The White House sent a letter to Speaker John Boehner late last night, asking for a total of $5.1 billion in disaster relief funding to deal with the multitude of hurricanes, flooding and wildfires that have rocked the United States this summer. Here is the text of the letter:
I ask the Congress to consider the enclosed budget request for disaster response needs through Fiscal Year (FY) 2012. It includes a supplemental appropriations request for FY 2011 of $500 million and a budget amendment for FY 2012 of $4.6 billion for the Department of Homeland Security.
The proposed totals for FY 2011 and FY 2012 would increase by $5.1 billion as a result of this request. The additional funding would fund disaster response needs in the Disaster Relief Fund, including approximately $1.5 billion for the Federal share of costs to respond to Hurricane Irene.
This request responds to urgent and essential needs. The supplemental appropriations request would be designated as an emergency requirement. The request for FY 2012 in the budget amendment would constitute disaster relief within the meaning of section 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended by the Budget Control Act of 2011, and would therefore adjust the discretionary spending levels for FY 2012 pursuant to section 251. The details of this request are set forth in the enclosed letter from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
That last paragraph refers to the fact that the debt limit deal allows for up to $11 billion in disaster relief funding without offsets, above the level of the spending cap for FY 2012. So the White House is asking for a quick authorization of funding without any spending cuts attached.
Harry Reid plans to introduce a bill in the Senate that would devote $6 billion to disaster relief, also without offsets. I imagine that Reid will modify his bill to contour to this request from the White House.
All eyes are then on the House to see what they’ll do. Eric Cantor has been hammered in recent weeks for his comments about disaster relief funding needing offsets. Democrats in Congress and the White House are clearly determined to call his bluff. Cantor has moderated his tone on this of late, no doubt in part because of the multiple House Republican freshmen whose districts where affected by Hurricane Irene. Let’s see if they allow a clean bill to come to the House floor.
One other thing on this. It would be nice if anyone in a position of power indicated that this summer of storms and fires is a direct result of the changes to our climate. The effects of man-made climate change are not something that exist in some far-flung future, they are happening right now.
UPDATE: It looks like the Republicans will seek offsets:
But a spokesperson for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) signaled late Friday that the GOP is likely to insist on offsets for the $500 million in emergency funds Obama requested for 2011, while dealing with the 2012 funds under a new set of rules agreed to as part of the August debt accord.
“The House has passed $1 billion in disaster relief funds that is fully offset, which we will look to move as quickly as possible,” she said. “There will be no delay in meeting the president’s request and providing people the aid they need.”
A little surprising that they’re making the $500 million the hill to die on here, not the funding request for FY2012 that’s 9 times larger. What Cantor doesn’t want to tell you is that the offsets in the disaster relief funding passed previously cuts grants for equipping and training first responders by 40 percent. So the bill provides disaster funding in exchange for cuts to the people who deliver disaster response.




20 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
definitely can’t say that.
It is not permitted by the Oil Companies, who have issued a moratorium on the public discussion and use of this information, by anyone with authority to do something about it.
consequences of ignoring instructions from Oil companies are dire, for elected officials, including Presidents of the United States.
I predict that the day will come, (after it no longer matters,) when burning coal or oil or gasoline , will be a criminal offence.
Obama is so beholden to these Oil Companies, and Coal mining operators, that he has found himself unable to utter the words
climate change
for quite some time.
Hi David,
OT can we have a front page story on it. i will make sure it goes viral. saw the below on another blog
Rumsfeld says “entitlement” programs are the problem, not “defense” spending?
Does he mean the pension plan for Congress where after serving just 1 term in office, they can retire with 100% pension matching their in- office pay, for the rest of their lives?
health care for government officials? Congress is not required to buy into ANY mandated national health care program. They get all their health care, by the best doctors, no matter what the cost, at tax payer expense.
Then of course they have those extra perks like insider trading is not criminal
Tell Obama that Perry must restore the firefighters budgets to previous levels if he wants the cash.
I am all for helping in a disaster but if Texas won’t do its job and pay its firefighters enough why give them money ?
David:
I thought I would point out this story just appearing on CNBC. Not good if it’s any more than a rumor:
.. US May End Taxes On Some Overseas Profits: Report
http://www.cnbc.com/id/44467160
I dare suggest that all research or discussion of non consensus understandings of the reason/cause of climate change be made an offense punishable by death. It is imperative that humanity be structured in such a manner as that the belief in human activity induced climate change cannot be publicly questioned. The establishment of our desired order depends upon this.
Humanity must come to accept this condition as it is a key plank in establishing the new ‘normal’. Conditioning humans to accept impoverishment and despair is a pillar equal to the acceptance of never ending war.
Our vision of absolute domination will not bear the final fruit absent the controls made available through the climate campaign.
The war on terror must be our guide. Our success in achieving the goals of that campaign have born much fruit.
For we to receive the full harvest however, the climate campaign must be ushered to victory.
“The White House sent a letter to Speaker John Boehner late last night, asking for a total of $5.1 billion in disaster relief funding to deal with the multitude of hurricanes, flooding and wildfires that have rocked the United States this summer.”
And Boehner replied, Eric(Cantor) says this is doable just cut the payroll tax rate (FICA) to zero permanently and stop sending out those budget-busting Social Security checks tomorrow.
Just like his “jobs” plan, it’s maybe 20 percent of what’s needed and it has no chance of getting passed without gutting things like first responders, the Department of Education and the sciences.
I too am deeply disturbed. Climate change is the scariest thing I could come up with to. Fear is a marvelous motivator. If we could only scare them more!
These idiots don’t even hear us proclaim that the sky is falling anymore!
I’m not going to ask “why is that” because what if I found out that the sky isn’t falling? That WOULD SUCK.
If I spent the last ten years freaking out about something that turned out to be a boogy man….well
Shit I would have to admit that I was wrong. That is WAY worse than global
coolingwarming.Yeah, that is really what happened. (really) It’s not just a second term thing. The guy has actually discovered his inner leftist. (really).
That would be a great move.
The first step toward just eliminating the corporate income tax. You know we have the highest rates in the world ( and the easiest to get around.)
Imagine if VOLUNTEERS actually were expected to volunteer? Can’t have that. In order to meet the real life challenge of x # of $$ vs x # of funding request, Perry should have simply called Bernanke and had him print up a few bills. The deal shouldn’t be hard to structure. It boils down to a real simple ‘I’ll gladly pay you next Tuesday for a hamburger today’.
Maybe these guy’s didn’t watch the right cartoons as children?
But it’s not crony capitalism. Oh no, it’s not that.
And a while later, Obama calls Boehner back and says, Okay, tell Eric I can sign that, but I’ll have to speechify ‘em about how it was necessary to keep you guys from doing something really really bad. Oh and hey! Michelle says you can’t have Malia. I tried, but you know how she is…
“What Cantor doesn’t want to tell you is that the offsets in the disaster relief funding passed previously cuts grants for equipping and training first responders by 40 percent. So the bill provides disaster funding in exchange for cuts to the people who deliver disaster response.”
Repug logic–in a class by itself.
MsWinkle: Sorry but congresscritters have the same pension rules as any federal employee. It takes 5 years of employment to become vested and then get only a percent of salary based on the total number of years worked, I think the top is in the 30 to 40 K region. Their health care is based the same as the other federal workers, they choose from the field of choices and they also have a co-payment as well. http://www.electroach.com/Truth/003CongressRetirement.pdf will give you lots of links and source documentation.
Since the Reagan era, homelessness has become such a familiar part of the national scene that it it isn’t seen as the disaster it truly is. The Daily Mail focuses on the disaster as lived by some NJ residents:
The Tent City of New Jersey: Desperate victims of the economic slump forced to live in makeshift homes in forest
You need to research your facts a bit more. While congress enjoys many perks and benefits while in office, thier pension is not quite as obscene as you suggest. It’s covered under Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_pension
I agee with what you are saying in general, however. The insider trading angles are rediculous.