I think this delay of ozone regulations is an even bigger deal if you consider the context. Brad Plumer has that story.
Basically, what happened is that the Bush Administration dragged its feet on new national ozone standards for years. Under the law, there must be a five-year review. EPA’s review of the science in 2006 showed that the current standards, set in 1997, were woefully inadequate. The Bush Administration countered with a new rule in 2008 that was well below the recommendation from EPA scientists.
And then…
Groups such as the American Lung Association quickly filed a lawsuit to stop the Bush rules, which they claimed were too weak and would lead to thousands of unnecessary deaths and cases of respiratory disease. However, when Obama came into office, the new EPA said it basically agreed with the critics and would issue revised rules by August 2010. At that point, the ALA agreed to hold off on its lawsuit. But August 2010 rolled around. Still no rules. Then October. Then November. Still nothing. Then the EPA said it wanted to go back and look at the science again, just to double-check. Sure enough, EPA’s scientific review board said that 60 to 70 parts per billion was the way to go. And EPA administrator Lisa Jackson announced that the final rules would be more or less in line with the science [...]
So now, today, the White House announced that it’s not going to have any new rules. On a call with reporters, White House officials argued that it doesn’t make sense to put out new rules in 2011 when there’s going to be another scheduled review of the ozone science in 2013.
This happens to be wrong. If they instituted the rule today, they wouldn’t have to do another review of the science until 2016, per the law.
So consider what we have here. A bunch of enviro groups were ready to sue over ozone standards. The Obama Administration came in and said “don’t worry, we agree with you, we have the authority, we’ll impose the higher standards you want.” Then they waited for two years, and finally, they punted. It’s a total sellout and a de-fanging of the enviro groups who wanted to go to court to get the rules changed.
As a result, the 2008 rules promulgated by the Bush Administration won’t be implemented either; the EPA already directed states not to comply with them. So most states are operating under the objectively worse 1997 standards. And that is expected to continue. So the Obama Administration is allowing, for his entire first term, ozone standards that are worse than George Bush’s.
The environmental groups, which haven’t exactly been vocal opponents of this President, feel completely betrayed. And this is the second betrayal in a week. Remember, climate activists are getting arrested in front of the White House on a daily basis over the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, and the State Department just released a whitewash environmental review of the project.
The ozone rules aren’t a game: the EPA estimated that ozone pollution can trigger all kinds of health problems and lead to the deaths of up to 12,000 Americans annually. The reason the regulation seems so expensive is that you’re talking about complying up from 1997 rules. Of course fixing a 14-year gap will be expensive. It will only get more expensive. And people will die as a result of inaction.
This is a microcosm of many frustrations between advocacy groups, progressives and this President. And in this case, there is no Congress on which to blame it.
UPDATE: The American Lung Association will reopen their lawsuit against the government over the ozone standards. Of course, this comes two years too late for those suffering and dying from heightened smog levels.




64 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thanks David for that.
Now I’m really pissed at Obama. This is the last straw for me.
Why is it that Obama states the Left must force him to act on some matter, and still doesn’t act, but acts like a tea party butt puppet when Boner Inc. wants something detrimental to the population. Money, meet palm.
The internalization of the GOP `uncertainty’ talking point is stunning.
Terrible policy and terrible politics.
Calling these people clowns would be an insult to Krusty.
The Union of Concerned Scientists:
“This delay is shocking. . . . They’ve allowed politics to trump science at the expense of the American People’s health.
. . .
This is a dangerous precedent for every science-based public health, safety and environmental protection we enjoy.
. . .
“The blame here rests squarely on the White House.”
Entire statement is here.
{{ barf }}
They’re reeling are they?
He doesn’t care.
It would be difficult to create a fictional betrayal greater than the one that has been perpetrated by Barrack Obama.
And the environmental failure that he has been, will be what he’s remembered for, more than all of his other failures.
and I don’t think he cares at all.
Has any political figure in recent history been as much of a phoney as this man?
My dream:
oil company executives demonstrating in front of the whitehouse, asking for drilling, pipelines, and coal mining, while the next President, meets with James Hansen, Bill McKibben and friends, in private, at the whitehouse, to get his instructions.
Anybody with one live brain cell back in 2008 knew Obama was a sellout. He shilled for the BushCo/Paulsen TARP bankster giveaway. His appointments of Geithner, Summers, and Rubin sealed the deal. You knew then who was running the show.
I guess we are supposed to believe that this is part of obama’s shrewd re-election strategy and that there is a huge sweet spot of single issue independent voters that are going to jump aboard the hope-and-change train becoz of the obvious economic benefits of dirtier air.
This is another shot across the bow of his liberal support. Like I’ve written before, he doesn’t want to run in 2012 … he wants out … and he’s attacking his base to erode their support of him so that he has an “honorable” way to slink out of the 2012 presidential race: I can’t win. He got to strut and preen on the world’s biggest stage for 4 years and he can see that the adulation won’t last for 4 more certainly to be difficult years. This whole oval office gig hasn’t been emotionally rewarding enough to the narcissist.
Next, he’ll go off to the 6-figure speech circuit and entertain the goldman sachs and petey petersons of the world. Actually, he wants out so bad now he may even bypass that for a few years in order to conceal the transparency of transitioning from selling out 99% of the country for 4 years and then adding another order of magnitude to his wealth for his dutiful service to the plutocracy.
Z
If it took that long to get to the last straw, you’ll probably grab another fist full.
Z
NYT: Stung by Obama, Environmentalists Weigh Options
But back in the Veal Pen (a/k/a the EDF blog) this:
That FISA bill turn about and sellout should have been enough to wake people up.
Z
I would think that his capitulation on FISA would be the last straw but that’s just me. He was a sellout from the beginning. My 2 cents.
Um, increased ozone pollution means a negative feedback loop applied to the web of life (a diminishing food supply for all living things including humans) and an increased threat to the overall integrity of the environment that supports all living beings (my bold).
(excerpt from “Environmental impacts” by European Environment Agency, accessed Sept. 3, 2011)
And after a point, like nuclear fallout, ozone pollution knows no boundaries. From very short primer on air pollution (Lenntech BV, Delft, The Netherlands, accessed Sept. 3, 2011; my bold):
This is just illustrative of an administration either being the most incompetent and ineffective administration in the history of the United States or the most criminally corrupt one. I submit that the distinction is unimportant when compared to the results though it’s hard to see how anybody can be this obtuse so I have to favor the corrupt theory. Still I don’t see any point in endlessly arguing criminal vs incompetent. The question should be, now what?
Yeah, Smogbama’s kids don’t have breathe in the bilge from the corporatist’s smoke stacks. That’s for the little people.
WTF is wrong with this guy? He just has to go. I can’t tell either if he is corrupt or just an idiot. Maybe both. What does he hope to gain? Think Boner and Eric the Piss Ant will give him more respect?
“It’s a total sellout and a de-fanging of the enviro groups who wanted to go to court to get the rules changed.”
it may be that the only thing good that comes from obamas entire political careeer is the provocation of left advocates to RE- fang, big time, and to wake them up to the reality the the democtratic party cant get a pass for an IOU.
Well he fooled me there. I really did not think those three were that bad back then. But now I think they helped define this corrupt, feckless, craven and fatuous administration. What more can you say about them? O I know, better vote for O or you get Perry??
Manchurian Candidate on steroids.
You are right. Regardless of how often I warned my friends about the man they still thought the sun shined out of his asshole. What has surprized me is the absolute capitulation of congressional democrats as they watched Obama dismantel what he could of the New Deal.
It is now obvious that the Democratic Party mandarins consider the protection of the planet a “vanity issue”–that is, one that won’t attract contributors or appeal to mythical “swing voters.” Just like the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, civil liberties, and torture are vanity issues.
I’ve spent the past week touring presidential libraries, and can only imagine what a pathetic legacy Barack Obama will leave behind, whether he is re-elected or not.
The only question is how long we have to wait for the other dominoes on Cantor’s anti-regulatory memo to fall. There are ten all together.
From Eric Cantor: Memo On Upcoming Jobs Agenda
The memo came out in the last week of August, Obama begins to enact it in the first week of September. It is clear who is calling the shots here.
Not only is Obama a “sellout” he’s a traitor to Americans and their families.
It’s painfully obvious Obama is in his usual mode i.e. cave in before the fight even gets started mode lest he actually has to confront somebody. He did this with very little thought as evidenced by the hastiness of his announcement. I am sure he is thinking this will ensure Boner and Cantor will play ball with him now that he has shown how valid their ideas are. And this is the president who dug in his heals on DOMA. As far as I can remember that is the only stance he fought for.
I guess we’re just supposed to hold off on breathing in and out until 2013.
11 Dimensional Chess strikes again!
Between the FISA fiasco and the promise to escalate in Afghanistan he pretty much staked out his philosophy, which just happens to be antithetical to mine. Throwing Rev. Wright under the bus just enforced that. Can’t believe it took carguy308 this long.
Yeah, I know it’s partly my own fault when I get suckered and that makes me even more angry at the BOzo.
Krugman puts it generously; “…. mush from the wimp, of a president who doesn’t stand for anything”.
Apparanently he does…not…stand…for…anything. What is inside that expensive suit?
Actually, if you go back to the election of 2000, during the campaign Bush met with mid-west governors and utility companies advising them, if he was elected President he would gut clean air act.
Mr. O thinks we can afford to give tax cuts to billionaires and millionaires. He thinks we can afford to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on a failed surge in Afghanistan. He thinks we can afford to stay in Iraq indefinitely. He thinks we can afford to give $ 60 billion in subsidies to the oil industry every year. He thinks we can give $ 40 billion to insure the nuclear industry. He didn’t seem to have a problem giving $ 16 trillion to Wall Street speculators.
But when it comes to universal health care or clean air… he thinks we can’t afford it.
About two weeks before the election, the thugs will put ‘..and he’s a wimp’ on the front page and that will be the end of the bozo.
“WTF”. Isn’t that Obama’s new mantra – Win The Future? You can’t tell if a Chicago politician is corrupt? He’s corrupt and certainly not an idiot. He’s already achieved financial security for life and attained membership in the plutocracy. He obviously doesn’t value “respect” of anyone other than the oligarchs he serves.
Can we get a citation, here? What law governs the EPA’s five year reviews?
Supporting clean air will provide jobs, jobs and more jobs as corporations have to get off of their excess capital and invest, Paul Krugman pointed out this morning.
I was a chance for a double win for the administration. It is exceeding clear that this president does not have a full deck to play with. In fact Mr. Zero has been consistent Benedict Arnold would be hard pressed to claim greater betrayal. 9.1 % unemployment with the WH prediction to continue to 2017. Insanity in action. Gah!
Tangential– From “New evidence of a massive oil slick near Deepwater Horizon site” (RawStory, Sept. 1, 2011, with embedded video from Aug. 30, 2011) with my bold:
Add this case to the evidence that Obama is, in fact, a secret Republican.
I saw an editorial cartoon today by Mike Lukovich that sums up Obama’s dealings with Republicans perfectly:
http://blogs.ajc.com/mike-luckovich/files/2011/09/mike09022011.jpg
That second link; in other words she’s still hoping for that pony
By pushing this back to 2013 that means that the next President will be the one to set the levels. If Obama is re-elected then it might get done. If it’s one of the Tea-Nutters then it definately won’t get done. That means there is a good chance it won’t happen for another 4 year. 8 years? 12? 20?
You mentioned Reverend Wright being thrown under the bus by O. I just finished reading his interview with Bill Moyers in his book the conversation continues and I would suggest it to everyone. It gives you an insight into O’s thinking and the contempt he has for people. Your right he threw him under the bus big time.
I think a lot of people’s initial reaction to Obama the candidate was that he gave empty rhetorical speeches but voters were looking for anything to pull them out of the Bush Cheney nightmare. Seems that someone else realized that as well, namely Obama’s Wall Street backers. It always seemed odd the way he came out of nowhere. Clinton will probably be seen as the last US President to have done any good at all.
Ah, the BBB.
Better Business Barry.
Now this tool is trying to kill me, as I have asthma. I don’t miss work because it, but I can imagine many do, and isn’t it a “productivity killer” when people can’t breathe well enough to do their jobs? (Oh, right, what jobs?)
No D next time; no R anytime. I’m going with the Greens the next cycle.
This is a dual strategy: increase profits for the polluters and their investors, and kill and inflict disease on urban dwellers, who are mostly Democratic voters. This might sound cynical, but consider New Orleans. The wholesale Bush admin selling out of that city was intended to remove the democratic majority in that state, and it succeeded. They shipped those democrats off to Georgia and Texas, where the republican majority could never be threatened.
Poor urban dwellers are most affected by smog. The rich suburbs and countryside have much cleaner air, that’s where the Republicans live. In my city, Cincinnati, the rich flee the intense summer smog season by retreating to cleaner vacation areas. There is a mass exodus of the rich from the city, mostly to northern Michigan, where the rich have second homes.
It’s a dual strategy, kill the opposition (literally) and make money at the same time ! Only in America can free-market strategies like this work so well !!
Rev. Wright is a truth-teller and Obama had to disassociate himself from that as expeditiously as possible.
Clinton and his pals, Rubin Summers, the Gramms and Greenspan, were the architects of the current economic disaster as well as the massive outsourcing of jobs with NAFTA, etc. What good did he do that would serve to ameliorate those disasters?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/did-the-white-house-double-cross-enviros-on-the-smog-rule/2011/09/02/gIQAWnZ7wJ_blog.html
What part of any good ‘at all’ do you not understand? Hint: it doesn’t mean ‘everything.’
Clinton did a lot of good, raised living standards, created 22 Million jobs, balanced the budget by (in part) raising taxes on the rich. Not interested in the predictable counter argument to everything I say, so don’t bother as I won’t engage in it.
I meant an actual citation of the law. But I guess it doesn’t really matter. In spite of the actual evidence to the contrary, “jobs vs. environment” is a pretty entrenched idea. Environmental regulations kill jobs, at least according to Republicans and business lobbyists, who have the resources to buy ads saying so.
Would you rather a Democratic president, already being hit with poor jobs numbers, open themselves up to even more “anti-job” attacks? The election is already going to be close, by all metrics. In a political world where the job-killing meme is powerful, why would you want to risk helping a Republican get elected? A Republican, mind you, who won’t want the EPA to do anything for the next 4-8 years.
I would like more environmental regulation. But I’m not all that angry about this. Does it suck? Yes. A lot of things suck about American politics. Is there anything we can do about it in the 2012 election? No. So I don’t see why I should be angry about this. I’m still going to vote a straight ticket for Democrats. Progressive should know when to pick their battles.
Because the Greens are definitely going to win in 2012!
What?
Secret Republican?
I’d say that all the signs he is a Republican were on display in 2008. His Canadian NAFTA snafu as well as his vote
in favor of retro-active immunity for the telecoms to name but two instances.
That “cat” was out of the proverbial bag a long time ago!!
That’s holeybuybull for you!
Giving a Clinton any credit is like waving a red flag in front of a bull! All hail the CDS!
Both Taipans and Black Mambas will kill you. It doesn’t matter that one is less poisonous than the other.
…
It seems that Obama has finally passed the test for being an American Christian: Everything he tells me is a lie. I cannot believe I was hooked like this.
I agree
No, because America and Americans are definitely going to loose if they keep voting–straight party line–for corporatists, anti-environmentalists, pro-war-ists, and anti-middle-classists. Which describes all Republicans, and a growing number of Democrats–at least those who could exert the needed pressure against such groups.
“Shut-up and take the abuse” may feel good, but it will not save this democracy, or this planet.
Memo to the Democrats: if you want me to vote for you, put up someone worth voting for.
I’d sign off as idealist, but I’ve already reached my -ist limit.
(Whoops–though the Obamabots may have a loose grip on reality, there is no excuse for misspelling lose.)
If Obama was more interested in jobs and less obsessed with memes maybe he’d have a clue how to create some. It makes no difference whether it’s pollution or medicare, he’ll throw anyone and everyone under the bus from the 4 year old urban kid with asthma to her grandmother with diabetes.
The goal is to reelect him so he’s can spend 4 more years selling Reaganism? I fail to see the point.
If you can organize a third party into a politically viable party, then I say go ahead and vote for them. By “politically viable,” I mean capable of garnering and maintaining at least one House seat and one Senate seat through a national campaign.
But you can’t organize it. Or, rather, you’re unwilling to organize it. You’d prefer to stick it to the President and vote for a third party candidate who objectively cannot win. You choose to ignore the realities of FPTP voting systems. You third-partiers should be trying to change the voting system from the inside, rather than voting against your own interests and getting nowhere.
This has all been said before, though. It’s never convinced third-partiers, and probably never will. That’s why there’s never going to be a viable third party in the United States.
Didn’t mean to disparage your image of your boyfriend, William Jefferson Clinton. Just wanted to give him credit for the disaster we’re currently experiencing.
You’ve heard this before. Your choice is between Obama and Democrats or [Perry/Romney] and Republicans. You hate Republicans all the time. You only hate Democrats when you’re talking about them out of the context of Democrats vs. Republicans. Obama is not Reagan. His policies are not Reagan’s. Get over your irrational resentment and face the realities.
I give Clinton credit for being able to conceal his Republican policies more effectively than Obama. He wasn’t known as “Slick Willie” for nothing.
At least Reagan ordered our troops out of Lebanon and raised taxes on the wealthy. Obama is to the right of Reagan on several policies and you still insist on calling him a Democrat and being worthy of our support. Unbelievable.
I don’t see red, I just don’t like to see inaccurate historical interpretations not being challenged. Feel free to refute my post in. re. the Clinton Presidency with facts.
I have met some really neat people through the comments, I certainly want to encourage more me to comment. Thanks for the tips!
Insurance Lexington KY
title insurance Fairfield CT