Here’s how out of control the debt limit debate has gotten on Capitol Hill. The Democrat in the White House is trying to increase the eligibility age for Medicare or effect a Social Security benefit cut, and the Republican from Maine is trying to stop him.
“There are solvency problems with both programs,” Sen. Olympia Snowe said in an interview on Friday, “They have to be addressed but not as part of the debt reduction talks.”
She said any debt reduction plan worked out by President Barack Obama and congressional leaders will still need the support of members of both parties and both Medicare and Social Security have strong bipartisan support [...]
She said she has no idea what will come out of the budget talks but she believes to get enough votes to pass it will have to have cuts in spending and additional revenue.
“We are not talking about raising tax rates,” she said, “but there are a lot of tax credits that are not needed and should be repealed.”
Susan Collins basically concurred with her. So that’s at least two Republicans in the Senate you could get on a deal that would probably have more spending cuts than revenue increases, but would basically hold Social Security and Medicare harmless.
That this deal, which has bipartisan support, has not been explored is probably attributable to the President wanting a right-leaning deal for the purposes of his re-election effort. Incidentally, what Snowe and Collins have in mind IS ALSO a right-leaning deal, simply by virtue of the fact that it contracts fiscal policy during a jobs crisis.
As for whether offering this grand bargain will help with re-election, keep in mind that everything Olympia Snowe has done has been to maximize her re-election bid. She signed on to a Balanced Budget Amendment, fercryinoutloud. And even she recognizes that cutting Social Security and Medicare is a total loser politically. For some reason, the President either doesn’t agree, or he does and he just wants to do it anyway because of some belief that taking deficits “off the table” now will allow for better policies in the future.



8 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thank you Senator Snowe for the clarity of your syntax. Yes, the word is “CUTS”. It isn’t “change”. Could you even make it up, the “change you can believe in” administration is talking about “changing” Social Security and Medicare or “reforming” them, when they really mean CUTTING them.
Any chance you could get me to tolerate any of this was lost when Democrats chose to LIE to seniors and people like me approaching retirement.
You plan to CUT Medicare, Mr. President by raising the Medicare age from 65 to 67. That could mean bankruptcy or death to someone diagnosed with cancer or other catastrophic illness and who PLANNED to be covered by age 65. People PLAN. They do not PLAN to be SCREWED and left WITHOUT HEALTHCARE when they are too old to possibly get health insurance at an affordable rate.
Most people don’t have a lot to say about retirement at 65 — WITH NO HEALTHCARE, President Obama? Retirement with NO HEALTHCARE? THAT is what the Democratic Party stand for now. NO HEALTHCARE when you retire? NO HEALTHCARE for senior citizens. NOTHING.
You ought to be impeached for even suggesting doing this to people who are already over age 60.
And the reviews are rolling in. From The Economist via Business Insider:
SHAME ON THE REPUBLICANS: Their Behavior Is “Economically Illiterate And Disgracefully Cynical”
“It’s time for the Republican Party to grow up and start acting on behalf of the country. Specifically, it’s time for the Republicans to end their reckless, cynical game with respect to the debt ceiling and compromise on a long-term debt-and-deficit reduction plan.”
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/shame-on-the-republicans-2011-7?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Falleyinsider%2Fsilicon_alley_insider+%28Silicon+Alley+Insider%29#ixzz1RqH1JpOB
LINK.
Head… hurting…
Re Snowe and Collins: Maine ranks 7th among the states in terms of the proportion of elderly in the total population.
By some odd chance would you be implying that Obama was responsible for this via his calls for cuts to SS/M/M?
… and it did not occur to you that the exact same charges must needs, perforce, be leveled at Obama?
WashingtonPost: “Without Social Security changes and tax increases, aides in both parties said, it had proved virtually impossible to push savings up to the Biden goal.” – http://wapo.st/pZtznP
When did Obama and Biden decide to start using savings from Social Security as a way to address the current deficit?
Was it before or after the Election?
Surely you jest, our impressionist Obama want to play dress up again.We all know what happen the last time. He sold the cow for two beans. Their are coming this time for the farm.
Saw your Blog bookmarked on Reddit.I really enjoy your blog and marketing tactic. Investigate out my Farmville Guidebook in the event you get a moment.
CHICAGO Moving Services
car rental san diego