On Friday, the Obama for America re-election campaign did a unique thing, publicly disclosing a list of all of its bundlers and their approximate fundraising totals for the second quarter of 2011. No other 2012 candidate has offered this level of transparency, so it should be commended. But while a lot of the commentary so far has focused on the personalities raising money for Obama – Jon Corzine, Anna Wintour, Ari Emanuel, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Orin Kramer – a couple have noticed that the total bundlers, and their collections, adds up to a substantial portion of the Q2 fundraising haul:
About 40 percent of President Barack Obama’s record-breaking $86 million second-quarter fundraising haul came from big-money bundlers, according to a POLITICO analysis of donors listed on Obama’s campaign web site.
No fewer than 27 mega-bundlers managed to collect at least $500,000 for a joint account run by Obama’s 2012 campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
That group chipped in a minimum of $13.5 million, according to records. In addition, $21.4 million was bundled in amounts of between $50,000 and $499,000.
In all, 244 people were listed on the website as soliciting – or bundling – donations totaling at least $50,000 from their networks of friends and professional acquaintances.
Michael Shear comes up with similar numbers, but includes the caveat of “at least” $35 million from bundlers.
I think the number is actually substantially higher. As Shear writes, “Because the amount each bundler gathers is reported in a range — from $50,000 to $100,000, for example — it is impossible to know exactly how much the 244 people have collected.” But here’s what we do know. Going back to the bundler list, we know that:
87 bundled between $50,000-$100,000
89 bundled between $100,000-$200,000
41 bundled between $200,000-$500,000
27 bundled more than $500,000
Politico and NYT are reporting the minimum range there to come up with their numbers. That’s why they’re saying “at least.” Their calculations are based on:
87 x $50,000 = $4.35M
89 x $100,000 = $8.9M
41 x $200,000 = $8.2M
27 x $500,000 = $13.5M
For a total of $34.95 million, or around 40.3% of the $86.7 million total reported by Obama for America and the DNC Victory Fund. But that’s the bare minimum. I don’t think we should believe that the bundlers between $50,000-$100,000 only bundled $50,000, and so on. The number is likely to be much higher than that. Let’s say we put all of the groups in their middle range. It’s impossible to do that for the $500,000+ bundlers, because there’s no upper bound. So for them, let’s be very conservative and make the average $550,000.
87 x $75,000 = $6.525M
89 x $150,000 = $13.35M
41 x $350,000 = $14.35M
27 x $550,000 = $14.85M
For a total of $49.075 million, or 56.6% of the total. Now, we don’t know if this number is right. We know that $34.95 million is the lower bound, the bare minimum reflected in the data. This number is in the middle. It could be less. It could be more. But it’s a somewhat reasonable estimate. I think we can say with confidence that more than half of Obama’s total fundraising in the second quarter came from bundlers.
Jim Messina tried to claim in his video announcing the Q2 numbers that 98% of all donations were $250 or less, and the average contribution was $69 from around 550,000 contributors. That gives the impression of a grassroots-fueled army. Messina didn’t say that these numbers excluded the DNC contributions, mostly maxed-out $30,000 donations. And now, the fact of these bundlers complicates Messina’s narrative even more. It’s possible – in fact, given the numbers, it’s likely – that a portion of the under-$250 contributions were collected by bundlers. I think we can say with confidence that bundlers aren’t going to “ordinary Americans” for those collections. They are rich elites who go to their rich elite friends.
In fact, Obama for America only cited less than half of their total contributions – $21.4 million – as “unitemized,” meaning they were smaller than $200 donations that don’t need to be teamed with identification. You can pretty safely bet that almost no DNC Victory Fund donations were under $200. That would mean that 3/4 of all money collected by Obama for America and the DNC Victory Fund were through donations over $200. That syncs with the bundler data.
What we also don’t know is if a maxed-out donor who comes to an Obama/DNC victory event counts under the bundler who may have “hosted” that event. This will all come out as people dig through the FEC reports. But just what’s out already tells you a lot. You cannot possibly take in between $35-$50 million, if not much more, from bundlers and maxed-out donors, and claim to have a grassroots campaign.





31 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
When OFA called me last weekend, I politely asked if they knew any Democrats who might be running for President in 2012.
Good on you.
I’d like someone to puncture Obama LLC balloon on his grassroots support claim, just as happened after 2008. I must admit there as some vary rabid Obamaites out there, but then 26% of our voting age population didn’t know the Colonies fought Britain for freedom so I shouldn’t be surprised he still has paying grassroot support.
What Obama’s Richest Donors Tell Us About His Campaign
“But according to ABC News’ Devin Dwyer, the list of donors “is also notable for who’s not there.” He reports that more than 80 percent of Obama’s biggest donors from 2008 received positions inside the administration, according to a recent report, and are now limited in how they can participate in the campaign. However, other major donors are holding back out of disapproval for Obama’s leadership.
‘“I have made it clear I don’t want to get involved,” said Jon Merksamer, 58, a California small business owner who helped raise close to $500,000 for Obama in 2008. “I don’t think he’s been too liberal, or too conservative. I think he’s been too gutless,” he said. “It is a common reaction to become even angrier with people who you’d had hope for that turned out to be such a major disappointment.”’
LINK.
I hope this guy’s aware of the availability of FDL membership.
CNN was helping to spread the bullshit meme this afternoon with this banner: “Obama is reaching out to the Grassroots”.
Not really. Even he he were, The grassroots have been sprayed with Round Up. As Monsanto goes, so goes Obama!
116F degrees in St. Louis last week.
Excellent analysis, Dday.
A fake grassroots campaign.
Why am I surprised by this from this fake Democrat.
Catapault the propaganda,
This man might be the President of the USA someday, if the country can survive Obama and the Republicans.
http://www.normansolomonnow.com/
Hell most American couldn’t find Iraq or Afghanistan on the map. Ignorant louts including the bots.
Fuckhead Obama deserves to go down in flames and ignominy. At least pukes are honest.
thx for linky – i’ve always liked Norman a LOT
GREAT post in the comment section of the L. O’Donnell story Scarecrow did that is instructive about HCR. cut/paste:
Henry on July 16, 2011 at 8:14 pm
This is the difference between ineffectual activism and actual governing; the difference between being satisfied with making a “statement” and actually making progress. Democrats had been trying to get HCR passed for decades, and the choice came down to getting most what we wanted now and working on establishing the missing elements later, or staring over from scratch; from zero. The choice was obvious. Why do you think Kucinich, with all of his talk of not voting for the bill, voted for the bill? It wasn’t because the Obama administration twisted his arm. It was because he was smart enough to know that passing that bill was enormous progress toward what he truly wanted. The “Kill The Bill” movement (if you can call it a movement) was the most idiotic thing imaginable. Hamsher and others who supported it see passing policy as a spectator sport, with no real regard to how real people’s lives are effected; “people with pre-existing conditions? Screw you! I didn’t get my single payer/public option pony.”
“Recent young adults who need to stay on their parents coverage? Screw you! I didn’t get my single payer/public option pony.”
Well that explains why they ran that “Can you chip in $5?” campaign; because without it, that $69 average figure they’re using now would have been far higher.
S
C
R
O
L
L
Isn’t it pretty normal for contributions to be mainly from large donors at this early point in the race? How many “click here to give $25″ donors are thinking about the race at all at this point, particularly with there not being any Democratic primary.
A) He raised a metric boatload of money, regardless of the composition of the donors. That’s one of the reasons that it’s almost impossible to knock off a sitting President. They have astounding ability to raise money. And, yes, a lot of it comes from big money donors. Everybody likes a winner.
B) He’s actually getting some money from sub-$200 donors, and even smaller than that if the average came to $69. Anyone donating at this early date are probably not making their only contribution, he gets to nag them with email until they contribute again, maybe they are even making a monthly contribution at this point. Those big donors have maxed out (more will be along, later), he also needs a steady stream of $25 per month from a million “little people”. That actually keeps the lights on and the phones connected.
*heh* Spoilsport…! ;-)
We should be honored that David Plouffe is joining us tonight.
I want you to always remember this rule!
and David Plouffe if you are out there you remember it too.
A black candidate must always dance with the person who brought him to the party. period end of discussion
Why? because he or she does not dance with them, they want get voted back to the party.
Obama biggest mistake was dancing with everybody else, and leaving the people who brough him to the party standing on the wall.
4cdave? Obama is down 8 points to a make beleive GOPer? WHy?
4cdave? Obama did not raise enough money
he gave the people who did not bring him to the party the following
tax cuts
more war
bank bail outs
Reagan/Bush/Hoover, economic policies
and he plans on cutting Social Security and Medicare
and they only gave him 86 million dollars, someone got rip off? LOL
4cdave? Obama needs to find 14 million good jobs by Nov 2012
Clinton got saved by a great economy, when he pissed on the people who brought him to the party.
Obama should not be surprise, the people he pissed on the last 4 years are now going to piss on him.
Black candidate who get re-elected never pissed off the people who brought them to the party.
So the Heritage Foundation/Dole Health Insurers’ Bailout that radical Bill Clinton rejected as worse than nothing is a huge triumph.
George Bush’s Medicare Part D does provide prescription medicine to seniors who need it. But it does it in the most expensive way imaginable at taxpayers’ expense.
Have you looked at the increases in health insurance rates or the performance of pharmaceutical stocks since the great “reform.”
Obama’s a chip off W’s block.
Mauimom! Great idea. We should start an outreach mailing list, inviting former supporters who now understand Obama is gutless to join us at the Lake.
I just hate those White House & DNC assholes so deeply, I usually shy away from posting to avoid going overboard. But here in D.C. where we just lost a bruising fight with our local DC Council over savage cuts to human services, I saw the same pattern of gutless elected Democrats kow-towing to the ultra-wealthy. They are killing the Democratic Party. We need to knock off as many incumbents as possible next year.
dave, not sure if you meant to imply that Obama & DNC are in fact getting this “steady stream” of small donations, or not. I read Dday’s post to deflate Messina’s claim that they have a solid base of small donors who will continue giving. Compare July 2011 to July 2007: how big was the grassroots base of small donors 18 months before Obama was elected & five months before Iowa? I suspect it was much, much bigger in total number of small donors, regardless of the dollar amount they raised in 2007.
So what it boils down to is Barry can tell rank-and-file Dems and progressives to go fuck themselves, he doesn’t need their money or volunteer time. He’s awash in Big Bux and there are enough apologists and True Believers to probably get him re-elected.
Everyone else can just bend over and take it like a man.
So much money for Mr. O to act as though he is hostage to the GOP.
If political knowledge was considered really useful by the voters, then I feel confident that they would acquire more of it it. More importantly if honest political speech was useful to both the individual politician, and the individual voter, then we would hear at least slightly more of that also! In other nations political speech has some intelligibility because that is useful to both the professional members of the political party and the individual voters!
Legislative politics is about deal making. Within a traditional two-party system, the potential voters of a particular party must be honest about what they want, and what they are willing to give to other potential party voters. This information is required to create a party platform that will attract enough voters to, hopefully, take control of the government. However, in the U.S. the party platform has been effectively outlawed, and politicians can run as individuals. The reason this was done was to eliminate coalition building among the voters. The citizens are prohibited from creating an organization that can organize politicians – only money does that, and mostly behind the scenes.
With the internet, there has been some effort made to create believable party platforms. Distribution of the platform document is no longer a problem. Honesty about individual interests could be becoming more useful to the voters.
ref. Modern Party Platforms
http://i-voter.tripod.com/Platforms.html
Proving Janes assertion is right time and time again…
My niece has diabetes. Then got cancer. Then turned 19. So yeah, I’m well aware of what this BIG DEAL did for her. She was allowed to stay on her mother’s (my sister) policy.
Now what you did NOT mention, but I’ll be glad to share is this. She works at a primary care doc’s office, with 6 docs and a staff of around 50. ALL OF THEIR PREMIUMS MORE THAN DOUBLED. Yeah, her monthly premium, coming out of her check, increased more than $500 per month. And that increase was for everyone in the company.
Needless to say, there’s about 49 people in one company that aren’t at all happy about not actually fixing health care. If you want to clap about progress like that, be my guest.
You can keep on talking like you’re the adult in the room and we’re a bunch of crybaby kids wanting a pony, and all you’re actually showing is that you’re the only asshole in the room, while the rest of us have to deal with the reality of what a piece of shit sellout that was, and what a once in a lifetime opportunity was wasted.
And oh yeah, all those folks in other countries with guaranteed health care want you to know that some ponies are real, and really worth fighting for.
Generic Republican is not running. Obama is beating the pants off every actual Republican in the race except Romney, who has exactly zero chance of getting the nomination. As the Republicans (such as Bachmann) are forced to actually talk in front of a camera, they make it impossible to extend their appeal beyond their looney base, and their base is not enough to get them elected.
$86 million is a metric boatload of money at this point in the cycle.
Yes, the economy is a factor. It is a factor that is 100% factored in, and his numbers are where they are. If the economy is no worse by the election, his numbers will be no worse.
If they actually screw up and don’t get the debt ceiling raised, the economy could get a lot worse in a hurry.
If Israel attacks Iran (September, if you want to believe the article on HuffPost today), then all bets are off for the economy, but he will be the CiC during a world war, and there’s the whole “changing horses in mid-stream” thing.
Absolutely. Old trick. Drives the averages Down.
It’s amazing that the Oily O has to make it seem like the People are with him. All deception, all the time. He may get some masochistic fools, but generally the Rope a Dope of Hope is sucking the giant teat of the criminal capitalist class.
…and the money will go to the advertising industry and broadcasting networks not the nullification of voter suppression or positive acts “to win the hearts and minds of the American people”. same old, same old
Heh, I was going to post something like this when hayduke copypasted that in another thread, but I gave up halfway through. Thanks for saying what I wanted to say.
hi. An Obamabot here. Me and all my black friends continue to support the prez financially. not sure what your end goal is friend? do you plan to vote for a republican in 2012…or just stay home?
No votes for any Republicans – including Obama.
It’s always an option to leave the top line blank, and vote the rest of the ticket. Votes are earned you see, not taken for granted.