Michael Tomasky discovers something that we’ve discussed here over the past couple months: Presidents have the power to adjourn Congress, which means there’s nothing stopping the President from making a recess appointment.
What? Force the Congress into recess? Yes. The president has the power under the Constitution to do exactly that. Read Article II, which is, of course, on the executive branch, Section 3, titled “State of the Union, Convening Congress.” It states in full about the president that:
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
“[H]e may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper.” Of course, there are caveats. First, it must be an extraordinary occasion. Second, the two houses of Congress must disagree about the time of adjournment. Both can be finessed. On the first point, Obama can actually reasonably argue that the number of presidential appointments held up by Republicans (we’ll get to the numbers in a minute) is so large as to constitute an extraordinary circumstance. On the second, all that would take is for the Democratic-controlled Senate to force a “disagreement” with the House about when Congress should adjourn.
This would solve the problem of having vacancies at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Commerce Department, the Federal Reserve Board and hundreds of other positions. I would argue that in the near term, the Fed appointments may be the most important, since fiscal policy is a dead letter and a couple extra activist monetarists would be the best hope for any kind of expansionary, growth-producing policies between now and the next election. But obviously, having Richard Cordray at CFPB would help as well. And the President would actually have to nominate people to those two open Fed positions for this to work.
Right now the Senate has been blithely agreeing to pro forma sessions that eliminate the ability for a recess appointment. But even this is dubious. There is a precedent not to recess appoint if the recess doesn’t last more than three days, but the President could simply aver that the pro forma sessions don’t constitute having Congress in session in his view, and that he will take advantage of the recess to end the deadlock and use his appointment power.
This is all in the realm of fantasy, of course, but in the event that a President who doesn’t want to be boxed in by Republicans comes around, it’s useful to know the extent of his or her powers.



7 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Seriously, why do some people have to make things so hard? Only one President, our youngest in fact, is a recipient of both the Nobel Peace Prize AND the Medal of Honor. What would that guy do?
At bottom, recess appointments are a matter of presidential will. In 1903, Theodore Roosevelt set the standard when he recess-appointed 160 officials during a recess of less than one day.
http://my.firedoglake.com/members/themomcat
Quite a fantasy you have there. Thank you for reminding (us) me of the truly impressive powers a real president would have at his or her disposal. If we had a Statesperson instead of a Politician Muppet with the Corporations’ hand up its fanny.
It is pitiful how hard it is to just accept that Obama is nothing like what he pretended to be. Now it is clear that none of us can expect anything at all of him. And voting, for the most part, is a complete farce.
Ah, well, dream on !
If Obama had the Balls (doesn’t) or desire (doesn’t) his appointments would be good through to the next Congress. The way things are going, the next Congress would marginally be Democratic, with a Republican President. The new Congress, as in the past, would play nice, letting the appointments lapse and have a whole new crop of conservative judges & DoJ attorney’s they’d rubber stamp.
But he doesn’t want to.
End of story.
Sadly, I think you are correct to guess that your musings, while informative, are the thing of fantasy as regards this president. But really, thank you for the info!
beowulf, that info about Teddy R is pretty eye popping. I’d like to see the NYT editions that came out that week. I wonder just how surprising it really was?
Looking up “List of Presidential Vetoes” on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_vetoes), I was heartened to see that FDR signed 639 total, with only 9 subsequently overridden. Obama is so behind on that effort.
But back to recess appointments: I am really glad that Elizabeth Warren did not fight to try and get the CFPB helm, during the open session or a recess period. I am guessing that she did not want to be a political pinata.
And, I am waiting to see what Obama is going to do with Donald Berwick’s recess apppointment as Admin. of Medicare and Medicaid. The tail-wind that the Repubs have may make confirmation nearly impossible when the next session starts. Really hope Obama does not let him get winnowed.
I’m hoping Obama decides he doesn’t have do the adjournment trick after all.
It would establish yet another new normal in our own times, a precedent to be tapped by the trolls when they have the WH at some point. Same problem using Senate reconciliation to prevent a filibuster of something as big and partisan as ACA. Katie bar the door.
These things have legs, and I’m afraid they’ll just keep running. We may not like how they are used going forward.
Obama is far beyond the point of hopeless as far as the interests of the Democratic base go.