Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson has released a letter that opposes giving a broad release to banks on foreclosure fraud in exchange for a quick settlement.
In the letter, Swanson writes that “the banks should not be released from liability for conduct that has not been investigated and is not appropriately remedied in any settlement.” Specifically, she refers to “liability for securities claims or conduct arising out of the securitization of mortgages or liability arising out of the use of the Mortgage Electronic Registry System (“MERS”), where those claims have not been investigated or fairly addressed through the settlement.” She adds that bank officers should not be released from criminal liability in a civil settlement.
Swanson lines up with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, then, in saying that she would not sign off on any broad settlement without an actual investigation. But she actually goes a bit further. Swanson writes that due process rights of individuals cannot be impeded or compromised by any settlement. A settlement among AGs could never preclude private action by individuals, but because AG lawsuits would invariably aid efforts by individuals to sue over irregularities in the securitization or foreclosure process, in a way this would nullify any settlement. In addition, Swanson notes that the FHFA has filed lawsuits against 17 banks over mortgage backed securities, and that “we should applaud these efforts and take no action to impede them… we should fully welcome and support all legitimate efforts to investigate the banks and to hold them accountable for their unlawful activity, which has been enormously destructive to this country and our citizens.” Simply put, this does not sound like someone who will allow a whitewash of a settlement.
Danny Kanner, a spokesman for Schneiderman, responded by email to the Swanson letter. “We have received Attorney General Swanson’s letter and agree that any agreement must not prevent attorneys general investigating the mortgage crisis from following the facts wherever they lead.”
What’s unique about this development is that it suggests a potential silent majority in support of Schneiderman’s view. I’ve been following the foreclosure fraud issue for a long time, and the state AG investigation since its inception. Lori Swanson hasn’t really come up. I know there are some other AGs who haven’t expressed publicly their reservations about a settlement without an investigation, but until this point, only Beau Biden and Catherine Cortez Masto and Martha Coakley have been willing to go on the record. And all of them were pretty deeply involved from the start. With Swanson coming forward, it shows that Schneiderman’s well of support is deeper than at first suspected. Perhaps this will lead to a flood of more AGs coming out in subsequent days.
That Swanson comes from a neighboring state to Tom Miller shouldn’t be discounted, either.




38 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Wonderful news! It just tickles me pink (or is that “pinker”?). Thnx ever so much for keeping us up-to-date, David.
This is good news!
I think it is safe for me to type that I hope this post gets front-paged to the FDL homepage. (That’s for you fatster!)
Go Swanson! Go Minnesota! I have been writng her, but no response. I am so happy she came out on the right side of things. I am like many. The banks killed Minnesota’s economy, killing my business, forcing me to bankruptcy…still no recovery after 4 years. I want individual bank presidents in prison, no less. I am writing her a much better composed letter than this one! (Tee hee)!
Glad to see another AG supporting Schneiderman. Too bad our lazy ASS AG here in KS is totally invisible.
F the banks, we all need to stick it to them. SUE their asses until they modify loans or give in to quiet title.
I did not see Deutsche being part of the BIG lawsuit, are they??? They are one of the slimiest of them all. They are in bed with all of the big banks as a Trustee. They help hide the frauds.
Baffling that our own US Government is so incompetent in pursueing the bank criminals. They are guilty of fraud, conversion, theft, forgery, lying to the FBI, lying to Congress, violation of Fair Lending Laws, Fraud on the courts, and more that I cannot think of. CEO’S SHOULD BE IN JAIL. JAMIE DIMON AT THE TOP.
The bank regulators need to be there with them —JOHN WALSH OF OCC PARTICULARLY.
Good to know another State AG has some principles and some backbone….now, if we could perhaps implant both in the White House?
Just kidding!
I have to believe that the only reason politicians like Swanson are falling in line with Schneiderman is that they see career gain from it and are afraid to be seen as aligned with the banks when the coming shitstorm hits. But to think that any of these folks actually hold a moral priniciple against criminal actions by the banks is, I think, delusional.
Lori Swanson for President.
Investigate first and then settle? What a concept!
YAY AG Swanson!
This is great news. I was wondering when she was going to say something. She really is and always has been a populist and fights for injustices committed against consumers. I am happy to have her as a relative. She is my second cousin.
This is great news. Thanks for reporting it here.
The crumbs of good news are so few & far between these days. Any one of them is welcome.
Warren and Swanson!!!
That’s great. Be proud.
Lucky you…she bedazzles…her opinion is oh so clear. The banksters are going to have a day off reconing. Will Dem village politicos get on the band wagon? The only way the pillage will stop and markets will settle then the recovery can actually happen. Global banking not just ours.
Wow!
Oh dear. Now there will have to be 2 plane “accidents.” Or perhaps Scheniderman & Swanson are screwing each other.
Sorry for the cynicism.
omg .. yes .. yes .. YES .. YES .. YES, YES! YES!!!!!!
*pausing to regain breath*
*lighting cigarette*
AG Swanson lays out the case for all of the other state AGs to oppose the banksters cheap settlement that does not restore the injured. The fact that each individual does not give up their claims because AGs make a settlement, And it may not hold the banksters criminally immune.
Please let there be more like these two.
Once the crimes and restorationa are made then the construction industry has a chance to get the world economy moving again.
Even Germany’s Merkel is making sense today, she wants to hold the Union together.
Liberty and justice for all! Pivoting in the right direction for change we can believe in.
It would be great if the AG from California would live up to her campaign promise. She reversed her campaign promise and joined the settlement side, hopefully she can be shamed into doing the legal thing and join Scheniderman and Swanson and make this a full country sweep.
Big Brother
Change we can believe in. How true. Like the other change and hope guy.
This is a good sign actually. I live in Minnesota you see.
It would appear that the establishment Democrats are afraid in Minnesota. I think I even know why. You see, some folks are calling them on their Kabuki Theatre pseudo opposition to the rotten, corporate corrupted system. And people are listening.
Here is a true story for you all.
In 2006, there was a race in Minnesota for Attorney General. Good old “liberal” NPR had a debate. With the three candidates. It was live and it had members of the public. It was held in NPR’s UBS room (I found out later that UBS are a Swiss Banking interest)
I was there as a member of the audience. I was dressed in a very nice green suit, with tie etc. They asked if there were any questions. I help up my hand.
My question was
“Sitting right here beside me is PaPa John Kolstad, the other Attorney General candidate. The only Attorney General candidate not on NPR. So why is NPR practicing naked political bigotry, censorship and in fact misinforming the Minnesota public about this race? Why is this man, sitting right here not in this debate?”
They said, “OK next question please.” We left.
As an aside, PaPa John was and still is a vocal proponent of (gasp) SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE. He was running under the Green Party banner.
AG Lori Swanson was not. AG Swanson was also not publicly or even privately in favor of gays rights to be married. It was an issue with her during her primary race with AG Mike Hatch. Oh yes, and PaPa John Kolstad had publicly pledged to continue Mike Hatches work of targeting the HMO’s. Big Health care insurance companies and Big pharma.
Her boss Minnesota Democrat Chair at the time, Brian Melendez’s wife was CFO of a local HMO United Healthcare. Lori Swanson was also opposed to Single Payer.
By the way,all of this is factual and documentable.
Hell. even just ask Alan Maki.
Shhhhh
Ignore the man behind the curtain. But ToTo I don’t think w are in Kansas anymore.
Or if you like. Some corporate hack says
Ruh Roh Shaggy.
We would have gotten away with it, if it was not for those pesky kids.
Grin
My real point is
The Democratic Party establishment are scared. Really scared. They know that people are pissed at them. So they desperately need to put forward something, anything to bring people back to the veal pen. They need you to believe in their Kabuki Theatre of pseudo opposition to the corporatocracy.
The fact that they are scared is a good thing. A very good thing.
It’s been over three years since the economy went in the dumper and their still talking about there needs to be investigations. What the hell are they waiting for the statute of limitations to run out? Put Bill Black in charge of this fiasco and there would be standing room only in the prisons. I get so sick of this kabuki all the while the looting and pillaging continues.
I like that–no settlement w/o investigation. Often, the wealthy and corps want to throw money to sweep the truth under a rug. If a pay-off is involved–guilt should be admitted & the what and why understood. Do they want to be able to say it was just easier and less time consuming to do the pay-off, then go on as though they have no record–go on to repeat the harmful BS? No, we don’t need to continue to play that game in America. Investigate fast and full. Then give pay-off money to individual Americans hurt by the BS and/or tax payers giving welfare to banks.
Banks are private corps, but I am a private household, too. Shame, shame that there is a gun to my head by my government forcing me to give my private money to big private banks with my government as middleman. I don’t hate my government. My government hates me.
Oh God. I love her. And she’s hot, too.
Hot damn, I’m gonna write this woman a letter of thanks.
Because of the multiple guilty parties in any one MBS transaction – and the 1940′s act exclusion for sophisticated investors, and because this is mainly at the request of the lobbyists for the hedge funds so as to get the reward of justice for wrongs done others (MBS sold for 30 cents on the dollar and now the hedge funds want 100 cents on the dollar for those purchases made this year), we will get PR about righting a wrong, but the reality will be that no one that did wrong will face the courts.
Instead the hedge funds will steal a few dollars as the banks are made weaker, and regulation – the thing that is needed – remains as soft as in 2006 Because this will take 30 years of civil suits the mortgage world will be dead for 30 years, home prices will be dead for 30 years, and the economy will enter a Japan no growth phase for 30 years (Japan also refused to change the regulatory world – to get tough with its banks – weakening its banks in the long run – and entering a no growth phase that has lasted 20 years).
Meanwhile the left cheers the political AG’s for leading us down this path.
But http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2011/09/moynihan-.html suggests BAC will put Countrywide – the company that did the fraud and was purchased by BofA at the request of Treasury – into bankruptcy rather than pay the hedge funds their blood money, giving the finger to the AG’s
Angelo Mozilo – the real crook – not Bank of America – reached a settlement on 10/15/2010 with the Obama Securities and Exchange Commission, over securities fraud and insider trading charges, agreeing to pay $67.5 million in fines out of his $600 million from Countrywide and accepting a lifetime ban from serving as an officer or director of any public company – all for being per the Division of Enforcement “a corporate executive who deliberately disregarded his duties to investors by concealing what he saw from inside the executive suite.”, and with the settlement avoiding a trial that could have provided fodder for future criminal charges. Indeed the Obama folks did not fight the agreement Mozilo had to have Countrywide pay $20 million of the $67.5 million penalty because of the indemnification agreement he put in his employment contract. The terms of the settlement allow Mr. Mozilo to avoid acknowledging any wrongdoing and the Obama folks in February 2011 dropped its criminal investigation into the facts behind that civil settlement.
So we crow about how the AG’s are going to hurt the banks and give us “justice” – as the crook – the CEO Mozilo of Countrywide – walk away with a half billion and a smile – admitting no wrong and with a closed criminal investigation that resulted in no charges.
While a settlement among AGs has no effect on private action by individuals, the AG’s threatening action in effect supports those private suits by the hedge funds – so I do not applaud AG’s Beau Biden, Catherine Cortez Masto, Lori Swanson, Eric Schneiderman and Martha Coakley as they go forth, “following the facts wherever they lead”, not convicting the really guilty, not changing the regulations or methods used by the banks, and causing economic harm to the nation compared to a settlement that could achieve changes in process without Obama’s lobbyists watering down the rules and without giving the hedge funds a few more dollars of bank shareholder money.
I think it’s going to be very interesting to see what happens to the banks’ immunity situation in the wake of the loss of the Democratic congressional in Brooklyn/Queens last night. If it is interpreted as a referendum on Obama, given that he is the face of the banksters’ ownership of the neo-liberal wing of the party, we may see more Democrats putting up a fight against pro-bank executive actions and legislative proposals. There are tens of millions of votes awaiting a Democratic candidate who truly takes up the fight against the financial sector.
Hurrah! for AG Swanson!
papau usually you are more empirical & precise than what you wrote this morning. You mentioned a bunch of different legal issues, but this one stood out for me:
Could you spell that out a little more for us? I am fairly sure that there is no “exclusion” for anybody from the anti-fraud provisions of the 1940 Act. Which is why Goldman Sachs had to pay half a billion dollars in penalties & restitution to the SEC for one (single) CDO deal (ABACUS-[date]-[code number]).
The "sophisticated investor" defense (or as the banksters PR flacks put it, "they are big boys, they knew what they were buying") is not a defense against allegations that the seller engaged in fraud, is it?
Until you wrote that, it did not sink in that Elizabeth Warren just announced she was officially running the morning after the Dems got wiped out in those two special elections. The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party should be awaking from its slumber, like you say, all over the country.
Which Wing does not, of course, recognize preznit as a member.
Right on. I live in Minnesota too. But what is really going to get interesting is what that worthless Amy Klobuchar does. If it’s controversial, she is no where to be found. She likes issues like “lead paint”, pot holes, cell phone fees, international adoptions, …who doesn’t. But single payer scares the crap out of her……..and the Big Three?? You will probably find her in a fetal position in some corner of her office if she has to take a position on this.
Fixed yer link for ya. I saw similar items over at Bloomberg, here and here, implying that BAC could file Chapter 11 for Countrywide, but filing bankruptcy is not a way to dodge law enforcement actions by state AGs, certainly not criminal investigations or prosecutions, nor most civil enforcement actions that result in fines or penalties. A bankruptcy stay might forestall collection of restitution or other forms of damages awarded in final court judgments, and a bankruptcy reorganization plan could force a haircut on such damage awards, but it is definitely not a way of “giving the finger” to state Attorneys General. Just the opposite: subjecting Countrywide to court jurisdiction would open up huge troves of data to rapid discovery, such as all digital files on all mortgage loans and mortgage securities. I know, that’s what I do for a living, conduct e-discovery.
The Bloomberg piece that actually mentions putting Countrywide into bankruptcy is this gigantic article on Sept. 7. In the bottom third of the article, under the heading “Eliminating Risks,” is this single graf:
The other Bloomberg links in @35 are more general coverage of the “New BAC” reorganization plans and do not expressly mention bankruptcy for Countrywide.
Metro
Grin. I know. If you want a MIKE CAVLAN US SENATE 2012 bumper sticker, let me know. The corporate media are going to TRY and ignore our campaign. We know that we are on the verge of something big. Very big.
The letter from AG Lori Swanson is more courageous than many who are unfamiliar with the current status of Minnesota law might recognize. Minnesota has allowed MERS to proceed to foreclose against homeowners because Minnesota has a unique statute which allows MERS to record mortgages. That she would take on the MERS issue suggests that she is doing her own investigation into the MERS scheme initiated in the just as Glass-Steagall was being repealed. There is a difference between being allowed to register mortgages (whether a specific statute allows MERS to do so or not–MERS has recorded tens of thousands of mortgages across the nation) and standing to initiate foreclosure sales. AG Swanson may have to take on the Minnesota Supreme Court, which has an appalling misunderstanding of MERS as to its standing to sell Minnesota homes (See the Minnesota Supreme Court decision in Jackson v. MERS, with one wise dissent by Justice Alan Page) and the concealment of the real party taking the home. BRAVO, AG Swanson.