The White House is getting an early jump on the House Republicans’ next potential hostage-taking event, and perhaps learning something in the process. In an event today, flanked by AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka, Chamber of Commerce COO David Chavern and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, President Obama will call for a clean extension of the Highway Trust Fund, which is set to expire at the end of September. Rather than cutting the surface transportation budget, rather than pre-compromising on a level of cuts, the President will demand a clean bill at present levels.
“The president will discuss the importance of moving forward with this extension to protect nearly a million American jobs and highlight the opportunity we have to work in a bipartisan way to further invest in rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure to strengthen our economy and create new jobs across the country,” the aide said.
It remains to be determined whether the president will also include the issue in his highly publicized speech on job creation, set for next week. Administration officials were mum on the matter when asked about it by The Huffington Post, choosing instead to speak in broad strokes about what the president will discuss.
But Democrats on and off the Hill say that the current spending levels must be maintained if the party is to be viewed as serious about jobs. Surface transportation spending is set to run out on September 30; if it is allowed to lapse, thousands of federal construction jobs would simply be lost.
The House and Senate are hundreds of billions apart on a new extension, with the House bill a 34% reduction from current funding levels. This translates to 630,000 jobs, according to Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chair Barbara Boxer. Neither chamber has so much as written legislation, so there will need to be an extension. The question is what level of spending and for how long. If nothing happens by the end of September, federal construction projects will be halted and the federal gas tax will not be able to be collected.
There have been seven clean extensions of the surface transportation authorization since September 2009, when the last bill expired.
More from The Hill. The innovation here is that the President is simply asking for a clean bill. Unlike the debt limit debate, where he agreed to the narrative of tying it to spending set forth by Republicans, he’s simply demanding that Congress do its job. So that’s something.
It helps that both business and labor are on the same side on this fight, each wanting an extension without delay.




17 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
This could be viewed as a preemptive give away by Obama.
Rather than ask for a clean bill, he could have asked for a 50% increase in the federal gas tax and increased infrastructure spending by that amount.
It would add a dollar to a tank of gas, but put a half million people to work.
But, no.
Bang. The starter’s gun on the 2012 campaign has gone off.
O throwing crumbs to the masses so that “we suck less” campaign slogan, plus his billions in contributions, makes him a shoo-in.
On edit: While laughing uncontrollably in the Oval Office at what suckers he’s making of the voters.
A proposal for a bill without necessary changes, given our crumbling infrastructure, is a pre-compromise.
So now he’s going to call for a clean bill before caving. BFD.
:slow clap:
I predict the Obama give away will be an extension to the tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires in addition to a reduction in the highway spending levels.
FDLer’s should start a pool as to what Obama will give away in order to pass the highway bill. I am in for $5 on the tax cuts.
Sorry, DP.
Working as a sub to General Engineering Contractors, I anxiously awaited these shovel ready stimuli. Did not happen. It was all talk. We are well on our way to Code Red and it is disastrous.
Now in my newfound naivety (stupidity, desperate need for sense) I see “shovel ready” for what it is, an oligarchy.
I have not realized yet where the liberal me should line up yet, but it will be a terrible experience to reckon with.
I think it will help being in the Bay Area, start praying Shibbo.
From the article: “..rather than pre-compromising on a level of cuts, the President will demand a clean bill at present levels.”
——–
Did you guys get as good a laugh out of that as I did???
Let’s go ahead and get the “hostage negotiation team” ready for the end of the month. Or as I call them, the PCS, “political capitulation squad”. With Obama and his people on this we’ll be lucky if they don’t turn all the interstates into toll roads.
You mean tax cuts for the top 2% ers and corps? Put me down for $10.
It helps that
bothbusinessand labor are on the same side on this fight, each wantingwants an extension without delay.Obama doesn’t give a damn about labor. Make him prove it, don’t give him their support despite how many of them fall over themselves to out-Obama Obama with their unconditional surrender.
Hopefully, Obama will demand a clean vote in 2012.
Countdown to Obama envisioning another “grand bargain”?
If Obama saw a grand bargain he wouldn’t let the opportunity to screw us go to waste.
Asking for a clean bill isn’t Obama learning and neither is it progress. That is giving him too much credit and seems downright naive.
I am looking forward to Obama’s speech next week but I’m not holding my breath on it being bold or for that matter, the ability of congress to pass anything meaningful. There are too many people in this country (particularly Republicans in congress) that think government is a problem to be fixed. They are right in one sense. There are problems within our government that need fixing. But what they’ve forgotten is that this government is supposed to be “we the people”. We don’t fix our broken government by giving up on it or trying to push it out of the way.
The corporatists just want to infuse government with select private sector mergers and that’s both Parties including Obama.
Redefining “we the people” is part of the plan.
I don’t think average Republicans are giving up on it or pushing it out of the way as much as seriously restricting it in some ways and bloating it in others, which many on the left actually agree with even while differing on details.
It’s not “we the people” forgotten. Rather the people have been rejected and the people know it.
That’s right! No compromise! Just like the PO and tax cuts for the rich and stopping the the wars and closing Guantanamo and… what’s that? Oh. Never mind.
I don’t see how that would put a half million people to work, since oil price shocks have caused every recession since the 1970s.
Because corporations are people too. We can’t forget that.
It is disheartening when services for the public good are privatized. A corporations first priority is the corporation. A government’s first priority is it’s citizens, that is if the government isn’t corrupted by corporate interests. That is the part I don’t understand about small government conservatives. A lot of them agree that money and big business corrupts our political system yet they have no problem letting public services be privatized.