuts back on the table. But it’s pretty alarming to see the D-Trip do this. If nothing else, it’s defying what the President explicitly wants.
There are two explanations for this. One is it’s just part of the “rotating heroes” series where a politician or organization list-builds off of the Democratic base while selling them out behind closed doors. Certainly the D-Trip has a poor track record generally among progressives, so that shouldn’t be discounted. But there’s also a real-world factor here, which Sam Stein plays out. Simply put, it will be impossible to recruit Democratic House candidates for November 2012 if their best issue gets taken off the table in the debt limit negotiations.
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Steve Israel warned lawmakers on Friday that he would have trouble recruiting candidates for office if the party caved on Medicare during the debt ceiling negotiations.
The comments came during a closed-door caucus meeting. Multiple sources confirmed the remarks, describing them as “impassioned.”
“He said recruits would not consider running if Democrats did not stand up for Medicare,” one attendee told The Huffington Post. “He added that national polling showed a seismic shift against House Republicans after the [Paul] Ryan budget because of Medicare.”
I always thought that, if nothing else, the self-preservation instinct might kick in to save Democrats from themselves. Israel runs the campaign team, and has political considerations at heart. And it’s simply a fact that, if the White House leads on cutting Medicare, they take the best argument for Democrats in the House off the table completely. Obama would be furthering his own re-election, or at least so he thinks, at the expense of the party. And the party, by virtue of voting for it, would have to be willing accomplices in providing this get-out-of-jail free card to the GOP.
You can just hear the glee from John Cornyn if you read this quote closely:
Republicans, who for months had their backs to the wall after they voted for Ryan’s far-reaching Medicare overhaul, sense new political opportunity.
“It dilutes their argument that the mean old Republicans are going to end Medicare as you know it,” Texas Sen. John Cornyn, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, told POLITICO.
That’s an understatement. This is really the President pushing his own party into the trenches to be shot.
There’s a fledgling effort from House liberals to stop any entitlement cuts. And maybe they can steer at least the Medicare cuts in another direction, like through allowing negotiation on prescription drugs to save money. That would actually be a positive development.
But if Obama cannot be swayed, House Democrats will have the choice: do they want to remain in the minority for the foreseeable future? Or did they run for office for some reason other than personal enrichment in their post-Congress lobbying careers?





48 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
So primary the guy. He’s been so miserably ineffective on the economy who wants him leading the ticket anyway?
Astounding. I feel as if I’ve just stepped into the Twilight Zone.
Again i wrote the same thing in another post, there are a set of issues that USA has to address before taking Office Obama knew that there would have to be changes to Medicare and Medicaid, to deficit and other. When he was at his height of power he could have gave a speech on TV and said that we need to deal with these damned deficits, the key is back then he could have fixed them on HIS TERMS, he did not need Boehner or any other Republican, but he did nothing so now that Republicans have all this power they are cutting the deficit on their terms.
If not for Boehner markets would have forced Obama to cut the deficit, it was coming in any case, but the fact that he waited and waited and did nothing will now end up costing him 3 additional trillion dollars.
Regarding Medicare Drug price negotiation as part of this budget deal, it’s worth noting that pharma stock prices have not budged at all. Clearly investors are very confident Obama’s backroom deals will hold.
He could have immediately pushed for the repeal of the Bush tax cuts. Instead, he seems to be cowardly advocating a stealth tax increase in this chain the middle class gimmick that will increase income taxes primarly on those with lower incomes, and cut veterans benefits, federal pensions, and Social Security, probaby more than that.
Had he done it back then he could have, but he CHOSE NOT TO DO IT.
Cutting Medicare is in 2012 what opposite-marriage was in 2008: all the GOPs will say “I support President Obama’s position, why is my opponent such a radical on this issue?”
I recall Chris Van Hollen sounding the same warning bells about a health care bill without a public option. And then Van Hollen led the entire caucus over the cliff by telling them their poll numbers would rise if they passed one that didn’t, when his own internal polling was telling him different. He knew he was lying and he did it anyway. Party leadership over caucus every time.
Israel is just trying to get out from in front of the runaway train. He’ll be a good soldier when the time comes if they need him, or he won’t have a job.
Yes if his vote or any other demodog is needed they’ll fall in line for the chance for future $$$$$. The hell with Main Street.
Great line
This is really the President pushing his own party into the trenches to be shot.
How strange. I’m getting 2 different front pages but the comments are the same on each. It’s just weird.
And I can’t access the comment section on the previous post, but I can on this one. Weird happenings here.
Obama can’t lead on LGBT rights, or on abortion rights, or on medical marijuana or on any ‘social’ or human rights issue, because he doesn’t believe in themm.
He is the most profoundly reactionary president we have ever had.
I got a glossy flyer today — “An Urgent Message from the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare”.
It urges me to vote for Janice Hahn on Tuesday in the election to replace Jane Harman. Of course, Hahn is Harman’s hand-picked favorite replacement. (Hahn got a heads-up call from Harman prior to Harman’s retirement announcement.)
I’m supposed to believe that the Dems will protect me from cuts in Medicare and Social Security. They must really think I’m stupid.
I’ve had the problem on other sites but then I wear a tin foil hat. I just might need a new one;)
What mine came with a packet of cool-aid, didn’t yours;)
I don’t agree – sort of – and do agree – sort of
Obama chose to retain the Bush Tax cuts,
Obama chose to reduce the requested $2 trillion stimulus to one of $800 billion with 1/3 tax cuts,
Obama chose to reject Medicare for all and kept the current medical inflation going,affecting Medicaid and Medicare,so as to give a welfare check of $600 billion to the ins co’s.
Obama from day one was planning to screw Medicare and Social Security because he chose to honor his hero, Reagan. FDR is not his hero.
Nothing to date has not been planned by Obama – the GOP made me do it speech was written a day after the election.
.
I’ve been having problems with this site for a week or so. Sometimes I can get to the post, sometime I have to try different methods and then I can get to it, and sometimes I can never go to it, like the last post. I wasn’t able to access it at all.
Well, I’m trying to comment about the Defense Department being ordered to not enforce DADT but instead the link on the front page took me here.
I would like to see the rest of ddays post on DADT but can’t get the correct comments to pop up.
Worst. Fucking. President. Ever.
Smells like a sell-out to me. Time for some tough love.
Letting Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, etc declare bankruptcy would have been far cheaper and far smarter.
WE need to take some hostages or something. I’m basically a nice person, I need a Repug to tell me how to do shitty. What proof should we demand? You can’t nail these weasels to the wall and make them stick.
Click Refresh. Firefox will sometimes keep going to an older version of a page to reduce load.
Yes you are right. Obama is our most profoundly reactionary president to date, our first out front fascist leading the Fourth Reich to victory. He is to the right of the Tea Party at this point.
Great line.
The national party still uses James Carville as a fund-raiser. That alone is reason never to give a dime.
At this point I think they would use anyone with a pulse.
But what’s in it for Dem members of Congress to cave after Israel’s strong pronouncement of negative consequences? Where’s the percentage?
This was sent to me as a snarky comment…
“If it weren’t for the auto bailouts President Obama would be the favorite over either Governor Romney or Congresswoman Bachmann for the Republican nomination.”
By whom? A mental patient?
He’d blow both Romney and Bachmann away with his hard-line stance on Gitmo and due process for suspected terrorists.
If you have problems with the site please report them, it really helps our programmers out. They’re working hard to try and track down the problems and fix them:
http://my.firedoglake.com/Jane-2/2011/07/06/report-fdl-site-problems-here/
Tough love? At this point, I’m more obliged to soft hate.
This is similar to a “plea” I just got from CREDO, urging me to “tell Obama not to cave.”
Hello???? The “cave in” is OBAMA’s POSITION!!! Telling him “not to cave” would be like telling him not to be himself!!!
Whose “radical plan to balance the budget on the backs of seniors, women and people with disabilities” is it???? Obama’s!!!!
The best any Democrat can do is to get as far away from Obama and his rotten plan as possible. Let Obama go sit on the side of the room with his pals the Republicans. Then tar ALL of them with this.
The purpose of the urgings within FDL to “write to your Senators & Representatives” is to make Dems realize how dangerous sticking with Obama is to their political health.
If Medicare cuts hinders recruiting candidates, stop recruiting health care industry millionaire.
The US spends more on health care in Medicare and Medicaid per capita than Canada, UK, Israel, Japan, but that doesn’t cover everyone like it does in those other nations.
All health care spending needs to be cut, not just Medicare, but cutting Medicare is absolutely essential and doing so will improve health care in the US if people focus on quality of care instead of how to increase spending and profit.
How does cutting the funds but doing NOTHING to end the profit motive in our health care system do anything but punish the sick and elderly?
Three can play at triangulation
Triangulation — it’s not just for presidents. Pelosi ought to lead whatever band of House Ds who will refuse to vote for any rise in the debt ceiling that’s part of a deal with any remotely unnacceptable features. It is clear that Boehner will not be able to carry a unified caucus for any rise in the ceiling, however Teahadist sweet the package he negotiates for it. He’s going to need Ds to pass any deal, maybe a majority of Ds.
But, oh my God, that might mean some Ds end up voting with a House majority that blocks a rise, and if the ceiling is not raised, oh my God — fiscal and economic Armageddon!
Not really. If there’s no rise in the ceiling, Treasury keeps on borrowing, because Treasury completely, absolutely, categorically lacks the authority to fail to meet the legal obligations of the US. Yes, if the ceiling is, because of House intransigeance, not raised by the time the national debt bumps into it on its way up, Treasury would have to rely for authority to keep borrowing on an interpretation of Congressional intent in passing the recent budget, which is deeply dependent on deficit spending, that in legally obligating a level of spedning that would require borrowing above the ceiling, they therebyauthorized that higher level of US debt. It would be nice to not have to rely on inference and interpretation, but to choose the other alternative, to follow the letter of the ceiling law, would require Treasury to infer a Congressional intent that the ceiling law serve as a sort of self-destruct button for the US of A. If inference and interpretation is the best Treasury has to work with, because Congress refuses to give it explicit instructions that aren’t non-contradictory, then inference and interpretation it will have to be.
Presumably, if Congress, or just the House, goes to court because it’s unhappy with Treasury’s inferences of its will, the courts will tell Congress that it has the power itself to compel the remedy of Treasury compliance it seeks, it just has to give Treasury non-self-contradictory instructions.
Yeah, I’ll start taking the progressive caucus seriously if it ever goes to the mat on any issue. If they won’t do it for Medicare, Medicaid and the 3rd rail Social Security, whoa.
I don’t care what they say and I’m not conned by their phony votes when they vote liberal ONLY when there are enough votes to pass a bill without them. I care about what they deliver. Sheesh, I’ve had 40 years of them expecting me to thank them for their epic fails. If you can’t pass your bill, then defeat the other guy’s bill. I mean that’s why we are where we are on the debt ceiling fight in the first place. How long did it take the Tea Party to learn how to control the government? About ten minutes.
Go to the mat progressives. If it makes Obama look like a wimpier version of Jimmy Carter, who cares? Show him the hippies can punch back. Become the saviors of Social Security. The folks might even learn to love the liberal label again.
the option the WH , current HOUSE DEMS, and SENATOR DEMS fear
is the rise of LIBERALS DEMS
A black candidate “OBAMA” that GUTS the NEW DEAL will not be a player in 2012
Unions and others will tell the DEM BASE that OBAMA is killing the party of FDR
Picture the following commercial
A white elderly couple sitting around a table, looking at their small Social Security check that OBAMA had CUT?
With A shot of OBAMA running down a beach Laughing
this commercial will energize the DEM BASE like never before
“Black politicians should not cut SOCIAL SECURITY”
recruiting DEMS will not be a problem in 2012, the CURRENT DEMS fear the RISE of real LIBERALS.
Obama is on his way to becoming the greatest villian the left ever had to take back the DEM party.
OBAMA is going to pass BUSH for most hated president by the LEFT.
Ya, we needed your urgent help in 2009,10,11 and counting and what did we get? The Lilly Ledbetter Act and the (still) unaffordable Affordable Care Act. Ever since the DLC was created in 85 you have been nothing but a steaming pile of excrement. Please take it elsewhere, you’re stinking up the joint. NEXT
They are just trying to provide a little cover for themselves, just like they did on the health care bill, hope everyones memory isnt that short.
Remember that they signed some paper that they would not support health care without an option. Then after signing on they tried to say that they tried, and most of you bought it hook line and sinker. Worked once, I expect it will work again.
Democrats of all types are delusional. On FDL the other day was an article about the DCCC (wasn’t it?) asking the Koch brothers for money. They have lost all touch with reality. This is the reign of Nero all over again. Rome will burn and Americans will be slaves of the rich and corrupt. Hence, the disconnect with the reality of what Obama is saying and doing can be completely disregarded. It’s nothing more than noise as the various types of Congresspig squeal around trying to find the best direction to preserving their jobs and entitlements. The latter does not intersect anywhere with anything that might help ordinary Americans.
It was Patty Murray at the DSCC and its called “going back to the well”.
One member of the DLC’s executive council is none other than Koch Industries, the privately held, Kansas-based oil company whose namesake family members are avatars of the far right, having helped to found archconservative institutions like the Cato Institute and Citizens for a Sound Economy. Not only that, but two Koch executives, Richard Fink and Robert P. Hall III, are listed as members of the board of trustees and the event committee, respectively–meaning that they gave significantly more than $25,000.
http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=how_the_dlc_does_it
Fuck! I knew they’d given, but as for them being council members of the DLC…!
The evidence of the Uniparty is everywhere yet the media, also in cahoots with that same Uniparty, continue to whistle past the graveyard. Don’t these people realise the danger they are placing themselves in when the now inevitable revolution kicks off? There will not be a trace of mercy on display for any of them. And they will find, to their horror, that their identities (every last one of them) are very much publicly available along with every detail of what they did to prop up the junta in its last days.
The media-lackeys, and the low-grade political hacks, and the finance-scum are playing with fire.
Just to clarify for other readers, the linked story is from 2001, I don’t the the DLC has since changed its name to “the White House”. :o)
After giving the current situation much thought, I have decided this about Obama:
1) He is a Republican. Probably a Dem in name only due to his Chicago roots.
2) I don’t think he cares if he wins or loses. If he wins, good. He can pursue his corporate agenda. If he loses, he goes off on a money-making journey, just like Clinton, who has made millions since he left office and gets rich. The Republicans take the Presidency and continue the pro-corporate agenda which Obama plans on doing anyway.
3) I don’t think he cares one hoot if the Dems. control Congress. The ultimate triumph for Obama would be to win a 2nd term AND have the Republicans control both houses. Can you imagine the damage he could do with both houses of Congress in Republican hands, and he himself supporting their agenda. Scary for us; a piece of cake for him.
Where can we find someone to primary him?
It didn’t work very well. They lost the House and almost lost the Senate.
If they’re going to continue to punt on first down every time they get the ball in great field position, more and more people will just stop going to the game.