Perhaps there’s a limit to how many caves can occur in a week, because Democrats are actually taking a stand on the FAA authorization mess. The backstory here is that House Republicans basically left town without extending the FAA, which has been in partial shutdown since last week. As a result, 4,000 FAA personnel are on furlough, construction contracts are on halt (putting another 70,000 temporarily out of work), airport inspectors are flying around on their own dime without pay, and $200 million a week in taxes are going away, into the hands of the airlines, who are pocketing the money. All because Republicans don’t want Delta Airlines workers to be able to unionize, basically. And by leaving town, Republicans assured that this will go on for at least a month.
So today you have the closest thing to a coordinated attack on Republicans for this reckless action. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi blasted out press releases. The President mentioned the dispute before a cabinet meeting, saying that “this is a lose-lose-lose situation that can be easily solved if Congress gets back into town and does their job.” He added that the House and Senate are engaging in these pro forma sessions anyway, and all it would take would be to agree by unanimous consent to move forward, and not one member of Congress would be inconvenienced on their precious vacation.
Chuck Schumer echoed this in a press conference today.
“The FAA is in limbo. Airports are the economic engine of the small communities around the country, and that economic engine is now stuck in neutral,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters Wednesday. “Under the cover of the debt ceiling crisis, they are holding these aviation workers hostage until they get everything they want…they have taken brinksmanship again one step too far.”
Democrats, including Schumer, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (NV), Sens. Barbara Boxer (CA), Jay Rockefeller (WV), as well as House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (MD), called on Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) to call the House back into active session and pass a clean FAA bill by unanimous consent.
Reid, in his previous statement, even named names, saying that this entire situation is about Republicans protecting the anti-worker stance of Delta.
Democrats could have taken the easier way out here, accepted the House-passed extension that had cuts to Essential Air Service and this policy rider for Delta on it, and gotten the FAA back to work. They chose not to sell out the workers at Delta. They tried to pass their own extension with the EAS cuts, but Senate Republicans denied unanimous consent. Now they are playing this out in the press.
Greg Sargent writes:
With tensions between labor and the Democratic Party running high over various policy let-downs endured by unions, the fight over the FAA has emerged as a key way for Dems — if they hold firm — to ensure that unions have a reason to work hard for national Dems in 2012.
I’m now told that the DCCC plans to make this showdown an issue in the districts of 50 House GOPers — who are pushing a version of FAA authorization that’s opposed by organized labor [...]
The DCCC is now going on the offensive over the issue, blasting out releases in the districts of 50 House Republicans slamming them for going on recess without agreeing to the “clean” temporary reauthorization. “Representative Chip Cravaack called it quits and closed shop in Washington without resolving the FAA shutdown, which has thousands of workers on furlough, safety inspectors working without pay, and millions lost in revenue by the day,” reads the DCCC release sent out in Cravaack’s district.
The question, though, is whether Dems will continue to hold firm after the recess against any long-term FAA reauthorization that contains the anti-union provision. The long-term proposal is now in conference negotiations.
That’s true, but so far, I’d say we’re off to a good start. And Republicans are in the bad position of staying on vacation while forcing thousands of FAA personnel and construction workers off the job. The optics are terrible for them. They could come back to Washington any day and rectify it.
UPDATE: Another element to this is that the Secretary of Transportation is Ray LaHood, a former Republican congressman. He’s blaming his former colleagues for the shutdown pretty vociferously.
…There’s also James Inhofe’s role in all this.
UPDATE II: Incidentally, yes, Democrats are getting very little help from the President when he says that “Congress” needs to get the extension done, rather than “Republicans.”




44 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m sorry, but I don’t understand the meaning of this phrase.
Is it written in English?
Version A: There are 4,000 furloughs among construction workers and inspectors, who won’t get a paycheck on time if at all.
Version B: There are 4,000 cubic feet of wet concrete left unpoured which will delay or prevent corporate LearJets from using this airport.
Either way, “jobs will be lost,” no? It shouldn’t be too hard for the left and right to see the light, from one angle or the other.
Anyone see where this is going?
I think it’s Aramaic. I’ll call Jim Caveizel.
It COULD be a euphamism. “Hold firm” in Italian means “retreat in unison.”
——
I saw Obama talking about calling congress BACK to “handle” the FAA issue. He wants them to “fix it” and then debate it when they return in September. The problem, the repubtilians want to elilminate the FAA. Let’s see how Obama handles THIS hostage crisis.
I guess the DINO’s must meet in another chamber then the House or they would have known when the Gomer Gohmert of TX, I believe, said he’d block funding the FAA. Where was Obama or Reid, Pelosi, Hoyer or any Dem leaders before the recess. At recess, in the bar, at the Club or race track? Does the Dem House have a separate schedule than the RINO House. If so what’s the new address and how about a schedule? What a sham Government.
Let me jump into my “WayBack” machine and see if I can all the way back to Monday and find out.
Sherman…..Sherman……Anybody seen my boy???????
Now that’s not fair. It’s just that some democratic legislaturds can’t walk and chew gum at the same time. Handle to crises at once. Not a chance.
It is surprising. I thought all the DINO’s were busy figuring out how they can get on the Super Catfood Committee so they gut federal employee pensions.
What I think happened is that the national news and certainly our local news as well has been running this story. I think it just totally astounded Congress that anyone else works in August. They didn’t think it would be reported.
They are worried about their own asses flying home safely and nobody elses.
Ewwwww press releases. i bet the r’s are quaking in their boots… if these cowardly, corrupt clowns had been in office during the 40′s i doubt we would have won the war- actually looking at the fascist impulses this country is embracing maybe we lost the war…………..
O, make believe spines after the mean republicans left town so they didn’t have to say it to their faces.
Please, there are no democrats that worry about the little people.
I’m not sure what you’re saying here. Are we all supposed to stand up and applaud because the demoncrats took “a stand” for 4,000 FAA workers and 70,000 contractors while their collective penises still have sperm on them from fucking the rest of the country?
David,
In the debt-limit deal, can the president veto the tiny congress commmittee recommendations and send those back the tiny (12-person commmittee), or is his veto only good AFTER the real Congress votes.
Talk’s cheep and he’s not making his guests, at his party, go back to DC afterward unless Grover says it’s OK.
It’s a pretty funny idea though.
All that is missing is the snark tag. By the way, has Reid deceided that him picking pomegranates and figs and sniffing roses isn’t the most pressing thing going in our country or is the Senate vacation still on? I guess while Reid is making homemade fig newtons Republicans will be trembling in fear of getting particularly nasty papercuts from the Democratic attack.
Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi blasted out press releases
No doubt followed by a strongly worded letter.
Republicans have learned that Obama will take off his “progressive” mask in due time. They will give Obama enough time to make harsh words against the GOP to satisfy the Daily Kos crowd. After that, he’ll “surrender” because the Republicans are “mean” and “intransigent.” Markos will later go on Olbermann and urge everybody to vote for Obama. LOL!
The issue is clear now: it not about taxes raised or lowered. It’s who the taxes are paid to! Taxes are levied by government but taxes should be paid directly to corporations.
I was going to leave a response here but I cannot top what you said. You are spot on.
What should terrify you is that he apparently called for another compromise. Let’s see, 4000 federal employees get fired and Delta gets to keep the taxes and their wages. I fixed it!
Yes Arbusto,you got it right …..Where were the elitist ,Obama,Pelosi & Reid before now ?It’s not like they didn’t know what was going on at the FAA 2 weeks prior for chrissakes!I knew,how can these so called leaders not know.
It didn’t matter to ‘em….they are all multi-millionaires folks.
Since the 4000 have nothing to do, maybe Obama could invite them to share the estate at Martha’s Vineyard with him. Shared sacrifice dontcha know.
anybody know the answer to this question about the Tiny Congress?
The President should provide free military transportation to these workers on the military’s credit card instead of asking them to use their own. In fact, put the FAA temporarily under the military’s budget, including those construction workers….
jimbowski,wasn’t markos’s appearance on Olberman pitiful.my goosh! just like his surrender on Obamacare on Olberman.
But please remember Kos is in the very wealthy bracket,so don’t expect him to want to see change as long as he can get away with being a “progressive”
in a the Democratic Party raking in big paychecks.
Hmmm, where’s slukegreen right about now…
More empty threats of action from the new transparent, empty vessel Democrat Party. The GOP lives by the children’s retort ‘Sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me” If anyone here believes for one second the GOP will react positively to this tactic, then I have an outsourced Chinese bridge to sell you.
Pardon my lack of knowledge about how Congress works….but…didn’t I read somewhere here a few days ago that the R’s would be keeping the Senate officially in session after they left D.C. in order to prevent a recess appointment of Richard Cordray as head of the CFPB?
Well, if it’s in session, can’t they call in the Dems and vote on the FAA issue? And if not, can’t Obama appoint Cordray to head the CFPB in a recess appointment?
Probably a simplistic question…but…anybody?
Call it the Tiny Congress not the Super Congress.
How do 12 members out of 540 or so get to be SUPER?
I think this post at least partially answers your question about a recess:
“Nothing Can Stop Obama From Adjourning Congress, Making Recess Appointments
By: David Dayen Tuesday June 21, 2011 9:30 am
“Tweet7
According to Public Citizen, there’s nothing stopping the President from circumventing the Congress for recess appointments of key positions, including Elizabeth Warren for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. And they have the Constitutional passages to prove it.”
According to Dayen’s post, Obama could delclare a recess, who knows why he hasn’t done so already.
I hope everyone who commented here is wrong and the Dems really do pull through on this. The outcome of the labor issue on this FAA authorization is very important. Congress should come back and vote on the “clean” authorization bill, which sidesteps the labor issue for now.
The dance goes on
… dance to the music …you know you can’t refuse it (Motorhead).
How do we stop the dance?
What a surprise. Can’t say anything that might imply the Reptilians are in any way at fault. Jeez, it’s pathetic when “balance” makes its way to the West Wing.
Obama needs to decide which party he really belongs to.
I’ll believe it when I see it. And I think I’ll see pigs fly first… bacon in the trees… cows rushing home…
Cynical? MOI??? Ya effing THINK???? (I’m old enough to be this cynical, and all of you kids can get the hell off my lawn.)
Democrats stand up? Bull. It’s all kabuki until they can take a dive for their corporate owners.
I’m with you, Marion!
Another hostage/crisis situation for the repugs!
It looks like they are going to get away with doing it every time on every issue because the President and the Dimbulbs in Congress won’t even attempt to stop it!
Well, you see they did goof. They were so busy packing for vacation that they forgot to pretend. Whoops. All those federal employees got laid off and the party that pretends to represent them forgot to pretend to give a damn. So they’re doing a little Punch and Judy show for the rubes.
But this is still a marker for the state of the party. They have become unable to even pretend. This even shocked the MSM which lead with the story again tonight. Tens of thousands lose jobs while Congress bipartisanly goes to the beach.
True. The really sick thing is they are planning to run on Jobs for elections next year. Ain’t that some cottonmouth snake slobber?
Third Party now. The time is perfect. If the Republicans win both houses and the White House it won’t really change anything except the middle class and poor will get screwed only a little faster than they are now. If a third party gains enough seats to take away any majority from any party, then real governance can happen. And maybe the Democrats will start to act the part they extoll.
For the same reason he appointed a Tea Partier’s staffer to be US atty for Utah?
And…really, again, where is Obama in this FAA mess? Any sign of leadership? LaHood goes out to call Congress back into session??
I think they mean super as in ‘above’. Above congress. Very telling.
You have two questions, one about recess appointments, and one about an appropriation for the FAA.
As to the FAA, the appropriation cannot happen because Boner will prevent it from going through, and moreover appropriations measures have to originate in the House of Reps, per the Constitution.
As to any recess appointments, someone else has noted correctly that there is no formal recess, and thus Obama supposedly cannot use his recess appointment power. Supposedly, though, the White House has ginned up some legal opinion saying that Obama can nonetheless make a recess appointment. I don’t get it. I’d like to see the WH explain it. I don’t think they’ve yet put it out in public.
Meanwhile, the Tea-GOP has de facto impeached Obama in many respects. There’s virtually nothing of major importance that he can do if they don’t agree to it.
Supposedly, though, the White House has ginned up some legal opinion saying that Obama can nonetheless make a recess appointment.
Would those be the same legal advisers who found the 14th Amendment unavailable to Obama to use in the debt ceiling “crisis”?
Isn’t that special.