Sticking to the immigration theme, over the past week we’ve seen major action from the Latino community to demand an end to the Secure Communities program and the mass of deportations that has separated families and sent non-criminal undocumenteds into the grips of ICE, contrary to the Administration’s stated goals for the program. Latino and immigration activists have staged mass walkouts of federal task force hearings, including on Monday night in Los Angeles. They say that Secure Communities damages local law enforcement efforts and has put 11 million people in a perpetual state of fear. They have also assailed what they consider lies that S-Comm only goes after criminal offenders for deportation, citing examples of undocumenteds working with law enforcement on reporting crimes and getting shifted over to ICE.
The Administration had to respond. These activists were threatening to sit home, saying they would hold the President accountable for the record deportations and twisting of S-Comm. They wanted to see some change. Today, the Administration made that response.
The Obama administration announced on Thursday it will do a case-by-case review of deportations, allowing many undocumented immigrants without criminal records to stay in the United States indefinitely and apply for work permits.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano will send a letter on Thursday to Senate members who had asked for details on how the agency would prioritize its immigration enforcement. The policy change is meant as a framework to help prevent non-priority undocumented immigrants from “clogging the system,” senior administration officials said on a conference call with reporters Thursday.
First, the agency will look at its pending immigration cases and close the low-priority cases, so immigration courts can focus on the most serious ones, administration officials said. The low-priority cases can be reopened if circumstances require. Next, guidance will be given to immigration enforcement agents to help them better detect serious criminals and other high-priority undocumented immigrants.
Undocumented immigrants whose cases are closed will be allowed to apply for work permits, but will not be given them automatically, officials said.
This would affect roughly 300,000 suspects currently in the immigration system, giving them the potential to stay and work legally in the United States. This would especially impact DREAMers, students with no criminal record who only know this country as a home and want to stay here and contribute to society.
Democratic Senators are praising the action. “The Obama Administration has made the right decision in changing the way they handle deportations of DREAM Act students,” said Dick Durbin (D-IL). “I applaud President Obama for taking this decisive step to bring our immigration enforcement policies more in line with our national security and public safety priorities,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).
However, if the Administration thought this would appease the activists whose work clearly led to today’s action, they should think again. I just spoke with Roberto Lovato of Presente.org, whose organization was instrumental in the week of action to protest S-Comm and the deportations. He made a crucial distinction.
“For the 300,000 in deportations, this is huge. Their cases will be reviewed, and they could get work permits,” said Lovato. “From the universe of people terrorized by Secure Communities and the policies of the Obama Administration, this does nothing for them. ICE can still tear down their door and put a gun in their face, or the face of their children. From the view of the 11 million (undocumenteds), this does nothing.”
In addition, Lovato said, this has the potential of being an administrative disaster. If the only way for a DREAM Act student to get a work permit is to get into the deportation system, for example, “this tells the DREAM students to go into ICE and start administrative proceedings.” That would only fill the system with a further backlog.
The Latino community’s demand remains to end S-Comm immediately, stop turning local law enforcement into tools of the immigration authorities, and to use executive powers like temporary protected status or deferred enforcement to deal with the other 11 million while Congress is gridlocked on an ultimate solution. “We pause to claim a small but important victory for 300,000 of the 11 million,” Lovato said. “But you would have to be covering up the sun with one finger to say this resolves the problem.” He believes this action was mainly designed by the Administration to get Latinos off their backs before the election.
Lovato did agree that this was a direct response to the pressure put on by the Latino community over deportations and S-Comm during the past several months. But they plan to continue the fight. “We will not hesitate to exercise our community’s power against the Obama Administration’s terror put upon us,” he said. “We will continue fighting for real reform.”
Chris Newman of the National Day Laborers Organizing Network had a similar take:
“In order to fulfill its promises, the administration must end policies like Secure Communities that result in the criminalization of innocent immigrants who are Americans in Waiting like those who came before them,” said Chris Newman, legal director of the National Day Laborers Organizing Network, in an email statement. “The administration has pursued policies that are sowing fear and devastation among immigrant communities, and it must reverse course to stop the Arizonification of the country,” he added, referencing Arizona’s strict immigration enforcement policies.
More from AP.
…The Center For Community Change forwards this statement:
“Everyone in America should welcome today’s announcement,” said FIRM spokesperson Marissa Graciosa. “The President has responded positively to the moral crisis created by wrong-headed deportations. This policy change reflects the hard work of hundreds of organizations and thousands of immigrants who literally put their lives on the line for to make their voices heard.”
“This is an important step in the right direction. We urge the Administration to enforce this policy vigorously and follow it through to its full logical and moral conclusion: suspend deportations of all those who work hard every day to create better lives for themselves and their families,” Graciosa said. “Specifically, the Secure Communities Program that undermines public safety and tears apart immigrant communities should be abolished.”




43 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Of course, the usual Obamabots will respond that the Latino/Latina community should just get the hell off President Obama’s back now, since he’s already done more then they humanly deserve because he has to fight the big, bad Teabaggers and those awful Republicans enough. After all, what else can they do…allow Bachmann or Perry to get elected and watch them build the eletrified fence and shoot them all at will??
Hopefully, I hope they tell him to go straight to Hell, and push the fight even more. People who are here legally and do no harm do not deserve to be the pawns of Apartheid.
Anthony
I think from now until the election at every speech Obama gives he should mention that he will refuse to enforce the immigration laws and will not deport illegal immigrants.
I’m actually pretty impressed, assuming the administration’s plan is implemented like I hope it will be.
Yeah, well that doesn’t actually mean anything though. How many speeches/statements did he give praising the public option, for example?
Obama’s embrace of the xenophobia and idiocy surrounding Hispanic immigration is just yet another way in which he has been a profoundly poor choice of head-of-state. It doesn’t seem like there is a group of backwards quasi-rightist idiots counted as a demographic population to which he has not bent over backwards to pander.
Ya, like he’s earned anyone trust.
Note this report (hat tip emptywheel, Aug. 18, 2011) regarding the Department of State’s J-1 program and Hershey’s.
???
Don’t you understand the story?
Ah, yes, “real reform”…defined as:
1. No fence.
2. No workplace investigations and no employer sanctions.
3. No deportations for anyone here illegally.
4. No barriers (physical or legal) to unlimited immigration for anyone who wants to come here.
5. Full voting rights for all non-citizens.
Because hey, what the heck, we have no problems with unemployment, over-population, strain on public services. Nah, none of that. And most importantly, we have a responsibility to welcome all the people of the world and solve all the problems of all the people in the world.
wrote about it yesterday. It’s actually the very first link in this piece.
Although Beach Populist is over-the-top, I think he/she raises the right issue: What the hell does “full reform” mean if it does not mean a mass grant of amnesty and a reward of citizenship on top of allowing the person to continue living in the US?
I know the stuff about paying fines, surviving a criminal offense check, and all of that, but it still rewards people for illegal behavior.
The US needs a real, humane immigration policy that is better than granting periodic amnesties.
So, what again is “full reform”?
DDayen: “New Deportation Order From White House”
No. There has been no such order.
There has reportedly been a conference call with reporters by senior administration officials.
Next, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano will reportedly send a letter on Thursday to Senate members explaining how the agency would prioritize its immigration enforcement.
Based upon Obama’s past behavior we can only speculate on what the government will actually do, particularly since Obama himself hasn’t mentioned any new policy. Guantanamo is still open, isn’t it?
Immigration has been a talking point for every election in my memory. Nothing ever happens because no one seems to have any answers. Whatever the answer is we certainly should not be treating undocumented people as if they are animals and putting them in camps – many are children. It’s inhumane.
The best “reform” I’ve heard is “tall fences, wide gates”. Keep illegal aliens out, but make it very easy for anyone who qualifies (no fellons or whatever) to get in legally.
Oh that makes perfect sense. Let’s not enforce the laws that are on the books now as they pertain to ILLEGAL aliens and let’s just wait until Congress comes up with a law that these law-breakers like.
So sad that these 11 million criminals are living in fear.
LOL – if you are doing a criminal background check on an illegal alien, don’t they by definition FAIL that check?
Thank you for that, David. I think repetition of atomic points in the form of comments isn’t a bad thing and should have prefaced my prior comment with “I’m noting for the record
Note” to indicate/make it clear I saw no omission in your post(s). By the way, I really appreciate your incredible work.Yeah, I part company with a lot of progressives on this issues. Wall Street whores like Reagan and Bush were also pro-amnesty. And they also lied to people just like Obama. Reagan gave us amnesty in exchange for a “promise” of enforcement. But no sooner had Mazzouli-Simpson been signed the Wall Street whores in DC began to undermine enforcement. Obama will do the same thing.
An elected government’s first duty is to its own polity. The DC assholes have yet to secure good affordable health care, jobs, decent housing, etc. for US citizens. Until they do, it’s a slap in the face to see Obama worrying about illegals.
I don’t want to rain on everybody’s parade…but,and I have some experience in this issue. When performing a background check on some illegal immigrants, they will come up “clean”, no criminal record…………under THAT name.
Actually, the BEST way to curb illegal immigration is to make America NOT the best country to immigrate to. Fix it so we have no jobs and inadequate housing, poor social services……………………oh………….we’ve done that.
Never mind.
Amazing what the threat of staying home on election nite can get you. Progressives have to be willing to let democrats lose elections in order to get the change we want.As long as they think we are too scared of the republicans to not support them we will continue getting what we have been getting.
Wow, whole lotta hate speech in the comments.
Sick shit indeed.
Paid trollers or just ignorant and hateful humans?
I agree that DDay does a lot of superb reporting on this site, and I am very grateful for it.
But I think he’s fallen down a wee bit on this one. Above, I asked the ether to tell me what “full reform” means to the “Latino activists” whom DDay is quoting. I agree with much of the response that has come to my comment and that of Beach Populist @9.
I don’t want to see the 11 million continue to cower in fear of Gestapo-type round-ups or live at sub-minimum wage and other horrendous working conditions because of fear of being exposed. Witness the round-up at that Iowa slaughterhouse a few years ago.
I want to see a new immigration law that is worker-oriented and humane and enforceable, so that we can reasonably expect that there will be no more mass amnesties.
I’d support an amnesty (on satisfaction of various conditions as, e.g., Kennedy proposed, re paying a fine, staying out of criminal activity, etc.) that allowed for continued residence ONLY. But I resent the hell out of the idea that amnesty should include a reward of citizenship.
I live in a Filipino immigrant and first-generation community, and every one of them has multiple relatives hoping and praying for a chance to come to the US as legal immigrants. Their leaders believe that it is extremely unfair for the line-jumpers to get preference over people who have been obeying the law and waiting patiently for a US immigrant visa (and often dying of old age during the wait).
But we have not yet heard from DDay himself, and I think he’s the only one who can answer my question without speculating. So, DDay, if you’re reading this, may we all please hear from you as to what the “Latino activists” consider constitutes “full reform”?
Obviously, the point of my question is not to badger DDay, but to say that I think the “Latino activists” are engaging in the same kind of intellectual dishonesty as we hear from Obama and others when we hear the code word “reform.” It usually means a bail-out of miscreants (health insurers, Wall Street, banksters) that fails to address the fundamental problems in a manner that constitutes good public policy.
It’s a tried-and-tested FDL ploy to call people who might disagree with one’s sacred position “trolls” but “trollers” is a new one. Congratulations.
Some general comments …
“Land of the Free, Home of the Poor” (video, Aug. 16, 2011, 11:47 minutes)
The world is a very small, tightly integrated place now. Meanwhile, the “Treasure Islands” aren’t just about money and secreted specialty material assets. There is the unequal application of laws at the international and national levels in favor of rich people who’ve gamed the systems to become that way, their objectives and their operatives.
“Met Undercover Snatch and Grab Squad at Soho Square – April 29 [2011]” (Note: the red and black don’t necessarily mean to Americans what they mean to Europeans)
Calling a human being “illegal” also belies another lack of understanding:
“No One Is Illegal” (Note: the place of this video is London, UK)
It is my hope that more people recognize their inherent self-worth and dignity. I think it is wise to have the same level of respect for each other, other living beings and the environment in which we all live. The still unresolved, still smoldering Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear sites make me think about all these things a lot these days.
That people are “terrorized by Secure Communities” is not an unintended consequence of this ICE program. It is part of the point. If ICE “receives limited resources” and therefore “must prioritize which of the estimated 10 million illegal immigrants in the United States and other removable aliens to pursue,”* filling those who they don’t have the resources to pursue with fear helps ICE accomplish its larger goal of deporting a much larger percentage of Latino immigrants. It is similar to the strategy employed with the construction of an incomplete border fence that forces immigrants into the more deadly parts of the Sonoran Desert.
I think three things will happen from here. One is that ICE will get more funding. More immigrants apprehended by ICE will be categorized as “criminals” “who game the immigration system”*–a deliberately broad category that can be used to detain or deport those who are not “a danger to national security or public safety”*–so that the number of immigrants negatively affected by S-COMM will remain high and growing. Lastly, for-profit detention centers to indefinitely imprison immigrants will increase.
What I would not bet a cent on happening is that deportations, terror and persecution will decrease, if the Obama administration, corporate interests and ICE have any say so.
* From http://www.ice.gov/secure_communities/
A perspective from my favorite blogger: http://theunapologeticmexican.org/elmachete/2011/05/05/them-who-must-show-their-papers/
Yes, other actions besides being undocumented can be illegal, like speeding on the freeway or starting wars, but we don’t call the people who do them illegal.
A fascinating thing from a society that imagines itself the bastion of freedom and human rights is how these two things always seem to be in dangerous short supply whenever they might extend to Latino immigrants, as if freedom and rights were commodities and there weren’t enough to go around.
Indeed. Them bosses need all the help they can get, especially in spreading fear for profit.
Immigration reform idea #117: End the forced dumping of publicly subsidized US agricultural products on Latin American markets where their artificially low prices put local farmers out of business.
Where is the law, and its concomitant calls for enforcement, for this crime? Somehow those with the least amount of power always seem to end up with the most amount of responsibility.
No, we call them “criminals”.
That’s a better word, I agree.
Criminal immigrants?
Violations of the Immigration legal scheme is not Criminal…those codes are civil in nature. Wise up….Even the horrors of deportation are not thru our criminal system….The ICE = enforcement of civil not criminal laws. But you can chose to be ignorant and intentionally cruel and/or demeaning if you wish.
Because as noted the immigration statutes are not criminal laws and therefore the encroachment does not come up in a criminal data base.
The AmericanG and UKG have an interesting concept of “undocumented” or un-”inventoried” as “bad.” In a super automated world, “inventoried” takes on additional implications.
India launches biometric census (Apr. 1, 2010)
If it weren’t for the legendary corruption of the IndianG, it could do its job now so it is hogwash that they need this database. Given the level of automation in the US, this internationally trackable human barcode would make it easy to, say, disrupt cell phones on demand at BART transit points (hat tip Kevin Gosztola, Aug. 13, 2011). With such a database and given what has already occurred in the US, the Indian people could be debt-enslaved and asset-stripped in record time.
“Agricultural robot: newest farm help” (Aug. 1, 2011)
“Companies see robots as employer-friendly” (Aug. 12, 2011)
The new meme of robotic worship which is totally foreign to Indian culture is being introduced in their media.
OK, Bev, what do you call them? They’re not “illegal” and they’re not “criminal”, so what do you propose?
Fact is, I don’t care what you call them. As long as you call them gone.
Oh, and by the way, do you know of any other civil offense where the offenders are routinely detained/jailed? Semantics aside, that sounds like something resereved for “criminals” to me.
“The AmericanG and UKG have an interesting concept of “undocumented” or un-”inventoried” as “bad.” In a super automated world, “inventoried” takes on additional implications.”
Bang! You have nailed one of the larger issues here! And what gets perpetrated on dismissable non-entities, if unchecked, frequently makes its way to the dominant group. Control is controlled by its need to control.
Immigration policy–from slavery, to the criminals who populated Georgia, to the boom of Europeans who passed under the Statue of Liberty a hundred years ago, to Latinos today–has always been constructed for the benefit of business profit. And when the numbers of immigrants need to be reduced in service to profit, those beneficiaries with concentrated power and money set about instilling fear of the Other in the citizenry. It is a pattern that repeats itself today. Perhaps you have fallen for this con?
“As long as you color them gone”? So, you do care what they get called, provided it is part of the objectification of The Other that must render them non-entities and therefore ready for persecution. I call them people. When citizens of Latin American countries see the quality of their lives wrecked by exploitive US policies and seek a redress of grievances, what is that called? Do the actions of the US–like stealing the lion’s share of Venezuelan oil or dumping chicken on the Jamaican economy putting native farmers out of business–fall within your definition of criminality? If you were on the shit end of such a relationship, what would you do? What might you consider criminal?
People, human beings, brothers and sisters…children of God,the least of these……Thank you for humanizing the conversation.
What else can we do? We are all of these things, after all. :)
So we think….I was musing after the last exchange that immigration is the new conversation of veiled racism…or not so veiled. Things we may have heard in the 60′s about not allowing those people at lunch counters…At least we are not quite there anymore…..
Not so veiled, indeed. Latino “illegal immigrants” are to the US today what Jews were to Nazi Germany: an irreconcilable, ethnic Other, enemy of the state upon whom rests all responsibility for many domestic woes, while laws designed to persecute them go unquestioned by authoritarian followers fed a steady stream of official propaganda, and prisons are built for their indefinite detention. Their very existence is “illegal,” both in terms of law and, as some commenters here indicate, culture. All without a thought for historical context, relationships of power, economic exploitation, their humanity, and least of all freedom. Because representation within a state constitutes political existence, they are thus rendered non-entities and cease to be. What is left to do after reaching such a point other than to expel or imprison them? Having spent a lot of time in Southwestern states, at the border, and seen these detention facilities with my own eyes, this comparison, while quantitatively different, is qualitatively apt.
A few months ago, I overheard a cashier angrily screaming at a Latino for not being able to speak “American” fluently. And my Latino students have now been telling me over the past couple of years about being racially profiled by police–I only used to hear about this from Black students.
Did you happen to read “Them Who Must Show Their Papers” in the second link at #26?
GOP now calling doing a prioritizing of the deportation effort a “amnesty”.