Just a brief recap of what happened last night on the election front:
In Wisconsin, the recall elections kicked off with primaries in 6 races, all of which are seats held by Republican incumbents being recalled. As you may know, Republicans ran “Democrats” in all six races against the official Democratic challengers, in an effort to delay the recall elections by a month. This both gave time for the Republican incumbents to fundraise and campaign, and allowed the leadership to force through a redistricting plan before losing control of the state Senate. That redistricting plan could tilt the state in their favor for the next 10 years.
Anyway, there was some thought that, in a low-turnout election, the six official Democratic challengers might have trouble defeating the fake Democrats, who were mostly Republican activists. This was especially true because there are open primaries in Wisconsin, and Republicans could cross over to vote for the fake Democrat. There was even some electioneering done by Republicans to try to get crossover votes and defeat the official Democratic challengers. But it was not to be.
Six Republican candidates posing as Democrats lost to genuine Democrats in primaries on Tuesday in Wisconsin. The voting was a prelude to the first in a series of recall elections singling out nine Wisconsin state senators for their positions on the divisive union rights restrictions of Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican.
The primary winners will now take on the incumbent Republicans on Aug. 9 [...]
Five of the six winners had at least 65 percent of the vote, based on unofficial results. A sixth had 54 percent.
The 54-46 race was won by Shelley Moore, who will now face Sheila Harsdorf on August 9. The rest of the races, as mentioned, were blowouts. I don’t know if you can read anything into the closeness of the Moore race. Now it’s a four-week sprint, and expect lots of cash to be spent on the recalls on both sides.
The other special election last night came in my Congressional district, CA-36. I said yesterday that this would wind up with a single-digit victory for Janice Hahn over Craig Huey, and that’s precisely how it turned out. Hahn won 54-45. The one poll commissioned before the race turned out to be dead-accurate, and Republicans were wise not to waste money in an expensive district getting Huey across the line. A few Republican dreamers try to go for seats like this in California every couple years, and they are endlessly disappointed.
Hahn will not be anywhere near the leader that, say, Debra Bowen would have been for CA-36. She’s just another number on the Democratic side in the House. Currently, Republicans have a 240-193 advantage in the House, with two vacancies; NV-02, vacated by Dean Heller when he moved to the Senate to replace John Ensign, and NY-09, vacated by, ahem, Anthony Weiner. Both of those elections will occur September 13.
UPDATE: FYI, here’s a report from Marcy Winograd about Janice Hahn’s acceptance speech last night:
When Janice Hahn gave her victory speech last night, she reaffirmed her commitment to supporting U.S. withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as protecting Medicare and Social Security. Those two issues drew the loudest applause from the audience, hundreds of supporters and volunteers gathered in the harbor at San Pedro. It was a bittersweet moment for both Janice Hahn, the next Congresswoman from the 36th District, as well as her brother, former LA Mayor Jim Hahn, as their beloved mother Ramona Hahn had passed away in her sleep the day before. The two paid tribute to their mother, as well as their legendary father, LA County Supervisor Kenneth Hahn. I congratulated Janice and wished her well.




27 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Good. Step one successful.
Huzzah, to the People! Keep it going.
Ok Dems, but don’t forget that Obama is not on your side, nor is most of the D party. Assuming you are not traitors yourselves.
Hurrah the left wing of the $$ party has won! I’m so excited! NOT really.
Nice. However, voters should exercise extreme caution in believing what any politician says, no matter what “party” they purport to be a member of. These days, there is little difference between so-called “Republicans” and putative “Democrats,” even at State levels.
All the best to good citizens of WI: on Wisconsin! Keep up the good fight!
It might have been interesting if a Republican posing as a Democrat had won the primary. Knowing the nature of these turds, I expect it would have been a real dirty election.
We should make extra efforts to identify the progressives from the democrats (spineless). Don’t forget Feinstein, chuck Schumer, Joe Biden etc.. are “proud” democrats too, vs Dennis Kucinich, Cynthia Mckinney etc (progressive)
Republicans operate like an organized criminal cult.
Allow me to repeat what I said earlier this morning at Swim:
One thing citizens in WI, and all other Americans, need to remember is that the Regressive Party forced these 9 districts to pay for an unnecessary election. By sticking with their “win at all costs” agenda the Regressives made the people pay for their stunt. Yes, outside interests (read Kochroaches) paid for a lot of Regressive campaign ads and Regressive campaign expenses but the people had to pay for the ballots and all the other stuff counties and cities have to pay for to hold an election.
How would anyone know the difference.
What’s the difference between a “fake democrat run by republicans” and any other “democrat”? Sorry, but I don’t believe there is any.
Any idea what these results might portend for the general? Will the voters be able to vote rationally after contending with all the fog of bullshit created by massive, pre-election spending?
Fuckin’ bastards are betting on the fact that they’ve got deeper, Kochroach-infested pockets than their opponents. Spend the opposition into oblivion. Fuckin’ bastards.
remember, there was a Dem Senator who asked, in her own name by phone and email for money from the Kochs for the coming elections. Look, there’s no point with this “those evil republicans…this/that”. Get into your head. It is the Uniparty you are up against, and it makes not a jot of difference which set of criminals from it are notionally in charge from one moment to the next. Progress begins when they are all – every one of them – safely behind bars.
Try here…
then try here
Fake Democrats…
Obama comes to mind.
Third Way is the new DLC. It’s where all the Clintonistas have gone.
Forget about parties. Think ideology. Think neoliberal/neoconservative. Only difference is the degree of nationalistic/militaristic ideals.
Janice Hahn is just another DINO party hack. And unfortunately I’m in her district. From Harman to her hand-picked successor. Pardon my if I’m not elated.
Do you know where she stood on the South Central community garden issue?
WOW!!! You Libtards threw a temper tantrum because you did not like the way that the Wisconsin Educrat/Money Laundering Union vote went and YOU forced WI taxpayers to spend money by having a recount. (most of the psycho demonstrators were not even from WI.)
The Dem’s lost last year, Republicans won. Fucking Deal with it!
So the Republicans, out in the open, ran 6 fake Democrats in primaries to throw mud in the Democratic Party’s nomination process. And this is the first I heard about it.
Anyone wanna bet that had the Democrats run fake Republicans in Republican Primaries that EVERY SINGLE CABLE NEWS network would be covering this story on a near 24/7 basis??? “Democrats trying to disenfranchise Republicans?” “Democrats showing a lack of respect for democracy” “Democrats this, Democrats that blah blah blah blah”..
I’ll make that bet.
Oh, I also should note though, that as far as the Repubicans running a Republican as a fake Democrat in primaries are concerned, I suppose they got the idea from the last Presidential election. Since that worked out so well for them.
You should get away from the computer before your mommy or daddy catches you there. Should be about nap time on the west coast now anyway. Good night.
S
C
R
O
L
L
past the
T
R
O
L
L
How do we get a consistent message such as yours to be repeated by all who want things to change in this country? The message needs to be changed if we are to have a chance.
Tell the people you know and talk to. Have a thumbnail definition/description of the 2 terms ready to recite and then discuss. Take them out of the this/that party mindset from the outset. One person at a time.
Janice Hahn probably is slightly better than Huey would be. Possibly even better than Harman, who was no peach herself.
What I’m most interested in is whether this means John Ek is taking his influence-peddling tentacles to DC, or whether he’ll still be The Palm to Grease (legally, of course, by hiring his firm as a “consultant”; bribes are far too gauche for today’s world) for Corpocrats looking for an inside edge in L.A.?
(For those who don’t know Ek, here’s the L.A. Weekly piece on “The Dark Lord”: http://www.laweekly.com/2011-04-21/news/how-lobbyist-john-ek-gets-his-way-at-city-hall/ )
Davey Koch, ‘zat you?
I disagree with David about Hahn/Bowen. I think neither is progressive but Bowen is much more corporate-minded. The fact that Bowen took Enron money while sitting as Chair of Energy Committee in CA during the time of the blackouts and declined to vote on re-regulation says it all about Bowen’s integrity and interest in protecting the people of CA. I think Hahn is a better politician and more responsive to the people in her district. She’s probably under-informed on most issues she’ll be dealing with but I think is open to persuasion, while Bowen is simply a corporate shill all over.