Elizabeth Warren, back in Massachusetts after a stint in Washington getting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau up and running, posted a diary at the state progressive blog Blue Mass Group today that comes close to saying, without expressing specifically, that she’s about to enter the Senate race against Scott Brown. Here’s an excerpt:
I left Washington, but I don’t plan to stop fighting for middle class families. I spent years working against special interests and have the battle scars to show it – and I have no intention of stopping now. It is time for me to think hard about what role I can play next to help rebuild a middle class that has been hacked at, chipped at, and pulled at for more than a generation—and that that is under greater strain every day.
In the weeks ahead, I want to hear from you about the challenges we face and how we get our economy growing again. I also want to hear your ideas about how we can fix what all of us – regardless of party – know is a badly broken political system. In Washington, I saw up close and personal how much influence special interests have over our law-making, and I saw just how hard it is for families to be heard. I want to hear your thoughts about how we can make sure that our voices –our families, our friends, and our neighbors — are heard again.
We have a lot of work to do in our commonwealth and our country. We need to rebuild our economy family by family and block by block. We need to create new jobs and to fix our broken housing market. We need to make sure that there is real accountability over Wall Street and that the greed and recklessness that created the last financial crisis do not create the next one. We need to restore the hope of a secure retirement and the promise of a good education. We need to stop measuring our economy by profits and executive compensation at our largest companies and start measuring it by how many families can stand securely in the middle class.
As one commenter at Blue Mass Group said, “This is a classic I’m-considering-running post.” And it’s true; it includes the hardscrabble biographical information as well as what I imagine would be the major themes of the campaign.
Warren remains on the fall teaching schedule at Harvard Law, but that could change quickly if she moves into a political campaign. And in addition to this post, according to The Hill she is being assisted by Doug Rubin and Kyle Sullivan, two high-level former campaign aides to Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick. We already knew that Warren has held meetings with leaders of the Senate, as well as its campaign arm, the DSCC, and other Massachusetts politicians.
There was a lot of talk in the immediate aftermath of Warren leaving the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau about whether she would make the best use of her talents in a dysfunctional US Senate. My argument was that Warren is one of those unique figures in American public life – an actual competent human being. And any position she decides to take on, she will ultimately make the most of it.
That doesn’t mean she will definitely succeed. Scott Brown is well-liked in Massachusetts during his short time as a US Senator, and especially with Warren in the race, he’ll be able to draw from a mountain of corporate money, particularly from the banking sector. Warren can counteract some of that with her national profile and people power. If it materializes, it promises to be the most interesting race in 2012.




86 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The MINUTE she announces, I’ll send MONEY!
I am totally in love with her.
I know. I know. Yes, I was in love with Obama, too. But, honestly, I’ve known for a few years now that he and I weren’t meant for each other. It’s time I move on.
Thanks, I knew you’d understand.
*sigh*
Elizabeth is so dreamy…
Best news in last 3 years.
:-)
Scott Brown can start thinking about getting back to his true calling underware commericals.
That excerpt sounds like more warmed over mainstream Democratic BS. Language like this
just rubs me the wrong way. It sounds like more “we’re all in it together” and “work together” crap that Obama sold us. I can’t get behind a candidate or a politician unless they’re going to explicitly say that there is a radical hardcore of between 20%-40% of the population that supports or can be made to support an explicitly corporate oligarchic agenda AND a social agenda based on fairy tales and hierarchy. That says that these people cannot be reasoned with, only defeated. That says there is no pacifying them.
Any talk of working together is pointless, and can now be looked upon as a mark of political self serving when it comes from a candidate or politician. Anyone that talks about working together is just another member of the club, or will be.
Her running for Senate means one of the following:
a) If she wins, she’ll sell out like all other Dems in DC.
b) If she wins, she’ll be the one true Progressive in the Senate and will buck the party leadership. (Wonderful dream, but not bloody likely.)
c) If she wins, she’s in position to pull an Obama and run for Pres in 2016. (By which time it will probably be too late to do any good.)
d) She’s a fool; the party wants to suck her into a campaign, then cut the legs out from under her and have the resulting loss demolish her credibility for a future run to any office, including President.
I’ll be anxious to see how she answers questions as a candidate about Obama policies.
Matt Damon is looking better and better every day.
How about a primary against Obama? Elizabeth Warren for President in 2012.
I’m actually loving all this talk of Matt Damon lately. I kind of want to see that. I’d probably vote for the guy.
Blasphemy! ;)
Two words: Hopefully She’ll Run a 100% Transparent Campaign
Well, it started out as two words.
What world leader would refuse to listen to Matt Damon playing the Secretary of State?
Warren had better start campaigning right now. She would be a great Senator but Scott seems to be very popular. I wish her – and us – the best.
I’m just sorry and feel pretty stupid that I did not vote for Nadar all these years. Just think if he were elected in say the last decade we wouldn’t be in this mess now. I fear it’s too late.
If she wins, the pubs will filibuster her swearing-in ceremony.
what’s the point the system is corrupted. look how little she could achieve in DC. All she does is give people hope that things might be better and plays into the illusion that we have choices. the elite love these kind of candidates, need a few to keep up the illusion
Win or lose, Warren will put a lot of truth out there about such things as Catfood II, Single-Payer and Job Street v. Wall Street that will otherwise not be uttered by the corporate owned media.
I saw the poll March 31 where Brown’s approval rating was at 73 percent — higher than Barack Obama and Gov Deval Patrick and Sen. John Kerry, and over the 50 percent mark beating Reps. Michael Capuano and Ed Markey and former Rep. Marty Meehan. But results were better when respondents were primed with negative information about Brown (also there is a Western New England College poll 3/14/11 -Brown beats Rep. Mike Capuano 51 percent to 38 percent and Obama adviser Elizabeth Warren 51 percent to 34 percent).
I have not seen recent polling – and I doubt she would jump in if not a closer race.
Thanks for the info. She would be a very good voice speaking in the Senate.
Where do I send my campaign contribution?
Damon already has a campaign manager singing praises about him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMMAuJg22i0
Sorry, hate to be the voice of dissension (so glad BeachPopulist went first, thanks).
I love O, he’s just like us, oh he really cares, he will save us from the baddies … well it’s DC, only so much he can do, he got the best he could … WTF?, dude that’s not how you bargain, but he’s a “nice” man and he wants us all to be civil … Ok this bipartisanship is getting insane now, WTF man, why don’t you just give them everything … oh shite, he’s a complete sellout, unfortunately he’s selling us out to the corporations, bloody corporatist tricked us …
And now, let’s all do the same amount of due diligence, ie. none, and run to the anti-O of the week … will it be Damon (don’t know shite about him except that he “speaks” for us, which reminds me of someone, who could that be?) … or will it be Warren (she did set up the consumer agency, toothless, will have no effect, and is already proving ineffective, … but I guess she did the best she could … oh shite, this is the best she could do).
I wonder why she didn’t just come out and say clearly, hey folks, the whole system is rigged, saw it first hand, and also they are literally stealing from everyone of us, and the whole system’s a scam?
Of course politics. Good to know she will be in good company in DC if she wins.
And running as a D? Great strategy. Why not sign up for the second branch of the Corporatist party that is now actively and in full collusion trying to gut SS/Medicare/Medicaid? Great Fing idea Warren. I mean what could possibly go wrong?
Please tell me she’s a millionaire as well, because that will just complete the picture.
Before I get roasted alive for the dissension in the ranks, all I’m asking is for a clear, and rational conversation about why she’s a “good” pick for us. Can we do that?
Because those points I listed above should be talked about. I mean how many times must we be betrayed by politicians before we start acting rationally and actually talking about issues, versus the cult of personality?
Me too!
Welcome ~ I love your sense of humor.
And, hey, let’s face it, Obama was *never* into us.
I just had a premonition about Presedent Elizabeth Warren ….
And in the meantime she could be one senator who would actually use her power to stop some of this shit. It could work out *well.*
Wow.
I think she does talk about our issues and she has lots of smarts. I’m quite certain that she isn’t perfect but she seems to actually understand the problems. Can’t say that about Obama.
Perhaps she *truly* does want to hear the kind of reaction she gets before deciding. Say she only gets Tea-GOP talking points? Or she only gets far left progressives? Those would be important findings for the decision of a principled, open person. YMMV.
I also can’t believe she doesn’t well understand what she is up against!
Damon will be up subject to the same pressures as Warren. And he might fold as well. He doesn’t have her experience with the ‘machine.’ Damon could be blindsided. Warren knows the enemy.
on edit: I have *nothing* against Damon ~ the more the *merrier.*
She does talk about issues and has lots of smarts. So does O. All the Fing time.
I’m sure she understand the problems. She is smart. Harvard-”smart”. So is O. He’s also smart. I’m certain he understands PERFECTLY. The difference is that sociopaths don’t care.
Everything yo said, I can say about O.
Another thing, why not just come out and say how Fed up DC is? She must know. And she must know we know. Why not say it? Why pretend we’re just going through “some rough times”?
I think she does after having been treated in such a shabby way in DC. She may have some personal axes to grind and I’d be glad to help her do it.
I have nothing against her, but I do believe this is just another way for one branch of the Money Party to keep good people from getting off this ridiculous merry-go-round. Our energy needs to go towards working on a real systemic restructuring. It’s not about whether we’re with Warren, it’s about whether she’s with us. In my opinion, if she’s running D, she’s running on empty. I know many people will differ, and again, no disrespect to Warren at all.
Oh! And, also, *swoon.*
True.
But I need to hear a lot more before I even begin to think about contemplating about whether to decide.
O fooled me once. Never again.
Oh, boy, yes, that would be delight to see ~ and she would be so polite! ;)
We face the same old problem – there really is no other viable party. She just might be our “in” because she seems quite confident in her beliefs IMO.
Never been one to shirk from going first, but thank you, anyway. I wish I could be more enthusiastic about Warren for Senate, but I just have such misgivings, esp. about her working within the existing Dem party structure.
Much afraid that we’ll discover that there are no heroes anymore.
I hear you. I have been following her closely for months. It’s well worth your while to watch her and listen to her, I think. One thing I really admire is she really worked to get some of the bankers on her side, not by compromising, but by earning their respect. I thought that was very saavy and very, very hard work. Took smarts, too.
“if she’s running D, she’s running on empty”
Can I just say F ya.
I mean why willfully and knowingly join a corrupt party, that is just the second branch of the Corporatist party?
She’s too smart. And she’s been DC so she knows, with details I’m sure.
So why join them? I mean in that case, why not just join the Rs?
Of course there is another perspective. Very BS shady stuff. But these are the times we live in. Here it is: Maybe she needs to get into play, and sure the Ds can help her do it, perhaps hoping to ensnare her, and all the while she uses them to get it, and then tells them to go F themselves.
Maybe, that’s possible, but I’m no betting on it.
I think she’d eat Scott’s lunch in ANY debate … she’s not creepy, either.
I mean after O, in my mind everyone has a giant ? next to them. Corporatist or not?
And how do we discern.
I admit I was so stupid I bought all of O’s lies.
Never again!
This would certainly be more interesting that the top of the ticket Republican Playoffs between Obama and whoever.
Beauty!!!!! Total beauty scenario!
I understand the suspicion of all but we are going to, sooner or later, have to trust someone. I can start with her until she shows me something bad.
That’s true.
But most of it is just words.
Do we know what happens behind closed doors? Like O, is she making deals, all the while telling us what we want to hear?
In these times, that doubt is wholly warranted.
Agreed.
But as I said, we don’t know, and no way I’m betting on it.
Everyone is suspect. And should be treated as such. These days, all our “friends” have become enemies.
I mean the Fing Ds are actively and willfully trying to destroy SS!!! I mean WTF? Friends like these, who needs Rs?
Unfortunately, there is no ironclad guarantee that she will not sell out. The only thing we have to go on with is her record. I guess she may have thought that Obama was faking it, that he never had any intention of empowering Consumer Protection Bureau. I thought he was actually frightened at the thought of establishing it. What came out is going to be another toothless agency. I think Obama hated her, though. I think she is sincere, but I cannot guarantee it. She must be tested by fire, but that means buying a cat in the bag. The only problem I have is that she is from Harvard, as it seems all the assholes surrounding Obama are from there. It seems like Harvard is the bastion of ruling elites, as if all the threads connecting the Establishment are running through Harvard. So we have have no way of knowing what is on her mind. This is the only thing that is making me suspicious of her. I just hope she is not Al Franken, this mealy mouthed asshole, just a lot of noise, no action. Is he Harvard or Yale? I just hope she has integrity. It is so difficult to tell nowadays who is going to work out. Once they get into the office, they forget everything they promised. Plus, she can be sidelined by the caucus to make ineffective.
Absolutely warranted!! I have seen no evidence or had any sense that any of that is going on and I would want to know if it were, just like you!!
It’s what Gorbachev did in the USSR, so there’s precedent. But it’s about as rare as … well something that’s very rare. :)
We are definitely going to have to trust someone. I suggest we start with each other and leave the Party operatives behind.
If she is *willing* to ditch the caucus and the central party organization, and that would take real -excuse the expression- ballz, Senators have powers that none of the Ds use. It could be *very* interesting. Just imagine, if she was willing to put a hold on a bad bill or -gasp- actually really fillibuster something. And, then, what if she could talk some other Senators into ‘seeing’ the light she sees to do the right thing along with her. I believe she has the potential to be a that kind of leader. I wonder if she would be willing to embark on this with any other objective in mind, even.
I agree. I really like her, but running against seems foolish. He is well like and moderate. In addition, running as a Democrat she will have to play ball to get any leadership roll. I think another possibility just hit the dust.
I also agree with comment 43, about her being from Harvard. With Summers and others from Harvard, Harvard’s not a good recommendation. It’s like being honest and coming from Chicago politics.
Absolutely agree with the gist of your post/points. I suppose she could run for the greens or the socialists, but too much perceived baggage with those groups. And this is why we really need to get that 3rd party up and running.
It seems to me that Jane, Moore, et al are drifting in that direction and I hope they do. Jane’s already shown an amazing ability to organize, so why not take the next step and found the Firedog Party, or whatever. See if Damon, Moore, and any others out there can get folks to give contributions, put together a populist/labor platform, and get someone like Warren to run for senate in the new party. Start with trying to grab seats in the congress, and then move for president in 2016. Because going for president in 2012 would be akin to a moonshot, and in the unlikely event a 3rd pty candidate made it in, he/she would be utterly destroyed by the money parties.
Love her and want her voice heard loudly and often, so if she runs, she gets exposure and that’s all good. I’m not seeing her as a Senator but I could be wrong. She seems to be too much of a truth teller than a go-along D. Again I hope I’m wrong. What this shows for sure is, there is a shockingly thin bench of D’s in the Bay State. And why the hell is Brown so popular there?
Moderate eh? I’m trying to think of the significant times when Brown has broken away from the R leadership. Thinking… thinking…
I have all the same concerns as you.
But honestly, and please do not take offense for it not meant as such, your entire rationalization is weak. I’m sorry, but it is rationalization.
You say everything I said, heck you could have written what I did. Exact same page.
But then you end with a different conclusion.
WHICH IS FINE. I have no problem with that. We all have different opinions, and that is actually good for the conversation.
But I think many here will make the same mistake I made with O. I wanted O to be something he is not, and I was stupid. Never again will I make that mistake. No way.
Wow, Gorbachev reference.
Very nice.
That’s kinda one of the things I was thinking of too.
But they are literally one in a trillion.
Good point.
But she could also run as I. But uphill climb on that idea.
I don’t know.
But for me, I say trust not a single one of them. Too many times burned by the corporatists.
I would still like to know if she’s a millionaire.
I really don’t care if people are millionaires. It’s how they GOT the money that matters. If they stole if from the poor and the middle class that is not okay. It’s great if people are smart and can earn that money – wish I could – but theft is something else entirely.
While Warren is considering making a run for the Senate I would urge her to run as an Independent should she decide to challenge Brown. If she should run as a Dim and win she’d be forced to toe the party line and be forced to carry water for those who were most willing to throw her under the bus – especially her former boss, Obama. As an Independent she could speak out without all the tethers of party membership and be beholding to none other than her constituents.
Her national following, her reputation, her almost rock star status, might be able to overcome the distaste many Massachusetts voters have for Harvard professors. She certainly would be a welcome addition to the Senate!
Exactly. She would have much more weight as a Bernie Sanders I than as a D party apparatchik
It would be interesting to see how much funding and volunteer support she could get running as in Independent. Esp. versus how much she expects to get through regular Dem party channels and sources. (You know that the Kock Bros types are going to pour gazillions into Brown’s re-election bid.)
Yay. I’m already signed up as a recurring contributor. Yay. I’m moving to MA next year.
I know that money is the mother’s milk of politics but IMHO I think that can be offset by a quality grassroots organization that can target all the right demographics. Judging her from a distance and the type of response she gets at FDL every time her name is mentioned I think she could put together one helluva formidable organization that could pose quite a challenge to Brown. I think she would attract a large number of volunteers – both in state and from points all over the US! It could make for a really compelling campaign.
I’ll bet that you could ask 100 people around the country who she is and 99 of them wouldn’t be able to tell you. That’s the problem with running as an Indie because she would need out of state help for campaign workers.
I want Elizabeth Warren to start her own Peoples’ Bank and run it the way the CFPB would want it run.
No other bank could beat her brand of bank. Imagine the money that would flow her way. Middle class America, sick of being ripped off by Wall St mega banks and usury rates on credit cards, could pull its money from those other banks and park it with Warren, safely!
Then Warren would have the cash to back future competent candidates for Congress and President.
Warren should start her own bank!
Nah, they’d have impeachment proceedings in place in Da Hauz. No filly busters needed . . . ;-)
All of us liberals in the deep south are jealous! :(
For those you who wonder if ***Elizabeth*** can handle DC triangulation. Watch her answer to Jon Stewart’s direct questions.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-april-15-2009/elizabeth-warren-pt–1?xrs=share_copy
Note pre-ad to watch, sorry.
That’s a harsh claim to make. I live in a small rural town – population of 22,000 – in northwest NM and many of my neighbors hold Warren in high esteem. The past year while she was setting up the CFPB she was effectively muzzled which might lead one to make your kind of claim when one considers how she was kept out out of the spotlight. As soon as she announces watch the national spotlight on her which could go far in restoring her national status.
Still workin my way thru comments but yers stopped me.
Your thots jibe with the webinar with Ellsberg/Moore . . .
Interesting comment you make, and thanks for it.
I’ll have more to say at the end when i catch up on all this, other than thanks Mr. Dayen once again for your ear to the ground . . . and to our ears . . . fascinating thing this Warren sitch now is.
Is she is or is she ain’t our baby . . . .
NEVAH!
Now stop that horrid strain, hug yer family and think decent thots.
;-)
Nice comment, thanks.
*G*
I’m really glad to hear that. My feeling is that if more people knew anything at all about the area of her expertise we wouldn’t be in the situation we’re in now. People would be screaming at Obama and Congress.
Off the top of my head, fully concur . . . seems logical.
Still need to know more about it all tho . . . as said, some of this we never know till battle tested . . . we gave Obama a shot, and were loyal till he announced his cabinet picks and other appointments.
DIM Centrist Clinton leftovers, thru it all.
Spelt the end of the road . . . took me a bit longer, but that was a key sign . . . I lost him about 6 months or so into the first year.
At least I think I did . . . if it was later don’t shoot me. ;-)
I’m all better now, for sure . . . Warren is beyond me to eval thoroughly at this point . . . I wanna go all pony n horn on the head at first blush . . . but after Obama, never again.
I wanna likey for Senate . . . I wanna likey for 3rd party, too.
But let’s see, long road to haul in front of us . . .
Hear, hear!! According to rumors I’ve heard on the net Paul Wellstone met her years ago and was heard to remark that the Senate could sure use the likes of Elizabeth Warren and 99 others like her! I may be a hopeless romantic but I like to think that rumor is true! I’d almost be tempted to travel cross country to work in her campaign.
Apologies for not hitting the Reply button – my comment at 70 is for both Twain at 68 & Larue at 69. *g*
Yeah, I’d like to see the $ potential of someone like her in the game, regardless of how it or Mz. Warren end up . . . . is that base out there that can be united for we the people . . . ALL of us, after Obama crushed us . . . good thot hoss . . . it’s something we need to learn.
Part of the ‘coming together’ stuff . . . . n we won’t need the right side Teabaggers n Libtards for this, they just spook the horses n frighten the kids . . . we don’t need the fringe lunitics over that side, only from the left side . . . ;-)
I know little of these finan matters, but at first exposure, I love the thot! Fascinating . . . never heard anyone ever suggest that . . .
Roger dat hoss . . . lol
I had no illusions about Obama. Looking at his behavior before he ran, you could see the man had absolutely no integrity. Just look at his telecom vote. Many people were saying that Hil is better, I personally did not see any difference, and still don’t. Both of them were bought and paid for by the “owners” of this country. The outcome would have been exactly the same.
However, if Hil could channel her energy properly, she probably is presidential material. The woman has steel in her spine. But being what she is it also makes her very dangerous. So, who knows, things could have turned out worse, as Obama overall is a corrupt weakling, whereas Hil would have been a powerful personality.
The main problem in this country is that right now we have a single party system. I don’t consider Democrats are opposition. They exist just to collect money to enrich themselves, and make Republicans object of hate by the Dem. base. However, it is a wasted emotion, as nothing can be done within the system that exists. Any law passed by Congress to control campaign contributions will be declared unconstitutional. So the only solution will be a constitutional amendment for public financing of elections, or a revolution. There is just no other way. And we all know that the Establishment will fight this tooth and nail. But a 3rd party is never going to happen, not under the present system.
Don’t misunderstand me: I like Warren. But she is an unknown quantity. If she had held some public offices before, at least that would have given us some sort of an idea how she is. But she is really a mystery. At least with Obama there was a track record, and those that chose to vote for him just because he claimed not to be Bush made a huge mistake. But what I am looking for is a powerful personality within our political system, with moral authority, and I just can’t see anyone. It is true that occasionally you see people like Bernie Sanders, who seems to be saying the right things, but he is just not a presidential material.
Final thot after the diary and the comments . .
Devil’s Advocate/Worst Case
She played the part with the new org, n bowed out when asked, and the Senate was pre ordained by the DIM PTB.
Gotta keep it in check methinks, till we know more.
I WANNA fall in love all over again . . . but.
;-)
I’m waitin this one out hosses n hossettes . . .
At this time tonite, I’m wonderin just a tad why she ain’t as OUT there against the machine as I’d want someone like her to BE.
That alone is worrisome . . . but ya can’t hang a hat on worrisome, not yet . . . on we hope . . . n fight.
What an imaginative suggestion!!! If personal involvement in an electoral campaign is not her cup of tea your suggestion might even intrigue Ms. Warren.
Your quoted comments are thoroughly to the heart of the matter and the sitch.
Nicely crafted n thanks, that’s what we the people are up against.
In my oft repeated words:
The entire system is corrupted and bought and owned and operated by the corporate fascist oligachs.
They own and operate the judiciary, congress, white house, military, and every cabinet position, every advisory position and every other position erected or annointed from city to county to state to fed.
Every facet of our lives is owned and operated.
It would take a huge revolution and lots of blood to change this.
Barring that, it WILL COLLAPSE of its own volition as all empires do thru over expansion and failure to care for the masses.
N then, there’s that whole mama nature thang that might be a game changer bigger n any failing global oligarch plans in place.
N of course, if the neocons wander too far, and Iran is attacked by Israel or USA, or both . . . game over for the planet.
Thanks for your thots, grand and spot on they are IMHO.
And the permanent irrelevancy of Elizabeth Warren has been achieved.
Our only problem is not if but when this empire will collapse. However, I think we should actually vote GOP in the next election, as this will actually speed things up. The more pressure is put on the populace, the faster change will happen. Nothing is worse than slow motion death, which is what we are witnessing right now. Financial crashes used to occur quite regularly at the end of 19th and beginning of 20th, and then came economists. I think crashes are actually good, as they bring opportunities. There are fewer and fewer opportunities at the present time. That is why everything is stagnating right now. Can you imagine that there actually was a time when the super wealthy could become paupers within a lifetime?
and Larue @73
Thanks. I don’t know the first thing about starting/running a bank, but I’m sure Elizabeth Warren does (or could easily learn) since she had to write the blue prints for monitoring them.
What I am intrigued by is the fact that if she runs a bank, then every American can vote for her, as often and as much as his/her money allows! Every vote counted. No rigged election.
We certainly know a lot more about her than we did :Clarence Thomas” Obama when we selected & elected hin!
You’re clueless. Where have you been for the last 18 months, she’s as real as it gets!
Further to the thought of grabbing congressional seats: try to get a couple of senate seats – ’cause that’s where the power sits. They could spell eachother in filibustering things for 4 years ;-) It would make headline catching stories that both advertise the new party and tell the rest of america that the new party is fighting for them. Maybe support progressive dems, shitbags that they are, and get them to switch to the new party after they win their seats. Suddenly you’d have a progressive caucus that wasn’t tied to the DLC. Simultaneously start up local party offices in as many states as possible – based on the strength and recognition of the seats held in the federal congress, and I think that in time for the 2014 or ’16 elections, you have a party that is a force to be recognized. Ya, sounds simple, but I do think that is the roadmap. How hard is it to win a senate seat? I don’t know. Probably easier and more within our grasp than a presidential seat. And quicker than the 30-odd years it would take to build a movement at the local county and state level; an amount of time that the middle classes don’t have before their total extinction.
I want her to be my president. Warren 2012
How awesome would a Grayson Warren team be?
Don’t compare her to Obama. I promise you she will have more fortitude than he has and that she will follow through on her promises.