Someone asked me yesterday if the economy had anything to do with the London riots, or if it was just about race and tensions with local police. I don’t see why it has to be any one thing, but if you ask me, yes, the economy – and particularly the austerity measures in Britain – play a role. It breeds a certain despair that comes with a lack of opportunity or social mobility. And that feeds right into unrest. Richard Sennett and Saskia Sassen tell this story today in the New York Times:
Kingsland Road resembles the bustling, ethnically mixed streets of Brooklyn. During the day, it is a home of sorts for unemployed young men with nothing to do; Britain’s youth unemployment rate is currently over 20 percent. During the economic boom a decade ago, though, nearly as many were out of work, and they did not all turn to crime.
To counter the risk that they might, there were storefront drop-in centers for young people in the neighborhood; these places are now shutting down, as are other community services, like health centers for the elderly and libraries. Local police forces have also been shrinking.
All are victims of what people in Britain call “the cuts” — the government’s defunding of civil-society institutions in order to balance the nation’s books. Before the riots, the government had planned to cut 16,200 police officers across the country. In London, austerity means that there will be about 19 percent less to spend next year on government programs, and the burden will fall particularly on the poor [...]
In attempting to carry out reform, the government appears incompetent; it has lost legitimacy. This has prompted some people living on Kingsland Road to become vigilantes. “We have to do things for ourselves,” a 16-year-old in Hackney told The Guardian, convinced that the authorities did not care about, or know how to protect, communities like his.
Britain is characterized by extreme inequality, particularly in the urban centers, and low social mobility. You could just as easily be talking about the United States. And while we may not have seen the same type of unrest as in London over the past week, the flash mobs beating up people in places like Philadelphia may stem from the same ennui and even despair. And remember, our austerity is yet to come.
Derek Thompson thinks that London won’t be the last city to burn, and I have to agree. The elite failure over the last decade has spurned a backlash. We’ve seen it in Britain and Spain and Greece; it arguably animated the Arab uprising, motivated by high commodity prices and an underclass of educated youths. The global recession has left pockets of this underclass all over the world. They are angry about their lack of opportunity and they are ready to act.
British Prime Minister David Cameron’s first solution may be to shut down social media to stop the communications among rioters. He could alternatively consider some economic opportunity for an entire generation of frustrated youth.




7 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The elite failure over the last decade
What failure? They’re richer than ever, corporations are more flush with cash then ever, and the working class is weaker than ever (at least since the 30s). From their standpoint, that’s tremendous, tremendous success.
The system’s unstable? So what? That just creates more pretexts for ongoing class war. People are rioting in Britain? Again, from an elite standpoint, so what? Call out the repressive forces of the state and crack a few more heads with a bit more ferocity.
Why should elites care about any of this? Yes, if I were a farsighted elite, I’d be nervous, but not about current events — I’d be nervous that the left would eventually get its shit together and start fighting in ways that I really couldn’t control.
But speaking as the farsighted son of a truck driver and a factory worker, the left isn’t that close. It never talks about goals, never discusses stategy, has no vision beyond only the most vague variety. It sometimes bleats about the need for vision, but refuses to acknowledge the very detailed anti-capitalist vision of parecon that’s been on the table for decades now, because it doesn’t want to confront its own coordinator-class privileges.
The left is so far from being a real threat to elite interests right now that it’s sad. The left still doesn’t need to win badly enough. It thinks it does, but it’s still like the alcoholic who can’t admit he has a problem.
If you’ve read Zinn’s People’s History, you can see how deeply sexism ran on the left 175 years ago — even in the women’s movements. It’s no exaggeration to say that classism runs as deeply on the left and in society more generally today as sexism did back then. But no one today understands that, just as no one then understood how deeply sexist they all were.
How is that transcended? I don’t know. But until the left figures out how, it’s never going to represent any sort of a real threat to elites in 2011 and beyond. I can’t prove that. I just know that it’s true.
Well, actually, I partially take it back. I think I do know. I just don’t know how to get the left to do it — just like I don’t know how to get an alcoholic to admit he has a problem.
you said
that’s interesting.
can you elaborate?
To understand it requires an examination of the pareconish concept of balanced job complexes and the coordinator-class privileges inherent in corporate divisions of labor.
Basically, are you willing to do your fair share of shit work? Are you willing to do your fair share of ass wiping, toilet cleaning, phone answering, and so on? That is, shouldn’t doctors do their fair share of nurse-aide ass-wiping work, instead of being able to wear suits all day as they do now?
It’s a little more complicated, and to truly explain it requires a deeper explanation of pareconish theory. But basically, what the left really wants is to overthrow the capitalist class and install itself as the new ruling (coordinator) class. And it wants to retain the current working class as its slaves. The left isn’t seeking working-class liberation for workers; it just wants to put them under new ownership.
To use another analogy, the left is the overseers, and it wants to overthrow the plantation owners and take over the cotton-farming operations for itself, but it still wants to retain its working-class slaves to do the picking of the crops so it doesn’t have to. The left will deny this, and it truly believes its denial, but based on its actions, this is in fact exactly what the left wants.
I don’t know what you’re recruiting for, Eric, but I doubt you’re going to get many followers. Peace out.
Well, no shit, Sherlock. Did you not read the first fucking post, where I said that classism runs deep on the left and it is as well understood now as sexism was by the left 175 years ago?
If people understood that — you know, like YOU? — I would be shocked since, kind of by definition, people DON’T understand it. And they won’t for likely decades more to come. And that includes you.
I happen to agree with you Eric.
It can be put in simpler terms too. In the US, especially the left is far to fragmented with to many people chasing down stupid shit that right now is unimportant in the bigger picture of things.
I don’t want Dumocrat billionaires running the show telling me I need to worry about some obscure environmental issue yet at the very same time courting Wall St and the banksters so they can pollute at will and cut down every fucking tree for 600 miles to carve up every hill for every speck of coal or gas under it so we’re driven in 40 different directions and can never hold power because we’re like herding butterflies in a hurricane.
If the left wants power the left needs to stop bickering over all the little shit like this right, that right, every species on the planet, abortions, guns, war and so on and start concentrating on one issue.. Kick the shitheads out of power…period and THEN begin working on the other issues once they’ve been soundly defeated once and for all.
After WWII the left held the congress with an iron fist but lost sight of it and everyone fragmented then a whole lot of people post 70s ran off to get rich then said, “Fuck everyone else..I got mine” and we continually allow the right wing to drive wedge issues between us and what happens? Unions broken up, a blue state here and there, half the people worrying about silly issues that will go absolutely nowhere if we don’t get the power back with the iron grip we once had.
We still have the myth of a classless society. We can’t have a “left” without a working class. The working class is the fucking left. The educated middle class liberals actually think they are the left and they wounder why they are impotent.
When the American working class discovers that they are the American working class we can talk about the left.
Oh yeah. A classless society also has no classism. We substitute sexism and racism. Keep them ignorant, poor and divided against each other. Americans in a class war are a one legged man in an ass kicking contest.