The White House estimates that Hurricane Irene caused $1.5 billion in damages, virtually assuring that they will have to ask for a disaster relief supplemental sometime in the next couple months.
The preliminary estimate, released by White House budget director Jacob Lew, is on top of $5.2 billion needed for other recent disasters, including tornadoes that leveled much of Joplin, Mo. Lew said the $1.5 billion should last through next year.
The Obama administration has said last month’s debt ceiling deal with Congress allows the government to pay for disaster spending by borrowing, which increases federal deficits. That is a long-time practice for financing emergencies. The House’s No. 2 Republican, Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia, has said disaster spending should be offset by cutting other parts of the budget.
Jack Lew announced the damage estimate in a blog post. He explained that the debt limit deal allows for disaster relief funding without an offset, suggesting that they plan to ask for the funding in that manner. So we can expect a $6.7 billion disaster relief bill, covering the previous disaster needs and Hurricane Irene damage, soon.
The vast majority of that $1.5 billion will begin to be paid in the upcoming fiscal year that starts in less than four weeks. Congress is back in session tomorrow, and we will work with them to fund both the $5.2 billion needed for non-Hurricane Irene known disaster needs and the roughly $1.5 billion that we now estimate is needed for Irene through FY 2012 (as was the case with prior disasters, there also could be costs for future fiscal years).
With regard to the next couple of weeks, we are watching the situation closely. If additional funds are needed to get us through the closing days of this fiscal year, we will make sure that whatever resources are needed are provided. Guiding us is the steadfast commitment to make funds available in the amount and at the time they are needed. If resources are required for the last four weeks of FY 2011, we will explore all options to get it done.
So this would be needed starting in October, at the start of the next fiscal year.
The President made pretty clear over the weekend in New Jersey that the federal government must provide the necessary resources to fund disaster relief. Clearly the White House is taking a stand on getting that money into the system without offsets. It was assumed that, because of the agreement in the debt limit deal on a level of spending for the next two fiscal years, the FY2012 budget would be a mere formality. This disaster funding need has thrown a $6.7 billion monkey wrench into those hopes.
The White House appears to be on solid ground in the court of public opinion on asking for emergency disaster relief funding. But public opinion is just not likely to move Republicans who want offsets. To those longing for the halcyon days of hostage-taking situations from earlier in the year, you’re in luck! This is the next one.




13 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m sure the question on everybody’s mind is “Have we checked with petulant child and famous fetid stool Eric Cantor. We must have his input or… I don’t know maybe we should just ignore the fucking twerp.
Take it out of defense-
“This is the next one.”
Hokay.
How about if we just save time and money?
Have Osterity send a self-addressed, postage-paid envelope to the Rethugs, with a blank piece of paper inside, so the Wise Ones can lay out what is “realistic and desirable” and send it back to the Preznit? He’ll go for it and all that time and money will be saved …
My only question is should Osterity include a pencil in the package or will the Rethugs have their own?
I know a lot of school don’t … have pencils, or papers … or even enough teachers, so I’m trying to anticipate “problems” BEFORE they arise.
Ours not to question … why?
What? When? How? Who? or Whom!?
Only question now permitted: “How high?”
DW
Eh? All you slackers out there need to get off of your lazy liberal butts & *defend* your family & property on your own. Figure it out and stop being such lazy govt tit-sucking slackers. Earthquake/fire/flood/hurricane/tornado destroy your home & all belongings? Go rebuild all of it yourself. Defend against fire with your garden hose; build your own storm cellar; rebuild the ruined road in front of your house; re-wire the downed power lines in your neighborhood yourself. Stop being a whining crybaby LIEbrul; man up & DIY.
P.S. Global climate change & attendant weather patterns are all a LIEbrul hoax.
Read my lips: no new taxes! huzzah!
/s
Zero and Goodhair should have a bipartisany coprayathon and then maybe the fires will quit burning and the jobs (approval numbers) will come back.
Didn’t he say NO already or am I thinking of something else?
HINT: The annual budget for Obama’s war in Afghanistan is $107 billion.
Having cut fire department funding by 75% and now hurrying back to TX to get applications for federal aid in order while his state burns, Campaigner Perry must surely have his fingers crossed that the USofA will ship lots of taxpayer funds slated for disaster his way.
Only sure thing in ‘Murkah, pokums, debt and Texas.
And ‘member, ya heard it here fust.
DW
idea:
take it out of the salaries of The President, the Senators, and the Congresspeople.
shared sacrifice and austerity.
Hooray!!!
Pretty sure they would all agree to this.
also, take the money for the east coast, out of the money for texas.
should be okay right?
and, ask the public spirited oil companies, head offices in Houston, to pay for some of it.
they won’t mind will they? and the Hedge funds; they have lots of extra don’t they? It’s so great to have them around, isn’t it?
Cutting the military was my first thought. It’s a shame (wink), but you gotta do what you gotta do.
Perry needs to pray the fire away otherwise he can STFU
Take some more out of the Pentagon, stop the Shock Doctrine in the classroom (Salon.Com, by David Sirota, Sept. 6, 2011) and terminate the corporate contracts with which folks like Tom Watkins are so gleeful (my bold):