A characteristic of this White House, probably of any White House, is a desire for message control. But just to show you just how far that goes, consider this episode:
It turns out that people in the Obama administration made several attempts to reach actor Matt Damon just before he spoke at last month’s Save Our Schools rally in Washington D.C., blasting education policies that focus on high-stakes standardized tests.
According to two people familiar with the efforts, the administration tried to arrange a meeting with Damon and government officials, including Education Secretary Arne Duncan, before the July 30 march. The sources declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter.
In fact, Duncan was willing to meet Damon at the airport when he flew into the Washington region and talk to him on the drive into the city, according to the sources. Damon declined all of the requests.
The Department of Education did not deny this pursuit of Matt Damon.
Matt Damon is an actor, and he gave a good speech, standing with the right people, on education policy. I’ve seen a mini-boomlet of liberals talking about “Matt Damon for President!” based off this action; that sounds suspiciously like falling in love with some other person based off, say, a keynote speech at the 2004 DNC convention.
But the White House is clearly concerned, I guess, because it attaches someone with a high profile to critics of their education policy. It just seems insane to me that ,with all the nation’s challenges, talking Matt Damon down from criticism is somehow one of their priorities.
What’s even more interesting is that the teachers who organized the Save Our Schools march were suddenly invited to a meeting with Administration officials the day before the march. I assume this occurred once the Education Department realized they couldn’t get to Matt Damon. The teachers declined the invitation, and asked if they could meet after the march. They were told no. Obviously they wanted to blunt the criticism, not engage on the policy.
So this is a clear effort to veal pen Matt Damon and the organization whose rally he supported. It signals a fear of activism, a fear of political pressure, even from the most trivial of sources.
This from the President who as a candidate said that “change does not come from the top down, but from the bottom up.”




12 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
change does not come from the top down, but from the bottom up.
one of many progressive ideas that Obama parroted without actually believing.
How do you people expect to make any gains without supporting this president? Don’t you realize the whole problem is your feckless addiction to progressive ideals? Just fucking get over yourselves, SELL OUT and go over to the dark side and then YOU too can be a winner. Sheeesh.
Obomba 2012!
Wow. It appears free speech and public assembly is quite a threat in a country that is suppose to embrace it and encourage such expressions of freedom.
This will look bad on the administration and the corp backed educational benefactors of the administration.
The demon, Damon.
The Obama Administration is lucky not to have heard what a social worker for the New York public school system said to me: “‘Education’ is simply one of the hundred arms of the beast which intends to destroy reason, humanity, and democracy …”
Can you imagine?
DW
Kinda cumbsersome sentence structure on this one, DDay. Might want to clarify, such as…
“So this is a clear effort to entice Matt Damon and the organization he participated in a rally with into the veal pen.”
Any chance the person was trying to convey the idea that the educational process has been bastardized in an effort to “destroy reason, humanity, and democracy”? IOW, there is a movement afoot to pervert the original purposes and systems of education?
I’m getting sentences diagrammed now? :)
Great article on childhood education in Finland, which truly loves its children and knows the future cannot be secured without well-educated, healthy youngsters.
Hey, we’re just a dynamic, diverse, diligent, dedicated group, David.
Matt Damon knows no more about anything than anyone else does, except for acting. It’s the same for most all of the mavens in the entertainment indurtry
Simply ignore him. The administration can do so. The public will catch on.
Damon understands exactly what is going on in Obama & Duncan’s movement (I will not call it reform as none of Arne’s RttTop bribe has any scientific evidence to support educational efficacy).
Duncan is simply a tool for corporate take-over of the last public service sector not tied to the corrupt public/private “partnership” model that has given us the military industrial complex, the health care system, the energy and power supply sector, and many other sub-sets of services the population depends on.
The Dems have their own Corporate think-tank that spews fake science to convince the public of educational changes that have NO basis in improving outcomes for children. Democrats for Education Reform (DFER) publishes educational junk science
AND, they buy legislators with checks written directly to them:
http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/political_stile/94802689_Well-off_education_PAC_eyes_Democrats_.html
“I haven’t identified our top 10 legislators who are for us and our top 10 legislators who are being detrimental,” said Kathleen Nugent, the group’s New Jersey director…
The national group now has chapters is six states and is stacked with executives of hedge funds — Anchorage Capital Partners ($8 billion under management), Greenlight Capital ($6.8 billion) and Pershing Square Capital Management ($5.5 billion).”
Damon understands exactly what is going on in Obama & Duncan’s edu-movement (I will not call it reform as none of Arne’s RttTop bribe has any scientific evidence to support educational efficacy).
Duncan is a tool for corporate take-over of the last public service sector not tied to the corrupt public/private “partnership” model that has given us: the military industrial complex, the health care system, the energy and power supply companies, and many other sub-sets of services the population depends on.
Further, the Dems have their own Corporate think-tank that spews fake science to convince the public of educational changes that have NO basis in improving outcomes for children. Democrats for Education Reform (DFER) publishes educational junk science:
AND, they buy legislators with checks written directly to them:
http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/political_stile/94802689_Well-off_education_PAC_eyes_Democrats_.html